[21:19] <blr> I liked anatoly's suggestions for the ppa view.
[22:40] <blr> wgrant: would be very useful to have pack-objects --revs --shallow sha1 which afaict was added in 2.2.1
[22:58] <blr> cjwatson: any thoughts on packaging a newer release?
[23:42] <wgrant> blr: What would that buy us?
[23:45] <blr> wgrant: entirely selfish, in this case it makes it easier to generate packs for tests
[23:46] <wgrant> Ah, heh.
[23:46] <wgrant> blr: If you add a commit, pack, then add another commit, and pack again, it should give you two packs normally.
[23:47] <blr> by 'pack' do you mean gc? because that seems to merge packs
[23:50] <blr> I do wonder if we should contribute back pack/re-pack to pygit2 (presumably in libgit2, I haven't looked yet)
[23:52] <cjwatson> blr: Ideally Debian will get round to it soon and then we'll just need to run backportpackage :)
[23:53] <blr> cjwatson: ok! yes, let's let them worry about it :) (I'm not desperate)
[23:54] <cjwatson> blr: PPA view> the yellow top bar looked awful to me, but the rest of it seemed mostly reasonable
[23:54] <blr> oh agree about the yellow bit
[23:55] <blr> but generally not repeating ourselves and relying on the context of a heading is good
[23:55] <blr> adding the add-apt-repository command seemed sensible
[23:58] <wgrant> Yes, the yellow bit is awful, but the rest is fairly obviously good.