| robert_ancell | bregma, I'm updating the metacity package and it changes the soname for libmetacity-private. This means compiz-gnome needs to be rebuilt. Have you done a migration like this before? | 03:38 |
|---|---|---|
| robert_ancell | bregma, bug 1463645 | 03:45 |
| ubot5 | bug 1463645 in compiz (Ubuntu) "Update metacity to 3.16" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1463645 | 03:45 |
| pitti | Good morning | 04:20 |
| didrocks | good morning | 05:56 |
| RAOF | pitti: Good morning! We seem to have some SRU autopkgtests failing due to test environment changes. | 06:14 |
| RAOF | I understand that you're on the hook for doing something about that? :) | 06:15 |
| pitti | RAOF: in trusty mostly, right? | 06:15 |
| RAOF | pitti: Yah. | 06:15 |
| pitti | RAOF: yeah, some of the tests fail because they expect their build dependencies to be installed | 06:15 |
| RAOF | Right. | 06:15 |
| pitti | we could fix them in trusty by SRUing the fixed tests if we care, but for the user that'd be a no-op update | 06:15 |
| pitti | we don't have the old infrastructure any more which ran tests with the null runner | 06:16 |
| RAOF | There was another one that seemed odd; “failed to find parent run by non-root” seemed to be the relevant output. | 06:18 |
| RAOF | But I can't remember which particular adt job that was. | 06:18 |
| pitti | RAOF: haven't seen that one -- is that a jenkins or a test error message? | 06:19 |
| RAOF | It looked like it was an test runner error message. | 06:19 |
| RAOF | It didn't look like it had actually started running the tests. | 06:19 |
| pitti | RAOF: then these should just be retried; might be just another jenkins glitch? | 06:20 |
| RAOF | Might be? It was one of the gvfs rdepend failures, which seemed to have hung around for some time. | 06:20 |
| pitti | RAOF: looking at the trusty gtk+3.0 rdeps | 06:26 |
| pitti | deja-dup: missing dbus-x11 test dep | 06:27 |
| pitti | notify-osd: doesn't say (darn parallel test runner), but presumably missing xvfb or something such (also fixed in utopic and later) | 06:27 |
| pitti | ubuntu-release-upgrader> not sure, there are multiple errors there; "None is not true" doesn't help much | 06:29 |
| pitti | perhaps due to missing at-spi-core or so ("The name org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files", but that's just a warning) | 06:29 |
| pitti | update-manager> 'HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed' | 06:30 |
| pitti | may be due to changed proxy settings; we can't just switch that back either | 06:30 |
| RAOF | Oooh, I downloaded the log! | 06:30 |
| RAOF | http://paste.ubuntu.com/11688382/ is the log with the weird non-root message. | 06:31 |
| RAOF | http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Trusty/view/AutoPkgTest/job/trusty-adt-gvfs/lastBuild/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/ | 06:32 |
| pitti | apport> not sure about that, but it never succeeded in trusty with teh current infrastructure either; needs a test fix backport and closer investigation | 06:32 |
| RAOF | trusty-gvfs | 06:32 |
| sarnold | that's a string from gvfs | 06:32 |
| pitti | gvfs> "Did not find a parent process that runs as non-root"> that was fixed in gvfs-testbed in utopic, needs backport | 06:33 |
| RAOF | Ah, good. | 06:33 |
| pitti | RAOF: ah, so that's what you saw, right | 06:33 |
| RAOF | Yeah. | 06:33 |
| RAOF | It didn't look like it actually got to running a test, but clearly it did. | 06:33 |
| pitti | so, we could fix the tests if/when we SRU these packages, but not sure if we should do SRUs *just* for test fixes | 06:33 |
| pitti | there's loads of them; the current infrastructure wasn't really meant to run trusty tests; we knew that a lot of the ones in trusty were broken and only worked due to the deficiencies of the null runner | 06:34 |
| RAOF | So, we can basically ignore trusty SRU adt failures, then? | 06:35 |
| pitti | the ones which never succeeded since we turned on SRU testing for trusty, yes | 06:36 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 06:36 |
| seb128 | hey pitti RAOF | 06:36 |
| pitti | or, we have to fix them all, but that's a rather large undertaking | 06:36 |
| pitti | bonjour seb128 | 06:36 |
