| === Guest97037 is now known as Tm_T | ||
| === Guest50701 is now known as Tm_Tr | ||
| === Guest47071 is now known as pitti | ||
| pitti | Good morning | 04:53 |
|---|---|---|
| === pitti is now known as Guest48990 | ||
| === Guest48990 is now known as pitti_ | ||
| didrocks | good morning | 05:26 |
| pitti_ | ça va didrocks, as-tu eu un bon we ? | 06:11 |
| didrocks | pitti_: très bien, on est allé en extérieur et pas mal marché. On a planifié nos vacances grâce au portable + 3G en profitant du soleil :) | 06:12 |
| didrocks | pitti_: et toi ? | 06:12 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: ça semble bien ! | 06:14 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: nous avons été à Dresden à nouveau | 06:14 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: je suis encode là, j'ai un rendez-vous ici ce matin | 06:14 |
| didrocks | ah, tu rentres quand ? | 06:14 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: midi, après le rendez-vous | 06:16 |
| pitti_ | je vais travailler dans le train | 06:16 |
| didrocks | comfy train ;) | 06:18 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: mon bureau mobiles :) | 06:19 |
| didrocks | pitti_: waiting for you to plug a monitor and a keyboard to it then! :) | 06:22 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: not that comfy yet :) but power plugs and wifi | 06:22 |
| didrocks | well, wifi -> 3G, right? | 06:22 |
| didrocks | or real wifi? | 06:22 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: I suppose they have a 3G connection in the train of some sort | 06:25 |
| pitti_ | maybe satellite, but I don't know | 06:25 |
| pitti_ | I let Telekom do their stuff, as long as the bits are flowing :) | 06:25 |
| pitti_ | as the user you just see wifi | 06:26 |
| didrocks | pitti_: and the connexion is decent? | 06:29 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: not perfect of course, but much better than with 2g/3g tethering from my mobile | 06:29 |
| didrocks | still nice to have that service :) | 06:30 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 07:37 |
| didrocks | re seb128 | 07:38 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks ;-) | 07:38 |
| Laney | hello! | 07:40 |
| didrocks | hey Laney! | 07:41 |
| Laney | hey didrocks | 07:43 |
| seb128 | hey Laney, wie gehts? you are on IRC early today! | 07:43 |
| Laney | yeah want to send an email first ;-) | 07:44 |
| Laney | doing good thanks! | 07:45 |
| Laney | chillaxed at the weekend https://goo.gl/photos/MAbjkKbN2ZkU7uSD6 | 07:46 |
| Laney | how's it going? | 07:46 |
| seb128 | good! | 07:53 |
| seb128 | nice picture ;-) | 07:54 |
| Laney | we taught him a fun trick | 08:06 |
| Laney | when he put both of his arms up in the air everyone around copied it and cheered | 08:06 |
| Laney | he wouldn't stop doing it for the rest of the day | 08:07 |
| seb128 | haha | 08:08 |
| seb128 | sounds like you had some familly fun :-) | 08:08 |
| seb128 | hum, mterry is online, I've a feeling some people have a work week in Europe ;-) | 08:11 |
| mterry | seb128, heh :) I'm in Isle of Man, yeah | 08:11 |
| === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 | ||
| seb128 | didrocks, pitti_, if a systemd service A Requires/After=B.service and B.service is not installed, should A start or not? | 10:59 |
| seb128 | bregma, hey, is there any unity7 landing scheduled for wily? | 11:00 |
| seb128 | I see that some fixes are approved since may and still not landing | 11:00 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| didrocks | seb128: A wouldn't start | 11:43 |
| didrocks | Requires is a strong dependency | 11:43 |
| seb128 | didrocks, ok, I don't get why the job is in a failed state then... | 11:43 |
| didrocks | so A will never start if B couldn't get activated | 11:43 |
| didrocks | what's the message? | 11:43 |
| seb128 | would it start if it owns a dbus name and something try do dbus active it? | 11:43 |
