[02:39] <wolflarson> Hello all, I am having some issues trying out motherboard raid (intel) on my computer. I have created the RAID array and durring the install of ubuntu server it seemed to have detected it however I am having issues mounting the array
[02:39] <wolflarson> can anyone point me in the right direction ?
[02:52] <wolflarson> dmraid -s shows my array as expected I am just having problems  mounting it or perhaps formating it
[07:49] <jamespage> morning
[07:51] <jamespage> bug 1469584
[08:37] <lordievader> Good morning.
[14:50] <elliotd123> Hi guys, my servers for some reason report temp as 8300 in /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0, but there's no way that's correct (8.3C?). Indeed, lm_sensors reports much higher temps (appears normal). Anyone know what's going on here?
[14:57] <teward> rbasak: poke
[15:39] <dannf> rbasak: is there a specific person/persons that tends to approve mysql srus?
[15:45] <teward> rbasak: i think you knwo why i'm poking you wrt nginx, no rush, i can poke the release team myself if you're not around :)
[15:45] <teward> (rather you do it)
[15:51] <coreycb> jamespage, zul: I finally looked at this again and it builds successfully for i386 on a local build so I'm at a loss as to why it ftbfs - https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing/+archive/ubuntu/juno/+build/7573015
[16:14] <Kully3xf> what's the name of the ubuntu-server download that is the most light weight
[16:14] <Kully3xf> not lubuntu
[16:15] <mnaser> minimal?
[16:15] <Kully3xf> actual ubuntu - need to fit on a tight spaced pendrive
[16:15] <Kully3xf> yes
[16:15] <Kully3xf> thanks
[16:15] <teward> Kully3xf: um... ubuntu minimal, but ubuntu-server comes pretty minimal on its own
[16:15] <teward> (if you go through tasksel and unselect everything then you don't get much more than the CLI, kernel, and core components, IIRC)
[16:16] <Kully3xf> yea it was minimal. Thanks all - having a brain fart
[16:30] <axisys> whats the fix for leap second?
[16:43] <teward> does update-ca-certificates by design not follow symlinks?
[17:25] <teward> anyone seen rbasak?
[17:26] <Azaril> should my boxes autoupgrade from say 12.04.01 to 12.04.05
[17:26] <Azaril> ?
[17:26] <teward> Azaril: 12.04.1 and 12.04.5 are identical if you continue to do apt-get update, etc.
[17:27] <Azaril> ok
[17:27] <Azaril> im just doing security updates, so thats ok right?
[17:27] <teward> if it were me i'd pull from the updates repo too but that's just me
[17:28] <teward> (12.04.1 and 12.04.5 i think are just the ISO respins with newer packages, updates, kernel, etc.but don't quote me on that)
[17:28] <Azaril> thanks man
[17:29] <teward> here we go... http://askubuntu.com/questions/106159/what-are-point-releases-in-lts-versions
[17:29] <teward> but if you keep up with the updates on the repositories (security and -updates) then you're no different if you started on 12.04.1 or 12.04.5
[17:46] <Kully3xf> hey all - I've got a brandnew ubuntu server running
[17:46] <Kully3xf> apt-get upgrade returns 401 on ALL repos
[17:46] <Kully3xf> and wget www.ubuntu.com returns  Resolving cfauth_1601 (cfauth_1601)... 10.0.7.20 Connecting to cfauth_1601 (cfauth_1601)|10.0.7.20|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 401 Unauthorized  Username/Password Authentication Failed.
[17:46] <tarpman> teward: modulo HWE bits on newer isos, moving an existing system to those is manual
[17:46] <Kully3xf> any idea what's going on? I can get to them from the desktop just fine - but not this VM
[17:48] <teward> tarpman: right, but otherwise standard updates will be essentially identical to 12.04.5 (from 12.04.1, etc.)?
[17:48] <tarpman> right
[17:48] <teward> Kully3xf: do you have a web proxy somewhere in between you and there?
[17:48] <Azaril> hwe?
