| mojtaba | Hi, could you please tell me what is wrong with this config? http://paste.ubuntu.com/10918180/ | 01:04 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | seems fine, what issues are you having/ | 01:09 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: content of the /etc/resolve.conf showing sth else. | 01:10 |
| mojtaba | also when I type sudo ifdown eth0, it says interface eth0 not configured | 01:11 |
| sarnold | mojtaba: how about /etc/resolv.conf? | 01:11 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10918591/ | 01:12 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: Do you know why I get that message after running sudo ifdown eth0 or sudo ifdown wlan0? | 01:13 |
| sarnold | mojtaba: do you have 8.8.8.8 configured manually in /etc/resolvconf/ somewhere? | 01:13 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: No, I entered in via GUI, but I removed it. | 01:13 |
| sarnold | mojtaba: is network-manager installed on this machine? | 01:14 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: yes | 01:14 |
| sarnold | mojtaba: can you uninstall it? I suspect nothing will work quite right os long as you have NM installed. it's a crazy wrench to throw into any problem.. | 01:16 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: can I disable it for a moment? | 01:16 |
| sarnold | mojtaba: no idea | 01:17 |
| teward | servers and network-manager don't get along very well :P | 01:17 |
| mojtaba | sarnold: what should I do after that? | 01:17 |
| === markthomas is now known as markthomas|away | ||
| linocisco | hi all | 07:10 |
| linocisco | root@ubuntuserver:/usr/local/src/noip-2.1.9-1# make install | 07:10 |
| linocisco | gcc -Wall -g -Dlinux -DPREFIX=\"/usr/local\" noip2.c -o noip2 | 07:10 |
| linocisco | make: gcc: Command not found | 07:10 |
| linocisco | make: *** [noip2] Error 127 | 07:10 |
| linocisco | root@ubuntuserver:/usr/local/src/noip-2.1.9-1# | 07:10 |
| === DenBeiren is now known as zz_DenBeiren | ||
| OpenTokix | linocisco: apt-get install build-essential | 07:32 |
| lordievader | Good morning. | 07:48 |
| Matsy | Hey everyone! I have a question regarding Landscape. Is it normal that I need to reboot my server for it to generate CPU/Memory graphs, and show the current process list? | 07:51 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: throw that shit out the window and get a graphite/collectd-system going | 07:52 |
| Matsy | OpenTokix: I actually really like the looks / functionality of Landscape. Started a 'trial' today with a few of my non-important servers | 07:52 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: I have tried it to - also tried obvservatorium, nagosgraphs, cacti and munin - and graphite/collectd - oh yes, so much win | 07:53 |
| Matsy | Well, I need something to replace my salt-environment | 07:53 |
| Matsy | So, it needs to do a bit more than collecting logs | 07:54 |
| OpenTokix | why are you moving away from salt? | 07:54 |
| Matsy | Company firewalls seem to have a lot of issues with salt | 07:54 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: you think ladnscape will replace a fully fledged CM-system? | 07:54 |
| Matsy | OpenTokix: I don't. | 07:54 |
| Matsy | But, since Landscape also allows the instant deployment of custom scripts to an arbitrary amount of servers, it seems to do the job | 07:55 |
| jcastro | landscape shouldn't require reboots to generate those graphs | 07:55 |
| Matsy | jcastro: That's what I figured. But it didn't show anything, other than 'Virtual Environment: vmware' | 07:56 |
| Matsy | That's the only piece of information it seemed to gather | 07:56 |
| Matsy | Which is odd, because finding out in what kind of virtual environment the computer is without the tools installed is quite a bit more complicate than doing a ps for the list of running processes | 07:56 |
| jcastro | the landscape guys are in #landscape | 07:56 |
| jcastro | I don't know enough about landscape to help | 07:57 |
| Matsy | You guys have a channel for everything | 07:57 |
| jcastro | heh | 07:57 |
| === zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren | ||
| linocisco | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10922486/ | 08:58 |
| Matsy | Yes? | 09:01 |
| Matsy | linocisco: Probably a DNS issue on your server. | 09:02 |
| linocisco | Matsy, so what do I do? | 09:05 |
