[04:40] <pitti> Good morning
[04:44] <Unit193> Howdy.
[04:57] <robert_ancell> pitti, if you were looking to delete more packages I noticed that gnomescan is no longer in Debian and seems effectively dead upstream. So could be cleaned out of wily.
[04:59] <pitti> robert_ancell: simple-scan FTW!
[05:00] <robert_ancell> pitti, yeah, I feel a bit biased proposing deleting it... :)
[05:00] <pitti> oh, gnome-scan
[05:01] <pitti> robert_ancell: *flush*, it's gone
[05:04] <pitti> hallyn, mbiebl: I replied to your patch on the lxc ML (might be moderated, but I CC'ed hallyn)
[07:08] <dholbach> good morning
[07:41] <jamespage> any chance an archive admin could accepted python-oslo.service into wily? its a sync from debian experimental
[07:44] <pitti> jamespage: done; will check in a bit for the binaries
[07:44] <jamespage> pitti, thankyou
[07:44]  * jamespage goes to raise a MIR :-)
[11:58] <GunnarHj> darkxst: ping?
[11:59] <darkxst> GunnarHj, hey
[12:00] <GunnarHj> darkxst: Sure, I can try to adapt the latest fixes in gnome-desktop3 to 3.16. Is the upstream code in a PPA somewhere?
[12:01] <darkxst> GunnarHj, I uploaded it to gnome3-staging/wily
[12:02] <GunnarHj> darkxst: Aha, now I see it. Will do it later today.
[12:03] <darkxst> GunnarHj, was pretty calm this cycle for gnome-desktop, may just apply as is if your lucky ;)
[12:04] <GunnarHj> darkxst: Yeah, hopefully I am. :)
[12:22] <darkxst> GunnarHj, also g-c-c in bug 1466245
[12:22] <darkxst> that will be a little tricker I dropped a bunch of code from the languages patch
[12:25] <GunnarHj> darkxst: Ack. Will look at g-c-c too.
[12:27] <darkxst> GunnarHj, thanks!
[12:57] <jamespage> cjwatson, hey - coreycb and I have started to document our workflow using git on launchpad here - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/OpenStackPackaging
[12:57] <jamespage> thought you might be interested
[13:05] <cjwatson> jamespage: Definitely, thanks - looks largely sensible.  Any reason you're recommending named repositories (i.e. with the trailing /+git/liberty-1) for contributors?
[13:06] <jamespage> cjwatson, that may just be us feeling our way through how things work
[13:06] <jamespage> cjwatson, that's what coreycb did for his proposed changes for our first milestone this cycle
[13:07] <cjwatson> You normally only need to use named repositories as a contributor if you have some unusual requirement that causes you to have to use multiple repositories for your contributions, rather than just lots of branches in one repository.
[13:07] <cjwatson> We're expecting that just /~USER/TARGET is the normal case.
[13:07] <jamespage> we can try that and see how it works
[13:08] <jamespage> the awkward bit right now is having to propose three branches for a new upstream release
[13:08] <coreycb> cjwatson, thanks. I think I got that from the Repository URLs section of https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git
[13:08] <cjwatson> coreycb: That documents all the available forms, but you don't have to use them :-)
[13:09] <cjwatson> coreycb: It does explicitly say that the common case is the owner-default repository, although maybe we should make it clearer and less jargony ...
[13:09] <cjwatson> (common case for contributors, that is)
[13:10] <coreycb> cjwatson, ok I'll try it out shortly
[13:12] <cjwatson> jamespage,coreycb: Anyway, this is a minor-ish point, glad the rest seems to be broadly OK for you.  Have you run into any other oddnesses with Git-based MPs?
[13:13] <cjwatson> We aren't quite at the point of using them for Launchpad itself, but pretty close
[13:14] <coreycb> cjwatson, just the bit on proposing a merge as jamespage mentioned.  something command line based would be nice, and having the ability to propose all branch changes in one command would be nice too.
[13:16] <cjwatson> coreycb: That definitely gets into specific policy, but it should be easily doable using launchpadlib
[13:16] <cjwatson> git_ref.createMergeProposal is exported
[13:20] <coreycb> cjwatson, good to know, thanks
[14:59] <pitti> chrisccoulson: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/1.7.9-0ubuntu0.15.04.1 alert
[14:59] <pitti> chrisccoulson: you SRUed a newer version into vivid without also updating wily, can you please do that too?
