[05:16] <Mirv> racarr: I'm not versioned
[05:19] <racarr> Mirv: lol
[05:19] <racarr> Mirv: some sort of strange copy paste error with weird symbols
[05:19] <racarr> I thought you might think it was funny though
[05:21] <Mirv> :)
[05:22] <Mirv> this channel gives me highlights anyway since you also have the mirvfb..
[06:12] <anpok> tldr
[06:31] <racarr> lol
[15:19] <racarr> Good morning!
[15:22] <racarr> alan_g: To answer some of your questions in other channel and in my email
[15:22] <racarr> I thought that as part of
[15:22] <racarr> the promotion from proposed to
[15:22] <racarr> archive
[15:22] <racarr> the reverse dependencies are built and
[15:22] <racarr> that is causing these failures
[15:22] <racarr> which is what halted the promotion?
[15:22] <racarr> http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html
[15:22] <racarr> Packages which have autopkgtest enabled will have their tests run whenever they get uploaded or any of their dependencies change. The output of automatically run autopkgtest tests can be viewed on the web and is regularly updated.
[15:23] <racarr> maybe that doesnt involve
[15:23] <racarr> a rebuild though?
[15:24] <alan_g> racarr: we're discussing in standup hangout
[15:52] <alan_g> it really shouldn't involve a rebuild - it should be testing the contents of archive
[15:53] <dandrader> alan_g,  wily still has mir 0.12.1. do you know what's the ETA for 0.13 there?
[15:57] <alan_g> dandrader: working on it. I need to get a fix into qtubuntu before it can land
[19:11] <anpok> finally it udevs behavior makes sense
[19:11] <anpok> -it
[19:29] <bschaefer> racarr, hey, was there new changes to mir library?
[19:29] <bschaefer> 'mir_surface_get_graphics_region' is deprecated?
[19:29] <bschaefer> as well as swap surfaces?
[19:34] <racarr> bschaefer: mir_surface_get_buffer_stream, mir_buffer_stream_get_graphics_region ;)
[19:34] <racarr> surfaces are getting multiple buffer streams
[19:34] <racarr> for decorations and other strange use cases
[19:34] <bschaefer> racarr, i see, looks like ill have to start getting things moved over then :)
[19:34] <bschaefer> Thanks!
[19:35] <racarr> np
[20:51] <anpok> kdub: what do you mean by disable the cursor? just hide the cursor more.. no cursor position processing / confinement..?
[21:55] <bschaefer> racarr, question, how come theres mir_event_type_key, mir_event_type_motion and under mir event input theres mir_input_event_type_key/pointer?
[21:55] <bschaefer> shouldn't the mir_event_type_key/motion just be mir_event_type_input? (which means you shouldn't need them?)
[22:01] <racarr> bschaefer: Yeah they will go away in next release
[22:01] <racarr> it was this whole
[22:01] <racarr> strategy to change the event without breaking ABI
[22:01] <racarr> mir_event_get_type will never return key/motion
[22:01] <bschaefer> racarr, cool just wanted to double check :) (want to include as much as i can in switch statements)
[22:01] <bschaefer> more for a TODO section wise
[22:01] <bschaefer> cool
[22:02] <racarr> Coooolio
[22:02] <bschaefer> thanks!