| Matsy | linocisco: Fix the internet? | 09:05 |
| Matsy | linocisco: dyn-update.no-ip.com resolves to 8.23.224.120 here. | 09:05 |
| Matsy | Do a simple ping, and see if that works | 09:05 |
| Matsy | If it doesn't, just set your nameservers to a proper DNS service (8.8.8.8 / 8.8.4.4 always work) | 09:06 |
| linocisco | Matsy, ping is blocked | 09:07 |
| Matsy | linocisco: Try adding dyn-update to your hostfile then | 09:07 |
| linocisco | Matsy, it is no-ip. not dyn | 09:10 |
| Matsy | linocisco: I know. See what hostname it tries to contact: dyn-update.no-ip.com | 09:10 |
| linocisco | dyn-update.no-ip.com: command not found | 09:11 |
| xqcao | jpds: ping | 09:53 |
| kevinde | Does anyone use/still uses monit? | 10:15 |
| kevinde | As i'm running a Teamspeak server on my Ubuntu server and recently discovered monit, I wonder how effective this is to keep your server up and running in case something like a crash occurs | 10:16 |
| === Joel is now known as Guest81232 | ||
| OpenTokix | kevyes | 10:52 |
| Teduardo | Is there an issue with Ubuntu 14.04 and disk performance? | 11:02 |
| lordievader | If there is I never noticed it. | 11:03 |
| Teduardo | okay, i am using rsync to copy some data from a RAID-5 array with 5 drives to an SSD and it's only copying at 134MB/s | 11:03 |
| Teduardo | and it's actually dipping down as low as 60MB/s | 11:04 |
| === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
| Walex | Teduardo: "performance" is not a property of a distribution, but of its configuration. If you are unhappy with the defaults (which are often not the best for anything in particular), perhaps you need a system administrator to configure your system for your applications. | 11:06 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: Sequential writes is not as fast on SSD:s | 11:06 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: What options are you using for your rsync? --whole-file ? - Are you doing something else on the machine? - What is the performance you expecting? | 11:07 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: 130M/sec from a raid5 on 5 sata-drives sounds resonable. | 11:07 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: hardware or software-raid? | 11:07 |
| Teduardo | hardware | 11:07 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: you have to remember rsync is doing hashing and stuff on the files you are copying - you can try --whole-file - that will generally be more consise | 11:08 |
| Teduardo | I guess I will just use bonnie++ to figure out if i can get it to go faster. I figured 5 drives each capable of 100MB/s seperately -1 drive for parity would be about 400MB/s | 11:10 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: it is not that simple | 11:10 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: it is not like the file is perfectly divided in four exactly the same size chunks | 11:10 |
| Teduardo | ah, im guessing the seek time is horrible on 4tb drives too | 11:11 |
| OpenTokix | The limit is not MB/sec, but operations per second, - while you are doing your rsync - do a iostat 3 to see how much ops, and how much time is spent on each operation | 11:11 |
| OpenTokix | Depends on the number of platters | 11:11 |
| OpenTokix | there ie 2 and 3 platter drives, 3 generally have better seek time than 2. - Also is it many small files, or few large files | 11:12 |
| Teduardo | its one gigantic file | 11:12 |
| OpenTokix | ok | 11:12 |
| OpenTokix | Then the absolutly fastest thing you can do is use dd | 11:13 |
| OpenTokix | or cp | 11:13 |
| OpenTokix | dd if=largefile of=/new/path/of/largefile bs=8M | 11:13 |
| OpenTokix | This will max out your machine, and you can check speed with kill -USR1 pid-of-dd | 11:13 |
| OpenTokix | Over 8M chunks, generally will not give better performance - but you can always try | 11:14 |
| OpenTokix | This will probably grind your machine to a halt, since it is doing only io more or less | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | so careful if its a internet-system | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | that does something =) | 11:15 |
| Teduardo | nah this is a t630 i have in a lab | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | ok, dd at full speed | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | then | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | will be quickest | 11:15 |
