[01:16] <drocsid> [#ubuntu] when I remove a package file, I notice that it leaves behind some of the configuration. What if I want to com
[01:17] <drocsid>  when I remove a package file, I notice that it leaves behind some of the configuration. What if I want to completly remove the package and config files. I'm asking because I tried removing them manually, but now when I reinstall the packate, dpkg is not installing the init scripts included with the package.
[01:30] <mbeacom> Hello everyone!  Would anyone happen to know why, after resizing my ubuntu server 14.04.2 ext4 partition from 50 GB to 100 GB using fdisk and then resize2fs to expand the FS... The FS states it is expanded, but the free space doesn't reflect the change.  Any thoughts?
[03:07] <sarnold> drocsid: use apt-get purge or dpkg --purge, not dpkg --remove, if you want the config files to be deleted too
[03:45] <dupingping> The awesome software is published, You can use the trial version of Sticky Notes.
[03:45] <dupingping> http://korsoftware.com
[05:54] <ArifWW> Hi all, is all server listed on http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/server/models/?release=14.04%20LTS&vendors=HP tested for ubuntu openstack ?
[06:46] <jak2000> hi all, anyone here copied from an IPAD Photos/Videos to the Hard Disk? how to?
[07:56] <jamespag`> morning all
[07:59] <trippeh> whoops, openssl update with stronger minimum DH size requirement broke mariadb ssl connections here
[08:01] <trippeh> upgrading the db servers too fixed it
[08:02] <trippeh> only clients were patched ;)
[08:35] <lordievader> Good morning.
[09:37] <rbasak> teward: draft email to release team: http://pad.ubuntu.com/nginx-1-9
[09:37] <rbasak> teward: please can you review and check for accuracy?
[09:37] <rbasak> teward: I wrote it directly from my understanding so it could be wrong.
[12:19] <willemgf> Hi, We hava a problem with configuring the use of jumbo-frame on a bridge. We use 2 10GB interfaces which comes up well with MTU 9000. Those 2 interfaces are used within a bond that also comes up well with MTU 9000, as well the vlan-tagged bond interfaces. But the bridge, linked to a vlan-tagged bond interface is not always available with MTU 9000 after boot. Any help is welcome to get this fixed permanently.
[12:24] <OpenTokix> willemgf:Don't use jumbo frames
[12:24] <OpenTokix> they add nothing
[12:24] <OpenTokix> unless you have _very_ long round trips
[12:24] <OpenTokix> 300ms+
[12:24] <OpenTokix> For a LAN - jumbo frames add nothing
[12:29] <willemgf> OpenTokix: Hmmm, we configured it, in advice, for our cloud-environment for the connection to our Ceph-storage.
[12:29] <willemgf>  Any good document on the net available that confirms it has no added value?
[12:30] <OpenTokix> willemgf: There is a common misconception that it will be better.
[12:30] <OpenTokix> In theory it will be - but in practise - generally no
[12:30] <OpenTokix> why? - since the networking hardware is _super_ optimized for a MTU of 1500
[12:30] <lordievader> Does the rfc specify an intended usage?
[12:31] <lordievader> Transatlantic links or something?
[12:31] <OpenTokix> willemgf: did some execcive labratory testing on various workloads with and without jumbo frames. - And it adds nothing, more then head ache
[12:31] <willemgf> Is there any technical documentation that
[12:32] <willemgf> describes this behavior
[12:32] <OpenTokix> willemgf: I am guessing the Ceph-dudes used some guess work when they advice it. - Much like Datastax does, and variouys other modern cloud/big-data people.
[12:32] <OpenTokix> willemgf: Used server grate 10G hardware, various vendors + fluke traffic generators
[12:33] <OpenTokix> saw _no_ increase thru put with jumbo frames, in many different configurations
[12:33] <trippeh_> you may want a slightly-bigger-than-1500 mtu if you run a overlay network on top, so you can run 1500b mtu on the inner network.
[12:34] <willemgf> OpenTokix: OK, thnx. Will discus this internally. If necessary I will check on the ceph-channel as well.
[12:35] <OpenTokix> willemgf: Any vendor I have talked to about this, have _nothing_ to back it up. More then it "should" be better. - but in reality, it makes no difference.
[13:26] <jamespage> zul, coreycb: semantic versioning here we come :-)
[13:27] <zul> nova being called 8.0.0 now? :)
[13:28] <jamespage> 12.0.0
[13:29] <coreycb> epoch++ :)
[13:50] <zul> jamespage: *sigh*
[15:42] <teward> rbasak: checking now (sorry for delay)
[15:44] <teward> rbasak: looks good except the minor revisions I made in the pad, please review
[16:10] <coreycb> zul, jamespage: the icehouse stable release is ready for review if one of you can take a look and sponsor me - bug 1467533 (mp's are in the bug)
[16:10] <coreycb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1467533
[16:14] <zul> coreycb: ill take a look this afternoon
[17:13] <teward> so, just a question, is there a reason https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting hasn't been updated?
[22:25] <keithzg> Has anyone migrated from Fogbugz (the self-hosted version, not the online one) to another bugtracker? I'm rather hoping our company can migrate to something non-proprietary but the best I can find is a Perl script for Fogbugz->Bugzilla circa 2006...
[22:26] <keithzg> Relatedly, how much of a pain is it to run one's own instance of Launchpad? I kindof prefer it to Bugzilla, but it seems like it'd be very simple to set up an instance of Bugzilla, while conversely I've yet to find simple instructions for setting up a Launchpad instance and there aren't any packages in the repos unless I'm blind.
[22:30] <sarnold> keithzg: I've gotten the impression that launchpad is a one-instance program..
[22:30] <sarnold> keithzg: hopefully helpful https://dev.launchpad.net/
[22:32] <keithzg> sarnold: Yeah, that site is part of why I asked here, heh, since nowhere does it say anything about running your own instance. Alas. I was hoping to aim for that, since I like the look and functionality more than Bugzilla (although it's gotten better over the years) and I'm far more comfortable with Python and Javascript than I am with Perl.
[22:33] <keithzg> I see https://dev.launchpad.net/Running for setting it up for oneself, but I was curious if anyone had any experience actually doing so.
[22:33] <keithzg> Err, I know my setences contradicted themselves there; long day at work :P
[22:34] <sarnold> keithzg: there's a #launchpad that mght be more useful
[22:34] <keithzg> I think I meant "doesn't say anything about running your own instance after installation"
[22:34] <keithzg> sarnold: Ah, didn't know that existed, yeah I'll give that a shot, thanks.
[22:35] <keithzg> Still wondering though if anyone out there has migrated from Fogbugz to any Free Software bug tracker, since I'd love not to have to invent the wheel, heh.
[23:16]  * ianorlin wonders if a juju charm to dpeloy  one's own version of launchpad would be a waste of time to make