| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === john-mca` is now known as john-mcaleely | ||
| sil2100 | mvo: hey! Yeah, right now we don't support syncing packages that don't have a CI Train ver number, you'll have to do a direct upload with the version demangled | 08:18 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | s/demangled/changes | 08:18 |
| sil2100 | *changed | 08:18 |
| mvo | sil2100: what the best way forward for me, can I just give it a ci-train friendly version number? | 08:20 |
| sil2100 | mvo: that could work, but I think your packaging has some metadata set that tells the train: "don't change my version number to a CI Train version" | 08:26 |
| sil2100 | You would have to change that, I can take a look if that's the case | 08:27 |
| sil2100 | Since once that flag is gone, the train will automatically prepare the version number to be train compatible | 08:27 |
| sil2100 | mvo: but wait a moment | 08:27 |
| mvo | ok | 08:27 |
| sil2100 | You might have found a bug in the train | 08:28 |
| mvo | heh | 08:28 |
| mvo | ok | 08:28 |
| sil2100 | Or maybe not... | 08:29 |
| sil2100 | So yeah, I suppose that's the only option to use dual landings | 08:29 |
| sil2100 | Since otherwise the train wouldn't know how to change the version numbers to not have conflict | 08:29 |
| sil2100 | (too much guessing work would be needed) | 08:29 |
| sil2100 | mvo: if you don't mind the big CI Train-compatible versioning, simply remove X-Auto-Uploader: no-rewrite-version from debian/control and rebuild | 08:31 |
| mvo | sil2100: thanks, if cjwatson is ok with me removing "X-Auto-Uploader: no-rewrite-version from debian/control" I will do that. I wonder why this wasn't a issue before? has something changed here? | 08:40 |
| sil2100 | mvo: it's only an issue for dual-landings, which robru wrote when we switched to the overlay-PPA, so not long ago | 08:41 |
| sil2100 | mvo: click probably wasn't dual landed before | 08:41 |
| mvo | sil2100: I see, thanks that makes sense | 08:42 |
| cjwatson | mvo: Your call | 08:51 |
| mvo | cjwatson: thanks! | 08:56 |
| mvo | sil2100: meh, I accidently clicked on "build" in ubuntu/landing-21 instead of in my click ppa, no harm fortunately. sorry for that | 08:57 |
| sil2100 | No worries, happens to me sometimes too ;p | 08:57 |
| mvo | sil2100: meh, fun! now it dislikes me for "bzr: ERROR: Inconsistency between source format and version: version is not native, format is native." when I remove the mangling. maybe I just do it manually (which makes me wonder what the benefit of the train is if I do it manually?) | 09:34 |
| sil2100 | Ah, right, the package format ;| | 09:35 |
| sil2100 | mvo: yeah, the train dual landings make sense and help a lot when dealing with train-specific packages | 09:36 |
| mvo | sil2100: I would love to use it, any hints what I can try to make it work? switching to non-native? | 09:41 |
| sil2100 | mvo: yeah... the train is a bit of a stupid entity (mostly because it was only a proof-of-concept), so non-native is the way to go if you want to use it... | 09:44 |
| sil2100 | The CI Airlines was supposed to be the smart thing | 09:44 |
| sil2100 | But it never happened | 09:44 |
| sil2100 | huh, now that's strange | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | Ah! | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | mvo: you're missing a .bzr thingie | 09:50 |
| mvo | sil2100: oh, in the version number? | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | No no | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | mkdir -p .bzr-builddeb | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | cat >.bzr-builddeb/default.conf <<EOF | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | [BUILDDEB] | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | split = True | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | EOF | 09:50 |
| mvo | oh, of course. thanks | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | Do this in your project :) | 09:51 |
| mvo | thanks sil2100 | 09:51 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| karni | rvr: (Cc davmor2) Hi, I was away yesterday, sorry. I'll look into it, I was sure I merged those missing translations properly. Today gets it from Telegram, those strings should be translated. | 10:47 |
