[00:49] Bug #1455840 was opened: network-bridge compatibility with Open vSwitch === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54_ is now known as kadams54-away [21:27] mwhudson: do arm put "superceeded" on the background of every page unconditionally [21:28] or are there actually some pages they have not yet depricated ? [21:28] davecheney: heh [21:28] davecheney: only the pages that have been around long enough to be found by google, i think [21:28] there will be a version that does not have superceded written on [21:28] but it can be pretty hard to find [23:32] mwhudson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/11193890/ [23:32] sad NEON is sad [23:34] fun times [23:34] for limited values of fun [23:34] is there no neon at all? [23:35] my guess is it's disabled in the kernel [23:35] is that a thing ? [23:35] model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 10 (v7l) [23:35] BogoMIPS : 790.52 [23:35] Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpd32 [23:35] compared to my freescale imx6 [23:36] oh yeah, no noen in features [23:36] *neon [23:36] but is that something you can disable in ther kernel [23:36] or does their SoC not have that feature ? [23:36] it is also something you can not include the silicon for [23:36] no idea, i don't know much about marvell designs [23:36] as in , it's not optional in cortex-A ? [23:38] not sure about the answer to that specific question [23:38] it's optional in armv7 [23:40] * mwhudson asks @scaleway on twitter [23:42] ... and people ask why arm hasn't taken over the data centre [23:44] mwhudson: i also dm'd the guy [23:44] we'll see what happens [23:44] cool [23:44] i'd be amazed that [23:44] a. they go their own silicon, rather than just taking a marvell or freescale soc [23:44] i guess 2am on monday morning is not a good time to expect quick replies [23:44] it's a slightly custom marvell part [23:44] o_O! [23:44] why do people do things like this [23:44] i did manage to dig that out of their site [23:45] "We developed with Marvell a Cortex A9 ARM SoC offering excellent performances for web applications." [23:45] https://www.scaleway.com/faq/server#why-did-you-choose-arm- [23:46] blah blah [23:46] it's also hinted at in the cpuinfo [23:46] Processor : Marvell PJ4Bv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) [23:46] the number of things you can tweak on a custom silicon that actually make a difference [23:46] are effectively zero [23:46] it's probably just form factor or something [23:47] cortex a9 means it's arm's design for the actual cpu bit [23:47] s [23:47] yeah [23:47] oh [23:47] a9 [23:47] booh [23:49] although it's always possible that scaleway's marketing material is using the terms wrong :) [23:49] inconceivable [23:56] the hints i see around the net sort of imply that they are [23:57] i _think_ it's based on the armada 370, which is not a cortex a9 [23:57] and does not have neon [23:57] (and i think cortex a9s always do have neon) [23:57] yeah, looks like armada 370 [23:57] that is oooooooooooooold [23:57] yeah [23:58] at least it has better IO than a panda :) [23:58] how they got a 4 core version of that is a great mistery [23:58] a yugo has better io than a pandaboard [23:58] oh yeah [23:58] cortex a9 is also dual core [23:59] oh no, 1-4 [23:59] lying there [23:59] ah, and neon is optional [23:59] specifications on http://www.arm.com/cortex-a9.php