[04:35] <pitti> Good morning
[06:51] <dholbach> good morning
[07:30] <LocutusOfBorg1> hi cjwatson did you break anything on git import code? :)
[07:30] <LocutusOfBorg1> https://code.launchpad.net/~blueyed/boinc/pkg-boinc
[07:30] <LocutusOfBorg1> seems broken since yesterday
[07:31] <LocutusOfBorg1> should I report a bug?
[08:12] <smb> Oh, while I remember: could the person that accepted grub2 updates into Trusty proposed also add the grub-signed please?
[08:17] <rbasak> tjaalton: ^^ - not sure of the process for the signed grub stuff.
[08:18] <tjaalton> smb, rbasak: I'll check it out
[08:18] <rbasak> tjaalton: thanks! If I'm supposed to have done something, please let me know.
[08:19] <tjaalton> rbasak: well, I don't see grub-signed there
[08:19] <smb> There is some manual step one has to do... not sure which exactly
[08:19] <rbasak> I get the impression someone needs to upload a no change rebuild of grub-signed or something?
[08:19] <smb> I only notice it everytime because I got proposed enabled and apt-get offers to uninstall my signed grub for me
[08:20] <tjaalton> cjwatson: ^
[08:20] <rbasak> Ah, Build-Depends bump too?
[08:20] <tjaalton> maybe any core-dev can do that though
[08:21] <rbasak> (and it's grub2-signed)
[08:21] <tjaalton> cjwatson: unping :)
[08:21] <tjaalton> also, it's been infinity doing the rebuilds, yay google search showing the precise pkg
[08:21] <smb> rbasak, oops yeah, sorry omitted the 2
[08:27] <tjaalton> rbasak: so, upload the rebuild and i'll ack it
[08:29] <rbasak> tjaalton: OK, but I'd like to just make sure that this is the correct thing to do. Can cjwatson or infinity or someone confirm please?
[08:29] <tjaalton> looking at the changelog I'd say yes
[08:30] <rbasak> I agree from the changelog, but I'd just like to make sure I'm not missing some other step that isn't evident from the upload.
[08:34] <tjaalton> ack
[08:58] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: gpgsig in a new commit, you're out of luck now
[08:58] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1084403
[08:58] <cjwatson> rbasak: rebuilding with a suitable version and bumping Build-Depends is fine
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg1> yes cjwatson I discovered the bug while trying to report a new one, sorry for the noise
[09:33] <rbasak> cjwatson: thanks, I'll do that now then.
[10:25] <Unit193> doko: I don't suppose you'd sponsor a QA upload for a gcc5 fix, would you?  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oidentd/oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc
[10:29] <rbasak> tjaalton: grub2-signed uploaded (precise, trusty, utopic, vivid)
[10:31] <tjaalton> rbasak: thx
[10:31] <smb> thanks
[10:37] <rbasak> (for anyone who cares, I hacked up a script to save myself from mistakes and for next time: https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/+git/tools/tree/grub2-signed/go)
[11:52] <doko> Unit193, the package still ftbfs
[11:53] <Unit193> Really?  I may have broken my gcc5 chroot then.
[11:57] <Unit193> Hrm seems fine..
[12:00] <doko> no, it fails with the default gcc
[12:00] <doko> you should mark the function with the inline attribute
[12:14] <Unit193> doko: Read, updated, tested on gcc5 and gcc4 this time (sorry), re-pushed.
[12:14] <Unit193> Thanks.
[13:15] <ricotz> doko, hi :), what is up with "util-linux" which openjdk-8 depends on?
[13:16] <ricotz> * the newer "util-linux"
[13:16] <ricotz> pitti, hi :) ^
[13:17] <pitti> I guess we need to merge it then :)
[13:18] <doko> well, just using the mountpoint utility there
[13:21] <pitti> ah, did stuff get moved around further?
[13:21] <Unit193> doko: But, would the new oidentd be a QA upload you could sponsor? :)
[13:21] <pitti> is it enough to merge this on Monday? (I'll make a note)
[13:21] <pitti> as it probably involves a sysvinit merge/upload too, and I don't want to start on that on a Friday afternoon
[13:33] <cyphermox> good morning!
[13:34] <Unit193> Howdy, cyphermox.
[13:35] <cyphermox> Unit193: how are you?
[13:36] <Unit193> Bit tired and glazed.  You?
[13:36] <cyphermox> good :)
[14:01] <infinity> doko: util-linux is Essential, depending on it doesn't make much sense there, since we don't intend to retroactively fix the "mountpoint might not exist" bug in older releases, I assume.
[14:21] <pitti> well, older releases just had it in sysvinit-utils, wasn't that also essential (or at least required)?
[14:21] <infinity> pitti: It was required, but not essential, which was the bug.
[14:22] <infinity> pitti: And, actually, it was in initscripts, IIRC, which was even easier to get rid of.
[14:23] <infinity> pitti: Anyhow, I'm looking at these merges, since it should also come with a change to mac-fdisk that no one made in Debian.
[16:21] <hallyn> arges: around?
[16:21] <hallyn> (prolly not, but worth a check :)
[16:22] <hallyn> will send an email
[16:43] <infinity> pitti: How/where do I configure what systemd-timesyncd syncs against?
[16:45] <infinity> pitti: Ahh, in a config file we don't ship.  So, follow up question, what does it do with no config?
[16:47] <infinity> pitti: And debian/rules sorted that one for me.  No more questions. :P
[16:48] <infinity> pitti: Also, took care of your util-linux and sysvinit merges.