| seb128 | what message? | 11:43 |
| didrocks | seb128: sudo sytemctl status <service_which_fails> | 11:44 |
| didrocks | systemctl* | 11:44 |
| seb128 | oh sorry, I got confused | 11:45 |
| didrocks | not sure what you are asking for, as it seems that B isn't installde in your case? | 11:45 |
| seb128 | I don't get why it tries to start | 11:45 |
| didrocks | installed* | 11:45 |
| seb128 | it fails because it timeouts | 11:45 |
| didrocks | ah | 11:45 |
| seb128 | which is expected, since it shouldn't be active | 11:45 |
| seb128 | yeah | 11:45 |
| seb128 | that's powerd.service | 11:45 |
| didrocks | so powerd.service tries to start and you don't know why, right? | 11:45 |
| seb128 | which Depends on lxc-android-start | 11:45 |
| seb128 | which is not installed | 11:45 |
| didrocks | and nothing Requires/Wants it? | 11:45 |
| seb128 | yes | 11:45 |
| seb128 | unsure | 11:46 |
| seb128 | how do I tell? ;-) | 11:46 |
| didrocks | grep -r Requires /lib/systemd/system/* | 11:46 |
| didrocks | and same for Wants :p | 11:46 |
| seb128 | user friendly :p | 11:46 |
| didrocks | yeah, I don't know of a reverse depends command | 11:46 |
| didrocks | (also, do you mind pastebining the service file?) | 11:47 |
| seb128 | let me see what I can do | 11:47 |
| seb128 | it's on the snappy personal image in a vm | 11:47 |
| seb128 | let's see if I can get internet working to pastebin things | 11:47 |
| didrocks | heh, I bet! : | 11:48 |
| * didrocks gets some water meanwhile now that I'm back from running | 11:48 | |
| seb128 | didrocks, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11756343/ | 11:57 |
| seb128 | it's not really clear | 11:58 |
| didrocks | WantedBy=multi-user.target | 11:58 |
| seb128 | but first 10 lines are systemctl --failed | 11:58 |
| didrocks | are you sure it's not activated? | 11:58 |
| seb128 | then it's cat powerd | 11:58 |
| seb128 | then status lxc-android-config | 11:58 |
| seb128 | well, powerd gets activated | 11:58 |
| seb128 | which is the issue | 11:59 |
| seb128 | it shouldn't | 11:59 |
| seb128 | there is no android side there | 11:59 |
| ogra_ | powerd should be activated .... but fixed for non android use cases ;) | 11:59 |
| didrocks | systemctl is-enabled powerd | 11:59 |
| didrocks | seb128: ^ | 11:59 |
| didrocks | I think I know what you mean now… I bet powerd is enabled on your unit | 12:01 |
| didrocks | so, if A Requires/After B | 12:01 |
| didrocks | and is A enabled (through a target, or as a dependency) | 12:02 |
| didrocks | A will try to be activated | 12:02 |
| didrocks | if B isn't there, A will fail to active | 12:02 |
| didrocks | (as you have here) | 12:02 |
| didrocks | systemd doesn't say "only active A if all requirements are installed" | 12:02 |
| didrocks | it will activate A, see that it needs B, try to start B, B fails (as not installed), and so A fails because of dependency missing | 12:03 |
| seb128 | didrocks, is-enabled -> enabled | 12:04 |
| seb128 | (sorry, had to restart the vm, took a bit) | 12:04 |
| didrocks | no worry | 12:04 |
| didrocks | but yeah, so it's what I meant here ^ | 12:04 |
| didrocks | (back in 5) | 12:05 |
| bregma | seb128, we have a bunch of Unity 7 fixes in a silo for wily but we haven't yet figured out why there are suddenly so many AP test failures | 12:05 |
| seb128 | bregma, k | 12:05 |
| === pitti_ is now known as pitti | ||
| === pitti is now known as Guest84030 | ||
| Guest84030 | seb128: no, in that case A sohuld not start; it would if it was a Wants= instead of a Requires= | 12:09 |
| === Guest84030 is now known as pitti_ | ||
| seb128 | pitti_, hey | 12:09 |
| seb128 | bregma, hum, k, good luck with that | 12:10 |
| pitti_ | meh, what's up with freenode? | 12:10 |
| pitti_ | I can't be "pitti" | 12:10 |
| didrocks | pitti_: but it will fail as seb128 saw, right? (due to missing Requirements) | 12:10 |
