jrwren | can anyone tell me equivalent of git add -up with bzr ? | 00:34 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | jrwren: Only git has the concept of the index, so there's no direct analogy in other VCSes. | 00:35 |
wgrant | jrwren: Other VCSes just commit whatever's in the working tree. | 00:36 |
jrwren | wgrant: thanks. | 00:36 |
wgrant | The bzr equivalent is to run 'bzr shelve' to store away the changes from the working tree that you don't want. | 00:36 |
wgrant | Then bzr commit, then bzr unshelve to get them back. | 00:36 |
jrwren | so, my editor "fixed" some source I was editing. I don't feel I should commit those fixes. I'd like to commit ONLY the lines I intended. | 00:36 |
jrwren | shelve worked well. thank you wgrant | 00:38 |
wgrant | (shelve is basically stash) | 00:39 |
jrwren | I don't know if any software-properties folks are around. I find this valuable. https://code.launchpad.net/~evarlast/software-properties/support-update/+merge/260640 | 00:49 |
wgrant | jrwren: It looks like you've proposed an Ubuntu packaging branch into the upstream trunk, which isn't going to work very well. | 01:38 |
wgrant | jrwren: You probably want to make a fresh branch of lp:software-properties, then commit on top of that and push. | 01:39 |
jrwren | wgrant: so I branched the wrong then? | 02:36 |
wgrant | jrwren: Looks to me like you branched lp:ubuntu/software-properties | 02:51 |
jrwren | wgrant: i did, but afaict they are the same thing. | 02:51 |
jrwren | how can you even tell that from the MP? | 02:52 |
wgrant | They're unrelated branches of the same codebase. | 02:52 |
wgrant | Have you seen the MP diff? :) | 02:52 |
jrwren | WTF?!?! | 02:53 |
jrwren | hahaha | 02:53 |
wgrant | Unless your change was actually 112000 lines, I think there's a problem. | 02:53 |
jrwren | i really do not understand LP and the way this stuff is done. | 02:53 |
jrwren | maybe someday. | 02:53 |
wgrant | Well, this isn't really LP-specific. | 02:54 |
jrwren | wgrant: and bzr. | 02:54 |
jrwren | wgrant: if it were git, I'd not be so confused :) | 02:54 |
wgrant | It's just that in this case the upstream project is also on LP, so it's slightly confusing. | 02:54 |
wgrant | It'd be the same if you grabbed a repo from Debian and then pushed it to the upstream developer. | 02:54 |
jrwren | i see. | 02:55 |
jrwren | yes, that is clear now. | 02:55 |
jrwren | thanks. | 02:55 |
wgrant | Remember that LP isn't Ubuntu-specific. If it's not under /ubuntu, it's probably an upstream project. | 02:56 |
=== wgrant changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: wily open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> utopic | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
jrwren | i guess I thought there was bzr+lp magic making the repos the same | 02:56 |
Unit193 | (Though it is heavily geared towards Ubuntu.) | 02:59 |
jrwren | i'm so bummed about this. I wrote a nice MR message and deleted the MR. Can't remember what I wrote. I should sleep instead. | 03:04 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== soee_ is now known as soee | ||
=== gammax90 is now known as gammax | ||
=== a|wen is now known as a|wen- | ||
=== a|wen- is now known as a|wen_ | ||
=== a|wen_ is now known as a|wen |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!