| RAOF | Hey seb128 | 06:36 |
| RAOF | pitti: Can we detect those never-passed ones, and not show them on pending-sru as regressions? | 06:37 |
| didrocks | re seb128 | 06:38 |
| seb128 | re didrocks ;-) | 06:40 |
| pitti | RAOF: replied to the ML | 06:42 |
| pitti | RAOF: yes; preferably through the britney override branch (I think slangasek and bdmurray discussed that yesterday, not sure of the outcome), and if that doesn't work, we can hack the history file | 06:43 |
| RAOF | infinity was also talking about it this morning. | 06:43 |
| pitti | RAOF: e. g. http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Vivid/view/AutoPkgTest/job/vivid-adt-click/ looks like an "honest" regression somewhere | 06:43 |
| pitti | vivid regressions should be fairly real; utopic still has some infrastructure related regressions, trusty's are mostly due to a completely different infra | 06:44 |
| willcooke | morning | 07:22 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke | 07:23 |
| seb128 | hey willcooke | 07:26 |
| didrocks | seb128: 32 bits of visual studio code coming in next ubuntu make release | 07:26 |
| seb128 | didrocks, oh, nice ;-) | 07:26 |
| larsu | bonjour! | 07:28 |
| seb128 | hey larsu | 07:29 |
| didrocks | morning larsu | 07:29 |
| larsu | hi seb128, didrocks! Ça va? | 07:31 |
| pitti | hey willcooke, hello larsu | 07:34 |
| larsu | hi pitti :) | 07:38 |
| larsu | morning willcooke | 07:38 |
| seb128 | larsu, oui, et toi ? | 07:38 |
| larsu | seb128: nickel, merci! | 07:39 |
| Laney | hey hey | 08:02 |
| larsu | morning Laney! | 08:02 |
| Laney | yo dawg | 08:03 |
| Laney | what is up? | 08:03 |
| larsu | sun! | 08:03 |
| larsu | very up | 08:03 |
| Laney | not here | 08:04 |
| larsu | :/ | 08:04 |
| Laney | lend me a bit | 08:04 |
| larsu | come on over | 08:04 |
| Laney | oh yeah good plan | 08:04 |
| Laney | brb plane | 08:04 |
| willcooke | goodly morloade Laney | 08:04 |
| * larsu makes some tea for Laney | 08:04 | |
| Laney | ahoy willcooke | 08:04 |
| seb128 | hey Laney | 08:05 |
| didrocks | hey Mr Laney | 08:05 |
| larsu | pitti: what's responsible for mounting the filesystem writable when /userdata/.writable_image is there? | 08:08 |
| larsu | booting with systemd makes it ro for me again | 08:08 |
| ogra_ | larsu, the initrd | 08:12 |
| larsu | hm, that shouldn't have changed though, right | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | but ! | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | i'm not sure core allows that at all :) | 08:12 |
| ogra_ | your desktop-next is based on core, not touch | 08:13 |
| larsu | talking about tough | 08:13 |
| larsu | *touch | 08:13 |
| ogra_ | ah, k | 08:13 |
| ogra_ | yeah, thats the phone initrd | 08:13 |
| larsu | weird | 08:14 |
| ogra_ | the initrd does the low level partition mounting and feeds all writable paths into fstab ... the boind mounting of the writable b its then happens from whatever processes fstab (mountall, systemd-fstab) | 08:15 |
| Laney | it puts something in kmsg | 08:15 |
| Laney | mounting or mounting in developer mode or something | 08:15 |
| Laney | so you can see if it reads the file right | 08:15 |
| ogra_ | so i guess systemd-fstab behaves a little different to mountall here | 08:15 |
| ogra_ | (or you end uzp with the writable partition in fstab, which shouldnt be the case) | 08:16 |
| ogra_ | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch/wily/view/head:/scripts/touch#L316 | 08:19 |
| larsu | ogra_: thanks! fstab lists the rootfs as ro, even though writable_image is there | 08:20 |
| larsu | Laney: nothing of the sort.. | 08:20 |
| ogra_ | larsu, with a partition name ? | 08:21 |
| larsu | no, /dev/root | 08:21 |
| ogra_ | /dev/root / rootfs defaults,ro 0 0 is fine | 08:21 |
| larsu | but then there should be something mounting / as rw? | 08:22 |
| * ogra_ must admit he hasnt used writable by default in ages ... remounting rw for the moment i need it feels a lot cleaner | 08:22 | |
| larsu | fair enough :) | 08:22 |
| ogra_ | but our tests that run for every build are all on writable devices | 08:23 |
| ogra_ | (the CI automation stuff too) | 08:23 |
| larsu | ya, it worked fine until I linked /sbin/init to systemd | 08:24 |