| seb128 | there can be only one pitti! | 12:10 |
| seb128 | didrocks, well, it doesn't fail | 12:10 |
| seb128 | it starts | 12:10 |
| seb128 | then get killed by timeout because powerd doesn't work without android | 12:10 |
| pitti_ | ca va seb128 ! (brb) | 12:10 |
| didrocks | ah, I misread then | 12:10 |
| seb128 | so it's in failed state | 12:11 |
| didrocks | that's indeed very weird | 12:11 |
| seb128 | what if the job owns a dbus name and it's dbus activated? | 12:11 |
| Laney | pitti_: try /msg nickserv release pitti | 12:12 |
| seb128 | it's->is | 12:12 |
| Laney | if you're authed first | 12:12 |
| pitti_ | Laney: still says "nick pitti is temporarily unavailable"; I already tried ghosting too | 12:15 |
| pitti_ | didrocks: yes, it will fail | 12:15 |
| seb128 | pitti_, you are in IoM this week? | 12:16 |
| pitti_ | seb128: no, just entered the train from Dresden to Augsburg | 12:16 |
| seb128 | oh ok | 12:17 |
| pitti_ | seb128: we were visiting family/friends again, and today I had a long appointment here | 12:17 |
| seb128 | I see | 12:17 |
| seb128 | seems like there is a snappy week in IoM I though you might be there ;-) | 12:17 |
| pitti_ | seb128: nah, I'm not in the snappy business :) | 12:19 |
| seb128 | ;-) | 12:19 |
| seb128 | k, so I don't understand why powerd try to start on that snappy personal issue | 12:19 |
| seb128 | lxc-android-config is not installed and is a Requires | 12:19 |
| pitti_ | seb128: those are separate issues | 12:21 |
| pitti_ | seb128: starting A or not is unrelated to A's dependencies | 12:22 |
| pitti_ | the question is if some target or service wants/requires A | 12:22 |
| seb128 | pitti_, powerd is WantedBy=multi-user.target | 12:22 |
| pitti_ | if powerd has [Install]WantedBy=multi-user.target or so, and gets enabled, it will try to starr | 12:22 |
| pitti_ | seb128: perhaps it's easier to explain what you want to do? | 12:23 |
| seb128 | pitti_, I want to have a clean boot on the snappy personal iso | 12:23 |
| seb128 | atm powerd is listed as failed because it starts, can't work, timeout and creates a fail | 12:23 |
| pitti_ | ok, so it wil always try to start (unless you disable it) | 12:23 |
| seb128 | it can't work because it's a desktop amd64 install and there is no android side | 12:23 |
| seb128 | so it shouldn't try to start if lxc-android-config is missing | 12:24 |
| seb128 | not sure how to state that though | 12:24 |
| pitti_ | seb128: so, what you can do: | 12:24 |
| pitti_ | - disable it | 12:24 |
| seb128 | locally? | 12:24 |
| pitti_ | - ship an override unit or drop-in which disables it | 12:25 |
| pitti_ | - add a Condition* to check if lxc/android is available | 12:25 |
| seb128 | is there a standard Condition stating "if that job is started"? | 12:25 |
| pitti_ | like, ConditionPathIsMountPoint=/srv/lxc/android or whatever | 12:25 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| pitti_ | or | 12:26 |
| pitti_ | - adjust the postinst to only enable the service in ubuntu touch / with android available | 12:26 |
| pitti_ | no, and that wouldn't help you | 12:26 |
| ogra_ | in any case file a bug so it learns to handle ACPI stuff | 12:27 |
| seb128 | why wouldn't it? | 12:27 |
| seb128 | ogra_, right | 12:28 |
| pitti_ | seb128: because chances are high that it's not yet started at the time when powerd.service is considered | 12:28 |
| ogra_ | (it is what the UI talks to about all brightness stuff ... and if available aboout proximity sensor covering etc) | 12:28 |
| pitti_ | (in fact it most probably won't be) | 12:28 |
| didrocks | (that's what I told: it will try to start without looking at the dependencies…) | 12:28 |
| didrocks | seems like this didn't get to the wire though :p | 12:29 |
| pitti_ | seb128: if you want to express that, then say it directly: | 12:29 |
| seb128 | didrocks, I guess it's just me not understand the systemd model well enough :p | 12:29 |