| OpenTokix | dd > cp > scp > rsync > > > > > > > windows explorer > > > > > os x finder | 11:16 |
| lordievader | Hehe, osx ;) | 11:17 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: Tell me what you get in terms of performance (if you try dd) | 11:18 |
| Teduardo | 53141921792 bytes (53 GB) copied, 234.048 s, 227 MB/s | 11:20 |
| OpenTokix | nice | 11:20 |
| OpenTokix | only 53G =) | 11:20 |
| OpenTokix | I tought you said large file =) | 11:21 |
| Teduardo | he he he | 11:21 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: there you go, - and I guess you learned something in the process | 11:21 |
| Teduardo | okay, i will add 10 more drives to the array and see if the performance scales | 11:22 |
| Teduardo | i need to be able to restore 11TB of data in less than 10 days | 11:23 |
| Teduardo | which is why i'm going on this quest in the first place | 11:23 |
| OpenTokix | you are already doing it in 13 hours | 11:23 |
| OpenTokix | with 227M/sec | 11:23 |
| Teduardo | yea that's a DD not the restore process of this wacky backup software | 11:24 |
| OpenTokix | ok | 11:24 |
| Teduardo | i'm trying to make sure that the underlying system is capable of what i need before i yell at the sw vendor | 11:24 |
| OpenTokix | then I guess its a software issue more than actual hardware, but hardware helps | 11:24 |
| OpenTokix | What backup software is it? | 11:24 |
| Teduardo | server backup manager by idera | 11:24 |
| OpenTokix | ok | 11:25 |
| OpenTokix | bleh | 11:25 |
| OpenTokix | comercial backup... | 11:25 |
| OpenTokix | bleh | 11:25 |
| OpenTokix | Never used any that wasnt complete useless | 11:25 |
| OpenTokix | good luck! | 11:25 |
| Teduardo | it works flawlessly it just takes forever | 11:26 |
| Teduardo | it restored the 11tb of data | 11:26 |
| OpenTokix | So its always 0 or 11TB? | 11:26 |
| Teduardo | yeah it's just backed up data.. which i dont need until it needs to be restored | 11:29 |
| Teduardo | but i can't have it take 10 days to restore over 10Gbps ethernet | 11:31 |
| lordievader | But sometimes you only need a small part of the backup. | 11:31 |
| lordievader | Like one config file. | 11:32 |
| Teduardo | oh, yeah i'm kind of worst case scenario planning | 11:32 |
| Teduardo | but it could be that the software is poorly written but the restore I ran was bare metal and it was just bits sent to the block device rather than files | 11:33 |
| Teduardo | so there is no excuse for 10 days | 11:34 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: did you also tune your network-settings for 10GBps? | 11:37 |
| OpenTokix | ie. txqueue and such? | 11:37 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: do _NOT_ use jumboframes on LAN | 11:38 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: if its over 10Gbps, your limit is network - and not disk-speed, since your network will topout about 100MB/sec | 11:41 |
| Teduardo | 10Gbps = 1.25GB/s | 11:45 |
| OpenTokix | Yes you are correct, - I got a slight case of the dumb for a minute or two there. | 11:46 |
| Teduardo | no worries. | 11:46 |
| Patrickdk | why no jumboframes? | 11:47 |
| Patrickdk | I only use jumboframes | 11:47 |
| Teduardo | i dont think jumboframes actually hurts anything | 11:47 |
| Patrickdk | and amazon has changed to only using jumboframes also | 11:47 |
| Patrickdk | Teduardo, depends on your switch | 11:47 |
| Teduardo | unless the switch in between is set to 1500 =D | 11:47 |
| OpenTokix | Patrickdk: For a LAN jumboframes give no added benefit - more then increasing the complexity of your network. | 11:48 |
| OpenTokix | Patrickdk: jumboframes, is not faster on local network | 11:48 |
| Patrickdk | no, ifthe switch has a normal (small) packet buffer, you will overflow it quickly | 11:48 |
| Teduardo | but i'm not even worried about the network yet like i said i'm just trying to get the read performance of the volume on the server itself showing me a little life | 11:48 |
| OpenTokix | Patrickdk: Did a lab on this, with switches from different vendors, many different 10G cards, multiples OS:es - no difference | 11:48 |
| Patrickdk | jumboframes or not highly depends on the nic used | 11:49 |
| OpenTokix | Patrickdk: it is a networking myth, many believe - since it is annoying as hell to test | 11:49 |
| Patrickdk | I do see a increase in performance on my local network | 11:49 |
