=== Riddelll is now known as Riddell [13:00] BTW, don't accept the other k* ones. There's more needed before those are ready. === doko_ is now known as doko [14:01] slangasek: Could you have a look at this old MP? https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu-archive-tools/edit-acl-crash/+merge/235471 [14:35] bdmurray: looking. btw what do you think about my follow-up on the other MP? [14:36] slangasek: Going to look at that again today [14:36] ok [15:04] Riddell: Around? [15:04] ScottK: Or you? [15:05] Sure [15:05] ScottK: kubunt-active and kubuntu-plasma5. Are those seeds dead now, can I not branch them for wily, or are one or both still needed? [15:05] Both dead. [15:06] Ta. [15:06] oh good. [15:07] I'm assuming last week of october for release (distro-info-data) [15:13] Reasonable. [15:13] tumbleweed: Can you go ahead and put a release called simply X in after that? [15:15] ScottK: I have pending patches to fix distro-info's braindeadery. Just need to clean them up a bit. [15:15] ScottK: that would remove the "out of date" warnings. Of course that's probably what you're trying to achieve, but they are ther efor a reason :P [15:16] tumbleweed: I'll get you patches "soon" to actually do sane things. [15:16] :P [15:17] tumbleweed: As for release, I haven't written the schedule yet, but Oct 29 will do as a preliminary guess until I give you a better date. [15:17] (Oct 22 seems more likely) === smoser` is now known as smoser [15:18] yeah, 4th week seems more common [15:18] Make it the 29th though as better to be a week late than a week early. [15:18] tumbleweed: It's also almost exactly a year after utopic release. [15:19] Anyhow, after I'm done with some opening faff, I'll go hunting conference schedules and such and set a proper date. [15:20] I'd also like to know why vim builds in sid but not in vivid. :/ [15:20] Grumpy. [15:20] 0.27 uploaded to sid, I'll do SRUs a bit later === jzheng is now known as jzheng_afk [16:04] slangasek: I've commented on your comment about my merge proposal regarding the phased-updater. [17:01] infinity: how about mesa-lts-vivid out of the queue today?-) [17:02] tjaalton: Seems likely. I'm a bit headless chickeny with wily opening, but we'll see where I get. [17:03] ack [17:03] did the werewolf get you ? [17:05] mitya57: that's interesting because in my trusty w/o proposed chroot the notify-osd autopkgtest fails [17:35] mitya57: I released the Trusty SRU but the Utopic part was never verified. [17:41] infinity: can a 'll' be an alias for 'l' codename? [17:44] xnox: -EPARSE [17:45] infinity: the new code name is "wily", i think "willy" should also be an accepted upload suite.... [17:46] like frank you mean ? [17:47] xnox: Pretty sure those words mean very different things. :P [17:49] infinity: .... a wily willy ?! =) it's so wrong. [17:50] infinity: is 15.10 a valid upload target? [17:50] xnox: Nope. [17:50] =( [17:50] devel is [17:50] devel? [17:50] * xnox will use devel from now on.... [17:50] devel won't work very well until it's open. [17:50] And once it's open, the name works too. [17:50] So... [17:50] Meh. [18:18] bdmurray: the fixes for Trusty and Utopic were identical, but I will now comment on the bug asking to test on Utopic === mhall119 is now known as mhall119|afk [20:54] infinity: ok, time to turn dailies on now that we're officially wily? :) [20:54] wxl: No, but in the next couple of days. [20:54] infinity: great thx :) [21:12] infinity: Does bug 1363519 need any more information? [21:12] bug 1363519 in live-build (Ubuntu Trusty) "start-stop-daemon fails debsums check" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1363519 [21:14] bdmurray: No, it's a live-build bug, I just didn't know that when it was first reported. [21:15] bdmurray: We'll get it fixed up for wily and trusty. === mhall119|afk is now known as mhall119 [22:03] wxl: please, we have a checklist, there's no need to poke us about something that's 50-odd items deep in it. [22:04] cjwatson: i've never seen such a checklist before and at least last release i saw dailies turned on sooner, so just checking. [22:04] last release we had a name sooner! [22:05] that blocks everything. [22:05] as i said, never seen said checklist, so i act out of ignorance [22:05] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess [22:05] now you have. [22:06] danke [23:36] infinity: I notice wily is frozen, in what other cases would a release be frozen? I ask as sru-report is broken trying to get wily data. [23:37] bdmurray: ... how could it possibly break in that case? vivid was frozen for a month before it released. [23:37] bdmurray: It's much more likely to break because wily has no files on the mirrors yet. [23:37] (Which is in progress, it's a slow publisher run) [23:39] bdmurray: Anyhow, I think it's a mistake for sru-report to even be looking at frozen series', since a stable series will never be in that state. [23:39] bdmurray: Unless someone derives value from looking at the stable series on sru-report during release week, but I never have, since we have update_excuses for that. [23:40] infinity: Okay, right now it only ignores "Active Development" it was failing trying to find excuses information. [23:41] bdmurray: Yeah, instead of an ignore list, you probably want an inclusive list that just looks at supported and current, or whatever those two are. [23:41] wgrant: What are those two keys in API speak? [23:43] infinity: distro_series.status in ('Current Stable Release', 'Supported') [23:43] bdmurray: Looks like status=Supported and status= ... What william said. [23:45] infinity: okay, I'll have an mp in a minute or two [23:59] infinity: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/series-status/+merge/258217