| seb128 | upstart \o/ | 12:29 |
| pitti_ | WantedBy=lxc-android.service | 12:29 |
| pitti_ | instead of multi-user.target | 12:29 |
| ogra_ | nobody understants it ... :P | 12:29 |
| ogra_ | that is why pitti needs to write plea-for-help mails :) | 12:29 |
| didrocks | this is simple: basically there is no magic | 12:29 |
| didrocks | (for this) | 12:30 |
| pitti_ | seb128: perhaps that would be cleanest, if we only ever want to start it with android? | 12:30 |
| pitti_ | well, you say "please always start powerd" and then complain that it does :) | 12:30 |
| seb128 | well, "wait for that job to start to start" is not magic | 12:30 |
| didrocks | yeah, it's explicit, as you told it in Requires/After | 12:30 |
| didrocks | explicitely | 12:31 |
| seb128 | well, requires/after is not enough to state that | 12:31 |
| pitti_ | seb128: yes, that's After= | 12:31 |
| seb128 | since it starts despite the other one not being started | 12:31 |
| seb128 | pitti_, powed has Requires/After lxc | 12:31 |
| didrocks | that's the part I don't understand | 12:31 |
| didrocks | are you sure the daemon starts? | 12:31 |
| seb128 | yes | 12:31 |
| seb128 | status is clear | 12:31 |
| didrocks | or it's just trying to activate the service | 12:31 |
| seb128 | it starts and hit the timeout and get killed | 12:31 |
| didrocks | you didn't get us the status output | 12:31 |
| seb128 | need to restart the vm | 12:32 |
| seb128 | but it stats the daemon | 12:32 |
| pitti_ | what it says now is: | 12:32 |
| seb128 | but the daemon hangs because no android side | 12:32 |
| seb128 | and gets killed by timeout | 12:32 |
| seb128 | because it never daemonize | 12:32 |
| pitti_ | - always start powerd (WantedBy=multi-user.target) | 12:32 |
| pitti_ | and | 12:32 |
| didrocks | seb128: I guess the service starts, but not the daemon | 12:33 |
| didrocks | and the service waits for lxc-android-config to start | 12:33 |
| seb128 | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/powerd/trunk/view/head:/debian/powerd.service | 12:33 |
| didrocks | and fails after a timeout | 12:33 |
| pitti_ | - I need lxc-android.service (Requires=) and start after it (After=) | 12:33 |
| pitti_ | apparently that's not what we want then? | 12:33 |
| pitti_ | (sorry, I really don't know much about powerd, and whether it should be started in any other use case) | 12:33 |
| seb128 | pitti_, btw you added that service according to the blame :p | 12:33 |
| pitti_ | my guess is that WantedBy=lxc-android.service and After=lxc-android.service should be what you want? | 12:33 |
| seb128 | would WantedBy state that lxc-android wants powerd? | 12:34 |
| seb128 | which is not the case, lxc-android doesn't care about if powerd is there or no | 12:34 |
| seb128 | not | 12:34 |
| pitti_ | seb128: yeah :) (cf. "I don't know much when it shold be started) | 12:35 |
| seb128 | my understand is that it should be started on systems with an android side | 12:35 |
| seb128 | because that's what it talks to | 12:35 |
| didrocks | I guess the ConditionPathExists= would be the best bet… | 12:35 |
| seb128 | that feels hackish | 12:36 |
| seb128 | like I've no clue is the path is stable or bound to change | 12:36 |
| pitti_ | it states that you want to start it when lxc-android.service starts | 12:36 |
| seb128 | "it"? | 12:36 |
| pitti_ | and it sounded like that's what you wanted | 12:36 |
| pitti_ | (ICBW) | 12:36 |
| seb128 | it does | 12:36 |
| seb128 | the issue atm is that it starts on systems where lxc-android.service is not installed | 12:37 |
| pitti_ | start on started dbus and android | 12:37 |
| pitti_ | respawn | 12:37 |
| seb128 | that's upstart syntax? | 12:37 |
| pitti_ | that's the upstart job, which is fairly equivalent to that | 12:37 |
| pitti_ | (dbus is implied, you don't need to declare that) | 12:37 |
| seb128 | well, the upstart job start only on "android" | 12:38 |