[15:00] <chrisccoulson> pitti, yeah, I'm aware of that. I can't actually upload it myself
[15:10] <pitti> chrisccoulson: ah, you got sponsored? do you still remember who did that?
[15:12] <chrisccoulson> pitti, no, these are copied from the security PPA, which I can do
[15:12] <chrisccoulson> The wily upload is being sponsored right now
[15:12] <pitti> chrisccoulson: ah, thanks
[16:10] <chrisccoulson> pitti, it's uploaded now :)
[16:10] <pitti> chrisccoulson: thansk!
[16:59] <cyphermox> ubuntu
[16:59] <cyphermox> haah sorry :)
[17:00] <ogra_> now we know your password !
[17:00] <cyphermox> well, only the password to this VM that I keep reinstalling to test multipath :)
[17:00] <ogra_> yeah, thats what i would say as well now :P
[17:01] <cyphermox> at least I suffix this with an s to make it more secure on my desktop
[17:01] <ogra_> heh
[17:01] <highvoltage> lol
[17:04] <mdeslaur> cyphermox: wth, you use my laptop password as your vm password?
[17:04] <cyphermox> yup
[17:04] <cyphermox> great minds thing alike.
[17:08] <davmor2> cyphermox: ubuntu isn't the safest password here use mine Ubuntu see the capital U much safer with that there ;)
[17:09] <jpds> davmor2: I use "ubunut' these days.
[17:10] <davmor2> jpds: man you just the king of password
[17:10] <ogra_> you could add double security and use "Ubunut"
[17:11] <davmor2> ogra_: you're just trying to steal jpds 's password thunder
[17:11] <ogra_> ssshhhh
[17:11] <jrwren> people use passwords?
[17:12] <jrwren> ah, nevermind. my ssh key has a password :)
[17:13] <davmor2> I bet it is really secure something like hunter2
[17:14] <davmor2> I'm so glad that IRC hides you're passwords and ogra_ told me all about it :)
[17:14] <ogra_> yeah, the backlog above is full of ****** everywhere !
[17:15] <mdeslaur> and here I just changed mine from "os2forever" not too long ago
[17:16] <ogra_> even more ********** !
[17:58] <davmor2> ogra_: hahaha nicely played good sir nicely played :)
[17:58] <jrwren> http://shetterly.blogspot.com/2012/04/expanded-stephen-fry-on-being-offended.html
[17:59] <davmor2> ogra_: be careful on how you copy and paste those ************* though you might not like what it says to you ;)
[18:00] <jrwren> sorry, misdir
[19:39] <tkamppeter> jdstrand, hi
[19:43] <sarnold> tkamppeter: jamie's out for the week
[19:44] <tkamppeter> mdeslaur, hi
[19:45] <mdeslaur> tkamppeter: hi
[19:46] <tkamppeter> mdeslaur, it is about bug 1455644, it is a MIR for ippusbxd, the IPP-over-USB printer daemon. I have posted it some weeks ago, jdstrand has assigned it to himself and then nothing happened any more.
[19:46] <mdeslaur> tyhicks: that's for you ^
[19:47] <tkamppeter> mdeslaur, probably he has taken it to check security aspects. Now jdstrand is on vacation. Can you have a look.
[19:47] <mdeslaur> tkamppeter: tyhicks will assign it to someone
[19:48] <tkamppeter> mdeslaur, thanks.
[20:32] <tyhicks> sorry, I must have missed the irc notification
[20:40] <tyhicks> tkamppeter: hi - I've now added that MIR to our backlog tracker
[20:41] <tyhicks> tkamppeter: note that there are a few other MIR security audits (and some other work) ahead of it
[20:56] <tkamppeter> tyhicks, thanks, but it will get done before FF?
[20:59] <tyhicks> tkamppeter: hopefully but we can still promote packages to main after FF
[21:35] <barry> cjwatson: you wouldn't happen to still be around would you?
[21:58] <hallyn> is there a set of tools to script the updating of /etc/pam/* files from packages?
[22:00] <sarnold> there's a pam-auth-update, I've never used it myself though..
[22:00] <cjwatson> barry: yeah, sort of, late meeting
[22:07] <barry> cjwatson: ah, thanks.  question: the order of entries in /etc/apt/sources.lists matters when searching for a package to install, with entries in /etc/apt.sources.d/* coming after sources.list... right?  do the ppas set those repos up to prefer packages from the ppa if the versions class with archive versions?  and if so, how?  (trying to reproduce locally)  or am i on crack?
[22:08] <barry> *clash