[00:48] <micahg> for the libproj transition can we ignore mapnik, push the rest through to the release pocket and copy https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mapnik/2.2.0+ds1-7build3 with binaries to the release pocket?
[02:21] <infinity> micahg: What have you got against the new mapnik?
[02:21] <micahg> infinity: the twp reverse dependencies seem like not easy fixes, seems mapnik changed a lot
[02:22] <micahg> oh, wait, I forgot, I had one more dep to fix for proj
[02:22] <micahg> zygrib still needs to be fixed, I'll have to try another day though
[02:23] <infinity> micahg: So, I can remove 3.x from proposed and copy build3 back in.  And then copy 3.0 back in later.
[02:23] <infinity> micahg: But no point until you're sure the rest is ready to transition.
[02:23] <micahg> infinity: ooh, that would work, ok, I'll ping you when I get the other piece sorted, will probably be later in the week I hope
[13:11] <jamespage> ^^ that new source superceeds oslo.messaging; equiv in the NEW queue in Debian - but need to unblock into Ubuntu
[16:32] <sbeattie> Not sure who's on SRU duty today, but I'd like to ask if the apparmor in trusty-proposed could be pushed to trusty-updates; everything verified okay except one bug (LP: #1296667) which doesn't introduce regressions, but was just not fixed properly.
[16:33] <sbeattie> The rest of the fixes address enough issues to warrent being accepted IMO. And I've posted a debdiff for the dovecot/apparmor bug that didn't get fixed and will work to push it through following the current package.
[16:43] <infinity> sbeattie: Seems reasonable to me.
[16:44] <sbeattie> infinity: thanks
[16:45] <infinity> sbeattie: Erm, did that want to go to -security too, or just -updates?
[16:45] <sbeattie> infinity: no, just updates.
[16:45] <infinity> sbeattie: I noticed it was built in a security PPA after I released it to updates.
[16:45] <infinity> sbeattie: Okay, cool.  Just updates it is, then.
[16:45] <jdstrand> \o/
[16:45] <sbeattie> no, it was just a place to build it before going into -proposed.
[16:45] <sbeattie> infinity: thanks again!
[16:45] <jdstrand> sbeattie: yay, yay!
[16:46] <jdstrand> this is going to be great for trusty users
[16:47] <infinity> sbeattie: Re-targeted that one bug to trusty, if you'd like to followup ASAP with the fix before you forget.
[16:48] <sbeattie> infinity: thanks, yeah.
[16:50] <infinity> jdstrand: While you're cheering this morning, I fixed LP: #1452238 that you escalated to my manager last week.
[16:51] <jdstrand> infinity: woohoo!
[16:51]  * jdstrand hugs infinity :)
[16:52]  * jdstrand reads
[16:52] <mdeslaur> infinity: heh, subtle :)
[16:54] <infinity> mdeslaur: Yeah.  I mean, fundamentally, it's an apt bug, but dependency loops end up being an O(insane) problem for resolvers, so breaking them is much simpler than diving into the resolver.
[16:54] <infinity> mdeslaur: And, in this case, both deps were entirely unnecessary cruft anyway.
[16:55] <mdeslaur> infinity: I was referring to your comment, not to the bug :)
[16:55] <mdeslaur> infinity: but yeah, that bug sucks
[16:55] <infinity> mdeslaur: Oh.  See, it was a subtle bug, so your comment could go either way. :P
[16:55] <mdeslaur> hehe
[21:13] <robru> is anybody looking into http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src ? I heard something along the lines that all the regressions are false positives and this should be waved through, but I'm not clear on the details.
[21:21] <ScottK> robru: Mirv was discussing it with Riddell earlier today.
[21:22] <infinity> robru: I'm retrying a bunch of tests, but it would be nice to get KDE people to weigh in on the current state of their autopkgtesting.
[21:22] <robru> ScottK: yeah, Mirv asked me to poke you guys later today since he had to EoD. any word on some progress there?
[21:22] <infinity> ScottK: Oh, hi KDE person.
[21:22] <robru> nice ;-)
[21:23] <ScottK> Not on a (K)ubuntu box ATM.