Kilos | greetings all, i need access granted for http://pad.ubuntu.com/eiEDBfo63Q please | 11:40 |
---|---|---|
Kilos | or tell me what i am doing wrong | 11:41 |
Kilos | i get Authorization is required to access http://pad.ubuntu.com/eiEDBfo63Q | 11:41 |
cjwatson | Kilos: You need to be an Ubuntu member, or be in the ubuntu-etherpad team. | 11:44 |
cjwatson | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-etherpad | 11:44 |
cjwatson | Kilos: Although since you're an Ubuntu member according to your cloak, you ought to have access already. | 11:45 |
cjwatson | You do need to go through single-sign-on. | 11:46 |
Kilos | yeah i dont know why im struggling, but i joined that team now and will try again, thanks alot cjwatson | 11:46 |
Kilos | thank you its working now | 12:02 |
cjwatson | OK, cool. Very odd that it didn't work already, since you should already have been an indirect member. | 12:04 |
Kilos | lol some glitch somewhere | 12:05 |
Kilos | thanks for the help guys, enjoy your day | 16:18 |
kartojal | Hi all! :) Can someone help me a bit with launchpad PPA? I have a error while building a single binary package :/ | 18:43 |
dobey | fix the error :) | 18:48 |
dobey | building locally with sbuild should let you debug what is failing | 18:49 |
kartojal | Locally works like a charm... | 18:50 |
kartojal | it builds perfectly | 18:50 |
kartojal | here is the log | 18:51 |
kartojal | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/206213032/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-amd64.gpuplotter-x64_4.0.3.2-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 18:51 |
dobey | not locally, build it in a clean chroot that doesn't already have everything installed | 18:54 |
kartojal | mmmmm kk i understand now, just installed sbuild, any guide to use it for debugging? | 18:55 |
dobey | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SimpleSbuild | 18:55 |
dobey | is this in a commercial ppa? | 18:55 |
kartojal | Commercial ppa? i think no, its my personal ppa | 18:56 |
dobey | you need to upload a source package which includes source and compiles the binaries from that, then | 18:57 |
dobey | what is "gpuplotter" exactly? | 18:57 |
kartojal | the problem is the original source code makefile isnt multiarch (need to change a variable in makefile to set it 64 or 32), and dont know very well about the makefile and rules file to make it multi-arch | 18:59 |
dobey | is it this? https://github.com/bhamon/gpuPlotGenerator | 18:59 |
kartojal | yes! | 18:59 |
dobey | ah, well then it should be patched | 18:59 |
dobey | and the correct package naming and such used | 18:59 |
dobey | hmm, manual makefiles are annoying, but doesn't look to hard to fix it | 19:01 |
kartojal | sure?? | 19:01 |
kartojal | i ll try to do it | 19:02 |
kartojal | want to learn how to and headhaches :P | 19:02 |
kartojal | thanks for all the info! | 19:02 |
dobey | yeah, i'm sure. :) | 19:07 |
kartojal | now just set up sbuild in ram and do the build, its fails like the previous log | 19:32 |
kartojal | how can i search the dependecy? | 19:33 |
kartojal | and where to place the dependency package? in debian/control? | 19:33 |
dobey | yes, dependencies are specified in debian/control | 19:34 |
dobey | but like i said, you need to build from source, not just upload pre-build binaries | 19:35 |
dobey | pre-built | 19:35 |
dobey | the same for burst-wallet | 19:35 |
kartojal | mmmh, i get it, thanks dobey! | 19:37 |
dobey | Homepage: <insert the upstream URL, if relevant> | 19:39 |
dobey | wow, i'm surprised launchpad even accepted that upload | 19:39 |
dobey | description is also the <inser description here> :( | 19:40 |
dobey | where did you get burst-wallet from exactly? | 19:42 |
kartojal | yes im surprised too hahaha, well it 's for a study project, a live cd hat includes a PPA with all packages related about a new cryptocurrence, like bitcoin, dont have time to convert all the sources to .deb packages, but learn a lot how to do for future | 19:43 |
kartojal | How NOT upload/make pakcages | 19:44 |
kartojal | its from https://github.com/BurstProject/burstcoin | 19:45 |
dobey | ah, java. so annoying with including the .jars in source repositories | 19:49 |
ThaNerd | Errr. Sounds like this channel is not about novation launchpad :-) | 20:11 |
wxl | cjwatson: remember we talked about signing messages for the email interface? i just sent one that got bounced back with a bad signature, then copied and pasted the original text and verified it with gpg and all is well. seems like there is indeed something wrong with launchpad. | 20:46 |
