[00:48] for the libproj transition can we ignore mapnik, push the rest through to the release pocket and copy https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mapnik/2.2.0+ds1-7build3 with binaries to the release pocket? [02:21] micahg: What have you got against the new mapnik? [02:21] infinity: the twp reverse dependencies seem like not easy fixes, seems mapnik changed a lot [02:22] oh, wait, I forgot, I had one more dep to fix for proj [02:22] zygrib still needs to be fixed, I'll have to try another day though [02:23] micahg: So, I can remove 3.x from proposed and copy build3 back in. And then copy 3.0 back in later. [02:23] micahg: But no point until you're sure the rest is ready to transition. [02:23] infinity: ooh, that would work, ok, I'll ping you when I get the other piece sorted, will probably be later in the week I hope === pgraner-afk is now known as pgraner [13:11] ^^ that new source superceeds oslo.messaging; equiv in the NEW queue in Debian - but need to unblock into Ubuntu [16:32] Not sure who's on SRU duty today, but I'd like to ask if the apparmor in trusty-proposed could be pushed to trusty-updates; everything verified okay except one bug (LP: #1296667) which doesn't introduce regressions, but was just not fixed properly. [16:32] Launchpad bug 1296667 in AppArmor "dovecot/apparmor: profile not found" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1296667 [16:33] The rest of the fixes address enough issues to warrent being accepted IMO. And I've posted a debdiff for the dovecot/apparmor bug that didn't get fixed and will work to push it through following the current package. [16:43] sbeattie: Seems reasonable to me. [16:44] infinity: thanks [16:45] sbeattie: Erm, did that want to go to -security too, or just -updates? [16:45] infinity: no, just updates. [16:45] sbeattie: I noticed it was built in a security PPA after I released it to updates. [16:45] sbeattie: Okay, cool. Just updates it is, then. [16:45] \o/ [16:45] no, it was just a place to build it before going into -proposed. [16:45] infinity: thanks again! [16:45] sbeattie: yay, yay! [16:46] this is going to be great for trusty users [16:47] sbeattie: Re-targeted that one bug to trusty, if you'd like to followup ASAP with the fix before you forget. [16:48] infinity: thanks, yeah. [16:50] jdstrand: While you're cheering this morning, I fixed LP: #1452238 that you escalated to my manager last week. [16:50] Launchpad bug 1452238 in apt (Ubuntu) "Failed to upgrade system from 14.04" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1452238 [16:51] infinity: woohoo! [16:51] * jdstrand hugs infinity :) [16:52] * jdstrand reads [16:52] infinity: heh, subtle :) [16:54] mdeslaur: Yeah. I mean, fundamentally, it's an apt bug, but dependency loops end up being an O(insane) problem for resolvers, so breaking them is much simpler than diving into the resolver. [16:54] mdeslaur: And, in this case, both deps were entirely unnecessary cruft anyway. [16:55] infinity: I was referring to your comment, not to the bug :) [16:55] infinity: but yeah, that bug sucks [16:55] mdeslaur: Oh. See, it was a subtle bug, so your comment could go either way. :P [16:55] hehe === utlemming_away is now known as utlemming === pgraner is now known as pgraner-dr === jhodapp_ is now known as jhodapp [21:13] is anybody looking into http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src ? I heard something along the lines that all the regressions are false positives and this should be waved through, but I'm not clear on the details. [21:21] robru: Mirv was discussing it with Riddell earlier today. [21:22] robru: I'm retrying a bunch of tests, but it would be nice to get KDE people to weigh in on the current state of their autopkgtesting. [21:22] ScottK: yeah, Mirv asked me to poke you guys later today since he had to EoD. any word on some progress there? [21:22] ScottK: Oh, hi KDE person. [21:22] nice ;-) [21:23] Not on a (K)ubuntu box ATM. === agateau_ is now known as agateau