| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| Mirv | mandel: so doko reported the ciborium problem is about porting it to the next qml go version (this might be obvious to you, but not to me since I didn't understand the build failure..) | 04:57 |
|---|---|---|
| robru | Mirv: sil2100 during your shift today can you find a core dev to ack 31? Happened right at my EOD and all US was gone by then. | 06:40 |
| sil2100 | robru: sure, thanks for the notice :) | 06:55 |
| robru | sil2100: you're welcome! Goodnight | 06:56 |
| Mirv | robru: yeah, I was thinking about that already | 07:03 |
| Mirv | robru: goodnight | 07:04 |
| Mirv | it's just that at early EU hours not too many core devs are around | 07:04 |
| Mirv | sil2100: uh oh, possible complication. there's a vivid-proposed upload with same version number https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/0.9.10.0-4ubuntu15.2 | 07:05 |
| Mirv | it does not affect the images immediately, especially as it has been in -proposed for a month already, so we can publish the current package to overlay | 07:06 |
| Mirv | it has failed SRU verification but still these cases might bite us at some point | 07:06 |
| === chunsang is now known as chunsang-away | ||
| sil2100 | Mirv: yeah, I think in this case we might need to start using some overlay-specific versioning scheme | 07:23 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: otherwise there's always a way it would bite us | 07:23 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, hey, can you reconfig silo4 please? I've added a tiny branch for the address book app to not allow rotating | 08:13 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: on it :) | 08:13 |
| sil2100 | The silo is dual-landing, right? | 08:13 |
| mzanetti | yes | 08:14 |
| mzanetti | all the dependencies should be ok now | 08:14 |
| mzanetti | I *really* hope | 08:14 |
| sil2100 | I think everything should be in place indeed | 08:15 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, I only need to build address-book-app right, no need to rebuild all the others because of the reconfig if they weren't dirty? | 08:17 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: exactly | 08:17 |
| mzanetti | ack. doing | 08:17 |
| mzanetti | let's get this beast landed today! | 08:18 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: if the others were clean before that is! i.e. nothing made the silo 'dirty' | 08:18 |
| mzanetti | yep | 08:18 |
| mzanetti | the last rebuild was yesterday night after the apps landed, nothing else landed | 08:18 |
| mandel | Mirv, sorry, I'm out today, I'm full of drugs after my wisdom teeth were removed | 08:30 |
| Mirv | mandel: ok! | 08:42 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, is it normal that the silo build log says "Dependency wait" while the ppa says "failure because of the dep wait"? | 10:15 |
| mzanetti | https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-1-build/197/console | 10:15 |
| mzanetti | https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-004/+packages | 10:15 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: looking | 10:15 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: eh... looks like vivid is missing another thing | 10:16 |
| sil2100 | hmmm | 10:16 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, libunity-api-dev, right? | 10:16 |
| sil2100 | But that's REALLY strand | 10:16 |
| cjwatson | mzanetti: It's normal that that shows up with an X icon; whether it's a failure or not depends on your point of view | 10:16 |
| sil2100 | *strange | 10:16 |
| mzanetti | that's in the silo too | 10:16 |
| cjwatson | mzanetti: Not Only as of recently | 10:17 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: let me retry, maybe it didn't pick up the dep appearing | 10:17 |
| mzanetti | I think the armhf build just gave up too quickly because it needed to build unity-api | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | It hasn't given up | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | dep-waits are auto-retried when the dep is available | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | But out of cron, so there's a delay | 10:18 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, sometimes it can take a while, so I usually poke it manually then | 10:18 |
| mzanetti | oh... now it builds | 10:18 |
| cjwatson | It would have sorted itself out, but retrying manually is fine | 10:18 |
| sil2100 | I poked it manually, should be fine now | 10:18 |
| mzanetti | ah ok... yeah, just the red cross confused me | 10:18 |
| sil2100 | No worries, it's a normal thing, I was worried we didn't have the right libunity-api-dev version in vivid | 10:19 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, same for unity8 armhf btw... if you can poke that too, otherwise I'll just wait, no prob | 10:19 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: done, let's say how it goes | 10:19 |
| mzanetti | ta | 10:19 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, erm... which version do I pick for the gles-sync in a dual landing silo? | 10:27 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: the upstream one I would suppose, why do you ask? | 10:27 |
| mzanetti | because there are two, 14.10 and 15.04 | 10:28 |