| rvr | karni: Ack | 10:47 |
| davmor2 | karni: boo or yay which ever works for you today ;) | 10:48 |
| karni | lol | 10:48 |
| jgdx | davmor2, how's config hell? | 11:31 |
| davmor2 | jgdx: I hate you, I have an effigy of you that I burning now ;) so freeradius has 100 setups everyone is different all are mostly old, some bits of some work some bits don't and visa versa, it is not fun at all. | 11:35 |
| jgdx | davmor2, it's popey's bug. I kindly request all malice be directed towards him :d | 11:40 |
| jgdx | but maybe you have other QA guys that are close to an eduroam network and have access? | 11:41 |
| jgdx | idk | 11:41 |
| popey | \o/ | 11:41 |
| popey | I filed that bug when I was at Oggcamp in Liverpool in 2013. I'll be back there in Oct/Nov this year. Would be great to report progress on the bug at that event ㋛ | 11:42 |
| === pete-woods1 is now known as pete-woods | ||
| * davmor2 stabs the popey voodoo doll repeatedly with a small pin | 11:47 | |
| davmor2 | jgdx: Hmm I wonder if wolverhampton uni uses it | 11:48 |
| popey | good luck getting a user/password | 11:50 |
| === alex-abreu|off is now known as alex-abreu | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| dobey | trainguards: my silo (21) seems confused now because apparently mvo tried to build it earlier without specifying any options and actually meant to build a different silo. i did a WATCH_ONLY build, but the status doesn't seem to be updating properly? | 12:31 |
| sil2100 | dobey: what's wrong with its status? | 12:32 |
| dobey | sil2100: it says "No packages are being considered..." | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | 14:27 -queuebot:#ubuntu-ci-eng- Silos: ubuntu/landing-021 (dobey, alecu, charles) | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | Packages built (pay-service, unity-scope-click) | 12:32 |
| dobey | yes | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | The queuebot disagrees ;) | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | Remember, the CI Train spreadsheet status updates every 5 minutes | 12:33 |
| dobey | ok now the dashboard has the right thing | 12:33 |
| sil2100 | Better trust the dashboard and queuebot | 12:33 |
| sil2100 | Google is slow | 12:33 |
| dobey | the dashboard was wrong too :) | 12:33 |
| dobey | but it's right now | 12:33 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, since the QA status is coming from the spreadsheet | 12:33 |
| sil2100 | So until that updates, it won't have all the info | 12:34 |
| dobey | ok | 12:34 |
| dobey | thanks | 12:34 |
| * sil2100 off to lunch | 12:44 | |
| dobey | jibel: hi, the MPs for landing-021 are reviewd/approved now, so is unblocked now for qa i think :) | 13:07 |
| jibel | dobey, thanks, moved to ready. | 13:10 |
| jibel | dobey, I probably already asked, but what is the reason of the unsatisfied dependencies in the ci jobs? | 13:11 |
| dobey | jibel: unity-scope-click needs the new libpay, which is not available in jenkins (but is obviously satisfied in the silo since both are in it) | 13:12 |
| jgdx | davmor2, will we miss the string freeze for this? USS has another high pri branch on the tracks. :) | 13:22 |
| jgdx | (no update for 5 hours worries me :)) | 13:24 |
| jgdx | sil2100, when do we have string freeze? | 13:25 |
| davmor2 | jgdx: one last thing to test I think I have the server setup right now | 13:31 |
| jgdx | davmor2, wee | 13:33 |
| charles | trainguards, queubot is right, I'm ready for a silo for line 74 :) | 13:54 |
| Laney | cihelp: hi, can you give me any more info on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/wily-boottest-ubuntu-touch-meta/lastBuild/console please? It looks installable to me - is there pinning involved, or anything else? | 13:59 |
| josepht | Laney: looking | 13:59 |
| oSoMoN | ubuntu-qa: is there anyone who could validate silo 2 soon-ish? I’m asking because I have another webbrowser-app silo lined up for landing today (will be ready for validation very soon), it contains user-facing string changes so it has to land today | 14:04 |
