| hallyn | zul: all right, screw it. systemd in the container doesn't want to restart jobs. ship it! | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| === Lingo is now known as IronDev | ||
| === markthomas is now known as markthomas|away | ||
| Abe_ | hey, i booted the ubuntu server installation iso from a usb flash drive but it's trying to detect and mount a cd-rom, possible to do it to the usb flash drive? | 01:19 |
| === zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren | ||
| zul | hallyn: first thing monday | 02:33 |
| === idafyaid is now known as Guest40723 | ||
| === Wiched is now known as asdasdgaasasd | ||
| === idafyaid is now known as Guest23901 | ||
| === CripperZ- is now known as cripperz | ||
| === a1berto_ is now known as a1berto | ||
| === cripperz is now known as CripperZ- | ||
| collizion | Odd. I've got a 14.04.2 server (fresh install) where resolvconf isn't creating any entries in /etc/resolv.conf. The symlink exists, and it will place the "this file gets clobbered by resolvconf" header in it every time, but it won't insert the nameservers specified in /etc/network/interfaces. | 14:30 |
| Patrickdk | well, then your /etc/network/interfaces isn't set right | 14:50 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: Please enlighten me as to how you came to that conclusion, considering the ubuntu installer configured it itself, and I haven't touched those lines. | 14:51 |
| Patrickdk | what does any of that have to do with it? | 14:53 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: ... The Ubuntu installer configured the contents of /etc/network/interfaces, and one would assume the installer knows how to do it properly. Thus your statement that it isn't set right seems a bit presumptuous. | 14:53 |
| Patrickdk | heh? | 14:53 |
| Patrickdk | there are only two options | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | resolvconf is broken | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | or /etc/network/interfaces is not right | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | both resolvconf and installer can have bugs | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | and someone has to tell the installer what to put into it | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | be it dhcp or static config | 14:54 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: Then it would seem that resolvconf isn't functioning properly in this instance. | 14:54 |
| Patrickdk | heh? I can't claim that, I cannot see your interfaces file | 14:55 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: You haven't asked to see it, either. You're making assumptions. | 14:55 |
| Patrickdk | yes, due to the lack of supplied infomation | 14:55 |
| Patrickdk | what did you want me to say? nothing? | 14:55 |
| Patrickdk | and let you not have any help at all? | 14:55 |
| Patrickdk | based on the information supplied, your /etc/network/interfaces is probably not right | 14:56 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: Or... ya know... Ask. That's why there's a question mark on your keyboard. "Hey, I'd like to help. Can I see your interfaces file?" | 14:56 |
| Patrickdk | na, no point, you told me twice it's perfect | 14:56 |
| Patrickdk | and can't be wrong | 14:56 |
| Patrickdk | and you never asked for help | 14:57 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: I think you need to get some sleep or take a vacation or something. | 14:57 |
| Patrickdk | so why would I respond assuming you wanted that | 14:57 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: if you're curious, the answer seems to be that if there is a secondary IP address specified for the interface in /etc/network/interfaces, resolvconf seems to latch on to that stanza for configuration rather than the previous. Because there isn't any DNS information specified for the secondary entry, it sets an empty /etc/resolv.conf file. | 15:04 |
| collizion | Does Ubuntu prefer a specific method for adding a secondary IP address other than the iproute2 method of adding a second "iface eth0 inet static" stanza with just an address? | 15:06 |
| Patrickdk | that is not valid | 15:08 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: It works just fine in terms of setting the addresses, but resolvconf doesn't like it. | 15:09 |
| collizion | Manual /etc/resolv.conf it is. | 15:09 |
| Patrickdk | ya, cause the parser is forgiving, but resolvconf isn't as much | 15:09 |
| Patrickdk | iface eth1:7020 inet static | 15:10 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: I believe that interface aliases are deprecated. | 15:13 |
| Patrickdk | likely | 15:14 |
| Patrickdk | but then the arp command has been deprecated for >10years | 15:14 |
| Patrickdk | and ip neigh has been deprecated for 5years | 15:14 |
| Patrickdk | so there is no non-deprecated to do proxyarp or arp stuff anymore in linux | 15:14 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: iproute2 is fine with multiple stanzas with the same interface name, treats them as one. resolvconf just doesn't like it all. I think the present alternative is to add up/down lines to the interface stanza so that ip addr adds/deletes the secondary IP on ifup/ifdown. | 15:15 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: Which did solve the issue. | 15:15 |
| Patrickdk | yes, you can do ip addr add | 15:15 |
| Patrickdk | that works | 15:15 |
| Patrickdk | but if you atleast use depreciated ifconfig, like lots of tools still use | 15:15 |
| Patrickdk | you will never see it | 15:15 |
| Patrickdk | unless you use, label eth0:xxxx | 15:16 |
| Patrickdk | and then your back to aliases | 15:16 |
| collizion | Patrickdk: It's fixed/working now without using an alias. | 15:16 |
| Patrickdk | but then, ifconfig is depresiated too | 15:16 |
| === markthomas|away is now known as markthomas | ||
| === NomadJim_ is now known as NomadJim | ||
| ReScO | hey people! | 19:22 |
| collizion | sup | 19:42 |
| arcsky | anyone know a mangment tool for my ubuntu servers like windows SSCM ? | 19:58 |
| bekks | Whats "SSCM"? | 19:59 |
| Patrickdk | bash | 19:59 |
| Patrickdk | puppet? | 20:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!