[17:48] <teward> (although, wget ubuntu.com... why are you doing that)
[17:49] <teward> Azaril: hardware enablement
[17:49] <teward> i think
[17:49] <Azaril> ah
[17:49] <teward> hardware enablement stack
[17:49] <Azaril> thats fine
[17:49] <tarpman> backported kernel and X from later releases
[17:49] <teward> but otherwise identical?
[17:52] <sarnold> Kully3xf: check the 'host' output for a variety of dns names between your desktop and your vm, I suspect your hoster is doing something to try to use local mirrors for ubuntu content
[17:52] <Kully3xf> I'm not sure if I do or if I dont
[17:52] <Kully3xf> it's at work so probably
[17:52] <Kully3xf> new job
[17:52] <Kully3xf> idk what they're running
[17:54] <teward> if it's at work they likely have a web proxy/gateway
[17:54] <teward> which all data routes through, which needs authentication
[17:54] <Kully3xf> how can I authenticate an ubuntu server?
[17:55] <Kully3xf> hmm, maybe it's best to NAT the VM?
[17:55] <teward> i think you should start discussing with your workplace's IT staff
[17:55] <teward> because there's somethin up there
[18:51] <noncomcinse> I installed ubuntu server today, and I'm wondering how to get audio to work?
[18:52] <noncomcinse> I tried installing alsa, but that didn't seem to do anything
[19:16] <gchristensen> Hi, is there a way to require an upstart target not start until another target has run and exited?
[19:17] <gchristensen> (without altering the target)
[19:17] <sarnold> gchristensen: is that becaus eyou don't want to modify the file or don't want to fiddle with the target at all?
[19:18] <sarnold> gchristensen: the .override files might help you overcome the first half of that..
[19:18] <gchristensen> because I don't want to modify the file, .override might do it :)
[19:18] <gchristensen> perfect, thank you sarnold
[19:19] <sarnold> yay :)
[19:23] <gchristensen> sarnold: is there a way to, override the `start on` stanza, but just append to the criteria with an AND?
[19:28] <parallel21> Setting up a bridged interface on this computer knocks out the wall port at my work
[19:36] <teward> sarnold: mind if i pick your brain?
[19:37]  * patdk-wk wants to watch!
[19:38] <teward> probably better to ask "What's the policy to poke the release team on something that was emailed to their list?
[19:38] <patdk-wk> only with 10lb sledges or larger
[19:38] <teward> lol
[20:06] <sarnold> teward: sorry, no idea re: release team
[20:07] <teward> mkay
[20:07] <sarnold> gchristensen: I think you have to specify the whole thing in one go
[20:07] <teward> see, rbasak said they'd do it... but ehh
[20:07] <teward> been lookin for them all day
[20:52] <mfisch> zul: jamespage: do you have any plans on a new OVS package anytime soon? We're going to upgrade in the next few weeks and really only want to do it once
[20:53] <mfisch> as it's painful
[21:00] <mnaser> mfisch do you happen to use openstack?
[21:00] <mnaser> if you do, kilo repos have a recent openvswitch release
[21:01] <mfisch> mnaser: yeah we do, but its 2.3.1, thats from January
[21:01] <mfisch> hence my question
[21:01] <mfisch> we're on 2.3.0 currently
[21:01] <mnaser> oh, 2.3.2 is quite recent
[21:02] <mfisch> its not in UCA
[21:02] <mfisch> http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openvswitch/
[21:02] <mnaser> i figure it's because it was released less than 2 weeks ago
[21:02] <mnaser> sorry, didnt know there was a new release!
[21:02] <mfisch> right and if it shows up in UCA in 3 weeks, I'll delay my upgrade ;)
[21:02] <mfisch> no worries thanks for the info
[21:57] <adam_g> zul, sup with the python-oslo.log package?
[22:00] <adam_g> or rather, sup with oslo packages
[22:17] <zul> adam_g,  what do you mean?
[22:18] <adam_g> zul, wait, nvm. my python env is borked
[22:18] <adam_g> should packages be depending on python-oslo.log or python-oslo-log at this point?
[22:18] <zul> adam_g, whats up with your python env? ;)
[22:18] <zul> adam_g,  python-oslo-log