| mzanetti | erm. 15.04 and 15.10 | 10:30 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, but just always target the upstream versions, i.e. if there's a version of 1.2+15.10.20150606-0ubuntu1, simply be sure to target the main upstream part, 1.2 | 10:31 |
| sil2100 | This means you'll have to bump the upstream version number whenever the API changes or there's something distinctive | 10:32 |
| mzanetti | ah ok. thanks | 10:33 |
| john-mcaleely | sil2100, what's the status of the ota-4 build? | 10:33 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: ping :) | 10:34 |
| sil2100 | john-mcaleely: we need to publish silo 31, on it now | 10:34 |
| john-mcaleely | so, QA is all done? | 10:34 |
| sil2100 | john-mcaleely: for silo 31 yes, then we copy it to snapshot, build an image, QA do some checks and I suppose we're good to go | 10:35 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: could you take a look at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-031-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/network-manager_packaging_changes.diff ? | 10:35 |
| john-mcaleely | ah, yes, makes sense | 10:35 |
| john-mcaleely | good to know, thanks | 10:35 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, ACK | 10:36 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 10:36 |
| sil2100 | THanks | 10:36 |
| Mirv | mandel: holy ... I may have accidentally been able to port ciborium to go qml.v1 .. https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ciborium/port_to_qml.v1/+merge/261707 could you take a look when you are back in ranks? | 10:40 |
| Mirv | if it's anywhere near what should have been done, I will be surprised. I was also surprised when bzr bd ran, unit tests passed and package was created | 10:44 |
| * Mirv is very trusting in his Go skills | 10:44 | |
| sil2100 | jibel: do you know if Pat wanted anything else in OTA-4? | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | Or is it ok for me to start doing magic tricks to build an image? | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: I'll be doing some build related magic for OTA-4 now | 11:21 |
| ogra_ | fine | 11:21 |
| sil2100 | ogra_, slangasek: just so you're aware... what I did is, disabled the importer, reconfigured the 14.09-factory-proposed channel to look for the vivid cdimage builds (and use tarballs from the respectful rc-proposed channels) and disabled the rootfs part of the rc-proposed/ubuntu channel | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | I did that for a one-time run | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | This way, once I build now an image from the snapshot PPA, the rootfs will only be picked up by 14.09-factory-proposed | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | We will use it as the final OTA-4 candidate | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | Once it's built, I'll run the importer, then modify the config back to the previous state and build a new rc-proposed image | 11:23 |
| sil2100 | I did all this mambo-jumbo so that we don't have a strange image in rc-proposed and that we can have the snapshotted one only in 14.09-factory-proposed | 11:23 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: sounds fine? (and overly unnecessarily complicated?) | 11:24 |
| ogra_ | sinds fine, yes | 11:25 |
| ogra_ | *sounds | 11:25 |
| ogra_ | not sure it is overly compilcated :) | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | Ok then, double-checking everything and running the build | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | Build running | 11:35 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| jibel | popey, are you not allowed to add lines to the spreadsheet? | 11:41 |
| popey | not last time i tried jibel | 11:43 |
| sil2100 | jibel: I usually help out and fill in the info as needed as well | 11:43 |
| sil2100 | I think popey has access | 11:43 |
| popey | \o/ | 11:44 |
| popey | now, what's the url :) | 11:44 |
| sil2100 | popey: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain has always the latest ;) | 11:44 |
| popey | thanks! | 11:44 |
| jibel | popey, add requests for click apps to the 'Tarballs and Clicks' tab | 11:45 |
| popey | sweet, will do that from now on thanks! | 11:45 |
| sil2100 | I added this one entry already :) | 11:45 |
| sil2100 | Normally just copy-paste the info to the right places as what you sent out by e-mail and poke us, we'll approve it as a landing | 11:46 |
| popey | k | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: hey! I'm building the final OTA-4 candidate | 11:50 |
| sil2100 | pmcgowan: I set 14.09-factory-proposed as the target for this image, it's being built from the stable-snapshot PPA - we have the 2G->3G fix in it | 11:50 |
| sil2100 | I'll take a bit to finish, I'll be jumping out for lunch as well but I suppose it'll finish around when I'm back | 11:51 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| davmor2 | jibel: I'm assuming once sil2100 has finished this we need to cover the ota tests right? | 11:52 |
| sil2100 | davmor2: I suppose the OTA tests will have to be done once we copy it to rc | 11:53 |
| sil2100 | I would like you guys to check if all is ok in the image before that happens ;) Maybe a quick look if it boots or something | 11:53 |
| * sil2100 lunch | 11:53 | |
| davmor2 | sil2100: yeah I think that is plan | 11:53 |
