=== jamesh_ is now known as jamesh [21:19] I liked anatoly's suggestions for the ppa view. [22:40] wgrant: would be very useful to have pack-objects --revs --shallow sha1 which afaict was added in 2.2.1 [22:58] cjwatson: any thoughts on packaging a newer release? [23:42] blr: What would that buy us? [23:45] wgrant: entirely selfish, in this case it makes it easier to generate packs for tests [23:46] Ah, heh. [23:46] blr: If you add a commit, pack, then add another commit, and pack again, it should give you two packs normally. [23:47] by 'pack' do you mean gc? because that seems to merge packs [23:50] I do wonder if we should contribute back pack/re-pack to pygit2 (presumably in libgit2, I haven't looked yet) [23:52] blr: Ideally Debian will get round to it soon and then we'll just need to run backportpackage :) [23:53] cjwatson: ok! yes, let's let them worry about it :) (I'm not desperate) [23:54] blr: PPA view> the yellow top bar looked awful to me, but the rest of it seemed mostly reasonable [23:54] oh agree about the yellow bit [23:55] but generally not repeating ourselves and relying on the context of a heading is good [23:55] adding the add-apt-repository command seemed sensible [23:58] Yes, the yellow bit is awful, but the rest is fairly obviously good.