[09:29] <cjwatson> (bazaar.launchpad.net memory upgrade completed successfully)
[09:30] <cjwatson> 6GB -> 16GB
[09:31] <cjwatson> well, the codebrowse frontend, which is the thing that keeps OOMing ...
[12:44] <daker> hi guys, i do have a wired thing with LP
[12:45] <daker> i want to login, LP redirects me to login.lp.n
[12:45] <daker> i fil my credentials then LP tells me to type the verification code
[12:46] <daker> i mean the 2-factor authentication but i don't have any 2f device added
[12:56] <wgrant> daker: #canonical-sysadmin can help you with that Ubuntu One login issue.
[12:56] <daker> wgrant: ok thank you
[12:57] <wgrant> daker: A setting was changed recently which means 2FA is always requested for launchpad.net if you have a device activated.
[12:58] <daker> wgrant: no i don't have any device added
[12:59] <wgrant> daker: You're in https://launchpad.net/~sso-2f-testers
[12:59] <daker> ah i see
[12:59] <wgrant> So you have done 2FA in the past.
[12:59] <wgrant> I suspect that you just disabled the "always ask me for 2FA" setting.
[12:59] <daker> no i wasn't able to added my device
[13:00] <daker> add*
[13:00] <wgrant> Anyway, #canonical-sysadmin can sort it out.
[13:00] <daker> wgrant: ok thanks!
[20:54] <bdmurray> Is the 1.0 version of the Launchpad API EoL? https://api.launchpad.net/1.0.html
[20:54] <bdmurray> "It was introduced in March 2010, and its end-of-life date is April 2015"
[20:55] <wgrant> bdmurray: Launchpad's concept of API versioning is silly and untenable. We should probably remove that text.
[21:00] <bdmurray> wgrant: Okay, I was wondering because I just ran across a comment in software-properties about it being EoL in 2015.
[21:02] <wgrant> bdmurray: That was the original plan, but the plan was predicated on it being reasonable to guarantee stability of 1.0 and issue new versions afterwards.
[21:02] <wgrant> bdmurray: In practice, parts of 1.0 that few people care about have evolved as necessary, so there's no reason to kill it now.