[06:51] <dholbach> good morning
[06:53] <jose> hello, dholbach!
[06:54] <bkerensa> dholbach: good morning
[06:56] <dholbach> hi jose, hi bkerensa
[06:56] <jose> all going good?
[06:56] <MooDoo> hello all
[06:56] <dholbach> yep - how about you?
[06:58] <elfy> morning all
[07:00] <bkerensa> elfy: morning
[07:07] <jose> I'm good, long day
[07:07] <jose> hey elfy, long time no see
[07:07] <elfy> hi bkerensa jose
[07:08] <elfy> jose: heh - I'm always somewhere :)
[07:08] <jose> true
[07:14] <dpm> morning all
[07:16] <elfy> dpm: hi
[07:17] <dpm> hey elfy
[07:19] <silverlion> o/
[07:20]  * jose goes to bed
[07:26] <elfy> night night :)
[07:43] <davidcalle> Morning all
[07:44]  * dholbach relocates to the office, brb
[08:22] <dholbach> popey, dpm, balloons, mhall119, davidcalle: any reason why the Q&A was moved to 17 UTC?
[08:22] <dholbach> now it stops at 20:00 my time
[08:22] <dholbach> which would be the second time in the week where I work until 20:00 which I'm really not looking forward to :-/
[08:23] <dpm> dholbach, no idea, I'd rather move it to 15:00UTC as it was when we originally scheduled it the first time
[08:23] <dholbach> <3
[08:23] <dholbach> I guess that'd conflict with our standup
[08:23] <dholbach> maybe that's why it was moved(?)
[08:24] <dpm> I don't know
[08:25] <dpm> happy to move it
[09:07] <silverlion> gosh. can somebody tell that guy on the mailing list to stop wasting our time?
[09:11] <dholbach> if you want to make yourself heard, write to the list
[09:18] <silverlion> dholbach: I would love to but I think I'd better not because my fear is that those words which are in my mind right now - would act as an insult
[14:21] <balloons> wow, where did may go?
[14:22] <knome> balloons, home
[14:26] <knome> and if you didn't notice, there's still almost a week of it left :P
[14:51] <balloons> knome, I didn't!
[14:51] <balloons> weeee!
[14:52] <elfy> there is ALWAYS a bonus - regardless of what other people might see or think
[15:12] <davidcalle> balloons, not sure if you know about it, but there is an incoming scopes branch with a python-harness tutorial inside, could be interesting for you https://code.launchpad.net/~stolowski/unity-scopes-shell/sphinx-docs
[15:13] <balloons> davidcalle, awesome.. that's what I was waiting for from Pawel
[15:13] <balloons> with docs <3
[15:13] <davidcalle> balloons, don't tell him I'm spying on his branches! :p
[15:13] <balloons> davidcalle, hehe.. nice to have an insider!
[15:16] <cprofitt> 8/names
[15:31] <jose> hey guys, anyone around here knows how to make an rt ticket urgent? I'm not able to send emails to ANY mailing list, and kinda need that...
[15:32] <knome> jose, i guess poke #canonical-sysadmin
[15:32] <jose> knome: no one on vanguard, already checked :(
[15:32] <knome> call mr. shuttleworth then
[15:32] <knome> :P
[15:32] <jose> phone's busy :(
[15:33]  * jose scratches head
[15:33] <knome> then you got no other chance than to retry aforementioned options
[15:33] <mhall119> jose: what's going on?
[15:36] <jose> mhall119: I can't send emails to any mailing list, reasons unknown
[15:36] <jose> I don't get any error messages or anything, but my emails don't go through
[15:37] <mhall119> jose: do you have an RT#?
[15:37] <jose> no, was thinking there was maybe a way to mark it as urgent, but I can file one noe
[15:40] <popey> jose: how do you know they aren't getting through, and can you give an example of a list this happened on?
[15:41] <jose> popey:
[15:41] <jose> Yesterday I was sending emails to ubuntu-news, loco-contacts and ubuntu-news-team as usual, but none of my emails went through (I had someone on the other side of the list check) or were archived. Same happened with ubuntu-pe, there are some emails are sent that are not on the archives.
[15:42] <jose> mhall119: rt.u.c#26584
[15:43] <jose> on ubuntu-news my email didn't go to the moderation queue and I checked with Lyz and she didn't get any emails, then I tried with the other two but same happened, no emails were sent out even though I contacted the list
[15:45] <popey> jose: has anything changed? I mean, you sending from a different address?
[15:45] <jose> popey: nope, still jose@ubuntu.com
[15:45] <jose> same PC, same email cline
[15:45] <jose> client*
[15:46] <popey> does that address receive mail?
[15:46] <jose> it does
[15:46] <popey> i just sent you a test mail, can you reply?
[15:47] <jose> reply sent
[16:19]  * balloons waves to jono
[16:20] <jono> howdy balloons!
[16:31] <mhall119> jose: FYI, I'm trying to find someone to look into this for you
[16:32] <jose> mhall119: cool, thanks a bunch!
[16:33] <mhall119> jono: FYI, kubuntu-council as an entity has existed for a very long time, it's not a new thing
[16:33] <jono> mhall119, that's what I thought
[16:35] <mhall119> shadeslayer was proposing a change to it's constitution
[16:37] <jono> ahh
[16:41] <balloons> and indeed the proposed changes were adopted
[17:17] <balloons> jcastro, nice comment on http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/37bedk/can_we_please_get_an_easier_way_to_submit_bugs/
[17:21] <jcastro> hah
[17:21] <jcastro> it would be nice if we could just get apport to stfu though
[17:21] <jcastro> I've only ever seen it hang up on junk in /var/crash
[17:22] <jcastro> someone needs to ttl that stuff
[17:22] <balloons> jcastro, bdmurray landed stuff to apport that should have shut it off for lts
[17:22] <balloons> that's been a bit, so I'm sad to see this post again
[17:24] <jcastro> I would just like it never to show up
[17:24] <jcastro> just do the background thing
[17:25] <balloons> right exactly. Unless you experienced something needing attention it really isn't supposed to appear
[17:26] <balloons> but I agree with your statement about how to "solve" the problem. Automated reporting and better testing
[17:31] <jcastro> I don't think I've had to manually file a bug in years
[17:31] <jcastro> well, for a defect anyway
[17:31] <jcastro> wishlist and others, then sure. :D
[20:40] <jose> mhall119: did you get anyone available on IS?
[22:37] <mhall119> jose: not yet, there doesn't seem to have been a vanguard all day
[22:37] <jose> weird
[22:37] <mhall119> jose: there's one there now, let me see if I can get some action on your rt
[22:38] <jose> woot woot, thanks
[22:39] <mhall119> np
[23:10] <mhall119> jose: all good now?
[23:10] <jose> mhall119: yup, looks like it was an unnoticed error on my side. thank you!
[23:10] <mhall119> np