[01:08] <Logan> does anyone know what bugproxy is? e.g. this cryptic report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1457146
[01:08] <Logan> appears to have something to do with...IBM?
[10:03] <cjwatson> taggart: The patch is there, but it's not in our configuration by default.  (That is, the patch introduces a way to turn off the Debian revision in the protocol handshake, but the default is to leave it in there.)
[10:25] <Quintasan> Hi
[14:40] <infinity> Logan: Yeah, it's a proxy from IBM's internal bug tracker.  Irksome that they picked a generic name.  Maybe we should force a rename on them.
[14:41] <infinity> wgrant: Do you know the right people to talk to to get IBM to fix their auth tokens and code to cope if we force an s/bugproxy/ibm-bugproxy/ rename on them?  That generic account name is irksome/confusing.
[16:00] <taggart> cjwatson: ok cool, I am updating a puppet module and I am going to setup "DebianBanner no" for both debian and ubuntu
[16:00] <taggart> cjwatson: and I am starting to wonder if that would be a good idea for the package
[16:09] <cjwatson> taggart: I wouldn't accept such a change
[16:09] <cjwatson> taggart: The existence of the option is a reasonably stable compromise :)
[22:43] <wgrant> infinity: You should probably rather get them to fix the displayname. The username is less interesting.