[06:11] <dholbach> good morning
=== erkules_ is now known as erkules
[08:35] <JamesTait> Good morning all; happy Friday, and happy Nylon Stockings Day! 😝
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr
=== leandrosansilva2 is now known as leandrosansilva
[10:02] <Chipaca> @reviewlist
[10:02] <nothal> https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/ubuntu-core-launcher/unshare/+merge/258367 | Approve: 1, Needs Fixing: 1 (8 days old)
[10:02] <nothal> https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiusens/webdm/queryPackageNames/+merge/258640 | No reviews (6 days old)
[10:02] <nothal> https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/snappy/allow-more-dots/+merge/259181 | Approve: 1 (less than a day old)
[10:02] <nothal> https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/snappy/log-command-failure/+merge/258669 | Approve: 1 (6 days old)
[10:02] <nothal> https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/snappy/no-more-log/+merge/258667 | No reviews (6 days old)
[12:32] <vmayoral|pc> rsalveti: thanks for yesterday's changes. It seems the we are still missing some dependencies https://gist.github.com/vmayoral/3be25ea9026a8d73568e. Mind taking another look please?
[13:02] <ogra_> vmayoral|pc, ouch ... thats a bit trickier to solve
[13:02] <rsalveti> yeah, the problem is see is mixing up vivid with trusty
[13:02] <ogra_> well, the problem is as well that we dont have android-tools for armhf
[13:02] <rsalveti> I think we do
[13:03] <ogra_> and u-d-f depends on that ...
[13:03] <rsalveti> at least I was able to install snappy-tools on my meizu yesterday
[13:03] <rsalveti> but using vivid
[13:03] <ogra_> ah
[13:03] <vmayoral|pc> let me retry bootstrapping a vivid file system and i'll provide feedback
[13:03] <rsalveti> after rebuild the packages
[13:03] <rsalveti> *rebuilding
[13:04] <ogra_> ah, right, i see them on the phone
[13:04] <rsalveti> let me reflash vivid, got wily while trying to get vivid
[13:04] <ogra_> heh, yeah
[13:04] <rsalveti> this channel mess we had yesterday
[13:04] <ogra_> i'm currently re.working all my bot scripts ...
[13:04] <davmor2> rsalveti: no really
[13:04] <ogra_> not only the channels changed ... buit versions were re-set too
[13:05] <davmor2> rsalveti: you'll need a new channel but I'm not telling you what :)
[13:05] <rsalveti> davmor2: rc/ubuntu-developer right?
[13:05] <rsalveti> or yet another channel
[13:05] <ogra_> no, thats wily
[13:05] <rsalveti> trying with mako
[13:05] <ogra_> ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris.en
[13:05] <rsalveti> even for mako?
[13:06] <ogra_> that seems the only vivid channel left
[13:06] <ogra_> there is a mako subdir
[13:06] <rsalveti> haha, interesting
[13:06] <ogra_> ogra@anubis:~/irc-json-daemon$ ubuntu-device-flash query --channel=ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris.en --device mako --list-images|tail -1
[13:06] <ogra_> 5: description='ubuntu=20150515,device=20150210,custom=mako-1.1,version=5'
[13:07] <ogra_> wow, we havent re-built android since feb.
[13:09] <rsalveti> yeah, need to rebuild that, was waiting a few patches to land in code-phablet first
[13:09] <rsalveti> like the aosp apns update
[13:26] <rsalveti> ogra_: seems to be working: http://paste.ubuntu.com/11147470/
[13:27] <ogra_> yeah
=== rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3
=== utlemming_away is now known as utlemming
[14:34] <mterry> Chipaca, what is the snappy project's code review flow?  For example, on lp:~mterry/snappy/allow-more-dots, you did an approve comment with a small comment request.  (I made that change)  Should I top-approve?  Do I need more than one approval?  Do we manually push to trunk or does tarmac do that for us?  We don't seem to have a CI instance I note
[15:10] <Chipaca> mterry: usually, if a branch is fine i'd +1 and top-approve; when it has comments i'd +1 and let you top-approve once you'd considered the comments (or come back to me and ask to re-review if it ended up being less-than-cosmetic)
[15:11] <mterry> ChickenCutlass, makes sense.  If top-approved, does it automatically land in trunk or do we use silos etc?
[15:11]  * Chipaca hugs ChickenCutlass 
[15:11] <mterry> whoops
[15:11] <mterry> :)
[15:11] <Chipaca> mterry: it lands in trunk
[15:12] <mterry> Chipaca, OK.  So only one approve needed, auto-lands in trunk.  But no CI hooked up yet?  Reviewers manually run tests?
[15:12] <Chipaca> mterry: it runs run-checks before landing to trunk
[15:12] <Chipaca> mterry: no CI yet; selftest needs work for that (not much though)
[15:13] <mterry> Chipaca, neat, great.  I'm out of questions  :)
[15:18] <Chipaca> mterry: you could also run go fmt as a precommit hook
[15:28] <Chipaca> mterry: congrats on your first landing :)
[15:28] <mterry> Chipaca, I'm breaking out the beer now  ;)
[15:28] <Chipaca> mterry: and now you've got (another) excuse!
[15:36] <Chipaca> mterry: and, jsut so you don't get *too* high and mighty, need-fixing'ed your second mp
[15:42] <mterry> :)
=== retrack is now known as Guest16574
[17:12]  * Chipaca ~> EOD \o/
[17:12] <Chipaca> EOW, also
[17:12] <ogra_> enjoy !
[17:12]  * Chipaca might be lying
[17:13] <Chipaca> no, not lying, promise
[17:13]  * Chipaca definitely lying then