[01:05] I love ubuntustudio thanks 4 existing [02:35] I just reinstalled Android Studio via terminal along with umake and I'm getting the error that my rendering library is more recent than my version on android studio. The thing is I already have the latest version of Android Studio and I need help on what I need to do next. [02:37] since its not an ubuntu package, youll just have to comply with whatever they require [02:37] i would try main #ubuntu and see if anyone is using the software.. or, maybe a PPA that automatically deals with the issue? [02:37] what's ppa? [02:38] !ppa [02:38] A Personal Package Archive (PPA) can provide alternate software not normally available in the offical Ubuntu repositories - Looking for a PPA? See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas - WARNING: PPAs are unsupported third-party packages, and you use them at your own risk. See also !addppa and !ppa-purge [02:38] oh ok [02:38] its a way for folks to provide software for ubuntu, things that are newer, or not in the repos [02:38] sometimes that can be easier.. [02:39] ok, thanks for the advice === daniel is now known as Guest93200 [05:09] jackd isn't working, neither is alsa. I'm wondering whether or not my sound card is supported. === wook is now known as Guest74581 [16:09] I have an issue guyssss [16:11] I have an error message every time I boot that occurs as soon as I log in [16:12] I'd like to learn a way to fix it [16:12] kris27mc: sure.. share if you would like a volunteer to look at it [16:12] could be, there is nothing broken to "fix".. there are lots of messages. [16:13] It reads "error: -session" [16:13] It doesn't seem to cause any problems, or at least not visibly [16:13] cool.. i would ignore the message [16:17] I have been for some time. But when I try to upgrade all available packages using Synaptic, it fails. And when Software Updater appears, it says it can only perform a partial upgrade. [16:17] kris27mc: i wouldnt assume those are related [16:17] i would close all package manager, and run, in a terminal, "sudo apt-get update" and share errors [16:17] I don't think so either [16:18] if no errors, then, i would run "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" and share errors.. [16:22] Errors while using apt-get update: [16:22] W: GPG error: http://httpredir.debian.org jessie InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8B48AD6246925553 NO_PUBKEY 7638D0442B90D010 [16:22] W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://ftp.utexas.edu/ubuntu/ vivid-backports/restricted amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.utexas.edu_ubuntu_dists_vivid-backports_restricted_binary-amd64_Packages) [16:22] W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://ftp.utexas.edu/ubuntu/ vivid-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.utexas.edu_ubuntu_dists_vivid-backports_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages) [16:22] W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://ftp.utexas.edu/ubuntu/ vivid-backports/restricted i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.utexas.edu_ubuntu_dists_vivid-backports_restricted_binary-i386_Packages) [16:22] !paste [16:22] For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://imgur.com/ !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [16:22] W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://ftp.utexas.edu/ubuntu/ vivid-backports/multiverse i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.utexas.edu_ubuntu_dists_vivid-backports_multiverse_binary-i386_Packages) [16:22] amnyways, i would address those errors, specically [16:22] those are not related to the message at boot, AFAIK [16:23] you have a jessie source added. thats a bad idea [16:23] you have duplicate source entries.. you are geolocated to an ftp at utexas [16:23] if you have installed a bunch of debian packages from that debian source, you likely have a lot of breakage in the system [16:24] if not, you can purge what you have installed, that is not ubuntu, and get a default sources list, and address the apt errors, and go from there [16:24] or, you can fresh install, if you have broken too much of the system [16:28] I haven't installed anything from the Jessie source to my knowledge. I just did a reinstall 3-4 days ago to see if it would prevent the error message. Before then though, I did have the "Wheezy" source, as it was recommended for more recently updated packages [16:29] kris27mc: you are adding debian sources to ubuntu [16:29] kris27mc: so, if you literally have a new install, i say, install again, fresh, and *dont* add debian sources [16:29] I wasn't aware it could be problematic [16:30] its a different operating system [16:30] they dont promise support for ubuntu.. [16:30] That's true [16:30] I apologize for my ignorance [16:31] no worries.. its not super obvious. just can cause your issues [16:32] I would've never thought to do it, but their was a package necessary for another that was found there. I don't recall it, but it obviously wasn't important [16:33] i would address those support concerns here, or #ubuntu [16:33] you can likely work around them, in the default repos.. if you add any sources, its up to the sources to provide the support [16:33] I'll backup my personal data, and just perform a completely clean install. [16:34] i truly think thats the shortest path to you getting "fixed" ubuntu, since, you literally have a new-ish install [16:35] Thank you for the help [16:35] sure.. cheers [16:35] If I'm unsure, I'll make sure to ask someone who knows better than myself [16:36] keep in mind, in linux, those sources are important.. they supply all the software [16:36] you cant easily mix them together.. or, trust all of them [16:38] Before I perform the install though, I think I should redownload the .iso and reinstall it, because my OS was useless on the latest install as the most recent kernel was absent and I was forced to install it through recovery along with other missing packages [16:39] kris27mc: all of ubuntu is frozen.. so,it doenst, and doesnt promise "the most recent kernel" [16:39] sounds like, you are using a bad, or questionable iso [16:39] I just used the iso from the official site [16:39] kris27mc: i say, decide between 14.04 or 15.04, and get them from the official site, and check the md5sum [16:39] !md5 [16:39] To verify your Ubuntu ISO image (or other files for which an MD5 checksum is provided), see http://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM or http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/answers/LQ_ISO/Checking_the_md5sum_in_Windows [16:40] Thank you === joerg is now known as Guest37168 [23:03] Hello all, for some reason, QJackCTL's status bar icon doesn't show the options when I click on it. I can see a few pixels that pop up near the very edge of it, but no actual options show up. All my other status bar icons work fine and show the options, except for QJackCTL [23:08] ObrienDave, what's up [23:08] 6'6" ;P [23:08] Lol. [23:08] you're tall! [23:09] i'm 6'5".... 6'6" is up ;P [23:09] Oh, now I get your joke. Lol. [23:10] for some reason, QJackCTL's status bar icon doesn't show the options when I click on it. I can see a few pixels that pop up near the very edge of it, but no actual options show up. All my other status bar icons work fine and show the options, except for QJackCTL [23:11] i know nothing about jack. never could get it to work right [23:12] Ah. I got it to work just a day ago. I figured it out :D It took about a week to figure out the most stupidest solution ever. [23:12] It was literally the easiest thing in the world to do. Just one small thing. [23:13] I didn't have my sound card selected. It was as simple as selecting my computer's sound card [23:14] oh my, i don't have a SC, maybe i should select the lappy sound [23:15] Lol