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
cjwatson | wxl: I'd need to see a sample of the text that you *have not copied and pasted*. Copying and pasting can cause whitespace differences, which will matter. | 21:39 |
wxl | cjwatson: that's the weird thing is that copying and pasting actually seems to work :) | 21:42 |
cjwatson | wxl: Do you have the message-id? | 21:42 |
wxl | cjwatson: of the sent message? | 21:43 |
cjwatson | er - yes? what else? | 21:43 |
wxl | here's the message id of the message i sent: Message-ID: <CAFe_ewgmz-si=EtOzJ5dizRVNjC2dkd+gvVfrmifg+B5m9JQnQ@mail.gmail.com> | 21:43 |
cjwatson | wxl: what address did you send that to? | 21:44 |
wxl | cjwatson: <1246906@bugs.launchpad.net> | 21:44 |
cjwatson | back in a bit, kids | 21:45 |
cjwatson | wxl: hm, I see it in the logs but there isn't much to go on there | 21:49 |
wxl | well that's unfortunate cjwatson. should i just file a bug against launchpad itself then? | 21:49 |
cjwatson | wxl: do you still have the original message? can you forward it with full headers to cjwatson@canonical.com ? | 21:49 |
wxl | cjwatson: sure, on it | 21:50 |
cjwatson | it's very important that whatever you do to forward it preserves it byte-for-byte as it was sent | 21:50 |
cjwatson | I don't want one of those "forwards" that just tacks some body text on the front | 21:50 |
wxl | ohhhhh | 21:51 |
wxl | hm | 21:51 |
cjwatson | because I need to be able to see it just as Launchpad did | 21:51 |
wxl | crap | 21:51 |
wxl | i'll have to think about how to bounce this easily | 21:51 |
wxl | might havbe to install mutt and all | 21:51 |
cjwatson | yeah, I believe you can save it as a file | 21:52 |
wxl | going to have a think abut it whilst grabbing coffee | 21:52 |
wxl | oh | 21:52 |
cjwatson | at which point you could send it as an attachment in mutt | 21:52 |
wxl | ok well brb | 21:52 |
cjwatson | wgrant: is there any reason we don't run process-mail with DEBUG logging, other than usual awfulness? | 21:54 |
cjwatson | this might be less painful to debug if we did ... | 21:54 |
cjwatson | actually, you know what, that's just obviously wrong, will prepare a branch to crank the debug level | 21:56 |
wxl | cjwatson: i think you should have got a redirected mail from me | 22:35 |
cjwatson | wxl: only your first one; but I'm waiting for increased logging to be applied on our servers | 22:44 |
wxl | cjwatson: the forward? not the redirect? i sent that latter one just a few minutes ago | 22:44 |
wxl | cjwatson: well 9 minutes ago :) | 22:44 |
cjwatson | I haven't seen it yet, though my mail goes through a few twisty paths | 22:46 |
wxl | okie dokie | 22:46 |
cjwatson | wxl: can you try sending that (or similar) to Launchpad again? | 23:00 |
wxl | sent cjwatson | 23:02 |
cjwatson | huh, it didn't even try to check the signature | 23:03 |
wxl | that would explain the problem | 23:04 |
wxl | i have three different programs telling me the signature is good | 23:04 |
cjwatson | wxl: I really do need the full message though, and your attempted redirect hasn't come through. Is there any way you can save it to a file and send it as an attachment or even put it on a pastebin or something? | 23:07 |
wxl | cjwatson: annoying the redirect didn't go through | 23:07 |
cjwatson | (because I'm fairly sure that I need to look at the fine details of LP's signed message parsing) | 23:08 |
wxl | cjwatson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/11086415/ | 23:09 |
wxl | i am using sha2. hopefully it's not choking on THAT. :) | 23:09 |
cjwatson | thanks, will look in a bit | 23:11 |
wxl | ping me if you need anything else from me cjwatson and thanks again | 23:11 |
cjwatson | thanks for the information, it's much more tractable with an example message | 23:12 |
cjwatson | wxl: so, I get a bad signature here; but it could be whitespace differences of some kind | 23:17 |
cjwatson | wxl: (I had to convert it to Unix line endings before mutt/gpg would accept it as a signed message at all) | 23:17 |
wxl | cjwatson: did you just download the paste? | 23:18 |
cjwatson | yes | 23:18 |
cjwatson | and then stuffed into a new Maildir so that I could look at it in mutt | 23:19 |
wxl | ah interesting | 23:20 |
wxl | there is some sort fo error with it | 23:20 |
* wxl sighs | 23:20 | |
wxl | i think it's choking on the html content | 23:21 |
wxl | gpg --verify gives me an invalid armor header that ends with /a>\r\n | 23:21 |