| jibel | davmor2, as sil2100 once it's in RC | 11:53 |
| jibel | +said | 11:53 |
| jibel | davmor2, but first check that languages are ok, MMS is default, 2G->3G is fixed on the new build then promote to rc | 11:54 |
| jibel | s/MMS is default/MMS group chat is not default/ | 11:55 |
| davmor2 | jibel: indeed | 11:55 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, I'm afraid I need your help again: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208833921/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-armhf.unity8_8.10%2B15.04.20150611.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 11:59 |
| mzanetti | looking at my vivid+overlay powered device, all seems to be fine | 11:59 |
| mzanetti | not sure why the silo won't install it | 12:00 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| pmcgowan | sil2100, awesome, I see the MMS receive fix queued up, would have been nice to get as well but need to ship sometime | 12:07 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| popey | sil2100: added calendar to spreadsheet \o/ | 13:03 |
| kenvandine | is anyone familiar with the boottest jobs, specifically for lxc-android-config? | 13:04 |
| kenvandine | it's failing to install the deb, which can't work since that package has to be installed from recovery | 13:05 |
| kenvandine | cihelp: ^^ | 13:07 |
| kenvandine | actually, fginther i see you've kicked a few of these jobs, any clue how to make them pass? | 13:07 |
| fginther | kenvandine, looking | 13:08 |
| kenvandine | fginther, the deb has to be installed in recovery, or at least after doing some manual unmounts... so the job would require some special handling | 13:09 |
| pstolowski | jibel, hello! what's the situation with silos 29, 40, 13, any chance to land that stuff this week? | 13:09 |
| fginther | kenvandine, ah, so this simple can't be handled by the current test. We should be able to just ask one of the archive-admins to pass it | 13:12 |
| fginther | I can't do it directly | 13:12 |
| kenvandine | Laney, ^^ can you do that? push lxc-android-config through? | 13:13 |
| kenvandine | Laney, from proposed to release that is | 13:13 |
| kenvandine | fginther, can't we drop the boottest for it? | 13:13 |
| fginther | kenvandine, There's a dependency between the proposed migration service and boottest, I can't just tell it not to run the test, but I may be able to fake a response | 13:16 |
| fginther | kenvandine, ok, lets see if this works | 13:20 |
| fginther | kenvandine, that did it | 13:31 |
| kenvandine | woot | 13:31 |
| kenvandine | thanks! | 13:31 |
| kenvandine | fginther, so future jobs won't need massaging? | 13:31 |
| kenvandine | not that i hope to land lxc-android-config... it isn't exactly fun :) | 13:32 |
| fginther | kenvandine, no, I had to just manually create a passing result for this. Getting it to automatically pass in the future will take more work | 13:32 |
| kenvandine | ok | 13:32 |
| kenvandine | fginther, it's had passing runs before though | 13:33 |
| kenvandine | which is just odd... | 13:33 |
| kenvandine | unless those were faked :) | 13:33 |
| kenvandine | dunno | 13:33 |
| jibel | pstolowski, rvr is verifying 29, 40 is next in the queue, and if you can find someone to review an approve the MR on 13 it'll move to ready for testing. | 13:33 |
| jibel | s/an/and/ | 13:34 |
| fginther | kenvandine, there was a regression in the boottest that was causing packages to not actually be installed for a while | 13:35 |
| pstolowski | jibel, ok, thanks. 13' MR was approved yesterday | 13:35 |
| fginther | kenvandine, which would explain those passes | 13:35 |
| kenvandine | ah | 13:35 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| kgunn | sil2100: just checking, silo 4 having trouble on unity8 due to libconnectivity-qt1, any update on that one ? | 14:06 |
| kgunn | i was disconnected for a bit | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: hey, didn't look at it, I was out for lunch when I got the ping and missed it sadly, let me look | 14:08 |
| slangasek | sil2100: thanks for the info. I don't think you actually want to disable *just* the Ubuntu part on rc-proposed however; I think you want to mark rc-proposed 'manual' so that it doesn't import some crazy set of files that excludes the ubuntu tarball entirely | 14:16 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: uh, ok, too late, but I think everything was fine I suppose... | 14:17 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: I remember I once asked stgraber and he mentioned that if there is no section (for instance, no ubuntu_file), nothing will be imported at for that | 14:18 |
| Laney | kenvandine: fginther: Can you fix boottest to skip this package if it's never going to work? | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | And since there was no change in tarballs, I thought no new image with junk would appear | 14:18 |
| slangasek | sil2100: in fact, if you look at the rc-proposed channel, you'll see that there is now an image on the channel with no 'ubuntu' part | 14:19 |
| sil2100 | Ouch | 14:19 |
| slangasek | sil2100: I've marked the channel manual for the moment, and we'll need to delete the image to clean it up | 14:19 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, once we actually get a real image to this channel | 14:19 |
