[00:53] <josharenson> Any reason I can't x-compile unity8 in a wily chroot? libconnectivity-qt1-dev:armhf giving me grief
[02:18] <Gest46573> hello, does anyone know how to edit GTK3 themes? or a tutorial? to make the highligh-selection look flat
[02:22] <Gest46573> like this, but for GTK3:  http://xfce-look.org/content/show.php/BtB?content=109494
[03:45]  * ljp now using a touchscreen workstation
[09:03] <dandrader> cimi, hey. I've two MPs I would like you to review:
[09:03] <dandrader> cimi, https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/ubuntu-settings-components/deprecation-warnings/+merge/262267
[09:03] <dandrader> cimi, and https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/deprecatedTheme/+merge/262216
[09:04] <cimi> dandrader, ok
[09:05] <cimi> dandrader, what time is in brazil?
[09:06] <dandrader> cimi, 6 am :)
[09:08] <dandrader> got at doctor appointment at 13. wanted to have most of my work done till then
[09:20] <cimi> dandrader, the trailing whitespaces in those cardcreator tests are there for a reson
[09:20] <cimi> reason
[09:25] <dandrader> cimi, ok. my editor does this clean up automatically and I was too lazy to do put them back (using another editor) :)
[09:25] <dandrader> cimi, but the card tests still pass though
[09:28] <cimi> dandrader, yeah
[09:28] <cimi> dandrader, can you revert that?
[09:29] <dandrader> cimi, almost done
[09:31] <dandrader> cimi, done. had to overwrite the branch though
[09:31] <dandrader> (was the easiest way)
[09:31] <cimi> dandrader, we need do ask albert why he wants trailing spaces
[09:49] <cimi> dandrader, both my reviews are like... if we need to update to 1.3, we need to do it for every file
[09:51] <dandrader> cimi, ok, doing so
[10:21] <dandrader> cimi, done
[10:51] <greyback_> mzanetti: can I get an ack here plz: https://code.launchpad.net/~mir-team/qtmir/gles-sync/+merge/262252
[10:51] <greyback_> and here https://code.launchpad.net/~mir-team/qtubuntu/gles-sync/+merge/262253
[10:51] <mzanetti> looking
[11:13] <ltinkl> larsu: ping
[11:32] <cimi> dandrader, we need to test it and see if it spots regressions
[11:32] <cimi> mzanetti, daniel went through replacing all 1.1 uitk imports to 1.3, can we silo it?
[11:32] <mzanetti> yes
[11:33] <cimi> dandrader, we also need to test the APIs, I am sure the ubuntushape needs changes
[11:34] <dandrader> cimi, that's why I asked you to review it :)   you know ubuntu shape and ubuntu-settings-components
[11:34] <cimi> dandrader, ok, it's a lot bigger then :)
[11:35] <dandrader> cimi, I tried it on the device and all seemed fine. But wasn't thorough as I don't know all the places that have to be checked
[11:35] <cimi> dandrader, at least all ubuntushape we use need to rename few APIs
[11:44] <dpm> hi seb128, do you happen to know if there is a wiki page with instructions to use xmir to start x apps on a unity 8 session?
[11:45] <dandrader> mzanetti, https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/fixShellTests/+merge/262323
[11:45] <mzanetti> thanks dandrader
[11:46] <cimi> dandrader, so, first advice is finding all ubuntushapes and update them to the new APIs
[11:46] <cimi> and simple Shape
[11:46] <cimi> and where we have UbuntuShapeForItem we can use a normal new UbuntuShape iirc
[11:47] <larsu> ltinkl: hey
[11:48] <ltinkl> larsu, can you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~lukas-kde/gsettings-qt/queued-processing/+merge/259883
[11:48] <ltinkl> larsu, or is there any problem with it? :)
[11:49] <larsu> ltinkl: oh no automerging for this?
[11:49] <larsu> seb128: do we need to do anything special with that branch? ^
[11:49] <larsu> or can I just push to trunk?
