[06:14] <hyper_ch> hi there, can't login to my launchpad account. it says something about cookies and http referer
[06:27] <wgrant> hyper_ch: The page tells you what you need to change.
[06:28] <hyper_ch> wgrant: it doesn't really help... cookies are activated for launchpad... well, they're activated for everything, just they get deleted after a while... and referer is also fine
[06:28] <wgrant> What is the URL that is complaining, and what exactly does it say?
[06:28] <wgrant> And are you completely sure you haven't got any extensions that may have changed Referer behaviour?
[06:28] <wgrant> eg. NoScript
[06:29] <hyper_ch> of course I run noscript
[06:29] <hyper_ch> https://login.launchpad.net/1PADmYr8Y29gZj9S/+login
[06:30] <hyper_ch> and launchpad is allowed to use js
[06:32] <wgrant> Right, but do you use NoScript's settings that give weird Referer behaviour?
[06:32] <hyper_ch> actually, using notscripts in chromium
[06:33] <wgrant> I don't know anything about that.
[06:33] <wgrant> Anyway, launchpad.net does not require JS for login, but it does require cookies and a minimally invasive Referer.
[06:33] <hyper_ch> what you mean by that?
[06:34] <wgrant> In Firefox I run with network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy=2 and network.http.referer.trimmingPolicy=2, which sends the origin (eg. https://launchpad.net/ -- no path) and only to the site itself.
[06:34] <wgrant> That's sufficient for almost all sites.
[06:34] <hyper_ch> I don't use ff
[06:34] <wgrant> I know.
[06:34] <wgrant> But I don't know the corresponding Chromium or NotScript settings, so I was explaining the minimum requirement.
[06:35] <hyper_ch> on a gazillion other sites I have no issues loging in.... but I can't login on launchpad
[06:35] <hyper_ch> and I don't even know what you mean by sends origin
[06:37] <wgrant> Try disabling NotScripts temporarily to see if that solves the problem.
[06:37] <wgrant> It works fine with default settings, so something in your configuration is breaking it.
[06:37] <hyper_ch> default settings aren't privacy concious
[06:38] <hyper_ch> so don't even refer to those
[06:39] <wgrant> But mine are, and they work fine.
[06:39] <hyper_ch> same results with notscripts disabled
[06:40] <wgrant> Do you have other extensions that are potentially relevant? And have you reclicked the login link, rather than just refreshing the page?
[06:41] <hyper_ch> I have lots of privacy extensions
[06:42] <wgrant> I suggest you try disabling them all and reenabling it until you find which one is causing the misbehaviour, so you can work out which one you need to reconfigure.
[06:43] <hyper_ch> found it
[06:49] <wgrant> hyper_ch: Which was it?
[06:53] <hyper_ch> fix url links redirect
[06:54] <hyper_ch> guess, I can't log into launchpad anymore
[07:18] <wgrant> Or you could just use something with a sensible Referer policy, but okay.
[17:10] <Sweet5hark> so ... with the new git support: what's the best way to mirror to launchpad?
[17:11] <cjwatson> Sweet5hark: We'll be adding proper mirroring support soonish, though no specific schedule yet.
[17:11] <cjwatson> Sweet5hark: In the meantime you could do a git clone --mirror / git push --mirror, I imagine, if you had a specific reason to be in a rush
[17:13] <Sweet5hark> we have gerrit running at gerrit.libreoffice.org and it routinely pushes to backup locations like github for mirroring. I assume, if we could push to launchpad, we could mirror using gerrits stuff.
[17:13] <Sweet5hark> cjwatson: hang on, getting our guy in here ...
[17:13] <cjwatson> It's a bank holiday today, I'm only slightly around, please don't expect to have a lengthy conversation with me
[17:16] <Sweet5hark> cjwatson: shm_get is our gerrit guy. however, I didnt realize that there is a bank holiday at cjwatsons home. So maybe you two just meet tomorrow, or something?
[17:16] <shm_get> Sweet5hark or something.. I'm at a conference for the next 3 days :-)
[17:16] <cjwatson> You may not need much from me, if all you want to do is treat git.launchpad.net as an ordinary git server
[17:20] <cjwatson> If you're pushing the main upstream repository, pushing it to git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/libreoffice will cause it to be set as the default, which will make pushing of per-user libreoffice repositories much quicker
[17:23] <shm_get> cjwatson our 'main' repo is core.git but it has 3 submodules...  and we have a bunch of auxiliary repos.... that being said my issue are less likely to be with git itself than with launchpad in general :-)  I have an openid on it.. but that is about it...
