| === mgz is now known as mgz_ | ||
| odin_ | hello, can anyone assist with how to change the URL for automated source code import from remote SCM ? | 14:25 |
|---|---|---|
| odin_ | gitorious.org is no more, so I need to change the import location to point to github.com | 14:26 |
| odin_ | https://code.launchpad.net/~qtjambi-community/qtjambi/master this is the relevant SCM import that is now broken | 14:27 |
| odin_ | also both remote SCM systems are git, can it resync, keeping the BZR revision numbers intact ? | 14:29 |
| dobey | odin_: delete the branch and create a new import | 14:29 |
| dobey | odin_: no, the bzr revno is unrelated to what the git revision numbers are. they are not persistent, and will change at next import, if someone does a rebase on the git master tree for example | 14:30 |
| odin_ | if I delete the branch, there are 10 recipies using it, they still remain intact (but broken) ? | 14:31 |
| odin_ | when I re-create the branch those recipies will start using the changed data ? | 14:31 |
| dobey | odin_: oh no, the recipes will be deleted i think | 14:50 |
| dobey | or they will prevent you from deleting the branch or something | 14:50 |
| dobey | so you might just need to create a new import and then change the recipes to use the new branch | 14:51 |
| dobey | or you might be able to just edit the url | 14:51 |
| dobey | https://code.launchpad.net/~qtjambi-community/qtjambi/master/+edit-import | 14:51 |
| dobey | sometimes it doesn't work so nice, but since they're both still git, it might be doable | 14:52 |
| odin_ | Not allowed here ... https://code.launchpad.net/~qtjambi-community/qtjambi/master/+edit-import | 15:04 |
| dobey | what's the new git URL? | 15:04 |
| cjwatson | It's usually best to create a new import | 15:04 |
| cjwatson | Although | 15:05 |
| cjwatson | odin_: Was the gitorious repository just moved directly to github? | 15:05 |
| cjwatson | Not a reimport or anything? | 15:05 |
| odin_ | moved directly ? yes I believe the history is intact | 15:05 |
| cjwatson | OK, bzr history can stay intact then | 15:06 |
| cjwatson | odin_: Is it https://github.com/qtjambi/qtjambi ? | 15:06 |
| odin_ | does launchpad prefer a git: or https: ? | 15:06 |
| odin_ | yes that is new URL | 15:06 |
| cjwatson | odin_: I've updated it for you | 15:06 |
| dobey | ah | 15:06 |
| dobey | i guess i won't do it then :) | 15:07 |
| cjwatson | https://code.launchpad.net/~qtjambi-community/qtjambi/master shows the latest revisions now | 15:08 |
| odin_ | ah great all looks to be building now, and some much needed maintenance completed (all but fixing build issues) | 15:17 |
| odin_ | updated project to include: utopic, vivid, wily | 15:17 |
| Peng | https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/auditing-github-users-keys <- wonder if anyone's scanned LP | 15:31 |
| odin_ | in "control" file Build-Depends can I use something like "package-name (>= 3.4 || >= 2:0.0 || >= 3:0.0)" ? | 16:08 |
| cjwatson | odin_: That's synonymous with "package-name (>= 3.4)", since 2:0.0 >= 3.4 | 16:10 |
| odin_ | but can I use || expression there ? | 16:10 |
| cjwatson | You could write "package-name (>= 3.4) | package-name (>= 2:0.0) | package-name (>= 3:0.0)", but no point in this case. | 16:10 |
| odin_ | ok understand | 16:11 |
| cjwatson | You can't use | inside the parentheses. | 16:11 |
| odin_ | well my example is contrived, but am trying to understand why packages are listed in http://packages.ubuntu.com/search but not picked up during build | 16:11 |
| cjwatson | It would be easier if you linked to the build | 16:12 |
| odin_ | can I make a build package "optional" ? | 16:14 |
| cjwatson | You can do Build-Depends: foo | base-files | 16:14 |
| cjwatson | Which has much the same effect. It introduces variability which may not be a good idea though | 16:15 |
| jhobbs | are draft inline comments on a MP lost if someone pushes an update to the MP/ | 16:54 |
| jhobbs | yes.. yes they are. | 16:59 |
| dobey | jhobbs: draft? you mean if you reload the page, before hitting the submit button on the comment form? | 17:40 |
| jhobbs | dobey: yeah | 17:41 |
| jhobbs | they are still there if you just reload the page or open it in another window | 17:41 |
| jhobbs | but if someone pushes a new revision of the branch being merged they go away | 17:41 |
| dobey | odd. i'm not quite sure how it is implemented, but i'm guessing your browser cleared the form when the page ETag or whatever changed | 17:42 |
| jhobbs | well, the comments are stored server side, just not published for others to see until you save the comment | 17:43 |
| jhobbs | inline comments specifically, not the textbox contents | 17:43 |
| dobey | they only stored on the server after you submit the form, afaik | 17:44 |
| jhobbs | naw, the inline comments are server side as soon as you add one. just checked and i can see it in firefox when adding in chrome | 17:45 |
| dobey | oh, weird | 17:52 |
| === Nigel_ is now known as G | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!