| Patrickdk | on the old nics, it was a huge improvement | 11:49 |
| Patrickdk | on newer nics it's down to like 10% or so | 11:50 |
| Patrickdk | but then, in vm's it goes up again | 11:50 |
| Patrickdk | it depends if you can take advantage of the nic's tso/lsr/gro/gso or not | 11:50 |
| Teduardo | so what should 5x4TB WD RE4s in RAID-5 do read wise in a bonnie++? | 11:51 |
| OpenTokix | ok, if youre running in vms - performance isnt a top issue anyway =) - so nevermind | 11:51 |
| Patrickdk | and since those only work for tcp | 11:51 |
| Matsy | OpenTokix: I only manage VM clusters | 11:52 |
| Patrickdk | do a crapload of udp stuff and rtp | 11:52 |
| OpenTokix | Patrickdk: About 350-450 ios/s | 11:52 |
| OpenTokix | iops* | 11:52 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: ok | 11:52 |
| Matsy | OpenTokix: Performance is one of my highest priorities | 11:52 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: ok | 11:52 |
| Patrickdk | and 3.5" 7k rpm disk is going max out around 80 iops per disk | 11:52 |
| Matsy | OpenTokix: How can you say that 'if you are running in vms, performance isn't a top issue' | 11:52 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: its not | 11:52 |
| Patrickdk | a top, it is | 11:53 |
| Patrickdk | the top, no | 11:53 |
| Patrickdk | it's normally second to the top | 11:53 |
| Matsy | Yeah | 11:53 |
| Matsy | Availability is number one | 11:54 |
| Matsy | But performance is a very close one | 11:54 |
| Patrickdk | or simple of management | 11:54 |
| Patrickdk | ability to move to new hardware without it going nuts | 11:54 |
| OpenTokix | Matsy: Depends also if your traffic is counted in the hundreds, thousands or millions per second - or if your latency is in seconds, ms or us | 11:54 |
| Patrickdk | lots of single vm per machine | 11:54 |
| Matsy | Patrickdk: Oh, I never use single VM machines | 11:55 |
| Matsy | Patrickdk: A good hot-swappable environment takes care of the hardware changes | 11:55 |
| Teduardo | so if you add more disks to a raid-5 volume does that make the performance better or does it just mean that the seek time goes up? | 11:58 |
| Matsy | More disks to raid 5 does not mean more performance | 11:58 |
| Sling | you shouldn't run big raid5 sets :) | 11:58 |
| Matsy | ^ | 11:59 |
| Sling | I'd consider 6 disks the max | 11:59 |
| Sling | beyond that the performance impact is big and much worse your rebuild times will be very long | 11:59 |
| Sling | during which your array has no fault-protection at all | 11:59 |
| OpenTokix | And will probably fail (the rebuild) | 11:59 |
| Teduardo | yeah the rebuild times and stuff arent that big of a deal given it's cold/backup storage | 11:59 |
| jpds | Deploy Ceph. | 12:00 |
| maswan | It depends on which performance though, read performance on a raid5 is roughly equivalent to the read performance of a n-1 raid0 | 12:00 |
| Matsy | Why does performance matter on a cold storage | 12:00 |
| Sling | I'd say, use zfs | 12:00 |
| Teduardo | Matsy: restore not taking 10 days | 12:00 |
| maswan | Of course, for a parity raid, raid5 is very brave with modern disk sizes | 12:00 |
| Matsy | Teduardo: Go for 1+0 or something | 12:01 |
| Matsy | Should only take 5 days then | 12:01 |
| Sling | raid 6 would work as well, if your controller supports it | 12:01 |
| Sling | gives a bit more slack | 12:01 |
| Teduardo | r6 is slower than r5 right? | 12:01 |
| OpenTokix | Teduardo: yes | 12:01 |
| Sling | r6 tends to work on faster controllers | 12:01 |
| Sling | so in theory yes, in practice no | 12:01 |
| Sling | or 'hardly' | 12:01 |
| OpenTokix | raid5: 2 iops/write, 6 4/iops per write | 12:02 |
| Teduardo | ah, the controller in question is a 2GB PERC H730 | 12:02 |
| Sling | but if you're doing many writes, r5/6 is not good anyway | 12:02 |
| Matsy | Which H730? | 12:02 |
| Teduardo | what do ya mean? | 12:03 |
| Sling | go for 1+0 if you want fast writes :) | 12:03 |
| maswan | it also depends on the size of the writes, if you do full stripe writes it is not so bad, as opposed to doing random small writes and getting a read-modify-write cycle int here | 12:03 |
| Teduardo | like i said i'm more concerned about how fast the data can be restored back to the client machine | 12:04 |
| Teduardo | it took 10 days for a 11TB restore in a DR test | 12:04 |
| Teduardo | trying to you know... make that.. not suck | 12:05 |