| * larsu is trying to find the cause now | 08:24 | |
| ogra_ | as Laney said, check dmesg for "initrd: mounting system.img (image developer mode)" | 08:24 |
| ogra_ | to make sure the initrd side is fine | 08:24 |
| larsu | ya, it doesn't say this | 08:25 |
| ogra_ | wow, thats weird | 08:25 |
| ogra_ | what phone is that ? | 08:25 |
| Laney | "(user mode)" seems to be the other case | 08:25 |
| larsu | nexus 4 | 08:25 |
| ogra_ | /sbin/init doesnt have any effect at that point in the boot | 08:26 |
| pitti | larsu: hm, I don't know I'm afraid | 08:26 |
| ogra_ | (or, well, shouldnt have :P ) | 08:26 |
| larsu | ogra_: I did a dist-upgrade as well, maybe this isn't init's fault. let me check | 08:27 |
| ogra_ | urgh | 08:27 |
| larsu | so ya, I get that message in dmesg now | 08:34 |
| * larsu <- confused | 08:36 | |
| Laney | pitti: have you seen the chromium-browser autopkgtest failure (ENOSPC)? any way the node can get some more space? | 09:26 |
| pitti | Laney: FYI, for your upower build, I'm on the broken umockdev | 09:26 |
| Laney | hah | 09:26 |
| Laney | hello! | 09:26 |
| Laney | I'm fixing the gjs (real) failure right now, F*Y*I :) | 09:27 |
| pitti | I'm waiting on LP to import 0.8.10-2 from Debian, then I'll sync, and the tests should be happy again | 09:27 |
| pitti | Laney: LibO fails on that as well, looking | 09:27 |
| * Laney blehs at people disabling testsuites | 09:27 | |
| Laney | s/disabling/|| true-ing/ | 09:27 |
| seb128 | libO keeps sending "dual jenkins emails" | 09:28 |
| seb128 | it fails | 09:28 |
| seb128 | or it's fixed | 09:28 |
| seb128 | it fails | 09:28 |
| seb128 | oh it's fixed | 09:28 |
| seb128 | ... | 09:28 |
| pitti | hm, neither / nor /run/shm is full on alderamin | 09:28 |
| Laney | it's failed on wazn and aldebaran too | 09:29 |
| Laney | seems systemic | 09:29 |
| pitti | perhaps they have finally exceeded our default VM size of 10G | 09:29 |
| pitti | err, 50G | 09:30 |
| Laney | surely not | 09:30 |
| pitti | but that would be gross | 09:30 |
| pitti | hm, wait | 09:31 |
| pitti | none 16G 200M 16G 2% /run/shm | 09:31 |
| pitti | jibel: ^ didn't these machines use to have 64G? | 09:31 |
| pitti | Laney: ok, that might be it; running locally to confirm, but it seems somehow these machines lost a lot of RAM | 09:33 |
| pitti | Laney: so I guess I'll invent an override mechamism to run these big packages on an overlay in /tmp/ instead of /run/shm/ | 09:33 |
| davmor2 | pitti: did you repartition? | 09:33 |
| pitti | davmor2: no, I don't have root on these machines, and partitions are fine | 09:34 |
| davmor2 | pitti: meh sorry something else all together | 09:34 |
| pitti | hah, we already have that mechanism | 09:35 |
| pitti | ./etc/adt.d/linux:USESHM=false | 09:35 |
| pitti | ./etc/adt.d/libreoffice:USESHM=false | 09:35 |
| * pitti will enable that for chromium-browser then; but why did libo fail then | 09:36 | |
| pitti | http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Wily/view/AutoPkgTest/job/wily-adt-chromium-browser/lastBuild/ARCH=i386,label=adt/consoleText definitively has -o /run/shm | 09:36 |
| pitti | but http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Wily/view/AutoPkgTest/job/wily-adt-libreoffice/lastBuild/ARCH=i386,label=adt/consoleText doesn't | 09:36 |
| pitti | jibel: ah, wazn and albali do have a 32 G /run/shm, so I guess alderamin just never had | 09:40 |
| jibel | pitti, yeah, alramin was the only machine with only 32G of RAM | 10:00 |
| jibel | alderamin* | 10:00 |
| pitti | jibel: I added USESHM=no for chromium-browser and re-ran; stil not sure about libo, I'm investigating | 10:01 |
| pitti | bah | 10:01 |
| pitti | http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Wily/view/AutoPkgTest/job/wily-adt-chromium-browser/39/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/consoleFull | 10:01 |
| pitti | same "disk full" without /run/shm/, so that isn't it | 10:02 |
| pitti | and running this locally on alderamin works fine | 10:02 |
| jibel | pitti, with the same base VM? | 10:04 |
| pitti | yes; re-running the exact command from the jenkins run now, with -proposed | 10:04 |
| pitti | and watching df in the VM | 10:04 |
| pitti | tmpfs 2.0G 69M 1.9G 4% /tmp | 10:05 |