[17:23] <shm_get> cjwatson are repo auto-created.. or do I need to pre-seed things ?
[17:25] <shm_get> and presumably I do not want to associate them with my personal user.. but to something more generic... like a 'tdf' group or a tdf user at least...
[17:26] <shm_get> cjwatson and yes.. the whole point is to mirror our main upstream repositories....
[17:41] <cjwatson> Repositories are auto-created on push.  You should probably push to a team-owned account, which requires a bit more fiddling in order to set it up as a default repository for a project.
[17:41] <cjwatson> Catch me tomorrow.
[17:42] <cjwatson> Er, "to a team-owned repository" I mean.
[17:47] <shm_get> cjwatson sadly that won't be tomorrow... next friday most likely...
[17:47] <teward> cjwatson: any idea when PPAs will be enabled for wily?
[17:52] <barry> is it expected right now that git branches don't show up on your code.launchpad.net/~ page?
[17:53] <teward> barry: https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git - "Here's a short list of bugs you don't need to tell us about: ... there is no web listing of repositories available for a given target"
[17:53] <barry> teward: oops, i missed that line
[17:54] <barry> no worries, you can always go directly to the branch page
[18:21] <xnox> $ git push lp:~ubuntu-foundations-team/cross-toolchain-base master:master
[18:21] <xnox> fatal: remote error: You cannot set the default Git repository for '~ubuntu-foundations-team/cross-toolchain-base'.
[18:21] <xnox> please help with git =)
[18:32] <xnox> ah i must be an admin =(
[18:42] <xnox> yeah \o/ got it to work
[22:00] <cjwatson> teward: PPAs are enabled when the distroseries works, but it usually takes a day or two to get everything set up.  Please don't nag :-)
[22:00] <cjwatson> shm_get: np
[22:14] <courrier> Heys guys! Is it possible to submit a bug directly within the web interface? While I'm logged in, I can't find any link to submit a new bug
[22:15] <ali1234> yeah it's possible
[22:16] <ali1234> on a project page it's one the right under "Get Involved"
[22:18] <courrier> ali1234: mmmmh, it's disabled "Launchpad needs to know where the user can report a bug"
[22:18] <ali1234> it depends on the project
[22:18] <ali1234> some don't use lp for bug tracking
[22:19] <courrier> oh, I see. It's for pulseaudio
[22:19] <courrier> I've seen another repositery for pulseaudio, but I couldn't submit a bug there either
[22:20] <ali1234> i highly recommend you run "ubuntu-bug pulseaudio" to report the bug
[22:21] <courrier> ali1234: under Mint as well?
[22:21] <ali1234> no
[22:22] <cjwatson> http://www.linuxmint.com/getinvolved.php says they want bug reports at https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint
[22:22] <ali1234> right, looking at that now
[22:23] <courrier> gosh, spaghetti bug submission =)
[22:23] <courrier> cjwatson: thanks :)
[22:24] <ali1234> well it's much easier if you don't use what essentially amounts to ubuntu with the serial numbers filed off :)
[22:26] <ali1234> i do kind of wish it was easier to report bugs against unofficial packages though
[22:26] <ali1234> for example, staging PPAs
[22:27] <courrier> ali1234: is that jealousy of Ubuntu forks?
[22:28] <ali1234> lol
[22:42] <courrier> AAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarg, "Timeout error" in launchpad, my bug submission is lost x(
[22:43] <courrier> " Trying again in a couple of minutes might work.".... ok, but still need to rewrite everything :(
[22:45] <mapreri> courrier: if you are lucky clicking the back bottom of your browser might get you back right with your text
[22:45] <mapreri> (depends on the browser mood)
[22:46] <courrier> mapreri: this trick no longer works with Web2.0 usually
[22:47] <mapreri> it used to work with lp, at least
[22:47] <courrier> going back in this case returns to the bug search field before submission
[22:48] <courrier> I wish someone wrote a Firefox extension to record the very last text typed in a field before validating it
[22:49] <mapreri> i'd not be happy to run such a plugin, though, for reasons.
[22:49] <courrier> mapreri: privacy I assume?
[22:50] <mapreri> you assume right.
[22:50] <mapreri> even if the text i type is already "in the browser", that's anyway more things that read it.
[22:50] <courrier> mapreri: as long as it's opensource that shouldn't be an issue...
[22:51] <mapreri> courrier: nothing block an opensource project to do evil things.
[22:52] <courrier> mapreri: nope, but asking an opensource extension to record a field is as much dangerous as asking an opensource browser to sumbit the same field to my mind
[22:53] <mapreri> maybe