[15:01] hiya [15:02] could somebody put up a quick post on the fridge linking to https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-community-team/2015-June/000646.html? [15:08] dholbach: I can do a cross-post if that's ok. [15:10] cross-post? [15:22] dholbach: for mailing list posts, what we do is re-post the whole email on the fridge. [15:23] ah ok [15:23] yes [15:23] cool :) [15:23] I still can't log in to the fridge any more :-/ [15:23] I don't know why [15:24] dholbach: let me check that real quick [15:24] it looks like I'm in a openid login loop [15:24] or something [15:24] hmm. let me try giving you a logout link to see if that helps [15:25] dholbach: https://fridge.ubuntu.com/wp-login.php?action=logout [15:26] I'll try [15:26] no, still same problem :-/ [15:26] want me to ping IS on it? [15:28] I think I'll just send a ticket [15:29] thanks for your help jose :) [15:29] no prob! [15:29] dholbach: oh, just to confirm. planet too? [15:30] sure [15:30] posted [15:31] czajkowski, ^ [15:32] thanks folks [16:35] I've stuck

s around the content on https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2015/06/25/joint-statement-from-the-cc-and-kc/ [16:36] and given it a one-line introduction to try the make the origin/authorship/context clearer [16:36] and pre-empty potential confusion [16:36] and pre-empt potential confusion [16:37] we don't usually do that [16:37] but ok :) [16:37] seems reasonable in this case [16:41] it's normally done for Ubuntu News: {introduction} {snippet} [16:44] I've found another email-posted-in-directly http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2015/04/30/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-lynx-end-of-life-reached-on-april-30-2015/ [16:45] which would concut that usual practice seems to have changed/headed that way [16:46] concur [16:47] tjat [16:47] ...at least for The Fridge, even if not Ubuntu News [16:47] that's how we usually do them on the fridge [16:47] no intro, no blockquote, just straight copy from the mailing list [16:48] I'm really ok with the change for this CC/KC statement, just noting that it's usual :) [16:48] in light of recent confusion observed, it might be worth pondering about changing/tighening this up [16:48] thank you [16:48] the citation at the bottom is supposed to make it clear, the CC post that was removed had no citation [16:48] which I think was the problem [16:49] the revision that I looked at had one (when I looked really hard!), though if I'd missed it, most readers probably had too [16:50] so it was there, but coming /after/, it was unclear or getting missed between the By-line, and the content from somebody else [16:50] yeah, so are supposed to put Originally posted.. blah blah, but in the case of the CC post it was an etherpad that the CC just asked jose to post, so no place to reference [16:51] anyway, this post is fine [16:51] * pleia2 back2work [16:52] * sladen nods [19:58] adding alpha1 to fridge