[05:48] mitya57: I think my symlink/directory packaging problem was due to the change from folder to symlink in an upgrade: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#Q:_Will_dpkg_replace_a_symlink_with_a_directory_or_vice_versa.3F [06:43] pipedream: well, you said that symlink was replaced with a directory at build time, not at install time [06:48] Hello, everyone! =) [06:48] I have compiled snort package in my PPA [06:48] good morning [06:48] i've compiled the package from ubuntu upstream [06:49] what i mean [06:49] bzr branch ubuntu:snort [06:49] the last version of snort in the ubuntu upstream is 2.9.7.0 [06:50] as may you know, new version of snort is out 2.9.7.0 [06:50] ohh sory [06:50] 2.9.7.2 [06:51] i've made decision to update package in the snort package in my ppa [06:51] sorry for a long prelude =) [06:51] i've done following for building new version [06:52] 1. bzr branch ubuntu:snort [06:52] 2. download the snort latest tarball 2.9.7.2 [06:53] 3. bzr merege-upstream /path/to/latest/snort/tarball [06:53] The question is [06:53] Is that correct way of updating package to the new upstream ? [06:57] Why i asking. When i did these steps I confront with that, I need to fix quilt patches manually [06:59] Any suggestions ? [07:14] Any help gents ? [07:33] Guys how i can skip applying patches during bzr buildeb ? [08:36] mitya57: no, it is an upgrade issue, I was wrong, it was not at build time [08:37] mitya57: the deb says it contains a symlink [08:37] so it was at install time [08:37] (a new install would not show this problem, oly an upgrade) [08:39] Then you need to remove the old directory in preinst === gammax90 is now known as gammax [15:10] hmm [15:10] vivid released, but what's the new devel release? [15:10] Because "devel" still claims its codename is vivid? [15:14] unknown ... [15:21] unknown is a strange codename [15:21] unknown unicorn? === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach