| darkxst | infinity, would it be possible to move webkit2gtk source only into main for building?, we need for it gnome-online-accounts which is need by gnome-control-center. bug 1466290 | 08:14 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot93 | bug 1466290 in gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) "Update to 3.16" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1466290 | 08:14 |
| infinity | darkxst: I had that bug open to look at. Just hadn't gotten there yet. | 08:14 |
| darkxst | ok, anyway the binaries that dep on webkit2gtk can all be demoted to universe (not used by Ubuntu even though they are in main) | 08:18 |
| infinity | darkxst: I haven't looked at the situation well enough to answer that yet. :P | 08:20 |
| bdrung_work | hi, http://releases.ubuntu.com/15.04/ shows ubuntu-15.04-snappy-amd64+generic.img.xz and ubuntu-15.04-snappy-amd64-generic.img.xz. What's the difference beside the one character (+ vs -) in its name? | 09:48 |
| infinity | bdrung_work: One is a symlink to the other because a blog post mentioned the incorrect (-) naming scheme. :P | 10:08 |
| bdrung_work | ah, okay | 10:08 |
| infinity | Or some install instructions or something. I forget the history, but should probably revisit the next time someone asks me to publish a snappy thing to cdimage and make sure it's not a problem anymore. | 10:09 |
| bdrung_work | infinity, having two files opens the question, which is the correct (and future proof) name | 10:13 |
| infinity | bdrung_work: arch+subarch is the canonical way to name subarches (as seen with, say, amd64+mac) | 10:16 |
| darkxst | infinity, I checked gnome-control-center and gnome-online-accounts, admittedly though I didnt check if there are other syncs from debian that might start building with webkit2gtk | 11:00 |
| rbasak | ScottK: thank you for releasing the grub2 SRU. Though grub2-signed hasn't been released concurrently. Won't this cause a problem for those who are doing the UEFI signed verification thing? | 12:09 |
| rbasak | cjwatson: ^^ help. infinity is asleep, slangasek presumably not up yet, and I don't know who else I can ask. Will this cause a regression? | 12:10 |
| cjwatson | That will cause a regression, yes. | 12:13 |
| rbasak | Well, it's live now, so we should do something. | 12:14 |
| cjwatson | Let me go and release it quickly now - it isn't quite aged, but the main change was in grub2 anyway. | 12:14 |
| rbasak | OK - thanks! | 12:14 |
| cjwatson | And as you say most of it was already live. | 12:16 |
| cjwatson | Done. | 12:16 |
| rbasak | Thank you! | 12:16 |
| cjwatson | Oh, yikes, I accidentally released it for utopic too and it wasn't explicitly verified for that so grub2 hadn't yet been released. | 12:17 |
| cjwatson | I think the path of least resistance is to release it there too. | 12:18 |
| cjwatson | Odds of problems are pretty low. | 12:18 |
| rbasak | :( | 12:18 |
| rbasak | OK | 12:18 |
| rbasak | I'll see if matsubara can verify utopic. | 12:18 |
| cjwatson | All done now. | 12:18 |
| arges | infinity: rbasak: hi. looking at bug 1454719, looks like most packages are in except docker.io... do i need to wait on somebody before putting that into -proposed? | 13:22 |
| ubot93 | bug 1454719 in docker.io (Ubuntu Vivid) "docker.io update to 1.6.2" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1454719 | 13:22 |
| arges | rbasak: and whats up with golang-pty-dev for utopic? did that ever get uploaded? | 13:23 |
| rbasak | arges: working on infinity on it. I have a list of fixes that are needed for the remaining items. | 13:30 |
| rbasak | err, _with_ infinity | 13:30 |
| arges | rbasak: got it. i'll leave it then | 13:31 |
| jamespage | please could the python-os-brick binary NEW packages be acked into wily | 16:38 |
| jamespage | ta | 16:42 |
| infinity | rbasak: Any progress on docker while I slumbered? | 19:16 |
| rbasak | infinity: sorry, kickinz1 was out today, so I focused on other stuff instead. I'll get back to Docker tomorrow with kickinz1. | 19:56 |
| infinity | rbasak: Mmkay. | 20:06 |
| === boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
| tjaalton | infinity: do you know if the daily trusty image should boot fine? mine drops in initramfs | 20:58 |
| tjaalton | could me my fault of course | 20:58 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I think that might be because we need the casper in the queue. :P | 21:27 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Let me review that and get it in. | 21:27 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I find it a bit disconcerting that no one's complained until now, since it's probably been broken for weeks. :/ | 21:28 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Next daily (at 6:31am UTC) should have the fix. | 21:33 |
| infinity | tjaalton: If you're around and want a test ISO faster, I can spin a one-off. | 21:33 |
| tjaalton | infinity: nah it's fine, I can try the next daily | 21:33 |
| tjaalton | should I ack the packages from proposed if it's good? | 21:34 |
| tjaalton | the xorg stack that is | 21:34 |
| tjaalton | realized that there's no tracker bug for everything.. | 21:34 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Let me know if the daily fixes your boot issue, that should help validate the casper bug. | 21:34 |
| tjaalton | ok | 21:34 |
| infinity | tjaalton: And yes, if you decide all the X stuff is good, lemme know. | 21:34 |
| tjaalton | right | 21:34 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Other than booting on two laptop with nearly identical Intel configs, I can't really test the X HWE reasonably. :/ | 21:35 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I hope you have access to a few more video cards than I do. | 21:35 |
| tjaalton | well it's just the mechanics that need testing | 21:35 |
| tjaalton | and it's solid last I tried | 21:36 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Oh, there's also new nvidia drivers in the trusty queue. I'm guessing I need those for the point release? Or are the current ones in -updates 3.19 compatible? | 21:36 |
| infinity | (binary drivers, that is) | 21:36 |
| tjaalton | hmm yes you want those too, tseliot pinged about those earlier I think | 21:36 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Right, I'll get those reviewed. | 21:36 |
| infinity | tjaalton: And you also uploaded a new intel-lts-vivid for me, I see. I'll look at that too. | 21:37 |
| tjaalton | yeah noticed they weren't in sync | 21:37 |
| infinity | Oh, was that the awful xv video corruption bug? | 21:38 |
| tjaalton | need to set up the scripts that mlankhorst had, if I could login to people.c.c (or whatever it is), vpn doesn't work for me | 21:38 |
| infinity | Definitely want to fix that. It's vile. | 21:38 |
| tjaalton | scripts that generate these webpages with package versions and stuff | 21:38 |
| tjaalton | yep that one | 21:38 |
| infinity | tjaalton: VPN doesn't work for you? | 21:38 |
| tjaalton | naw | 21:39 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Sounds like something you should bring up in #is. :P | 21:39 |
| tjaalton | I have no dns if I start it | 21:39 |
| tjaalton | yeah tried that too | 21:39 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Do you have dnsmasq installed? | 21:39 |
| tjaalton | maybe if I don't use _this_ machine | 21:39 |
| infinity | tjaalton: If so, don't. | 21:39 |
| tjaalton | dnsmasq-base it seems | 21:40 |
| infinity | -base is fine (and needed) | 21:40 |
| infinity | Anyhow, lemme look at driver SRUs. | 21:40 |
| tjaalton | right, thx | 21:40 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Intel accepted. nvidia will take a bit more gin before I'm prepared to face it. | 21:43 |
| tjaalton | nvidias are straight backports from vivid iirc | 21:43 |
| infinity | Pretty sure he did a bit of mangling to make them trusty-compatible. | 21:43 |
| infinity | At least, the changelog implies such. | 21:43 |
| tjaalton | ok | 21:44 |
| tjaalton | the one I was able to ack was clean | 21:44 |
| infinity | So, I need to diff and understand said mangling, and check for sanity. | 21:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!