[12:02] <brendand> pitti, is this resolvable? http://paste.ubuntu.com/11798706/
[12:39] <pitti> brendand: doesn't look like it :/ you have a package installed (in the r/o system image) which conflicts with your test dependencies
[12:40] <pitti> brendand: unless you actually cheat and do the ro-apt-update stuff, of course
[12:40] <brendand> pitti, afaik i am doing that
[12:41] <pitti> brendand: ah right, update, but not dist-upgrade
[12:41] <pitti> i. e. the current archive went through some transition, but the tested image didn't yet
[12:41] <pitti> brendand: are you in the "happy" position of having to test old images again? :-(
[12:42] <brendand> pitti, well it seems there will always be a period of time where the two are out of sync
[12:42] <brendand> i'll check for a new image
[13:05] <brendand> pitti, weird even after i updated the image it still fails :/
[14:51] <brendand> pitti, crazily that error still happens even with the just built image ???
[14:52] <pitti> brendand: oxideqt-codecs-extra already ought to be on the image, is it not?
[14:53] <pitti> which version is it?
[14:53] <pitti>  oxideqt-codecs-extra | 1.7.8-0ubuntu1 | wily | amd64, armhf, i386
[14:53] <pitti> that's the version we have in the archive, so I'm not sure what requires 1.7.9
[14:53] <pitti> oh, overlay PPA perhaps?
[14:54] <brendand> pitti, maybe, but the image i'm using should have been built with that
[14:54] <pitti> oxide-qt also doesn't seem to be in teh overlay
[14:55] <pitti> brendand: what is apt-cache policy oxideqt-codecs-extra ?
[14:56] <brendand> pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799522/
[14:56] <brendand> pitti, 1.7.9 is in -updates ???
[14:57] <pitti> brendand: erk, someone SRUed it without updating wily
[14:57] <pitti> sorry, I just looked at wily
[14:59] <pitti> brendand: so apparently we don't build the image with -updates/-security enabled, but do enable their apt sources
[15:00] <pitti> brendand: you should be able to work around this by commenting out the -updates/-security apt sources and running apt-get update
[15:00] <pitti> brendand: but congrats, you just found a rather major flaw in our image builds :)
[15:01] <brendand> pitti, will it be fixed?
[15:02] <pitti> brendand: I don't know; worth bringing up with ogra and sil2100 in #ubuntu-touch
[15:07] <brendand> pitti, ogra and sil seem to be in denial :)
[15:07] <brendand> pitti, well - they certainly are in sources.list, but why do you say they aren't used in the image build?
[15:07] <pitti> how do you mean? (I didn't see any recent discussion in #u-touch)
[15:07] <pitti> well, your apt-cache policy proves just that
[15:07] <brendand> pitti, sorry i'm talking on -ci-eng. maybe i shouldn't
[15:08] <pitti> if it was a recently built image
[15:09] <pitti> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/1.7.9-0ubuntu0.15.04.1 landed on June 23, so a week aog
[15:09] <pitti> any image younger than a week ought to have it
[15:51] <brendand> pitti, it says published 3-4 hours ago on that page ??
[15:52] <pitti> brendand: oh, I see -- so it was held in some staging area for a week; nevermind then
[15:52] <brendand> pitti, probably the ppa
[15:53] <brendand> pitti, i think it just missed the cutoff for the new image
[15:53] <brendand> pitti, so need to wait for the next one
[15:53] <pitti> the -security staging PPA, not the touch overlay PPA
[15:53] <brendand> pitti, ah ok
[15:53] <pitti> brendand: as a workaround, you could remove -updates/-security apt sources from your image
[15:54] <brendand> pitti, i did try that, there was another error
[15:54] <brendand> pitti, http://paste.ubuntu.com/11799786/
[15:55] <pitti> brendand: ah, meh -- so, "next image" it is :/
[15:55] <brendand> pitti, yeah eventually this will happen enough times we'll be compelled to do something about it...
[15:56] <brendand> pitti, might become more urgent once more people start using autopkgtest
[19:30] <cachio> brendand, do you know how to avoid this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/11800900/?
[19:31] <brendand> cachio, it could be there is a problem importing a sub-module
[19:32] <brendand> cachio, is this with a specific branch?
[19:32] <cachio> brendand, this happened when I install all the packages in the device manually
[19:32] <cachio> brendand, and then I run the test with adt-run
[19:32] <cachio> brendand, i.e. python3 -m ubuntu_system_tests.command_line --update-apt ubuntu_system_tests.tests.test_html5_application.HTML5ApplicationTest
[19:33] <cachio> brendand, it happens with any branch
[19:34] <brendand> cachio, ok. i'm not sure off the top of my head
[19:34] <brendand> cachio, if you edit the adt-run command in command_line.py and add -S to it then it will break after that failure inside the adt-run environment
[19:34] <brendand> cachio, then you can try the import ubuntu_system_tests and see if it gives you a more detailed error
[19:35] <cachio> brendand, ok
[19:36] <cachio> brendand, tx