| pitti | hah! that would be it | 10:06 |
| pitti | Laney: ack, looking at that; auto-mounting /tmp as tmpfs seems to be from systemd 220, seems our patch to not do that doesn't work any more | 10:07 |
| === CrazyMelon is now known as CrazyLemon | ||
| Laney | pitti: ah, right, so it's at least a real regression somewhere | 10:28 |
| * Laney wonders why shotwell started failing in the same way again | 10:28 | |
| Laney | passes on my real system :( | 10:28 |
| pitti | Laney: umockdev | 10:28 |
| pitti | Laney: libudev 220 changed behaviour a bit, umockdev needs to follow along | 10:28 |
| Laney | ah | 10:28 |
| pitti | Laney: should reproduce with --apt-pocket=proposed -U | 10:28 |
| Laney | probably; I just ran d/t/... | 10:29 |
| Laney | is that breaking gvfs too? | 10:29 |
| Laney | I wish adt-run would say in which way test-deps are unsatisfiable | 10:31 |
| pitti | Laney: it usually does | 10:42 |
| pitti | Laney: well, it calls apt-get with Debug::pkgProblemResolver | 10:42 |
| pitti | that isn't very readable I'm afraid | 10:42 |
| pitti | but at least it's there | 10:42 |
| pitti | Laney: gvfs> yes, the Gphoto test uses umockdev too | 10:42 |
| pitti | Laney: and ubuntu-drivers-common | 10:43 |
| Laney | pitti: ah, right, yes - the output is further up | 10:43 |
| Laney | it's readable if you know how - for kde-gtk-config it's quite simple looking anyway. :) | 10:44 |
| seb128 | Laney, can you retry desktopnext cdimage build? | 11:20 |
| Laney | ok | 11:20 |
| seb128 | thanks | 11:20 |
| Laney | I'm goign to set up this team | 11:20 |
| Laney | (later) | 11:20 |
| seb128 | Laney, thanks | 11:30 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| seb128 | Laney, oh, I forgot to follow up after the meeting yesterday about those gnome-shell-extensions/gtk, what was that? | 11:54 |
| seb128 | Laney, also you retried desktop-next on amd64 only? | 11:55 |
| seb128 | mvo, livecd-rootfs 500-move-kernel-to-device-tar.binary has its name on it ... maybe you can help there :-) | 11:56 |
| seb128 | mvo, " cp -ar boot/vmlinu?-* $TMPDIR/assets/vmlinuz", where is that boot/ coming from? | 11:56 |
| seb128 | it fails on amd64 for desktop-next with | 11:57 |
| seb128 | "+ cp -ar boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-20-generic boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-20-generic.efi.signed /tmp/tmp.WKlc3yv5h0/assets/vmlinuz | 11:57 |
| seb128 | cp: target '/tmp/tmp.WKlc3yv5h0/assets/vmlinuz' is not a directory | 11:57 |
| seb128 | E: config/hooks/500-move-kernel-to-device-tar.binary failed (exit non-zero). You should check for errors." | 11:57 |
| seb128 | I guess there is a /boot/vmlinuz, should we mkdir mkdir -p $TMPDIR/assets/vmlinuz before the cp then? | 11:57 |
| seb128 | hum, that's a stupid suggestion :p | 11:58 |
| seb128 | I guess that's not mean to be a dir | 11:58 |
| seb128 | so the issue is likely that we have several matches for vmlinu?-* | 11:58 |
| Laney | seb128: the others are going to fail no? | 11:59 |
| seb128 | likely due to the uefi variant | 11:59 |
| Laney | oh wait, it'is i386 that works | 11:59 |
| seb128 | Laney, yes | 11:59 |
| Laney | teehee | 11:59 |
| seb128 | Laney, i386 is the one I'm interested in ;-) | 11:59 |
| seb128 | that's the one that builds | 11:59 |
| Laney | gtk> test regressions to fix first | 11:59 |
| seb128 | k | 11:59 |
| Laney | that's what I was talking about with p itti | 11:59 |
| Laney | great fun | 11:59 |
| mvo | seb128: from the kernel we install in our livecd-rootfs | 11:59 |
| mvo | seb128: do you guys install a kernel too? | 12:00 |
| Laney | ok i386 going | 12:00 |
| seb128 | Laney, thanks :-) | 12:00 |
| seb128 | mvo, I guess we do :-) unsure why/how though, that image should be similar to ubuntu-core, just with extra seeded binaries | 12:01 |
| seb128 | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.wily/view/head:/desktop#L64 doesn't include linux-* | 12:01 |
| mvo | seb128: I think we don't do it via the seeds, irrc its black magic | 12:02 |
| mvo | seb128: hold on a sec | 12:02 |
| seb128 | mvo, yeah, I just don't understand that magic, I'm a muggle ;-) | 12:03 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| mvo | seb128: I think you need to set KERNEL_FLAVOURS some lines earlier, I can add that for you | 12:05 |
