/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/05/27/#ubuntu-us-fl.txt

=== aaron is now known as ahoneybun
=== aaron is now known as Guest26610
=== Guest26610 is now known as ahoneybun
Nothing_MuchThere be some drama happening!08:28
Nothing_Muchhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2015/05/kubuntu-project-lead-asked-to-step-down-by-ubuntu-community-council What's this about?08:29
ahoneybunsercet meeting and such Nothing_Much11:19
Nothing_Muchahoneybun, damned if anybody does and damned if anybody doesn't11:20
Nothing_Muchit's that and humans are humans11:20
Nothing_Muchuwiywq8 sleep11:20
ahoneybunits all over social media and such11:22
ahoneybun#ISupportJonathan11:25
mhall119ahoneybun: every time the CC has had to deal with an individual's behavior, those discussions were done in private13:18
mhall119it's not nice to air a list of grievances against somebody in public13:19
ahoneybunmhall119: I agree with that but the min that the option to make someone step down it should have been taken to the community and council18:31
ahoneybunif they are in Leadership roles18:31
mhall119ahoneybun: we did go to the KC as soon as we reached that decision18:33
mhall119ahoneybun: as I said in the Kubuntu meeting, we never considered it the Kubuntu Council's responsibility to police one of their members, so they were not asked to intervene18:34
mhall119in hind sight, maybe they could have talked him down from the ledge, or maybe that would have just turned him against them as well, I don't know18:35
ahoneybunthe original email was only riddell18:35
mhall119ahoneybun: Riddell and the KC were both sent similar emails at the same time18:35
ahoneybunmhall119: I'm trying to hear both sides as best I can. but it is hard as I'm hugely biased sadly18:36
ahoneybunthey only posted the email that riddell got as I did not get a email sent to the KC18:37
ahoneybunI've never seen the email18:37
mhall119ahoneybun: understandable, as long as you keep in mine that (A) we're all human and (B) we all care about Ubuntu as a whole18:37
ahoneybunnot on the KC anyway18:37
ahoneybunI would like to think the CC think that way but I'm worried that Mark does not (from the flavors stand point)18:38
mhall119ahoneybun: he's probably spent several million dollars of his personal money on flavors at this point18:39
mhall119somthing to keep in mind18:39
ahoneybunI'm looking beyond his checkbook18:40
ahoneybunmoney does not equal love or care18:40
mhall119true, but people don't tend to spend money on things they don't care about, especially not that much of it18:40
ahoneybunand that was way before Phone, Snappy, OpenStack18:40
ahoneybunhe has much more important stuff that focus on core Ubuntu18:40
ahoneybunnot flavors18:40
mhall119ahoneybun: and yet he's still committed to supporting those flavors, even bringing in new ones18:41
mhall119even though MATE isn't going to help us sell phones or servers18:41
ahoneybuntrue18:42
ahoneybunmhall119: this is what I would have done, 18:42
ahoneybun1. Talk to Riddell (which I'm more then sure you did)18:42
mhall119yup18:43
ahoneybun2. if the CC is all voting towards taking him off email the KC to discuss18:43
ahoneybunand have it out18:43
ahoneybunI'm sure the KC and Community will go his side (which is what is happening)18:43
ahoneybunbut include emails and logs (which can be provided and not *private*) in that email to the KC ML, -devel ML, and -users ML18:44
mhall119ahoneybun: we're still talking about how to procede, there is still a lot of misgivings over making private communication public18:45
ahoneybunmost of the talk in the channels with Kubuntu seem not to say that Riddell has not done this, no it is that you did not logs18:46
ahoneybunI'm sure there was lots of talk on ubuntu-meeting which is public already18:46
mhall119ahoneybun: there was some, but the majority was in private email18:46
ahoneybunsomeone sent me a list of ML archives but there are like 15-20 posts18:46
ahoneybunwhich is a ton to go over18:47
mhall119ahoneybun: that's the short list18:47
ahoneybunmhall119: but the CC should have gotten these emails available to be public LONG before the email to step down was sent18:47
mhall119ahoneybun: and make a list of public accusations against somebody we only wanted to step down temporarily? Everything that's been made public now is permanent, any future employer or partner that googles his name is going to find this, that's never what we wanted to happen18:51
ahoneybunbut you sent it like we don't deserve the whole story18:52
ahoneybunit was going to be public no matter how you handled it18:52
ahoneybunthings go fast on the internet and social media18:52
mhall119ahoneybun: we wanted to give the whole story to the KC, we didn't want to ruin somebody in public18:54
ahoneybunI understand that18:54
ahoneybunand thank you for that18:55
ahoneybunas it stands I'm with Jonathan till I see hard evience against him18:55
ahoneybunand I'll try to turn off my biased side and look at the facts18:55
ahoneybunI want to keep the bridge open between us mhall119, but I have to go atm19:09
mhall119ahoneybun: my door is always open, to you and anybody else who wants to talk19:10
ahoneybunthank you mhall119 for that19:10
ahoneybunbbl19:11
ahoneybunthough I believe all this is out of the hands of the CC now that Mark has spoken right mhall119?19:43
mhall119ahoneybun: Mark is part of the CC, he spoke in support of our decision, but wasn't the one who made it20:49
ahoneybunI see20:53
ahoneybunmhall119: would you say the CC have not changed their minds about their decision?20:57
mhall119ahoneybun: we have not, and nothing has been presented to us to make us feel differently than we did before20:57
ahoneybunok20:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!