[00:02] <SpamapS> smoser: hey, remember pbput/pbget ? They're borken now
[00:02] <SpamapS> smoser: pastebin.com revoked the keys
[00:21] <smoser> SpamapS, oh. that sucks. that is kirkland .
[00:21] <SpamapS> smoser: Oh you were just the one who showed it to me. ;)
[00:21] <SpamapS> and it just failed me, ;)
[00:21] <smoser> i use https://gist.github.com/smoser/7647304/
[00:21] <SpamapS> but works if you make your own api key
[00:21] <smoser> i use that a lot. not perfect.
[00:21] <SpamapS> smoser: I had a crazy idea which was to just use bitcoin. ;)
[00:22] <smoser> bitcoin ?
[00:22] <smoser> (i'm not really here.)
[00:22] <SpamapS> the memo field is rather large, and you can spend about one one millionth of a penny
[00:22] <SpamapS> smoser: distributed hash table that anybody can fetch and verify cryptographically
[00:22] <SpamapS> err hash chain
[00:22] <SpamapS> not table
[00:23] <a|3x> hi, i have this problem with ufw, it gets switched off by itself occasionally, even after i do ufw enable
[00:23] <a|3x> any thoughts?
[00:24] <a|3x> ufw status shows "Status: inactive" again after a few days
[00:24] <smoser> SpamapS, i think pbput/pbget is actually sit atop pastebinit
[00:24] <smoser> but maybe i'm wrong.
[00:26] <lifeless> whats pbput/pbget?
[00:34] <SpamapS> lifeless: uuencodes a file and puts to pastebin
[00:34] <SpamapS> pastebinit rather
[00:34] <SpamapS> lifeless: and then reverses that too
[00:34] <SpamapS> rather handy for "I have this binary blob and I want to give it to you"
[00:34] <lifeless> ah
[01:08] <b4tm4n> is there something wrong with the following:
[01:08] <b4tm4n> ip rule add from 172.16.0.0/24 table vpn
[01:08] <b4tm4n> ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 dev tun0 table vpn
[01:08] <b4tm4n> i'm trying to route traffic from behind a router through a vpn
[05:25] <DenBeiren> morning
[05:25] <DenBeiren> i'm using rsync to transfer large amounts of data from one server to a synology
[05:26] <DenBeiren> transferspeed is a bit dissapointing
[05:27] <DenBeiren> 25-30 MB/s
[05:27] <DenBeiren> both machines have dual GB nics in a bond
[05:31] <linocisco> hi all, NTP.conf settings work under proxy with authentication ? because apt-get install ddoesn't work unless proxy config settings under apt.conf manuually
[05:47] <kickinz1> linocisco, you need to check if your firewall let ntp packets from your server to go through.
[05:47] <linocisco> kickinz1, i have no access to firewall. how can I check from client if my firewall blocked it
[05:47] <linocisco> ?
[06:00] <kickinz1> linocisco, try sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org
[06:43] <linocisco> kickinz1,
[06:43] <linocisco> root@ubuntuserver14:/# sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org
[06:43] <linocisco> 19 Jun 13:13:18 ntpdate[1547]: the NTP socket is in use, exiting
[06:45] <kickinz1> nslookup pool.ntp.org?
[06:49] <linocisco> kickinz1, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/11738951/
[06:50] <kickinz1> linocisco, so it seems you can reach out external ntp servers.
[06:58] <linocisco> kickinz1, reading this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=862620, "If the 'delay', 'offset', and 'jitter' fields are non-zero and you haven't synchronized, it probably means that you just need to wait a while. Check again that you've inserted the 'iburst' argument to your servers list! My peers, for reference, look something like the following:
[06:58] <linocisco> "
[07:05] <kickinz1> linocisco, from ntpq doc (http://doc.ntp.org/4.2.4/ntpq.html), peers
[07:05] <kickinz1>     Obtains a current list peers of the server, along with a summary of each peer's state. Summary information includes the address of the remote peer, the reference ID (0.0.0.0 if this is unknown), the stratum of the remote peer, the type of the peer (local, unicast, multicast or broadcast), when the last packet was received, the polling interval, in seconds, the reachability register, in octal, and the current estimated delay, offset and
[07:05] <kickinz1> dispersion of the peer, all in milliseconds. The character at the left margin of each line shows the synchronization status of the association and is a valuable diagnostic tool. The encoding and meaning of this character, called the tally code, is given later in this page.
[07:08] <kickinz1> linocisco, and a pastebin from a just installed ntp, 3 ntpq command issued with some seconds in between, first just after installing ntp: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/11739000/
[07:12] <KlausedSource> hello guys, i have issues with virtualenv/pip on my new ubuntu 14.04 vps. I wanted to install django-cms in a virtual env (everything without sudo). While most modules installed without problems, PIP complains about missing permission on some others.
[07:12] <KlausedSource> How is this possible?
[07:20] <KlausedSource> no one?
[07:22] <kickinz1> linocisco, in the ntpq doc, look at the tally codes
[07:22] <linocisco> kickinz1, yes.
[08:21] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:21] <linocisco> silient whisper
[10:21] <linocisco> silent whisper
[10:22] <RoyK> (resilient whisper)
[11:41] <kickinz1> sudo snappy list
[12:09] <rbasak> paultag: hey. Got a report (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1459916) that the docker daemon doesn't start automatically after installation. Before I look further, is this intended behaviour?
[12:10] <rbasak> (this is for 1.5.0 I think, but we're bumping to 1.6.2 soon. I haven't checked if it still applies yet)
[12:15] <kickinz1> rbazak: usual behavior seems to be docker-daemon start after install (trusty and utopic previous version did like that).