| ogra_ | yeah, it isnt handled by seeds | 12:06 |
| ogra_ | comes from a live-build var | 12:06 |
| seb128 | mvo, ogra_, how/why is that different between ubuntu-core and ubuntu-desktop-next? | 12:06 |
| seb128 | they have the same livecd-rootfs hooks basically | 12:06 |
| ogra_ | seb128, not sure, let me take a look | 12:06 |
| seb128 | ogra_, thanks | 12:06 |
| ogra_ | (i havent touched core before) | 12:06 |
| ogra_ | (at least on that level) | 12:06 |
| mvo | seb128: I don't know, I don't know why it wasn't added it to desktop-next | 12:07 |
| seb128 | well, for sure they are different | 12:07 |
| seb128 | mvo, is it in ubuntu-core? | 12:07 |
| mvo | seb128: but really, this code-duplication that we need is bothering me (quite a lot) | 12:07 |
| mvo | seb128: one sec, let me point you at the code line | 12:07 |
| seb128 | mvo, yeah, me too, I tried to symlink those hooks yesterday but build failed then | 12:07 |
| seb128 | "cp: cannot stat 'config/hooks/03-boot_with_systemd.chroot': No such file or directory" | 12:07 |
| mvo | seb128: well, its ok for now, but longer^Wshoter term this is becoming a nightmare | 12:08 |
| seb128 | right | 12:08 |
| seb128 | need to fix that | 12:08 |
| mvo | seb128: not blaming you :) | 12:08 |
| mvo | seb128: don't get me wrong, the tools just have not kept up with the task we now throw at them | 12:08 |
| seb128 | I've to admit I didn't sit down trying to understand the livecd-rootfs details | 12:08 |
| seb128 | I'm just poking around | 12:08 |
| mvo | seb128: *cough* I doubt many people do | 12:08 |
| ogra_ | seb128, line 412 in live-build/auto/config adds the kernel | 12:09 |
| ogra_ | OPTS="${OPTS:+$OPTS }--linux-packages=linux-image" | 12:09 |
| ogra_ | seb128, i guess you want to add "ubuntu-desktop-next" to the case in line 368 | 12:10 |
| seb128 | ogra_, ok, good spot, thanks | 12:12 |
| seb128 | mvo, thanks as well ;-) | 12:12 |
| ogra_ | :) | 12:12 |
| mvo | ogra_: well, if we do that they will not install recommends anymore | 12:14 |
| ogra_ | oh, right | 12:14 |
| mvo | ogra_: so we need another if ! ubuntu-core | 12:14 |
| ogra_ | then you want to duplicate the whole thing or some such | 12:14 |
| mvo | ogra_: which is frankly all terrible and spahgeetty | 12:14 |
| seb128 | ogra_, mvo: in fact it seems didrocks did that | 12:14 |
| seb128 | ogra_, mvo, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/trunk/view/head:/live-build/auto/config#L206 | 12:14 |
| seb128 | l220 | 12:15 |
| seb128 | OPTS="${OPTS:+$OPTS }--linux-packages=linux-image" | 12:15 |
| mvo | seb128: I'm not sure thats enough, it may need KERNEL_FLAVOURS, but again I don't know the ins/outs | 12:15 |
| seb128 | mvo, so adding a " KERNEL_FLAVOURS=generic" line? | 12:16 |
| ogra_ | it definitely needs more additions now that you are snappy based | 12:16 |
| mvo | ogra_: meh, sorry, I don't want to come across negative, the or thing is probably a good start, we could move the other ubuntu-desktop-next after ubuntu-core and override the apt recommends to true again | 12:16 |
| seb128 | ogra_, like? | 12:16 |
| mvo | still not great but if its close together and we add a comment it would be ok I guess? | 12:17 |
| ogra_ | seb128, look at the ubuntu-core stuff ... | 12:17 |
| ogra_ | while you dont want the dropping of recommends it adds a ton of extra packages etc | 12:17 |
| seb128 | ogra_, well, it mostly install packages, that we don't need because our seed is complete/has recommends | 12:17 |
| mvo | I really wish we had somthing declarative where you can say "project ubuntu-desktop-next(ubuntu-core):\n apt_recommends = true\nextra_package += ["foo", "bar"] | 12:18 |
| ogra_ | seb128, add_package install ubuntu-snappy ... and the like | 12:18 |
| ogra_ | also enabling universe for system-image-cli | 12:19 |
| ogra_ | etc etc | 12:19 |
| seb128 | ogra_, but ubuntu-snappy is installed, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208626439/livecd.ubuntu-desktop-next.manifest | 12:19 |
| ogra_ | ah, k | 12:19 |
| ogra_ | well, all i mean is you should go over all the lines there and see that you end up with the same bits installed | 12:19 |
| seb128 | right, we added those to our desktop seed | 12:19 |