| slangasek | sil2100: even if stgraber said this was supposed to work, it's a weird way to do it, as opposed to just disabling imports for the channel :) | 14:19 |
| slangasek | sil2100: no, immediately; I'll work on it now | 14:19 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, we seem to have the snapshot image in 14.09-factory-proposed now, just confirming it has the right parts | 14:20 |
| sil2100 | Ok, image looks fine, device and custom bits are correct + the ubuntu parts correct | 14:22 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: I guess we can revert the setting now, I would build a standard overlay image though as I don't want the rc-proposed channel to pull in the snapshot release | 14:23 |
| sil2100 | Not a big deal, but I didn't want them to have strange images (but they already did get that, eh) | 14:23 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: next time I'll make it manual, just this seemed quicker to me ;) | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | Didn't expect it to fetch anything | 14:24 |
| slangasek | sil2100: 'manual' is a one-line change ;) | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: well, I wasn't sure it didn't require removing all the other lines | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | I feel bad deleting so many good lines | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:24 |
| slangasek | broken images removed from all devices, rerunning importer | 14:25 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: thanks, sorry about that, as I said I didn't expect anything to be pulled in since why would it | 14:26 |
| kenvandine | fginther, couldn't you just return success if the package is lxc-android-config? | 14:30 |
| kenvandine | hopefully it's truely a one-off case | 14:30 |
| kenvandine | we don't want to skip it for most packages | 14:30 |
| fginther | kenvandine, the test has to also determine the version of the package to promote, thats really the only thing that's complicated here | 14:31 |
| kenvandine | Laney, ^^ | 14:31 |
| fginther | kenvandine, Laney, but yeah, whitelisting this package is probably the right approach here | 14:31 |
| Laney | I think so | 14:31 |
| Laney | do you need a bug or anything to track the work to do it? | 14:31 |
| fginther | Laney, sure, you can file them here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-touch-boottest | 14:33 |
| Laney | done, thanks | 14:35 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: still looking into that, will have to experiment in a chroot | 14:36 |
| kgunn | mzanetti: ^ | 14:37 |
| kgunn | full shell rotation==snake bit | 14:38 |
| mzanetti | as soon as that's landed I'll probably be drunk for a day or two | 14:38 |
| sil2100 | kgunn, mzanetti: anyway, not sure if it's related as otherwise this would lead to all archs to fail, but there's a somewhat of a loop-dependency in connectivity-api right now... | 14:39 |
| sil2100 | I mean, in unity8 basically, but due to connectivity-api | 14:39 |
| sil2100 | unity8 depends on libconnectivity-qt1, that depends on indicator-network and that depends on unity8 o_O | 14:40 |
| sil2100 | That's not healthy at all | 14:40 |
| mzanetti | uh oh | 14:40 |
| mzanetti | I don't think that has changed in a long time tho... | 14:40 |
| sil2100 | It changed in the latest connectivity-api | 14:41 |
| mzanetti | oh, I see | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | I checked and the vivid version does not depend on indicator-network | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | The one in the overlay that's shipped with indicator-network starts having that dep ;/ | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | That smells like serious trouble to me | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | Need to check if that can be the cause here as well | 14:42 |
| mzanetti | Wellark, ^^ | 14:42 |
| sil2100 | Damn, this is really bad right now | 14:44 |
| sil2100 | When I check the amd64 unity8 build logs it's actually INSTALLING UNITY8 as a build dep during building | 14:45 |
| sil2100 | :O | 14:45 |
| sil2100 | Wellark: ping | 14:50 |
| kgunn | sil2100: just wondering, how'd this only happen in vivid+overlay? is connectivity-api diverged ? | 14:58 |
| sil2100 | Not sure, still checking if it's related, maybe it's just a race that causes it to fail - all in all, this is NOT the correct behavior anyway and will lead to problems sooner or later | 14:59 |
| sil2100 | Since you can't depend on unity8 when building unity8 | 14:59 |
| sil2100 | But I'm still looking, now prepared the chroot | 14:59 |
| cjwatson | Well | 14:59 |
| cjwatson | You can | 14:59 |
| cjwatson | It's not necessarily a good idea, but it's not fatal | 15:00 |
| slangasek | sil2100: should the importer be re-enabled now? | 15:00 |