| Matsy | 10 days?! | 12:05 |
| Matsy | That's 700mb per minute | 12:05 |
| Matsy | That's very very slow :p | 12:05 |
| Teduardo | and like i said that was a bits to block device restore not a file restore | 12:05 |
| Teduardo | so it was hot garbage | 12:05 |
| Teduardo | anyway i will check out raid-10 and maybe enable ssd caching on the volume and see if that gets me anywhere | 12:08 |
| Matsy | Wait, you're using SSDs? | 12:08 |
| Teduardo | no | 12:08 |
| Teduardo | the controller can use SSDs as read cache | 12:09 |
| Teduardo | i will install some for that purpose | 12:09 |
| Teduardo | just to test around with | 12:09 |
| Teduardo | since i have pretty much unlimited hw | 12:09 |
| Teduardo | i imagine that i'm going to find that this is all limited by the software and then im going to be unhappy | 12:10 |
| Sling | so I have an init script with 'Required-Start: $network $remote_fs $syslog', but during bootup it fails to bind to the interfaces defined in /etc/network/interfaces, after booting is done I restart the service, and it works fine | 12:12 |
| Matsy | Unlimited hardware, I envy you | 12:12 |
| Sling | what could be causing the network service to report as up to init/upstart/whatever but the interface to be still unavailable for binding? | 12:12 |
| Sling | service in question is pdns-recursor | 12:12 |
| maswan | Teduardo: well, if you are not seeing lots of io-wait state, you're not waiting for the storag | 12:13 |
| Teduardo | Matsy: well, its the company's and not mine of course haha =) | 12:13 |
| Matsy | Teduardo: I work at a university. Unlimited hardware is still very rare. | 12:14 |
| Matsy | Every time I need to buy a new server, there's 200+ pages of bureaucracy | 12:14 |
| Teduardo | yeah, currently i am playing with a bunch of Intel NVMe PCI Express drives | 12:14 |
| Matsy | Sigh | 12:14 |
| Matsy | Those are such beasts | 12:15 |
| Teduardo | yeah, bios support for booting them is dodgy so have to use uefi and uefi + pxelinux is... errr.. wacky (for me anyway) | 12:15 |
| Teduardo | but they are monsters, yes | 12:16 |
| Matsy | Why do you boot them though? | 12:16 |
| Matsy | Seems overkill for just booting | 12:16 |
| Matsy | I mean, servers restarting in 0.1 second or 0.2 seconds | 12:16 |
| Matsy | I'd love to switch my mongo-disks to them though :p | 12:16 |
| Matsy | Maybe in the new fiscal year... | 12:17 |
| Teduardo | hehe yeah, it's kind of my job to make sure that we know all of the potential answers to all of the potential questions before hand, so i just test | 12:17 |
| Teduardo | im not sure i would boot from them | 12:17 |
| === bilde2910|away is now known as bilde2910 | ||
| Teduardo | and now we wait for the background initialization.. | 12:34 |
| Teduardo | woe | 12:34 |
| === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away | ||
| === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
| === shirgall is now known as Guest37225 | ||
| delinquentme | can rsynch used to jsut sync folders remote and local? | 13:38 |
| teward | delinquentme: rsync can be used to sync folders and files between two locations, yes, I believe, but depending on what you want to do you may have to provide additional arguments and options to it. You may wish to refer to 'man rsync' (without the ' characters) to read up on the various options. | 13:40 |
| === Faylite_ is now known as Faylite | ||
| === markthomas|away is now known as markthomas | ||
| rickbeldin | Hi. Not sure where to go with this. I'm having a landscape issue. When I login to landscape and attempt to select the 'Support' option at the top (I have valid entitlements), it takes me to a Salesforce.com login screen instead of the Canonical support portal. | 17:37 |
| rickbeldin | The link is the 'Support' link here: https://landscape.canonical.com/account/hp-l3-support/activities | 17:39 |
| sarnold | rickbeldin: I think that's intentional; at least, when I go to the url you provided. I wind up at an Ubuntu SSO login prompt.. I login, see the landscape interface, hit my own "support" link, which brings me to https://eu1.salesforce.com/500/o -- which appears fully active and live.. | 17:41 |
| rickbeldin | I was using the interface yesterday, and it logged me right in to where you could see cases. | 17:42 |
| sarnold | rickbeldin: I've heard some sso oddities can be poked in the eye by visiting https://login.ubuntu.com/ first | 17:42 |