| seb128 | unsure why core is not doing that | 12:20 |
| seb128 | like | 12:20 |
| seb128 | " | 12:20 |
| seb128 | # some workarounds because the seeds are not quite | 12:20 |
| seb128 | # corrent at the moment | 12:20 |
| seb128 | add_package install dbus" | 12:20 |
| Laney | seems to just be the flavour thing | 12:20 |
| seb128 | I don't understand why that needs to be there as a hack | 12:20 |
| ogra_ | dropped recommends ? | 12:21 |
| ogra_ | though yeah, one could have seeded that :) | 12:21 |
| seb128 | couldn't dbus be seeded? | 12:21 |
| * ogra_ has no idea why it wasnt | 12:21 | |
| seb128 | yeah :-) | 12:21 |
| ogra_ | perhaps because you dont want it in certain images | 12:21 |
| ogra_ | cloud ? | 12:21 |
| ogra_ | hmm, no, its in the generic part of the code | 12:22 |
| Laney | is there an ubuntu-core seed? | 12:23 |
| Laney | I think this SUBPROJECT thing is because there is ubuntu-core and ubuntu-core-system-image | 12:23 |
| Laney | yes indeed, there is | 12:24 |
| Laney | so maybe this can be cleaned up now? | 12:24 |
| Laney | also the broken indentation in that block makes me twitch | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | well, ubuntu-core still builds the ubuntu-core tarballs on cdimage | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | which are used by many projects as cheap chroots | 12:26 |
| Laney | yes | 12:26 |
| ogra_ | (and i agree about the indendation) | 12:27 |
| seb128 | Laney, it's a vcs and you have commit access, feel free to fix the indent ;-) | 12:28 |
| Laney | I am doing | 12:29 |
| seb128 | cool | 12:29 |
| Laney | done, please pull | 12:32 |
| Laney | mvo: It looks like you've not got LP generating Task: for your seed - intentional? | 12:37 |
| Laney | I think it'd be feasible to move those manual installations there and then we could merge the desktop-next and core bits | 12:37 |
| Laney | at least that block | 12:37 |
| Laney | Maybe there's a project I can file a bug on? :) | 12:38 |
| mvo | Laney: hm, I have Task headers for some bits, no? what am I missing :) ? | 12:49 |
| Laney | mvo: e.g. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-core.wily/view/head:/core-libs-dev don't have them | 12:58 |
| mvo | Laney: oh,core-libs-dev will go away, sorry. task: ubuntu-core is the one we use | 12:59 |
| Laney | Maybe so, but those packages don't have Task headers which indicates that ubuntu-core isn't being processed | 12:59 |
| mvo | Laney: a while ago there was this idea to have core-libs/core-libs-dev so just like ubuntu-sdk-libs/ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev so that we can re-use the click chroots environment. but that never got enaywhere | 13:00 |
| Laney | it needs to be in lp:ubuntu-archive-publishing scripts/cron.germinate | 13:00 |
| mvo | Laney: there are a bunch of packages with a ubuntu-core header, no? | 13:00 |
| * mvo is probably confused | 13:00 | |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| Laney | mvo: Seems to come from ubuntu.wily/system-image seed | 13:04 |
| Laney | is that your thing? | 13:04 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| rickspencer3 | didrocks, so, ironically, I think I am getting punished for not using umake | 13:22 |
| rickspencer3 | I tried writing some Go code and go build kept complaining that certain members weren't in a certain class | 13:23 |
| rickspencer3 | I assume this is because I have an out of date Go from the archives and need to use ubuntu make to get the fresh stuff ;) | 13:23 |
| didrocks | rickspencer3: not sure if I should \o/ in some way :p | 13:25 |
| rickspencer3 | lol | 13:25 |
| rickspencer3 | didrocks, brace yourself, I may come back and ask for help with umake :) | 13:26 |
| * didrocks is away for a long long time ;) | 13:26 | |
| davmor2 | didrocks: not sure that's what rickspencer3 meant when he said brace yourself :p | 13:28 |
| didrocks | davmor2: I will argue "ENOTNATIVESPEAKER" | 13:28 |
| davmor2 | hahaha | 13:30 |
| Sweet5hark1 | didrocks: that one is always helpful | 13:30 |
| davmor2 | didrocks: you speak better English than I do French so that doesn't wash sorry ;) | 13:31 |
| mvo | Laney: yes | 13:32 |
| mvo | Laney: sorry for the delay, meeting | 13:33 |
