[14:21] Odd_Bloke, i think i said vivid to you [14:21] but i meant wily. wrt webhooks reporter [14:21] Oh, OK. [14:21] Cool. :) [14:57] smoser: You're going to confuse zuul again by doing workflow +1 without two CR +2s. :p [14:59] ? [14:59] i did +2 [15:00] i guess i didnt understand what i did wrong. [15:00] clearly. [15:00] explain ? [15:03] smoser: Will do in a mo; in a meeting ATM. [15:04] Oh, confusing, I would have expected it to do nothing because there was only one +2. [15:05] smoser: My understanding is that zuul only examines a change for gate+merge when a workflow +1 happens. [15:05] When that happens, it checks if there are two code review +2s. [15:05] If there are, it queues for gate. [15:05] If not, it does nothing. [15:05] why would it want *2* code review +2 ? [15:05] I thought that was what was required. [15:06] hm.. [15:08] harlowja_, why does cgerrit just show "Connecting" for me ? [15:14] smoser: Looking at project-config, I see no requirements for code review at all. [15:14] So I'm confused in one of two ways. :p [15:14] harlowja_: Can you explain how stuff gets in to gate? [15:22] Merged stackforge/cloud-init: Basic implementation of a reporting framework. https://review.openstack.org/191144 [15:24] \o/ [16:13] harlowja_, why does cgerrit just show "Connecting" for me ? [16:14] harlowja_: WAKE UP [17:11] whatttttttttt [17:12] smoser hmmm, cgerrit showing connecting, hmmm, might not work anymore, lol, or a bug or something :-P [17:13] smoser ssh keys setup and stuff? [17:13] cgerrit connects into the gerrit ssh event stream [17:16] smoser run -v (which should enable more logging that may show something) [17:17] https://github.com/harlowja/gerrit_view/blob/master/scripts/cgerrit#L800 should get configured then [17:17] -v output.log (since the screen isn't useful) [17:19] harlowja_, can you give me an example that works for you? [17:20] let me get it running again, sure [17:20] see if it works :-P [17:20] * harlowja_ hasn't ran cgerrit in a while [17:20] its petting cpu right now. [17:20] ah. it came back. now waiting for events. [17:20] ya, so that means whenever a review or review comment comes in via the ssh event stream [17:21] so it just sits there and polls ? [17:22] negative [17:22] gerrit pushes [17:22] *pushes events [17:22] so its push based [17:22] *vs the web ui, which is poll based [17:31] hmmm, i got 'socket.error: [Errno 113] No route to host' let me see, ha [18:08] ok finally got it to work, ha [18:08] smoser "cgerrit -v output.log -i 500 -p 100 -k "/home/harlowja/.ssh/id_rsa" -u harlowja -s "review.openstack.org" -p "29418" " [18:08] that worked for me [18:09] so guess it still works lol [18:09] it pegs cpu ? [18:09] its eating 100% of one of my cpu [18:09] not for me [18:09] cpu 1.0% [18:12] make sure the key works [18:12] by trying 'ssh review.openstack.org -p 29418' [18:12] that should emit something like http://paste.openstack.org/show/355953/ [18:13] i've got reviews up to make https://github.com/openstack-infra/gerritlib/ better, but they just sit there for months [18:13] ^ which is the lib thats used to talk to gerrit [18:17] cgerrit imho not super-useful, just neat to 'see' (c) stuff, but u can't review stuff on it (gertty was made for this, after cgerrit was made) [18:18] it was a fun mini-project no-matter (and inspired the guy who made gertty to make that program, lol) === rangerpb is now known as rangerpbzzzz