[12:15] <rbasak> kickinz1: thanks. In that case, could you look into the bug please?
[12:16] <kickinz1> rbasak, yes, this one an the one about using lxc engine.
[12:16] <rbasak> kickinz1: it might well end up invalid if the reporter has made some local changes previously or something. But it's be nice to conclude that, or conclude it's Incomplete, etc.
[12:44] <b4tm4n> is the best way to get modules to persist a reboot to add them to /etc/modules - i'm seeing varying answers and want to confirm
[12:48] <rbasak> teward: draft email to release team: http://pad.ubuntu.com/nginx-1-9
[12:48] <rbasak> teward: please can you review and check for accuracy?
[12:48] <rbasak> teward: I wrote it directly from my understanding so it could be wrong.
[16:05] <BTJustice> I am kicking around the idea of making a Ubuntu Server file server.  It would have to have the ability to be controlled by a Windows Server.  I want to be able for the Ubuntu Server to create user folders for Documents, Pictures, Videos, etc. and not to be accessed by any other user other than the account the folders are for.  Does Ubuntu Server have a way of knowing if the user changes their Windows password and updates it on the Ubuntu Serve
[16:05] <BTJustice> r?
[16:07] <jrwren> BTJustice: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/windows-networking.html
[16:11] <BTJustice> jrwren: Reading it now thanks.  I guess my biggest question is can the Windows Server (used to administer the workstations) have the ability to upidate the users/passwords used on the Ubuntu File Server?
[16:12] <jrwren> BTJustice: the answer is: it depends.
[17:49] <slowe> Hello all, I'm trying to use VLAN interfaces on 14.04.2 and seeing some weird behaviors. Are there are known caveats of which I should be aware?
[17:49] <slowe> Sorry, I meant to say are there *any* known caveats of which I should be aware?
[17:53] <bekks> slowe: Which "weird behaviors"?
[17:54] <slowe> bekks: HostA (with VLAN interface on VLAN 3) can't ping HostB (also with VLAN interface on VLAN 3), but HostB *can* ping HostA.
[17:54] <slowe> bekks: Also, I'm not seeing an ARP table entry on HostB for HostA, whereas on HostA I see an "incomplete" entry for HostB.
[17:55] <bekks> How did you configure the "VLAN interfaces"?
[17:56] <slowe> bekks: I'm using multiple ifcfg-* files in /etc/network/interfaces.d (with an appropriate "source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*" line in /etc/network/interfaces
[17:56] <slowe> bekks: There is an ifcfg-p55p1 for the physical interface, with no IP address assigned (inet manual)
[17:57] <bekks> slowe: Whats the output of "cat /etc/issue"?
[17:57] <slowe> bekks: Then there is an ifcfg-p55p1.3 for the VLAN 3 interface, with a static address assigned
[17:57] <slowe> bekks: The output is Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS
[17:59] <bekks> slowe: Can you show us your config files?
[18:00] <slowe> VLAN interface config files, physical interface config file, or both?
[18:00] <bekks> both, ideally.
[18:01] <slowe> bekks: Sure, one minute...
[18:04] <slowe> bekks: Here are the configuration files for host201, one of the two hosts in question: http://pastebin.com/CB7Q6Gi1
[18:05] <slowe> bekks: Here are the configuration files from host202: http://pastebin.com/KAnCdPQf
[18:06] <bekks> slowe: Did you try to use the line "vlan-raw-device p55p1" in the /etc/network/interfaces.d/ifcfg-p55p1.3 file?
[18:06] <slowe> bekks: The "vlan" package is installed on both systems, the 802.1q module is loaded on both systems, and the network interfaces to which they are connected are identically configured.
[18:07] <slowe> bekks: I have not added the "vlan-raw-device" to the configuration files as it was my understanding it was optional. Let me try that.
[18:08] <slowe> bekks: I've added that line to both servers, restarted the interface, and still get the same results.
[18:10] <slowe> bekks: Are the interface configurations cached anywhere?
[18:11] <bekks> firewalls and stuff is disabled?
[18:11] <slowe> bekks: Yes, firewall is disabled.
[18:12] <bekks> And the switch configuration is doublechecked as well?
[18:12] <slowe> bekks: The 2 switch ports to which these servers are connected are identically configured.
[18:13] <slowe> bekks: If there is a switch configuration issue, it doesn't explain the asymmetric connectivity (host202 being able to reach host201 but not vice versa)
[18:18] <slowe> Are the network configurations cached somewhere? I'm seeing that using "initctl restart network-interface" vs. "ifdown; ifup" is producing different results from the same configuration files.
[18:22] <bekks> Which different results?
[18:23] <slowe> bekks: With "initctl", I'm not seeing the VLAN interface at all, and p55p1 is getting assigned an IP address (the address that's supposed to be on the VLAN interface).
[18:24] <slowe> bekks: When I run "initctl start network-interface" for the VLAN interface, it also gets the assigned IP address, meaning both the physical interface and the VLAN interface are getting the same address. Odd.
[18:24] <slowe> bekks: I need to step away for a meeting. I'll check back in later. Thanks for your help so far.
[18:53] <mfisch> zul: will you guys be enabling keystone wsgi by default this cycle since eventlet is deprecated?
[18:53] <zul> mfisch,  not sure yet...possibly
[18:54] <mfisch> zul: puppet carries a copy of httpd/keystone.py because its not packaged so I was curious
[18:54] <mfisch> if that changes I'd like to remove the puppet forked copy
[18:54] <mfisch> its annoying to update and gets stale
[18:58] <zul> mfisch: still not sure yet...i havent been doing much packaging the past couple of weeks (been working on other things)
[18:59] <mfisch> okay thanks