| Laney | no worries | 13:33 |
| didrocks | davmor2: what do you mean? j/k ;) | 13:33 |
| Laney | larsu: do you want to try to get https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/ubuntu-themes/overlay-scrollbars in? | 13:39 |
| * Laney hasn't tried it yet, mind | 13:39 | |
| seb128 | Laney, that has issues, progressbar have no bg with it | 13:40 |
| * seb128 tried it | 13:40 | |
| Laney | oh right, did you report that already? | 13:40 |
| seb128 | IRC report :p | 13:40 |
| seb128 | larsu confirmed/said he would have a look | 13:40 |
| Laney | ok | 13:41 |
| larsu | what seb128 said | 13:44 |
| seb128 | oh, other gtk316 issue | 13:45 |
| seb128 | in nautilus sidebar, the equivalent of ~1.3 rows of space is empty at the bottom | 13:46 |
| seb128 | http://people.canonical.com/~seb128/nautilus.png | 13:47 |
| seb128 | oh, also | 13:47 |
| seb128 | gnome-tetravex: /usr/@DATADIRNAME@ | 13:47 |
| seb128 | wth! | 13:48 |
| * seb128 looks at that | 13:48 | |
| larsu | looks like the undershoot rule doesn't apply there... | 13:51 |
| seb128 | larsu, speaking about which issue? | 13:51 |
| seb128 | weird, the gnome-tetravex debs in Debian don't have the issue and we are in sync | 13:51 |
| seb128 | different intltool or something? | 13:52 |
| larsu | seb128: nautilus | 13:52 |
| seb128 | larsu, undershoot, is that having to do with the scrolling overshoot? | 13:53 |
| seb128 | or...? | 13:53 |
| seb128 | do you see the issue as well? | 13:53 |
| larsu | seb128: yes, undershoot is when there's more content at an edge. I see the issue too (haven't until now because my nautilus is usually large enough) | 13:54 |
| Laney | seb128: can you file a "gtk316" bug so it doesn't get lost? | 13:54 |
| * Laney has trying the 3.16 update on the list | 13:54 | |
| larsu | gtk316 assignee:larsu :( | 13:54 |
| Laney | maybe that fixes it :) | 13:54 |
| Laney | jhbuild run nautilus doesn't work :( | 13:55 |
| larsu | Laney: is the nautilus on your system still running? | 13:56 |
| seb128 | larsu, Laney, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1463848 | 13:56 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1463848 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "[gtk 3.16] sidebar has unused space at the bottom" [Undecided,New] | 13:56 |
| larsu | seb128: thanks | 13:57 |
| Laney | thx | 13:57 |
| seb128 | yw! | 13:58 |
| Laney | larsu: I quit it first, it's an assertion failure | 13:58 |
| larsu | uh oh | 13:58 |
| * Laney tries the 3-16 branch | 13:59 | |
| seb128 | is calling nautilus -q or nautilus from a command line also giving you | 13:59 |
| seb128 | gtk_icon_theme_get_for_screen: assertion 'GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed | 13:59 |
| seb128 | GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance | 13:59 |
| seb128 | g_signal_connect_object: assertion 'G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed | 13:59 |
| Laney | no | 14:00 |
| seb128 | :-/ | 14:01 |
| seb128 | Laney, can you retry deskotp-next on amd64? want to see if the livecd-rootfs update made a difference there | 14:57 |
| seb128 | Laney, I see what you are trying to do :p | 15:10 |
| seb128 | thanks | 15:10 |
| Laney | fail | 15:10 |
| Laney | I guess I have to still do it >:( | 15:10 |
| seb128 | meanwhile can you start a build? I would like to see the result before going off for tennis in ~1.5 hours | 15:11 |
| Laney | running | 15:11 |
| seb128 | thanks | 15:11 |
| popey | willcooke: in your mail you suggested installing unity8 on desktop, what method would you recommend? (I'm on Wily on my Intel laptop) | 15:18 |
| popey | willcooke: tbh I'd rather not install on my main machine simply because then it means flip / flopping between two sessions (unity7 and 8) | 15:19 |
| popey | willcooke: would way rather have a machine dedicated to this so I can continue working / file bugs / build clicks etc on main machine while doing testing on second machine. | 15:19 |
| willcooke | and we'd rather not rework everything we've done to get the U8 snappy image out ;) | 15:19 |
| popey | well it was clearly prematurely expired, surely? given we have a requirement for click based desktop | 15:20 |
| willcooke | who is we? | 15:21 |