| cjwatson | That sort of thing is more to be expected from toolchain-type stuff, though | 15:00 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: I was thinking - is rc-proposed still manual? Since I woudln't want the snapshot image to generate a new image | 15:01 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: maybe we should build a new overlay-based rootfs? | 15:01 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, kgunn: I guess this is the reason why it only fails on vivid: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/0.5.1+15.10.20150604-0ubuntu1 | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | hm, still, a bit strange it would break like this | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti, kgunn: I'll keep investigating, but we have a team meeting now :) | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | So much slooower than usual | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | But my chroot will certainly make thins easier | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | Ok, getting somewhere | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | Found the root cause | 15:12 |
| ogra_ | this is ubuntu, we only have sudo causes | 15:15 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| davidbarth | hey trainguards, are you guys still creating silos for oldies? like an rtm14-09 missing backport ? (see line 65) | 15:17 |
| ogra_ | davidbarth, what for ? | 15:18 |
| robru | davidbarth: uh, no, rtm support was ripped out of the train | 15:18 |
| ogra_ | all users will be on vivid soon ... no need to care for 14.09 | 15:18 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, fix is in spreadsheet row 66 | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: anyway, the bug is oxide ;/ | 15:19 |
| mzanetti | wat? | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | I mean, not exactly, let me clear out everything in a minute | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | Too many stuff going on | 15:19 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, I found out that pete-woods dropped the dep to unity8 from indicator-network in wily, with the commit message describing this issue | 15:20 |
| mzanetti | so I backported that commit to their 15.04 branch | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: so, the problem is in qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-web-plugin which is one of the big chain dependencies | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | hm, no, wait | 15:23 |
| sil2100 | Oh | 15:23 |
| robru | sil2100: when was the last time you assigned or reconfigured a silo today? it seems the spreadsheet has been updated to new spreadsheet API which breaks a lot of our code (in particular the menu for assigning and reconfiguring is gone). I'm not sure if a person did that or if google is just forcibly deprecating the old api. | 15:24 |
| sil2100 | robru: uh, I reconfigured one silo at least, it seemed to be ok | 15:24 |
| robru | sil2100: yeah but how long ago? | 15:25 |
| sil2100 | robru: in the morning I think, so around 7 hours ago? | 15:25 |
| sil2100 | Damn, stupid google | 15:25 |
| robru | sil2100: k, I don't know when this switch happened, but I just tried to assign a silo and google was like "welcome to the new google sheets! btw all your scripts are broken" | 15:26 |
| sil2100 | uuh | 15:26 |
| mzanetti | oh dear... | 15:26 |
| kenvandine | robru, close it and reopen | 15:27 |
| kenvandine | it happened to me earlier today | 15:27 |
| rvr | pstolowski: Approving silo 29 | 15:27 |
| kenvandine | robru, at least that worked for me | 15:27 |
| kenvandine | like 30m ago | 15:27 |
| robru | kenvandine: oh weird, indeed reloading worked | 15:29 |
| kenvandine | robru, yeah... i freaked out about it earlier... spent a few minutes swearing about the damn spreadsheet | 15:29 |
| robru | kenvandine: it's really pathetic. luckily the replacement is really close ;-) | 15:30 |
| kenvandine | robru, yeah yeah... heard that before :) | 15:30 |
| * kenvandine ducks | 15:30 | |
| * kenvandine gets a red bull for robru, code faster! | 15:31 | |
| robru | kenvandine: the difference is, last time I said that i was waiting for another team that had other priorities. this time, I'm writing it myself and I have a working demo that i'm iterating on ;-) | 15:31 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: ok it's actually a very absurd thing, I'm starting to think it was just some hiccup :| | 15:32 |
| pstolowski | rvr, great, thanks for the update! | 15:32 |
| slangasek | sil2100: the rc-proposed channel is still manual, yes | 15:49 |
| slangasek | sil2100: and if you're done with the snapshot build, yes we should probably kick off another overlay rootfs with the regular config - but since rc-proposed is still set to manual it should be ok to re-enable the importer | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: ok, so we can re-enable the importer, disable the 14.09-factory-proposed and build a new rootfs | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | Right :) | 15:50 |
| * slangasek nods | 15:50 | |
| sil2100 | Ok, on it | 15:51 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, so that branch I proposed, is that no good? | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | Building the rootfs | 15:52 |
| mzanetti | https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/indicator-network/backport-dep-loop-fix/+merge/261742 | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: I'll check it in a moment, I'm still looking for the reason of the issues | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: it's strange as it almost looks as if it didn't see packages in -updates - if I enable updates in my chroot, everything works fine... but actually, let me try one more thing | 15:54 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| popey | sil2100: we having a landing call today? | 15:58 |