| rvr | davmor2: ^ Can you? | 14:05 |
| jibel | om26er_, ^ | 14:05 |
| Laney | josepht: If nothing else you could add "-oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=true" to the appropriate apt-get invocation which should get it to give more output | 14:05 |
| jibel | rvr, davmor2 is on another silo | 14:05 |
| rvr | Ah | 14:05 |
| rvr | jibel: I thought he moved it to passed | 14:06 |
| om26er_ | jibel, sure, i'll take a look | 14:06 |
| jibel | actually he just landed it | 14:06 |
| jibel | yeah | 14:06 |
| davmor2 | jibel: it passed | 14:06 |
| davmor2 | jgdx: ^ by the way incase you missed it finally found a guide that worked :) | 14:08 |
| jibel | davmor2, great, you won the title of expert in freeradius configuration ;) | 14:09 |
| jgdx | davmor2, yeah dave can you come configure my home router? | 14:10 |
| davmor2 | jgdx: there is still no certification verification it is only enterprise level user/password but it works :) | 14:10 |
| jgdx | davmor2, great work! | 14:11 |
| * sil2100 gazes at poor ogra_ | 14:19 | |
| ogra_ | sil2100, i'll try to get to it today (rushing from meeting to meeting atm) | 14:20 |
| jgdx | seb128, ^ | 14:22 |
| jgdx | seb128, what's the solution to silo 40's publishing? | 14:22 |
| seb128 | jgdx, good question, I've no idea ;-) | 14:23 |
| seb128 | landing team can probably help | 14:23 |
| seb128 | either commit the change from wily to trunk and rebuild the silo | 14:23 |
| seb128 | or overwrite the archive version | 14:23 |
| jgdx | trainguards: can silo 40 overwrite the archive version? | 14:24 |
| jgdx | trainguards: there was a manual upload that can be overwritten/discarded. | 14:24 |
| seb128 | it would be better if it was not | 14:25 |
| seb128 | but I don't want to delay landings on it | 14:25 |
| seb128 | I might just redo another manually upload with those changes after the landing :p | 14:25 |
| sil2100 | jgdx: yes, that can be done by an override flag, we do recommend to merge in the changes manually to trunk though | 14:25 |
| sil2100 | But if time is of the essence, there's a flag for overriding that check | 14:26 |
| jgdx | sil2100, time is of essence.. seb128, you okay with overwrite? | 14:26 |
| seb128 | if we merge to trunk then we need a silo rebuild | 14:26 |
| seb128 | jgdx, sure, I'm just going to redo a manual upload after you :p | 14:26 |
| davmor2 | jgdx: https://dani33l.wordpress.com/2014/11/ this is the working guide, there are a couple of things I had to do on top 1 is documented at the bottom the other was to use phpadmin to ensure the user was created on first attempt it wasn't | 14:26 |
| sil2100 | Use FORCE_REBUILD when building | 14:26 |
| jgdx | seb128, what if we include your branch in silo 22? | 14:26 |
| sil2100 | That's like our magic flag for almost everything | 14:26 |
| seb128 | jgdx, that would be good | 14:27 |
| jgdx | great | 14:27 |
| jgdx | sil2100, am I to do the publish with the override flag or is that you guys? | 14:27 |
| sil2100 | We'll do that now | 14:28 |
| jgdx | sil2100, awesome, thank you | 14:28 |
| sil2100 | Published! | 14:29 |
| jgdx | sil2100, wonderful. Quick question, will silo 22, when built, see the changes made by silo 40? | 14:32 |
| jgdx | if not, where's the answer to that question? Launchpad? | 14:33 |
| seb128 | jgdx, we might get a conflict on the changelog, I think I'm just going to manually commit/push to trunk once the current landing is merged in, then we can rebuild the silo | 14:35 |
| jgdx | seb128, okay, you'll let me know when I can rebuild? | 14:36 |
| seb128 | jgdx, ok | 14:36 |
| charles | makes sense | 14:54 |
| josepht | Laney: the output is here: http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/wily-boottest-ubuntu-touch-meta/21/artifact/results/log | 14:58 |
| robru | sil2100: mvo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyRelease/InlinePackaging these are the packaging instructions for making packages compatible with the train | 14:59 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, hey! where do I find packages with debug symbols for stuff from overlay ppa? | 14:59 |