| willcooke | How about this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity8inLXC | 15:21 |
| popey | that is broken here :( | 15:21 |
| popey | i get a blank screen when i login to that unity8 session | 15:22 |
| willcooke | is blank screen this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8-lxc/+bug/1383497 | 15:23 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1383497 in unity8-lxc (Ubuntu) "TTY switching does not work when running Unity8 in the LXC" [Medium,Confirmed] | 15:23 |
| seb128 | popey, we never had a click based desktop and I don't see how that would work, click is a good simplified format to distribute apps, it's not something you build a desktop from | 15:23 |
| popey | I dont mean click distributed desktop | 15:23 |
| popey | I mean, a desktop build which is similar in setup to the phone build | 15:23 |
| popey | which is based off debian packages and click packages | 15:23 |
| popey | which I truncated as "click based" sorry. | 15:24 |
| seb128 | desktop-next was not different from install unity-desktop-session-mir on your normal wily and logging into that from the login manager | 15:24 |
| seb128 | why can't you just do that? | 15:24 |
| seb128 | installing* | 15:24 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|errands | ||
| willcooke | qengho, you around? | 15:37 |
| seb128 | mvo, same error with the kernel flavor set :-/ | 16:16 |
| seb128 | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208754412/buildlog_ubuntu_wily_amd64_ubuntu-desktop-next_BUILDING.txt.gz | 16:16 |
| seb128 | cp: target '/tmp/tmp.nawPuZ1kD7/assets/vmlinuz' is not a directory | 16:16 |
| seb128 | cp -ar boot/vmlinu?-* $TMPDIR/assets/vmlinuz | 16:17 |
| seb128 | wonder if the *uefi/signed variants don't make several matches to "boot/vmlinu?-*" | 16:17 |
| seb128 | should have added a ls debug line in there, I was pondering doing that for that upload | 16:18 |
| === ejat is now known as ejat- | ||
| === alan_g|errands is now known as alan_g | ||
| * willcooke -> EOD | 17:37 | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| mvo | seb128: meh, :( is the script run with set -ex ? but I guess thats not helpful | 18:22 |
| mvo | seb128: we really need a livecd-rootfs that can run locally | 18:22 |
| mvo | (IMNSHO) | 18:22 |
| ogra_ | mvo, i was pondering to update rootstock-ng ... that runs it locally | 18:26 |
| mvo | ogra_: I wonder if there is anything that blocks getting that support for upstream livecd-rootfs | 18:27 |
| ogra_ | mvo, it is a complex setup if you want to do the same as the buildd does (stacked chroots in onion model) | 18:28 |
| mvo | ogra_: right, still… | 18:28 |
| ogra_ | mvo, well, there is the BuildLiveCD.sh script upstream | 18:30 |
| mvo | ogra_: aha, part of live-build? | 18:30 |
| ogra_ | which is essentially the thing that gets executed on the buildd | 18:30 |
| ogra_ | no, part of livecd-rootfs | 18:30 |
| ogra_ | but that doesnt help you since you need to first get the setup in place that LP does when provisioning the buildd | 18:31 |
| ogra_ | (which is what rootstock-ng does) | 18:31 |
| mvo | ogra_: yeah, I write some code for this a long time ago and then it didn't get anywhere and I lost interesst :/ but everytime I need to debug a failure I whish I hadn't | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | mvo, well, as i said, its probably just 10min of work to update rootstock-ng and make it build wily images (and to build core instead of the hardcoded touch) | 18:33 |
| ogra_ | i wrote it in a way (explicitly) to not be a generic tool | 18:33 |
| ogra_ | would just need some generalizing again | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | "funny" how we keep having this same issue over and over and over | 18:49 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 18:58 |
| Noskcaj | Laney, Would you mind syncing gjs from exp now you've uploaded it to there? | 20:49 |
| Laney | I'm certainly going to do that, can't right now though | 20:49 |
| Noskcaj | ok | 20:50 |
| Laney | LP needs to know about it first | 20:52 |
| robert_ancell | Laney, I was about to track down how to sort out the libpeas / Debian Python issue - thanks for doing that. | 23:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