| pitti_ | yes, that's from debian/upstart | 12:38 |
| seb128 | which is what we want | 12:38 |
| seb128 | the systemd job stats atm despite having no android afaik | 12:38 |
| seb128 | starts* | 12:38 |
| seb128 | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/powerd/trunk/view/head:/debian/powerd.service | 12:38 |
| seb128 | would deleting the WantedBy work? | 12:39 |
| seb128 | if that's what makes it start atm | 12:39 |
| didrocks | well, it will not start then on android system | 12:39 |
| pitti_ | seb128: right, so changing WantedBy to lxc-android.service (please check the correct name) should be fine | 12:39 |
| seb128 | k | 12:39 |
| pitti_ | seb128: just deleting it will then not make it start at all, unless something else requires/wants powerd | 12:39 |
| seb128 | but lxc-android doesn't want it | 12:39 |
| seb128 | so it would work | 12:39 |
| seb128 | but it feels like a wrong workaround | 12:40 |
| pitti_ | (which might be the case) | 12:40 |
| seb128 | so there is no way in systemd to state "start if that job is started"? | 12:40 |
| seb128 | or is that WantedBy? | 12:40 |
| seb128 | the naming is confusing if that's the case | 12:40 |
| didrocks | this is the WantedBy (conterpart of Wants) | 12:40 |
| seb128 | it suggests the other job wants yours | 12:40 |
| didrocks | counterpart* | 12:40 |
| seb128 | when the other job doesn't care | 12:40 |
| didrocks | well, it's the only way to achieve what you want, that or Condition | 12:41 |
| pitti_ | seb128: well, we don't have a target for android support, so that's the closest thing | 12:41 |
| seb128 | k | 12:41 |
| seb128 | didrocks, pitti_, thanks | 12:41 |
| seb128 | that wfm | 12:41 |
| seb128 | the naming is just counter intuitive | 12:41 |
| pitti_ | seb128: that's WantedBy=, more or less (it's usually being used with targets, where reading it makes more sense) | 12:42 |
| seb128 | they should have called if "IfJobStarted" or something | 12:42 |
| pitti_ | in a dependency model you can't do "start me if that other thing starts", that's the event-based upstart model | 12:42 |
| seb128 | pitti_, well you can condition on the existence of a while, which can be created by another job | 12:43 |
| seb128 | so I don't get why you couldn't condition on the status of another job | 12:43 |
| seb128 | it's just another random condition | 12:43 |
| seb128 | of a file* | 12:43 |
| pitti_ | seb128: yes, you can also use conditions | 12:43 |
| seb128 | but there is no builtin condition "is that job active" | 12:44 |
| seb128 | ? | 12:44 |
| pitti_ | not quite | 12:44 |
| seb128 | k | 12:44 |
| pitti_ | no, there isn't | 12:44 |
| pitti_ | it wouldn't do what you think it does | 12:45 |
| pitti_ | or you had to start everything serially | 12:45 |
| seb128 | well, you would have to block in the case where you depends from something else to be ready | 12:45 |
| seb128 | but if that's what you want/need... | 12:46 |
| pitti_ | well, it could be done with "running or will be run in the current transaction" | 12:46 |
| pitti_ | but anyway, it's rather counterintutitive in a dependency based model | 12:46 |
| seb128 | yeah, I guess I just didn't adapt to the the dependency model yet | 12:46 |
| seb128 | that feels less natural to me atm | 12:47 |
| seb128 | I might eventually get used to it ;-) | 12:47 |
| seb128 | didrocks, pitti_, thanks | 12:47 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| pitti_ | seb128: thanks to you too | 12:48 |
| pitti_ | sorry for having misunderstood powerd when I wrote that service | 12:50 |
| seb128 | no worry | 12:50 |
| seb128 | ideally powerd should work on linux !android systems as well | 12:50 |
| pitti_ | ok, back to autopkgtest-cloud :) | 12:50 |
| seb128 | but it doesn't atm | 12:51 |
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| Sweet5hark | desrt, larsu, seb128: http://pranavk.github.io/open-source/initial-preview-of-libreoffice-integration-with-gnome-documents/ <- libreoffice running in a gnome-documents container ... | 14:35 |
