| bdx | charmers, openstack-charmers: for 50 rupes ..... what is the purpose of ext-port and data-port params in neutron-openvswitch? | 02:44 |
|---|---|---|
| bdx | charmers, openstack-charmers: From what I can gather, a hypothetical multi-provider l2/l3 configuration might look like: floating-pool-ext-net-1 --> network-node.eth0, floating-pool-ext-net2 --> network-node.eth1 ----- then we might expect our bridge_mappings to look like: physnet1:br-ex1, physnet2:br-ex2 ----- AND FINALLY THE data-port param could be: br-ex1:eth0 br-ex2:eth1 ? <------- this makes sense to me: | 03:14 |
| bdx | eth0 --> br-ex1 --> physnet1, and eth1 --> br-ex2 --> physnet2. We could then create our floating pool nets on their respective interfaces by specifying --provider:physical_network=physnet1, --provider:physical_network=physnet2 and implement multi-provider...... am I on the right track here...as far as the data-port param is concerned? | 03:14 |
| bdx | charmers, openstack-charmers: I guess where I am confused is why neutron-openvswitch should be concerned with a configuration of this nature....from what I can gather it only affects the neutron and neutron plugin conf files on nova-compute nodes....is this a common practice to connect your floating pool provider networks to your compute nodes and network nodes too? <-- for dvr this makes sense... but should | 03:23 |
| bdx | it have any implication elsewhere? | 03:23 |
| bdx | charmers, openstack-charmers: I have a feeling I'm missing something here....could anyone help me out? | 03:24 |
| bdx | jamespage: Could you give any insight on this? | 03:25 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, +1 for https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charms/trusty/neutron-api/kilo-dvr/+merge/258370 | 10:14 |
| gnuoy | Happy for me to land it? | 10:14 |
| gnuoy | It'd be good to get it into stable too | 10:14 |
| * gnuoy lands it into next | 10:14 | |
| jamespage | gnuoy, ta | 10:27 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: ping | 11:24 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, o/ | 11:24 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: how's it going? | 11:25 |
| jamespage | good thanks - and you? | 11:25 |
| apuimedo | here, doing some changes to our charms for better interoperability :-) | 11:25 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, awesome! | 11:25 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: I found that it is better that I use the identity-service keystone relation for midonet-api | 11:26 |
| apuimedo | the problem I encountered trying to use it is two-fold though | 11:26 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, for registering the endpoints and getting credentials? | 11:26 |
| apuimedo | yes | 11:26 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, def the way togo | 11:26 |
| apuimedo | midonet-api needs to get the admin-token | 11:26 |
| apuimedo | so it should be a valid-service | 11:26 |
| jamespage | you'll probably need to update keystone to understand the midonet service type | 11:26 |
| apuimedo | so it should be in valid_services | 11:26 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, yah - you got it :-) | 11:27 |
| apuimedo | could I submit a patch to keystone stable about it? | 11:27 |
| apuimedo | *the keystone charm stable | 11:27 |
| apuimedo | the other issue, that does not directly affect me, since I need to be a valid service, is that for non_valid service, I think I stumbled upon a bug | 11:29 |
| apuimedo | 2015-05-08 11:14:42 INFO identity-service-relation-changed File "/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-keystone-0/charm/hooks/keystone_utils.py", line 1521, in add_endpoint | 11:29 |
| apuimedo | 2015-05-08 11:14:42 INFO identity-service-relation-changed desc = valid_services[service]["desc"] | 11:29 |
| apuimedo | you are accessing the desc field without checking if it is in valid services | 11:30 |
| apuimedo | I mean, you call ensure_valid_service to remove the admin token | 11:30 |
| apuimedo | but then on add_enpoint | 11:30 |
| apuimedo | you uncondicionally will try access the fields | 11:31 |
| apuimedo | -> Kaboom :-) | 11:31 |
| apuimedo | uncaught exception | 11:31 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: ^^ | 11:31 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, interesting | 11:32 |
