=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
brendand | pitti, is this resolvable? http://paste.ubuntu.com/11798706/ | 12:02 |
---|---|---|
=== pgraner-dr is now known as pgraner | ||
pitti | brendand: doesn't look like it :/ you have a package installed (in the r/o system image) which conflicts with your test dependencies | 12:39 |
pitti | brendand: unless you actually cheat and do the ro-apt-update stuff, of course | 12:40 |
brendand | pitti, afaik i am doing that | 12:40 |
pitti | brendand: ah right, update, but not dist-upgrade | 12:41 |
pitti | i. e. the current archive went through some transition, but the tested image didn't yet | 12:41 |
pitti | brendand: are you in the "happy" position of having to test old images again? :-( | 12:41 |
brendand | pitti, well it seems there will always be a period of time where the two are out of sync | 12:42 |
brendand | i'll check for a new image | 12:42 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
brendand | pitti, weird even after i updated the image it still fails :/ | 13:05 |
brendand | pitti, crazily that error still happens even with the just built image ??? | 14:51 |
pitti | brendand: oxideqt-codecs-extra already ought to be on the image, is it not? | 14:52 |
pitti | which version is it? | 14:53 |
pitti | oxideqt-codecs-extra | 1.7.8-0ubuntu1 | wily | amd64, armhf, i386 | 14:53 |
pitti | that's the version we have in the archive, so I'm not sure what requires 1.7.9 | 14:53 |
pitti | oh, overlay PPA perhaps? | 14:53 |
brendand | pitti, maybe, but the image i'm using should have been built with that | 14:54 |
pitti | oxide-qt also doesn't seem to be in teh overlay | 14:54 |
pitti | brendand: what is apt-cache policy oxideqt-codecs-extra ? | 14:55 |
brendand | pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799522/ | 14:56 |
brendand | pitti, 1.7.9 is in -updates ??? | 14:56 |
pitti | brendand: erk, someone SRUed it without updating wily | 14:57 |
pitti | sorry, I just looked at wily | 14:57 |
pitti | brendand: so apparently we don't build the image with -updates/-security enabled, but do enable their apt sources | 14:59 |
pitti | brendand: you should be able to work around this by commenting out the -updates/-security apt sources and running apt-get update | 15:00 |
pitti | brendand: but congrats, you just found a rather major flaw in our image builds :) | 15:00 |
brendand | pitti, will it be fixed? | 15:01 |
pitti | brendand: I don't know; worth bringing up with ogra and sil2100 in #ubuntu-touch | 15:02 |
brendand | pitti, ogra and sil seem to be in denial :) | 15:07 |
brendand | pitti, well - they certainly are in sources.list, but why do you say they aren't used in the image build? | 15:07 |
pitti | how do you mean? (I didn't see any recent discussion in #u-touch) | 15:07 |
pitti | well, your apt-cache policy proves just that | 15:07 |
brendand | pitti, sorry i'm talking on -ci-eng. maybe i shouldn't | 15:07 |
pitti | if it was a recently built image | 15:08 |
pitti | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/1.7.9-0ubuntu0.15.04.1 landed on June 23, so a week aog | 15:09 |
pitti | any image younger than a week ought to have it | 15:09 |
brendand | pitti, it says published 3-4 hours ago on that page ?? | 15:51 |
pitti | brendand: oh, I see -- so it was held in some staging area for a week; nevermind then | 15:52 |
brendand | pitti, probably the ppa | 15:52 |
brendand | pitti, i think it just missed the cutoff for the new image | 15:53 |
brendand | pitti, so need to wait for the next one | 15:53 |
pitti | the -security staging PPA, not the touch overlay PPA | 15:53 |
brendand | pitti, ah ok | 15:53 |
pitti | brendand: as a workaround, you could remove -updates/-security apt sources from your image | 15:53 |
brendand | pitti, i did try that, there was another error | 15:54 |
brendand | pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799786/ | 15:54 |
pitti | brendand: ah, meh -- so, "next image" it is :/ | 15:55 |
brendand | pitti, yeah eventually this will happen enough times we'll be compelled to do something about it... | 15:55 |
brendand | pitti, might become more urgent once more people start using autopkgtest | 15:56 |
=== pgraner is now known as pgraner-appt | ||
cachio | brendand, do you know how to avoid this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/11800900/? | 19:30 |
brendand | cachio, it could be there is a problem importing a sub-module | 19:31 |
brendand | cachio, is this with a specific branch? | 19:32 |
cachio | brendand, this happened when I install all the packages in the device manually | 19:32 |
cachio | brendand, and then I run the test with adt-run | 19:32 |
cachio | brendand, i.e. python3 -m ubuntu_system_tests.command_line --update-apt ubuntu_system_tests.tests.test_html5_application.HTML5ApplicationTest | 19:32 |
cachio | brendand, it happens with any branch | 19:33 |
brendand | cachio, ok. i'm not sure off the top of my head | 19:34 |
brendand | cachio, if you edit the adt-run command in command_line.py and add -S to it then it will break after that failure inside the adt-run environment | 19:34 |
brendand | cachio, then you can try the import ubuntu_system_tests and see if it gives you a more detailed error | 19:34 |
cachio | brendand, ok | 19:35 |
cachio | brendand, tx | 19:36 |
=== pgraner-appt is now known as pgraner |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!