| popey | (just checking) | 15:58 |
| ogra_ | oh, thats what the harps in my pocket watend to tell me ! | 15:59 |
| sil2100 | popey: yeah | 16:00 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| sil2100 | robru: ping pong | 16:01 |
| mzanetti | lol... "the harps in my pocket" | 16:17 |
| mzanetti | so true | 16:17 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: this build failure is still a mystery for me, cannot reproduce the issue in a similarily configured chroot | 16:21 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, same here... can't repro on the phone with the same archive configuration | 16:22 |
| mzanetti | sil2100, anyhow, pete-woods seems to have broken it for wily | 16:22 |
| mzanetti | shouldn't we just land that backport to vivid? | 16:22 |
| mzanetti | by broken I mean "broken the dependency loop" | 16:22 |
| mzanetti | aka fixed it :D | 16:22 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, probably a good idea :) It *might* help, but... there's no guarantee | 16:24 |
| sil2100 | We'll assign a silo, we had spreadsheet issues | 16:24 |
| john-mcaleely | sil2100, any story on an ota-4 build? | 16:24 |
| sil2100 | Ah, forgot robru assigned it already | 16:25 |
| sil2100 | john-mcaleely: it's done, the build at least, now QA is making sure all is cool | 16:25 |
| sil2100 | Then we copy to RC | 16:25 |
| john-mcaleely | sil2100, aha. perfect | 16:25 |
| robru | sil2100: mzanetti: yep silo 18 is ready to go | 16:25 |
| sil2100 | Good you reminded me, with all the things going on I almost forgot I need to fix up a generic image... | 16:26 |
| sil2100 | hmmm, problem is, we already have another one | 16:26 |
| sil2100 | Damn | 16:26 |
| mzanetti | thanks robru, thanks sil2100. Really appreciate your help | 16:26 |
| robru | mzanetti: you're welcome | 16:28 |
| sil2100 | Ok, generic image stuffed in | 16:33 |
| sil2100 | That was so close... | 16:33 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: so, since I'm currently out of ideas, let's try landing the change from silo 18 and see if that helps - if not, we'd have to re-check that ;/ | 16:34 |
| mzanetti | yep | 16:36 |
| mzanetti | building right now | 16:36 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, silo27 is ready for publishing | 16:38 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: hey! We'd need some packaging ACKs for really easy changes: | 16:41 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-029-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ubuntuone-credentials_packaging_changes.diff and https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-029-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/unity-scope-click_packaging_changes.diff | 16:41 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, ACK | 16:43 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: thanks! | 16:43 |
| sil2100 | :) | 16:43 |
| sil2100 | robru: ok, so I'm approving and publishing silo 11, but it seems the train invalidly built the package - it thought there was no previous version in wily and included all the history in the upload (and requested a packaging ACK saying it's a NEW package) | 16:45 |
| sil2100 | robru: while the actual change was just a small code change | 16:45 |
| sil2100 | robru: (see https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-011-2-publish/56/ ) | 16:45 |
| sil2100 | robru: will you need the PPA contents for debugging or can I publish it? | 16:46 |
| sil2100 | (this is the actual change: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208269342/nuntium_1.4%2B15.10.20150521-0ubuntu8_1.4%2B15.10.20150604-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ) | 16:46 |
| sil2100 | Ah, I see the reason for that | 16:46 |
| sil2100 | robru: actually, it seems the problem here was the version number in the latest package | 16:46 |
| robru | sil2100: wait | 16:47 |
| sil2100 | robru: somehow 1.4+15.10.20150521-0ubuntu8 was not in trunk... | 16:47 |
| robru | sil2100: do not publish | 16:47 |
| robru | sil2100: the reason it thinks it's a new package is because dest is set as overlay ppa. | 16:47 |
| sil2100 | It got hm, overriden by 1.4+15.04.20150521-0ubuntu1, strange stuff | 16:47 |
| robru | sil2100: not a train bug, silo is misconfigured. | 16:47 |
| sil2100 | Ah, uuuh! | 16:47 |
| robru | sil2100: nuntium really isn't in overlay ppa | 16:47 |
| jhodapp | thanks sil2100 | 16:47 |
| sil2100 | Duh | 16:47 |
| sil2100 | robru: right, not for wily at leaset | 16:48 |
| robru | sil2100: reconfigure for wily and watch only build,should fix it | 16:48 |
| sil2100 | *least | 16:48 |
| robru | sil2100: I mean reconfigure without dest ppa set | 16:48 |
| sil2100 | Right | 16:48 |
| sil2100 | robru: ok, updated the MR, if you could later top-approve it it would be awesome | 16:51 |
| sil2100 | :) | 16:51 |
| sil2100 | Thanks for noticing the invalid target btw.! | 16:51 |
| robru | sil2100: you're welcome | 16:52 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| robru | boiko: you got silo 20, note telephony-service conflict in silo 43 | 17:05 |
| sil2100 | robru: publishing still broken... | 17:07 |
| sil2100 | robru: it would require a rebuild probably | 17:07 |