| apuimedo | :-) | 11:32 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, please do submit a merge proposal for keystone for the new service types you need - that's 100% appropriate | 11:32 |
| apuimedo | I think it warrants an amulet test for adding non valid services :P | 11:32 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, well a unit test at least :-) | 11:32 |
| apuimedo | at the very least, yes :P | 11:33 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: do you need me to file the launchpad bug or you take care of it? | 11:33 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, I guess the handling could be better - the identity-service relation expects endpoints with valid types to be presented - if that's not the case it errors - not sure whether that is better than handling with a log message or not | 11:34 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, please file a bug :-) | 11:34 |
| apuimedo | jamespage: well, the fact that there's specific code for removing the admin token from the returned data makes me think that the original intention was to allow arbitrary non-privileged endpoint additions | 11:34 |
| apuimedo | so the fix, for keystone/next | 11:35 |
| apuimedo | would be to either remove that capability or to make sure that it adds the endpoint ;-) | 11:35 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, it might be - I did not write much of that code tbh so I'd have to go grok and learn | 11:35 |
| apuimedo | who is ivok? | 11:36 |
| jamespage | apuimedo, ivok? | 11:38 |
| apuimedo | I see him as the author of this code in the bzr blame | 11:39 |
| apuimedo | oh, I see, Ante Karamatic | 11:48 |
| === rogpeppe2 is now known as rogpeppe | ||
| stub | gnuoy: Nothing says thank you like a reciprocal review -> https://code.launchpad.net/~stub/charm-helpers/integration/+merge/257748 | 13:19 |
| === anthonyf is now known as Guest11644 | ||
| apuimedo | jamespage: https://code.launchpad.net/~celebdor/charms/trusty/keystone/midonet_valid_service/+merge/258624 | 13:35 |
| gnuoy | stub, thanks for the review. I'm not keen on having the exits in status_set tbh, I was planning to run status_set multiple times in the same hook. | 13:37 |
| anacapa | get a wire problem while using JUJU + MAAS | 16:28 |
| anacapa | I have 8 nodes are in status "ready" at MAAS. when I use "juju add-machine" command, it will deploying 3 nodes at the same time. but actually, I only want one. | 16:31 |
| anacapa | In before, it will just request one machine. but suddenly switch to 3, after I run add several arguments to "juju add-machine " command like: juju add-machine -n 5, juju add-machine zone=production. | 16:33 |
| anacapa | but, when I switch batch to default command " juju add-machine" it always request 3 machine ..... | 16:33 |
| anacapa | does anybody have such kind of experience before? thx | 16:34 |
| lazyPower_ | anacapa: thats interesting behavior and the first time i've seen this reported | 17:22 |
| lazyPower_ | anacapa: which version of Juju are you using? | 17:22 |
| sinzui | natefinch, mgz: can either of you review http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/1633/ | 17:38 |
| === mhall119 is now known as mhall119|afk | ||
| anacapa | lazyPower_ : 1.23.2-trusty-amd64 | 19:04 |
| anacapa | sorry, went to DataCenter just now | 19:04 |
| anacapa | sorry, the version which has the described problem is: juju-1.22.1-trusty-amd64 | 19:06 |
| anacapa | I just upgrade it to 1.23.2 | 19:06 |
| === anthonyf is now known as Guest82825 | ||
| anacapa | the problem appears again, even I use command" juju add-machine -n 1". it asks 3 nodes from mass, and show me the error likes: "106": | 19:43 |
| anacapa | agent-state-info: 'cannot run instances: cannot run instances: gomaasapi: got | 19:43 |
| anacapa | error back from server: 409 CONFLICT (No available node matches constraints: | 19:43 |
| anacapa | zone=default)' | 19:43 |
| anacapa | instance-id: pending | 19:43 |
| anacapa | series: trusty | 19:43 |
| === mhall119|afk is now known as mhall119 | ||
| nodtkn | juju version 1.23.2 does not appear to queue actions. I have a script that bootstraps, adds two machines, deploys a service to each machine, adds a relation between the two services, and then runs an action. That action occurs before the relation-changed hook is fired. | 20:17 |
| nodtkn | I am expecting to much or doing something wrong? | 20:17 |
| nodtkn | I have a one second sleep between each juju command. | 20:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!