| Laney | josepht: no debug output there... | 14:59 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: hm, not sure if we have that setup | 15:00 |
| mvo | robru: nice, thanks a bunch | 15:00 |
| Laney | josepht: maybe it went to apt-get-install.stderr, what happened to that? | 15:02 |
| robru | mvo you're welcome | 15:02 |
| josepht | Laney: I'm trying to track it down now | 15:03 |
| * Laney knows not how to attach artifacts to jenkins | 15:04 | |
| rvr | bfiller: You don't have permission to access /~bfiller/com.ubuntu.gallery_2.9.1.1205_armhf.click on this server. | 15:08 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, hmm that's really unfortunate :( | 15:12 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, pstolowski our tracking document says its supported | 15:17 |
| pmcgowan | This makes it possible to query the Launchpad librarian directly for debug symbols associated with a package in any ppa. | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | Maybe, maybe someone else would know more details | 15:18 |
| pmcgowan | maybe its not debug packages though just querying the symbols | 15:20 |
| pstolowski | pmcgowan, awesome, this would save me a lot of time | 15:20 |
| pstolowski | pmcgowan, what is the 'tracking document'? | 15:20 |
| pmcgowan | cjwatson, maybe you can advise us | 15:21 |
| pmcgowan | pstolowski, compares ppa wth derived distro https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iQebOdbio-8k4vMcHAZ8SPhqAUlQws47SihlHKfrxOQ/edit | 15:21 |
| abeato | sil2100, is it possible to drop the version of a package in a silo once it has been built once by modifying the version in the changelog? | 15:21 |
| karni | rvr: (Cc robru) I've updated the Telegram click with translations. Not sure if it was not there, or just not translated, but I ensured this time spanish translation for scope strings are in the click package. Ready for re-review (as it was only blocked on i18n). Thanks | 15:22 |
| cjwatson | pstolowski: What specific package is this? | 15:23 |
| sil2100 | abeato: hey! What do you mean by that? You mean like, dropping a version that's already released in the archive? | 15:24 |
| pstolowski | cjwatson, libunity-scopes3 | 15:24 |
| abeato | sil2100, no | 15:24 |
| abeato | sil2100, I have version 6900 for ofono in silo 6 | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | pstolowski: It's right there in http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/stable-phone-overlay/ubuntu/pool/main/u/unity-scopes-api/ | 15:25 |
| abeato | sil2100, I modified the changelog setting the version to 6898 | 15:25 |
| abeato | sil2100, but the package version did not change | 15:25 |
| cjwatson | pstolowski: You can put something like "deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/stable-phone-overlay/ubuntu vivid main/debug" in sources.list if you want apt to be able to fetch it | 15:26 |
| sil2100 | abeato: yeah, it's not really possible... if, let's say, 6900 is now in the PPA, it's not possible to upload anything that has a smaller or equal version | 15:26 |
| pstolowski | cjwatson, great! thanks for help | 15:26 |
| cjwatson | sil2100,pmcgowan: ^- it's definitely set up :) | 15:26 |
| sil2100 | abeato: hm, wait, maybe a smaller version would be possible | 15:26 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: excellent! | 15:26 |
| abeato | sil2100, Ihow? | 15:26 |
| pmcgowan | cjwatson, awesome thanks | 15:27 |
| sil2100 | abeato: since the PPA won't allow a same-version upload, but if I remove the package from the PPA it *might* allow upload of the lower version | 15:27 |
| sil2100 | Let me check | 15:27 |
| cjwatson | For completeness, you can also download them directly from LP: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+packages, search for "unity-scopes-api", expand | 15:27 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: correct | 15:27 |
| abeato | sil2100, ok | 15:27 |
| sil2100 | abeato: ok, I'm removing the package from the PPA, now you should be able to upload/build the smaller version | 15:29 |
| abeato | sil2100, awesome, thanks! | 15:29 |
| rvr | karni: Ack | 15:31 |
| karni | :) | 15:31 |