| sil2100 | robru: as it has the wrong information in the upload, but I suppose the package itself is good | 17:07 |
| robru | sil2100: that's weird, before the content diff was null now it has something, which is expected. I'm not sure why the packging diff still thinks it's a new package | 17:08 |
| robru | sil2100: I say just force publish it, should be fine | 17:08 |
| robru | sil2100: the package is definitely fine, this is just an issue with train barfing on the diff | 17:08 |
| sil2100 | -nuntium (1.4+15.10.20150521-0ubuntu8) wily; urgency=medium | 17:09 |
| sil2100 | +nuntium (1.4+15.04.20150521-0ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=medium | 17:09 |
| sil2100 | This is a bit worrying but still | 17:09 |
| sil2100 | I guess it's ok to publish | 17:09 |
| sil2100 | I'll go on ahead since we need this package badly now | 17:09 |
| robru | sil2100: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-011-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/nuntium_content.diff/*view*/ what diff you looking at? package is still a wily package | 17:09 |
| robru | oh, the previous release. weird. | 17:10 |
| robru | sil2100: I blame trunk, check the diff on the MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/nuntium/fix-mms-rx/+merge/260678 it shows 521 as vivid. | 17:11 |
| sil2100 | hah, yeah... | 17:11 |
| popey | pmcgowan: I know how much you love bugs - this is annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu/+bug/1454210 | 17:43 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1454210 in qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "accounts are lost each time the app is ran on the device" [High,New] | 17:43 |
| popey | pmcgowan: if you're on vivid and you update an app which has an account plugin, the plugin is removed and re-added, losing settings | 17:43 |
| popey | pmcgowan: will hit everyone once we OTA-4 | 17:44 |
| pmcgowan | that is annoying | 17:44 |
| pmcgowan | oh | 17:44 |
| pmcgowan | popey, so its not a developer thing only? | 17:44 |
| popey | nope | 17:44 |
| popey | if a user updates an app which has an OA plugin inside (reminders/notes) it will hit them | 17:45 |
| popey | mzanetti: right? ^ | 17:45 |
| pmcgowan | popey, sounds like you need to uninstall | 17:45 |
| mzanetti | erm... it is a developer thing only | 17:45 |
| pmcgowan | not update | 17:45 |
| popey | mzanetti: how so? | 17:45 |
| mzanetti | because update doesn't remove it, only if the account is uninstalled | 17:46 |
| popey | mzanetti: if I pkcon install-local a new reminders, it does it to me. | 17:46 |
| popey | I have to re-auth each time | 17:46 |
| mzanetti | oh really | 17:46 |
| mzanetti | well, I only tried with qtcreator which does indeed a remove + install | 17:46 |
| popey | maybe the wording of that bug doesn't cover my use case exactly | 17:46 |
| mzanetti | however, I don't think we're affected if an app is just updated in the store | 17:47 |
| popey | how so? | 17:47 |
| mzanetti | at least I wouldn't have noticed it yet... we are releasing a reminders update now, are we? | 17:47 |
| mzanetti | I will watch out if it happens | 17:47 |
| popey | soon | 17:47 |
| popey | let me test on my device here | 17:47 |
| popey | you dont think it happens from store, but does from pkcon? | 17:48 |
| popey | can't see how | 17:48 |
| mzanetti | fair point | 17:48 |
| popey | lemme confirm anyway | 17:48 |
| popey | ok, so all works as expected on rtm... upgraded and didn't lose the account | 17:52 |
| * popey tries vivid | 17:52 | |
| mzanetti | I only have this issue as of vivid | 17:55 |
| popey | mzanetti: confirmed | 17:59 |
| mzanetti | popey, what is the situation then? | 17:59 |
| popey | the act of installing a new version of reminders onto a system that has an online account setup will delete that online account entry | 17:59 |
| popey | (on vivid) | 17:59 |
| mzanetti | popey, erm... does it affect us throught the store too? | 18:00 |
| popey | I don't see how it wont | 18:00 |
| mzanetti | O_o | 18:00 |
| mzanetti | do you have an old package of reminders floating on your hard disk? could install it, set up the account and then upgrade from store | 18:01 |
| popey | i can do that, yes | 18:01 |
| popey | i can pluck any old version from jenkins. will do that now, to confirm | 18:01 |
| popey | mzanetti: confirmed | 18:04 |
| mzanetti | :( | 18:05 |
| popey | installed com.ubuntu.reminders_0.5.429_armhf.click, created evernote account, opened reminders, worked. upgrade to 434 (from store) and it disappears | 18:05 |
| * popey adds to the bug | 18:06 | |
| popey | mzanetti: updated bug | 18:15 |
| popey | pmcgowan: so basically yes, on vivid, _any_ app update via the store, where the app has an online accounts plugin (reminders, untapped - dunno how many others? scopes?) the account will be deleted. | 18:16 |
| pmcgowan | sh*t | 18:16 |
| pmcgowan | popey, tagging it up | 18:16 |
| popey | So only affects apps which have an online account component where the user has logged in. | 18:16 |
| popey | It's an inconvenience. | 18:16 |
| popey | thanks | 18:17 |
| davmor2 | pmcgowan: did this get fixed in rtm maybe the fix was never ported to vivid | 18:18 |
| davmor2 | pmcgowan: we had it for the u1 account | 18:18 |
| popey | It certainly doesn't happen in RTM | 18:18 |
| popey | (now) | 18:18 |