| Sweet5hark | (even with basic selections/editing) | 14:36 |
| seb128 | cool I guess | 14:36 |
| === mfisch` is now known as mfisch | ||
| seb128 | you are doing something similar for our touch viewer, right? ;-) | 14:36 |
| === mfisch is now known as Guest82290 | ||
| Sweet5hark | seb128: I throwing a hint over the fence and hope someone who already knows about QML and foo will pick it up from there, yeah ;) | 14:38 |
| seb128 | right ;-) | 14:38 |
| seb128 | let's see how that goes | 14:38 |
| Sweet5hark | s/hint/proof of concept/ | 14:38 |
| seb128 | Sweet5hark, so you gave the example to dpm&co? | 14:38 |
| Sweet5hark | seb128: working on it right now. | 14:39 |
| seb128 | great | 14:39 |
| seb128 | k, need to restart machine to test some iso, back in a bit | 14:39 |
| === pitti_ is now known as pitti | ||
| === pitti is now known as Guest85442 | ||
| === Guest85442 is now known as pitti_ | ||
| dpm | excellent, thanks Sweet5hark! | 15:21 |
| Sweet5hark | dpm: FYI, I get it to load a document and to report that the document is a writer document (so it should already be done with the parsing etc.) for that ... however I get a segfault after that, dunno why yet. | 15:38 |
| * Sweet5hark installs libreoffice-dbg. | 15:38 | |
| dpm | thanks for following up Sweet5hark | 15:59 |
| Laney | Sweet5hark: looks like we got new wps from an autosync - https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Wily/view/AutoPkgTest/job/wily-adt-libreoffice/91/ARCH=i386,label=adt/console now fails | 16:01 |
| Laney | can we take http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git/commit/?id=99bd1e8ec3736c450b32f09388787a70e2dbbf95 or similar or are you going to upload a new version? | 16:02 |
| === Guest82290 is now known as mfisch | ||
| Sweet5hark | dpm, seb128: *squeee* | 16:32 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| * Sweet5hark just rendered a document into a png | 16:32 | |
| seb128 | nice | 16:33 |
| Sweet5hark | ca. 20 lines of C++11 to render the image into the buffer. ca. 60 lines of C to tell libpng to write it to a file. | 16:34 |
| * didrocks1 waves good evening | 16:38 | |
| larsu | Sweet5hark: you're comparing a language from a couple of years ago with a 20-year-old library... | 16:41 |
| larsu | (which has a really bad API) | 16:41 |
| Sweet5hark | larsu: it wasnt meant as a comparison between C/C++ really. Rather just to show that the 'LibreOffice-specific' stuff to use this is just some 20 lines, the rest being boilerplate for the demo. | 16:50 |
| larsu | fair enough :) | 16:56 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| dpm | Sweet5hark, great. Let me or popey know once you've got the final example | 17:17 |
| Sweet5hark | dpm: yep, will tindy it up a bit and add some documentation, you will have it tomorrow. | 17:31 |
| dpm | thanks Sweet5hark! | 17:43 |
| dupingping | awesome notes editor: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntusticky/files/ubuntu-sticky-trial_1.0.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb/download | 18:38 |
| GunnarHj | darkxst: Hi Tim, did you notice my comments at bug #1440275? | 18:39 |
| ubot5 | bug 1440275 in gnome-desktop3 (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu GNOME only allows regional format setting for US, UK, Canada, Australia, and NZ" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1440275 | 18:39 |
| Sweet5hark | dpm: you've got mail ;) | 18:47 |
| === nessita_ is now known as nessita | ||
| === siel_ is now known as siel | ||
| robert_ancell | Enabled Inbox for work email today. So. Much. Easier. :) | 22:55 |
| robert_ancell_ | rsalveti, I think I'm set as the bug supervisor for libhybris in Launchpad. Can you remove me from that? https://launchpad.net/libhybris/+configure-bugtracker | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!