| rickbeldin | !!! | 17:43 |
| rickbeldin | +1 sarnold. | 17:43 |
| sarnold | rickbeldin: did that sort it? | 17:44 |
| rickbeldin | Not very intuitive. Sort of along the lines of ctrl-alt-delete or close your browser and restart. Yes, it fixed it. Thanks very much. | 17:44 |
| sarnold | no kidding... | 17:44 |
| sarnold | rickbeldin: I don't kno wmuch about the support / landscape end of things.. it feels like one of those support tickets there would be the place to report the bug, but if those cost you money, _maybe_ this is a better place to start: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape -- seems a bit empty there, but it might be worth a try | 17:46 |
| jazzorius | I have a question about ufw. The log files (small sample here: http://pastebin.com/5pguu4kN ) show many connection requests to port 80 being blocked. | 17:46 |
| rickbeldin | Thanks. This was the first time and now I know which way to hold my nose. : ) | 17:47 |
| sarnold | rickbeldin: hehe :) | 17:47 |
| jazzorius | Port 80 is open because the server hosts a website. My nginx logs don't show any requests from these IPs. Is ufw blocking legitimate requests? The IP addresses seem like legit users, not server farms. | 17:47 |
| === Guest37225 is now known as shirgall | ||
| CompuChip | Hi. Can someone please help me replace a broken disk in a RAID1. I am getting really confused with the output of mdstat to the point where I am not even sure which disk is broken (it is showing 5 md12* disks, with inactive sdb2[0](S), active sdb5[0] [U_], active sdb1[0] [U_], active sda5[1] [_U] and active sda[2] [_U]). | 18:36 |
| CompuChip | I think it was sda that failed because for a bit I couldn't boot (no operating system) but that seems to have gone away. I get a login prompt but I can't login when booting from HDD, and now using a Server 14.04 rescue CD to get a prompt. | 18:37 |
| sarnold | CompuChip: I think it'll be easier for other sto help you debug the issue ifyou can pastebin status outputs or similar; the pastebinit package can be very helpful here | 18:39 |
| CompuChip | Thanks sarnold, can I install that from the rescue disk prompt? | 18:39 |
| sarnold | CompuChip: I hope so; apt-get update && apt-get install pastebinit to find out :) | 18:40 |
| CompuChip | apt-get not found :) | 18:40 |
| sarnold | dang :) | 18:41 |
| CompuChip | If I select that I want /dev/sda1 as root and open a shell there I get apt-get but no internet connection | 18:41 |
| CompuChip | Don't seem to have a DNS, I can ping 8.8.8.8 but not google.com. | 18:43 |
| sarnold | CompuChip: try adding 8.8.8.8 to your /etc/resolv.conf | 18:44 |
| sarnold | CompuChip: this might work for you once you've got dns up: http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/5918/7064 | 18:44 |
| CompuChip | sarnold: thanks, got a bunch of error but think I installed astebinit | 18:48 |
| CompuChip | Yay it worked http://paste.ubuntu.com/10928895/ | 18:49 |
| sarnold | nice! now you get to solve your actual problem :) | 18:50 |
| CompuChip | Shall I ask the question again? :) | 18:52 |
| CompuChip | One of the disks in my RAID1 is broken. I am getting really confused with the output of mdstat to the point where I am not even sure which disk is broken - http://paste.ubuntu.com/10928895/ | 18:55 |
| CompuChip | What's even more confusing is that the Rescue Disk refuses to mount /dev/sdb1 as the root, even when I physically swap the connections. | 18:59 |
| CompuChip | I can only get a shell in /dev/sda1. | 19:00 |
| === markthomas is now known as markthomas|away | ||
| wk5h | been a while since I've run Ubuntu as a server, and getting back into it. seems like there used to be a post-install graphical command where you could change some of the settings, such as ip address, mount points, etc. that looked a lot like the install process. make sense? | 19:52 |
| patdk-wk | no idea | 19:53 |
| wk5h | thought it was a some tk scripts that was packaged with it... maybe I'm thinking of a different distro. | 19:54 |
| === bilde2910 is now known as bilde2910|away | ||
| === klaas_ is now known as klaas | ||
| === DenBeiren is now known as zz_DenBeiren | ||
| === bastidra1or is now known as bastidrazor | ||
| === markthomas|away is now known as markthomas | ||
| === Joel is now known as Guest14185 | ||
| === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!