[11:49] <ltinkl> larsu: no idea, you'd have to ask mzanetti
[11:49] <mzanetti> well, it needs to be siloed
[11:50] <mzanetti> automerging doesn't happen any more in quite a while now
[11:50] <larsu> ya, seb128 said something like that
[11:50] <larsu> which is why I'm asking
[11:50] <larsu> mzanetti: it was a better time...
[11:50] <mzanetti> heh...
[11:51] <mzanetti> not really sure. it was easier in some places, harder in others
[11:51] <mzanetti> i.e. once you have a trunk full of automerged bugs, it wasn't fun to release that any more
[11:51] <larsu> why not? Don't merge if it's not ready to go in
[11:51] <larsu> now someone needs to deal with it after approving
[11:52] <mzanetti> because automerging didn't pull QA in. so it's easier to merge bugs to the code base
[11:52] <mzanetti> now landing things can be a pain, but trunk is generally higher quality
[11:53] <dandrader> cimi, please write that stuff down on the MP
[11:53] <seb128> larsu, it needs to go through the ci landing
[11:54] <dandrader> cimi, if you have the time, I would appreciate help on it as well. we could move that branch to ~unity-team so you could push as well
[11:54] <dandrader> cimi, also, you sure these updates are necessary? I didn't spot anything broken...
[11:54] <mzanetti> dandrader, cimi. do you want a silo for that uitk branch then? Or should I wait a little more?
[11:54] <larsu> mzanetti: good point. Couldn't we have added that to the MR process thoguh? I guess I shouldn't start this conversation in case didrocks is looking
[11:54] <mzanetti> hehe
[11:54] <mzanetti> indeed. nothing we can change right now
[11:55] <mzanetti> I'm actually quite happy with how it works right now, for the biggest parts
[11:56] <seb128> +1
[11:56] <mzanetti> larsu, still that gets us back to the original question, please sync with seb if you will land that branch. If you can't for some reason I guess I can squeeze it into some unity8 silo
[11:56] <seb128> larsu, also we do testing on device nowadays, with the current system you can batch 6 changes and test together, with individual commits you had to test every changesets
[11:58] <larsu> seb128: let's sync!
[11:58] <seb128> larsu, "sync"? you mean land the change?
[11:58] <seb128> sure, can put a landing for that one
[11:59] <larsu> seb128: yes :) was using mzanetti terminology
[11:59]  * larsu liked that
[11:59] <mzanetti> I did say sync?
[11:59]  * mzanetti reads scrollback :D
[12:00] <larsu> "please sync with seb"
[12:05] <mzanetti> ah :) yes
[13:28] <dandrader> cimi, replied to your comment in https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/deprecatedTheme/+merge/262216
[13:29] <dandrader> cimi, I think it's good as it is. This MP isn't meant, and doesn't have, to solve everything. just what's needed to get rid of these warnings.
[13:29] <cimi> dandrader, the new ubuntushape is deprecating things though
[13:29] <cimi> dandrader, for warning fine then
[13:29] <cimi> dandrader, we should however fix splash.qml
[13:29] <cimi> dandrader, we shouldn't have a visual regression because we are fixing a warning
[13:30] <dandrader> cimi, there should be no visual regression
[13:30] <dandrader> cimi, have you tried it?
[13:32] <cimi> dandrader, not yet, I will make sure to test it deeply
[13:34] <dandrader> cimi, changing all imports to 1.3 was already beyond the scope of this MP....
[13:40] <cimi> dandrader, well, sdk team said we need to either change them all or not
[13:41] <dandrader> for what's it's worth, trunk is already a mix of 0.1 and 1.1
[14:03] <cimi> dandrader, yeah, there are also other import 0.1 that need to be 1.3
[14:04] <dandrader> cimi, I also moved thos 0.1 to 1.3 in this branch
[14:05] <cimi> dandrader, grep -rn "Components 0\.1" .
[14:05] <cimi> #fail
[14:05] <cimi> that was settings components
[17:38] <ahoneybun> hello all I am having a issue with unity8 in a container
[21:32] <ahoneybun> any idea why my LXC container is blinking on and off and does not take input?