| sil2100 | abeato: yw! | 15:33 |
| rvr | karni: Did you update the link to the new click file in the document? | 15:34 |
| karni | rvr: yes, 1.3.8.112 version has the new link on the line above | 15:35 |
| karni | I also uploaded it to people.c.c | 15:35 |
| jgdx | seb128, I'm going away soon. Could you do the build? | 15:36 |
| jgdx | sil2100, when is the string freeze? | 15:36 |
| om26er | dbarth, Hi! | 15:36 |
| rvr | karni: Thanks | 15:36 |
| karni | rvr: thank you | 15:36 |
| om26er | dbarth, could you point to the relevant code for bug 1421009 fix in silo 2 ? | 15:36 |
| ubot5 | bug 1421009 in qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "unity8 sometimes hangs on boot" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1421009 | 15:37 |
| sil2100 | jgdx: it was planned for today EOD | 15:39 |
| dbarth | om26er: hi, ok, 1 sec. | 15:44 |
| jgdx | seb128, I'll go ahead and build silo 22 | 15:44 |
| dbarth | om26er: hmm, not a bug i'm on | 15:44 |
| dbarth | om26er: ah, via | 15:46 |
| dbarth | https://code.launchpad.net/~mardy/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/lp1447175 | 15:46 |
| dbarth | om26er: that would be : https://code.launchpad.net/~mardy/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/lp1447175/+merge/257251 | 15:47 |
| dbarth | ie, this merge makes it so that it builds fine with qt 5.5; is that what you were looking for ? | 15:47 |
| om26er | dbarth, hmm, interesting. thanks | 15:47 |
| om26er | dbarth, well it claims to also fix a unity8 hang | 15:47 |
| om26er | thats what 1421009 is about | 15:47 |
| dbarth | right | 15:47 |
| dbarth | om26er: apparently, beacuse of it being a threading issue, itself fixed by qt5.5, so requiring OA to also be qt5.5 compatible | 15:48 |
| dbarth | zipping through the initial bug report | 15:49 |
| om26er | dbarth, aaah, ok, so we just assume its fixed :) | 15:49 |
| jgdx | sil2100, when's EOD? | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | jgdx: you still have the whole day today, I suppose tomorrow when I wake up we'll no longer be accepting any new string changes | 15:54 |
| sil2100 | If, of course, this won't get overrided by the product team, as it all depends if we have everything we need in the image | 15:55 |
| jgdx | sil2100, okay, great. | 15:55 |
| abeato | sil2100, it is still building 6900, I guess that cannot change after the birst build :-/ | 16:02 |
| dbarth | om26er: yes; otherwise, all good for the rest of the tests? | 16:04 |
| om26er | dbarth, yes, everything looks good, just need to verify a few more scenarios | 16:05 |
| dbarth | ok nw | 16:05 |
| seb128 | jgdx, k, with what? | 16:09 |
| rvr | karni: "No se pueden recuperar sus datos de Telegram" \o/ | 16:15 |
| karni | PHEW | 16:15 |
| jgdx | seb128, what are you responding to? :) | 16:26 |
| seb128 | jgdx, <jgdx> seb128, I'll go ahead and build silo 22 | 16:26 |
| seb128 | jgdx, but seems like the landing didn't work? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings | 16:26 |
| seb128 | or was it not a wily/dual landing? | 16:26 |
| jgdx | it was | 16:27 |
| jgdx | sil2100, what's the status on silo 40? Something abyss something. Not sure what that means | 16:28 |
| rvr | karni: Do you have a test plan for Telegram somewhere? | 16:33 |
| karni | yes, I think it's linked in the relesae notes, lemme see now | 16:33 |
| rvr | karni: Ah, the spreasheet, nice | 16:34 |
| karni | rvr: do you have relesase notes open? there's 'QA results' | 16:34 |
| rvr | Thanks | 16:34 |
| karni | rvr: one older (initial QA pass), and the latter I left empty IF you wanted to do a full pass | 16:34 |
| karni | rvr: in any case, these contain sub-sheets, for instance, with test descriptions | 16:34 |
| karni | rvr: I think this document is pretty crazy if you asked me :D (beefed up) | 16:34 |
| rvr | karni: hehe. Great, I'll run a subset. | 16:35 |
| karni | :) | 16:35 |
| sil2100 | jgdx: looking | 16:36 |
| sil2100 | jgdx, seb128: the rsync file looks okayish, I'm a bit worried that maybe the package got rejected because of the dest version being different, but in the past it worked fine | 16:38 |