| pmcgowan | davmor2, not sure | 18:19 |
| davmor2 | popey: good catch though. we wouldn't of picked it up as we start from a fresh base and then install the stuff to test everytime. So the account was only created after the app was installed :( | 18:20 |
| om26er | pedronis, pinh | 18:28 |
| om26er | ping | 18:28 |
| om26er | pedronis, re: silo38 -- I am not sure if the proposed package really fixes the issue. | 18:28 |
| pedronis | om26er: do you still see the issue in the bug? | 18:40 |
| om26er | pedronis, yes, after clearing the messages, I quickly sent another email, after 15 minutes that email never showed up in notifications | 18:40 |
| om26er | pedronis, I did however see a later email | 18:40 |
| pedronis | om26er: did you restart ubuntu-push-client after installing (I'm not sure the package does that atm) | 18:44 |
| pedronis | ? | 18:44 |
| om26er | pedronis, i rebooted | 18:44 |
| pedronis | om26er: ok, I'm not sure what to do, either there is a bug in account-polld or the timing is such that is really an easy problem to trigger even with the fix and that means we need a better interface for this from the messaging-indicator | 18:49 |
| om26er | pedronis, :/ | 18:52 |
| === alexabreu is now known as alex-abreu | ||
| pedronis | om26er: and the client and account is moving to another team soon, so I won't work on it anymore, not sure if to revert the change (the change is better than before but may be useless) or we should land it anyway | 18:53 |
| pedronis | s/and account/and account-polld/ | 18:54 |
| om26er | pedronis, it it didn't fix the bug, I don't think it makes sense to lad it | 19:02 |
| pedronis | om26er: ok, I will revert and it goes back to the todo list of who picks up the project | 19:03 |
| robru | kenvandine: around for a packaging ack? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-013-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/unity-scopes-api_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ | 19:13 |
| kenvandine | robru, sure | 19:13 |
| robru | thanks | 19:13 |
| robru | alex-abreu: https://code.launchpad.net/~abreu-alexandre/webbrowser-app/saml-url-persistence/+merge/260248 need this top approved before I can publish | 19:14 |
| alex-abreu | robru, done | 19:14 |
| robru | alex-abreu: thanks | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | robru, the build depends change for g++ looks a little odd based on the comment that was there before | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | - g++-4.9:native, | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | + g++, | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | but | 19:15 |
| kenvandine | the fact that the comment was removed too, makes me think this was intentional | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | so... ack :) | 19:16 |
| robru | kenvandine: yeah that concerned me. but I mean, it's not like they changed that by accident right? | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | right | 19:16 |
| robru | kenvandine: k, thanks | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | so... ack | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | np | 19:16 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: hey! Are you around? :) | 19:19 |
| sil2100 | jibel: hey, image 10 in -factory-proposed should have all the right changes | 19:20 |
| ToyKeeper | sil2100: Hmm? | 19:30 |
| ToyKeeper | I've got an appointment in a few minutes but should be around all day afterward... | 19:32 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, finally? | 19:45 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: could you check image 10 from the ubuntu-rtm/14.09-factory-proposed channel? | 19:47 |
| sil2100 | ToyKeeper: it's our new OTA-4 candidate, it basically only needs checking if MMS group chat is disabled by default and some hm, nuntium fix | 19:47 |
| sil2100 | alesage: hey! :) | 19:56 |
| alesage | sil2100, hiya | 19:56 |
| sil2100 | alesage: maybe you could help out as well with validating an image? | 19:56 |
| alesage | sil2100, ok what's needed? | 19:56 |
| sil2100 | alesage: so, channel ubuntu-rtm/14.09-factory-proposed has a new release candidate for OTA-4 | 19:57 |
| sil2100 | alesage: davmor2 already tested image 9, but we missed a few fixes so I build image 10 | 19:57 |
| sil2100 | alesage: so, image 10 now needs to be checked if MMS group-chat is disabled by default and there's also fix for LP: #1459995 | 19:58 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1459995 in nuntium (Ubuntu) "M-NotifyResp.ind PDU is rejected in some networks" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1459995 | 19:58 |
| alesage | sil2100, ok acknowledged | 19:59 |
| sil2100 | alesage: thank you! :) | 19:59 |
| robru | mzanetti: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-018-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/indicator-network_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ hm? why are you dropping the dep on unity8? | 20:19 |
| robru | mzanetti: oh is it cyclic? | 20:20 |
| mzanetti | robru, there's a circular dependency between this and unity8 | 20:23 |
| robru | mzanetti: ok | 20:23 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| * ToyKeeper wonders if image 10 still needs validation | 23:17 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!