=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr [12:02] pitti, is this resolvable? http://paste.ubuntu.com/11798706/ === pgraner-dr is now known as pgraner [12:39] brendand: doesn't look like it :/ you have a package installed (in the r/o system image) which conflicts with your test dependencies [12:40] brendand: unless you actually cheat and do the ro-apt-update stuff, of course [12:40] pitti, afaik i am doing that [12:41] brendand: ah right, update, but not dist-upgrade [12:41] i. e. the current archive went through some transition, but the tested image didn't yet [12:41] brendand: are you in the "happy" position of having to test old images again? :-( [12:42] pitti, well it seems there will always be a period of time where the two are out of sync [12:42] i'll check for a new image === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [13:05] pitti, weird even after i updated the image it still fails :/ [14:51] pitti, crazily that error still happens even with the just built image ??? [14:52] brendand: oxideqt-codecs-extra already ought to be on the image, is it not? [14:53] which version is it? [14:53] oxideqt-codecs-extra | 1.7.8-0ubuntu1 | wily | amd64, armhf, i386 [14:53] that's the version we have in the archive, so I'm not sure what requires 1.7.9 [14:53] oh, overlay PPA perhaps? [14:54] pitti, maybe, but the image i'm using should have been built with that [14:54] oxide-qt also doesn't seem to be in teh overlay [14:55] brendand: what is apt-cache policy oxideqt-codecs-extra ? [14:56] pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799522/ [14:56] pitti, 1.7.9 is in -updates ??? [14:57] brendand: erk, someone SRUed it without updating wily [14:57] sorry, I just looked at wily [14:59] brendand: so apparently we don't build the image with -updates/-security enabled, but do enable their apt sources [15:00] brendand: you should be able to work around this by commenting out the -updates/-security apt sources and running apt-get update [15:00] brendand: but congrats, you just found a rather major flaw in our image builds :) [15:01] pitti, will it be fixed? [15:02] brendand: I don't know; worth bringing up with ogra and sil2100 in #ubuntu-touch [15:07] pitti, ogra and sil seem to be in denial :) [15:07] pitti, well - they certainly are in sources.list, but why do you say they aren't used in the image build? [15:07] how do you mean? (I didn't see any recent discussion in #u-touch) [15:07] well, your apt-cache policy proves just that [15:07] pitti, sorry i'm talking on -ci-eng. maybe i shouldn't [15:08] if it was a recently built image [15:09] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/1.7.9-0ubuntu0.15.04.1 landed on June 23, so a week aog [15:09] any image younger than a week ought to have it [15:51] pitti, it says published 3-4 hours ago on that page ?? [15:52] brendand: oh, I see -- so it was held in some staging area for a week; nevermind then [15:52] pitti, probably the ppa [15:53] pitti, i think it just missed the cutoff for the new image [15:53] pitti, so need to wait for the next one [15:53] the -security staging PPA, not the touch overlay PPA [15:53] pitti, ah ok [15:53] brendand: as a workaround, you could remove -updates/-security apt sources from your image [15:54] pitti, i did try that, there was another error [15:54] pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799786/ [15:55] brendand: ah, meh -- so, "next image" it is :/ [15:55] pitti, yeah eventually this will happen enough times we'll be compelled to do something about it... [15:56] pitti, might become more urgent once more people start using autopkgtest === pgraner is now known as pgraner-appt [19:30] brendand, do you know how to avoid this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/11800900/? [19:31] cachio, it could be there is a problem importing a sub-module [19:32] cachio, is this with a specific branch? [19:32] brendand, this happened when I install all the packages in the device manually [19:32] brendand, and then I run the test with adt-run [19:32] brendand, i.e. python3 -m ubuntu_system_tests.command_line --update-apt ubuntu_system_tests.tests.test_html5_application.HTML5ApplicationTest [19:33] brendand, it happens with any branch [19:34] cachio, ok. i'm not sure off the top of my head [19:34] cachio, if you edit the adt-run command in command_line.py and add -S to it then it will break after that failure inside the adt-run environment [19:34] cachio, then you can try the import ubuntu_system_tests and see if it gives you a more detailed error [19:35] brendand, ok [19:36] brendand, tx === pgraner-appt is now known as pgraner