[00:03] zul: all right, screw it. systemd in the container doesn't want to restart jobs. ship it! === Lingo is now known as IronDev === markthomas is now known as markthomas|away [01:19] hey, i booted the ubuntu server installation iso from a usb flash drive but it's trying to detect and mount a cd-rom, possible to do it to the usb flash drive? === zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren [02:33] hallyn: first thing monday === idafyaid is now known as Guest40723 === Wiched is now known as asdasdgaasasd === idafyaid is now known as Guest23901 === CripperZ- is now known as cripperz === a1berto_ is now known as a1berto === cripperz is now known as CripperZ- [14:30] Odd. I've got a 14.04.2 server (fresh install) where resolvconf isn't creating any entries in /etc/resolv.conf. The symlink exists, and it will place the "this file gets clobbered by resolvconf" header in it every time, but it won't insert the nameservers specified in /etc/network/interfaces. [14:50] well, then your /etc/network/interfaces isn't set right [14:51] Patrickdk: Please enlighten me as to how you came to that conclusion, considering the ubuntu installer configured it itself, and I haven't touched those lines. [14:53] what does any of that have to do with it? [14:53] Patrickdk: ... The Ubuntu installer configured the contents of /etc/network/interfaces, and one would assume the installer knows how to do it properly. Thus your statement that it isn't set right seems a bit presumptuous. [14:53] heh? [14:54] there are only two options [14:54] resolvconf is broken [14:54] or /etc/network/interfaces is not right [14:54] both resolvconf and installer can have bugs [14:54] and someone has to tell the installer what to put into it [14:54] be it dhcp or static config [14:54] Patrickdk: Then it would seem that resolvconf isn't functioning properly in this instance. [14:55] heh? I can't claim that, I cannot see your interfaces file [14:55] Patrickdk: You haven't asked to see it, either. You're making assumptions. [14:55] yes, due to the lack of supplied infomation [14:55] what did you want me to say? nothing? [14:55] and let you not have any help at all? [14:56] based on the information supplied, your /etc/network/interfaces is probably not right [14:56] Patrickdk: Or... ya know... Ask. That's why there's a question mark on your keyboard. "Hey, I'd like to help. Can I see your interfaces file?" [14:56] na, no point, you told me twice it's perfect [14:56] and can't be wrong [14:57] and you never asked for help [14:57] Patrickdk: I think you need to get some sleep or take a vacation or something. [14:57] so why would I respond assuming you wanted that [15:04] Patrickdk: if you're curious, the answer seems to be that if there is a secondary IP address specified for the interface in /etc/network/interfaces, resolvconf seems to latch on to that stanza for configuration rather than the previous. Because there isn't any DNS information specified for the secondary entry, it sets an empty /etc/resolv.conf file. [15:06] Does Ubuntu prefer a specific method for adding a secondary IP address other than the iproute2 method of adding a second "iface eth0 inet static" stanza with just an address? [15:08] that is not valid [15:09] Patrickdk: It works just fine in terms of setting the addresses, but resolvconf doesn't like it. [15:09] Manual /etc/resolv.conf it is. [15:09] ya, cause the parser is forgiving, but resolvconf isn't as much [15:10] iface eth1:7020 inet static [15:13] Patrickdk: I believe that interface aliases are deprecated. [15:14] likely [15:14] but then the arp command has been deprecated for >10years [15:14] and ip neigh has been deprecated for 5years [15:14] so there is no non-deprecated to do proxyarp or arp stuff anymore in linux [15:15] Patrickdk: iproute2 is fine with multiple stanzas with the same interface name, treats them as one. resolvconf just doesn't like it all. I think the present alternative is to add up/down lines to the interface stanza so that ip addr adds/deletes the secondary IP on ifup/ifdown. [15:15] Patrickdk: Which did solve the issue. [15:15] yes, you can do ip addr add [15:15] that works [15:15] but if you atleast use depreciated ifconfig, like lots of tools still use [15:15] you will never see it [15:16] unless you use, label eth0:xxxx [15:16] and then your back to aliases [15:16] Patrickdk: It's fixed/working now without using an alias. [15:16] but then, ifconfig is depresiated too === markthomas|away is now known as markthomas === NomadJim_ is now known as NomadJim [19:22] hey people! [19:42] sup [19:58] anyone know a mangment tool for my ubuntu servers like windows SSCM ? [19:59] Whats "SSCM"? [19:59] bash [20:00] puppet?