cjwatson | no, I'm getting this even from just the text part | 23:22 |
cjwatson | and I know that LP walks part by part | 23:22 |
wxl | there's also a CRC error of some kind | 23:23 |
cjwatson | same error if I leave DOS newlines in place | 23:23 |
wxl | i wonder if it's not pastebin that causes the problem | 23:23 |
wxl | 1s | 23:23 |
wxl | must not be | 23:24 |
cjwatson | that was why my first option was to send as an attachment | 23:24 |
wxl | same md5 | 23:24 |
cjwatson | did you copy and paste into pastebin, or use a program? | 23:24 |
cjwatson | ok | 23:24 |
wxl | so it could be the way thunderbird saves the message but that seems unlikely | 23:24 |
cjwatson | still, it's not a straight signature verification failure on LP's side | 23:24 |
wxl | right | 23:25 |
wxl | well, i'll keep exploring options i guess | 23:25 |
wxl | maybe i should try thunderbird/enigmail | 23:25 |
cjwatson | a signature failure would (now) leave a debug message | 23:25 |
wxl | so where do you think the problem lies? | 23:26 |
cjwatson | my best theory so far is that it's in the code which walks through MIME messages looking for signatures - that is, it simply doesn't think the message is signed at all, good or bad | 23:27 |
cjwatson | but when I run that by hand it seems fine ... | 23:31 |
wxl | well let's see what enigmail does | 23:31 |
wxl | just sent one | 23:31 |
wxl | i have a strong suspicion it won't fail | 23:31 |
wxl | still no reply | 23:39 |
cjwatson | wxl: worked, though, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxterminal/+bug/1246906 | 23:41 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1246906 in lxterminal (Ubuntu) "changing terminal color in lxterminal causes display of htop to partially disapper" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 23:41 |
wxl | yeah bizarre | 23:41 |
wxl | i wish there was a way to test messages directly with lp | 23:42 |
wxl | so i could test things without having to have something to do it to :) | 23:43 |
wxl | i note there's no mime | 23:44 |
cjwatson | You could probably use staging for this | 23:44 |
wxl | oh that's a thought | 23:44 |
cjwatson | Mail to same address but @bugs.staging.launchpad.net | 23:45 |
cjwatson | Assuming the bug exists there, otherwise pick another one | 23:45 |
wxl | well i could probably make a new bug too | 23:45 |
wxl | well not really make one, but you get the idea :) | 23:45 |
wxl | to new@ | 23:45 |
cjwatson | wxl: Actually, could you try again with your previous setup? Because I've just looked more closely and it would appear that the crontab change I requested was live briefly, then reverted, and is now live again | 23:46 |
cjwatson | wxl: Which means that a good part of the debugging I did earlier was on the wrong track :-( | 23:46 |
wxl | ahhh | 23:46 |
cjwatson | (Because debugging was in fact switched off) | 23:46 |
wxl | so you want me to do the original message? | 23:46 |
cjwatson | Yeah | 23:46 |
wxl | k 1sd | 23:46 |
cjwatson | But maybe to something on staging now to avoid confusion | 23:47 |
wxl | should i send it to staging | 23:47 |
wxl | yeah ok | 23:47 |
wxl | bug 1 maybe XD | 23:47 |
ubot5 | bug 1 in Ubuntu Malaysia LoCo Team "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 | 23:47 |
cjwatson | Oh | 23:47 |
cjwatson | Hang on | 23:47 |
cjwatson | I bet staging doesn't have my debugging change | 23:47 |
cjwatson | So it would actually be more helpful in this case to pick a different bug on production | 23:47 |
wxl | ok lemme dig something up | 23:47 |
cjwatson | If I really have to, I'll set something up on dogfood, but that won't be tonight | 23:48 |
wxl | i can't imagine others are having this problem otherwise you'd hear more griping | 23:49 |
wxl | then again maybe people don't really use the email interface | 23:49 |
cjwatson | It gets some use, but I suspect most people who use it aren't using gmail | 23:51 |
wxl | sent | 23:51 |
cjwatson | Haven't actually checked, difficult to mine it out of logs due to spam | 23:51 |
wxl | yeah well such is the case with email :( | 23:51 |
cjwatson | ok, that cron job is */3 so wait a couple of minutes | 23:52 |
cjwatson | ah, there we go | 23:55 |
cjwatson | 2015-05-11 23:54:14 DEBUG attempt gpg authentication for <Person at 0x961de10 wxl (Walter Lapchynski)> | 23:55 |
cjwatson | 2015-05-11 23:54:14 DEBUG Signature couldn't be verified: (7, 8, u'Bad signature') | 23:55 |
wxl | cjwatson: and indeed that's the message i get :) | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!