| josepht | Laney: here's what I was able to get: http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/wily-boottest-ubuntu-touch-meta/26/artifact/results/apt-get-install.stderr | 16:39 |
| Laney | josepht: bah! | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | seb128: you have access to snakefruit? | 16:40 |
| seb128 | sil2100, no | 16:41 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: hey! You have a moment to help us out with something? We published a package through the train to wily and it doesn't look like it appeared... not sure if the copy-package even happened for it | 16:43 |
| slangasek | sil2100: package? | 16:44 |
| sil2100 | ubuntu-system-settings | 16:44 |
| sil2100 | https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-040-2-publish/11/artifact/packagelist_rsync_landing-040-wily/*view*/ <- this was the rsync file | 16:44 |
| jgdx | sil2100, it's dual, btw | 16:45 |
| slangasek | sil2100: would it have failed if there was another version of u-s-s still in wily-proposed? (which was the case until 6 hours ago) | 16:45 |
| slangasek | sil2100: it looks cleanly copyable; do you want me to copy it now? | 16:47 |
| jgdx | trainguards: ^ please, could we give slangasek an answer on this? :) | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | slangasek, jgdx: sorry, was otp | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: no, it shouldn't have failed | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | Could you copy it? | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | Not sure what caused the issue as I'm not sure if the copy2distro doesn't provide much debugging logs | 16:59 |
| robru | sil2100: man we really need better logging from copy2distro | 16:59 |
| jgdx | sil2100, np, thanks | 17:00 |
| jgdx | bfiller, starting testing now | 17:25 |
| bfiller | jgdx: great, I'll test it as well | 17:25 |
| slangasek | sil2100, jgdx: copied now | 17:26 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: thanks! | 17:26 |
| jgdx | slangasek, thanks | 17:27 |
| jgdx | sil2100, I'm going to see the new versions here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings ? | 17:28 |
| sil2100 | jgdx: the new wily version | 17:28 |
| jgdx | okay | 17:28 |
| jgdx | it goes in the ppa as well I assume | 17:28 |
| sil2100 | http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/overlay-ppa-version <- this script can be used to check the version in the overlay | 17:29 |
| sil2100 | It's already there | 17:29 |
| jgdx | okay thanks | 17:31 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: hey! How's the new oxide? I didn't see a silo for it yet | 17:36 |
| jgdx | bfiller, we need another build after 40 has been copied to wily. And I'll also drop an MP from the silo. | 17:36 |
| sil2100 | Is it under testing? | 17:36 |
| jgdx | bfiller, okay silo 40 now in wily, building… | 17:37 |
| bfiller | jgdx: just installed and testing 22, after choosing a contact to forward the number to and pressing "Set" I get a message saying "Call forwarding can't be changed right now" | 17:37 |
| jgdx | bfiller, what happens if you try again? | 17:38 |
| bfiller | jgdx: I can't as it grays out the option and text for "Forward every incoming call" | 17:38 |
| jgdx | bfiller, go back and in again? that's per design if your carrier disallows forwarding | 17:39 |
| dbarth | sil2100: hmm, we haven't made a new build | 17:39 |
| bfiller | jgdx: ok let me try, don't like the text either way - it should tell me my carrier doesn't support it if that's the case | 17:40 |
| jgdx | bfiller, we have no way of knowing | 17:40 |
| dbarth | i need to worry about that | 17:40 |
| bfiller | jgdx: so it worked the second time | 17:40 |
| bfiller | jgdx: when I manually entered the number | 17:40 |
| jgdx | bfiller, what happened in the first attempt? | 17:41 |
| bfiller | jgdx: I think I see the problem | 17:41 |
| bfiller | jgdx: seems to do with the phone number formatting | 17:42 |
| jgdx | bfiller, what's the number? | 17:42 |
| bfiller | jgdx: when selected from the contact it puts the (617)489-xxxx and when I enter manually it puts +1617489xxxx | 17:42 |
| bfiller | jgdx: the first case fails and the second case works | 17:42 |
| jgdx | ugh, dashes? :| | 17:43 |
| bfiller | guessing that's the issu? | 17:43 |
| jgdx | yea | 17:43 |
| bfiller | jgdx: I have 2 numbers for my contacts, nice dialog comes up and asks me to select one and it uses the format (xxx) xxx - xxxx and that's what gets copied into the text field | 17:44 |
| jgdx | yup | 17:44 |
| bfiller | jgdx: when using the keypad it has no formatting and after I press set it seems to correctly add the country code of +1 | 17:45 |
| jhodapp | robru, can you please reconfigure silo 38 for me? | 17:45 |
| robru | jhodapp: I hereby deputize you in the name of holy train guardyness, you may now reconfigure your own silos! ;-) | 17:46 |
| jhodapp | robru, haha, thanks :) | 17:46 |
| jhodapp | robru, no longer want to do my dirty work huh ;) | 17:46 |
| robru | jhodapp: you're welcome. let me know how it works. | 17:46 |
| robru | jhodapp: no no, I'm empowering you to be able to work independently. | 17:46 |
| robru | ;-) | 17:46 |
| jhodapp | much appreciated :) | 17:46 |
| robru | jhodapp: I'll still be here to clean up if anything explodes though | 17:47 |
| bfiller | jgdx: shall I cancel the build until we can resolve that issue? | 17:47 |
| jgdx | bfiller, makes sense. We should deal with dashes, but I'm not sure where to draw the line. Will talk to boiko | 17:47 |
| bfiller | jgdx: should strip out all the formatting | 17:47 |
| jgdx | bfiller, I don't have an immediate good solution though | 17:47 |
| jgdx | okay | 17:48 |
| bfiller | jgdx: does the formatted number come from the vcard import or are you formatting on your own? | 17:48 |
| jgdx | bfiller, comes from the vcard import, translated into a model of qtcontacts. | 17:49 |
| bfiller | jgdx: so pretty sure there is a libphonenumber or something that should give you the unformatted number for that string? renato or boiko might know | 17:50 |
| jgdx | bfiller, that'd be great | 17:50 |
| boiko | robru: regarding silo 44, I discussed with bfiller and salem_ about it, and we decided to temporarily have a separate bzr branch for vivid for telephony-service | 17:50 |
| boiko | robru: could you please reconfigure the silo to be vivid only? I have re-created the merge proposals against that branch already | 17:51 |
| robru | boiko: you have the power to reconfigure now. just note I put the overlay PPA in column L for you | 17:52 |
| boiko | robru: ah nice, thanks! | 17:52 |
| robru | boiko: you're welcome | 17:52 |
| robru | boiko: let me know if you have any issues | 17:53 |
| boiko | robru: sure | 17:53 |
| jhodapp | robru, where's the reconfigure button located? | 17:53 |
| boiko | jhodapp: it is in the landing tools menu | 17:53 |
| robru | jhodapp: "Landing tools" menu at the very top of the page. | 17:54 |
| jhodapp | ah ok cool | 17:54 |
| boiko | jhodapp: just make sure any column of the row you want to reconfigure is selected | 17:54 |
| robru | jhodapp: just make sure you have the right row selected first | 17:54 |
| jhodapp | robru, cool, I'm not seeing landing tools on the spreadsheet page...I refreshed even | 17:55 |
| robru | jhodapp: it's at the top of the page, not the first row of the spreadsheet. | 17:56 |
| robru | "Addons Help Landing Tools" | 17:56 |
| jhodapp | robru, I don't have that, or I'm just blind :) | 17:58 |
| jhodapp | robru, oh I see it now | 17:58 |
| robru | jhodapp: yeah, there | 17:58 |
| jhodapp | next to Help | 17:58 |
| robru | heh, 6 conflicting silos, most excellent. | 18:01 |
| robru | jhodapp: did you get it? didn't see the bot ping saying the silo is ready to build | 18:03 |
| jhodapp | yes it worked | 18:03 |
| robru | jhodapp: ok looks good, not sure why we didn't see the bot ping about that | 18:05 |
| robru | anyways, I'm off for lunch, if anything explodes I'll fix it later! | 18:05 |
| jgdx | bfiller, there's an issue with the connection type in Cellular panel, removed that MP from the list so that won't be an issue for next build. | 18:07 |
| bfiller | jgdx: ack | 18:08 |
| boiko | robru: would you mind removing the wily packages from silo 44's ppa? | 18:10 |
| jhodapp | robru, yeah it is weird, but it successfully reconfigured according to the console output | 18:11 |
| rvr | karni: Update approved | 18:23 |
| karni | rvr: great news! that's a green light for release? | 18:24 |
| rvr | karni: Yes | 18:24 |
| karni | (as far as QA is concerned) | 18:24 |
| karni | rvr: \o/ thank you | 18:24 |
| robru | boiko: sure one sec | 18:29 |
| robru | boiko: ok wily should disappear in a sec. let me know if you need any more help with that | 18:30 |
| boiko | robru: thanks! | 18:37 |
| robru | boiko: you're welcome | 18:43 |
| robru | brb | 19:16 |
| oSoMoN | ubuntu-qa: I’m waiting on silo 2 to finish landing, I’ll then rebuild silo 16 and will need validation from you guys, will there be someone available to ack it before EOD? It contains user-facing string changes, hence the need to land it today | 19:17 |
| rvr | oSoMoN: Maybe alesage or om26er | 19:18 |
| oSoMoN | ok, thanks | 19:18 |
| alesage | oSoMoN, someone will get it :) | 19:19 |
| robru | oSoMoN: silo 2 is free & clear | 20:59 |
| oSoMoN | robru, I’ve seen that, thanks | 21:03 |
| oSoMoN | I’ve rebuilt silo 16, running some tests locally and will hand over to QA in a moment | 21:04 |
| robru | oSoMoN: cool, no worries | 21:06 |
| robru | oSoMoN: oh heh, just checked the timestamps, didn't realize I'm an hour late, lol | 21:07 |
| oSoMoN | :) | 21:07 |
| kgunn | trainguards not really sure if i should whine here....but why is it when i run u-d-f query --list-channels --device=flo | 21:28 |
| kgunn | it's showing only devel available ? | 21:28 |
| kgunn | no stable ? | 21:28 |
| kgunn | or maybe i'm confused.... | 21:28 |
| kgunn | if i a want vivid+overlay on flo....what channel should i use | 21:28 |
| * kgunn thot it was stable | 21:28 | |
| kgunn | or rc | 21:30 |
| robru | kgunn: errr, dunno, sorry | 21:31 |
| kgunn | robru: do you have a guess who should i whine to | 21:31 |
| kgunn | ? | 21:31 |
| oSoMoN | ubuntu-qa: silo 16 is now ready for sign-off | 21:31 |
| robru | kgunn: maybe more of a question for rsalveti or ogra_ ... not really sure | 21:31 |
| oSoMoN | alesage, ^^ | 21:31 |
| alesage | oSoMoN, ack | 21:31 |
| ogra_ | robru, not really anymore ... feel free to direct any snappy questions to us :P | 21:32 |
| ogra_ | the whole channel re-org happened after we changed teams | 21:32 |
| robru | slangasek: what can you tell kgunn about 'u-d-f query'? I'm not familiar with that | 21:32 |
| kgunn | not so much about query but the result :) | 21:32 |
| kgunn | for flo | 21:32 |
| kgunn | vs mako i get all the combos i want.... | 21:33 |
| robru | kgunn: slangasek did the channel reorg, so I guess he's the guy. | 21:33 |
| ogra_ | all i know is that it suppresses all -proposed channels on purpose | 21:33 |
| kgunn | ta | 21:33 |
| * kgunn is gonna bet money he's lighting fireworks and saying hold my beer right about now | 21:33 | |
| ogra_ | flo might not have a stable entry simply because it isnt on the QA list for stable releases ? | 21:34 |
| slangasek | right, nobody's promoting any flo images to stable | 21:34 |
| charles | kgunn, lol | 21:34 |
| slangasek | because they wouldn't be "stable" | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/stable/ ... no flo in any of the subdirs | 21:34 |
| slangasek | AIUI there's been zero qa on flo for the past 6 months | 21:34 |
| kgunn | slangasek: but if i want vivid+overlay on flo...what do i do ? | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | yep | 21:34 |
| slangasek | kgunn: ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu - which is one of the hidden developer-only channels | 21:34 |
| kgunn | cool....thanks | 21:35 |
| === pat_ is now known as Guest94669 | ||
| ogra_ | slangasek, so with adduser and shadow being patched for extrausers support in wily i was wondering if there is any benefit to sync that into the overlay PPA | 22:15 |
| slangasek | ogra_: I guess it's not all that useful on its own, but only if someone is going to do the work to make use of it higher up the stack | 22:16 |
| ogra_ | well, you could add new users on a phone | 22:17 |
| ogra_ | without hacking the files manually | 22:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!