[08:50] <doko> hi, who plans / coordinates / is doing kde uploads these days?
[09:18] <soee> Riddell: ^ ?
[09:18] <Riddell> hi doko I've been away for a week but am back now, why do you ask?
[09:18] <Riddell> still catching up on e-mail
[09:19] <doko> Riddell, planning for the GCC 5 change ... see my email to ubuntu-devel. So I'd like to avoid any new kde versions until then
[09:19] <doko> btw, is there a Debian qt channel?
[09:23] <Riddell> doko: yes on oftc #debian-qt-kde
[09:23] <Riddell> c++ transition, havn't had one of those in a while, just like the good old days
[09:31] <Riddell> doko: any idea what % of packages will need to be renamed? I see none of the qt ones have been in ci-train
[09:33] <doko> Riddell, I don't know. e.g. I see I have a bug report in debian about kplayer to ftbfs. so best thing would be to prepare the kde stack in the very same ppa
[09:39] <Riddell> doko: anything I need to do?
[09:39] <doko> Riddell, well, update the symbols files ...
[09:40] <Riddell> pesky symbols files
[09:43] <doko> Riddell, and tell me why qtwebkit-source ftbfs ...
[09:43] <Riddell> because it's webkit and it likes to do that?
[09:45] <sebas> gol
[09:45] <sebas> wrong channel, and I'm not watching soccer
[09:45] <sebas> :)
[10:12] <lordievader> Good morning.
[13:27] <doko> Riddell, sitter, whoever ... now fixed the qtwebkit-source ftbfs. btw, debian has the package named qtwebkit. in version 2.3.4, Ubuntu has 2.3.2, maybe an update / merge could be done ...
[13:28] <Riddell> doko: awooga, well done
[13:29] <Riddell> our qtwebkit had an epoch on it so I had to rename the source back in the day
[13:29] <Riddell> but yes an update/merge would be good to do
[13:29] <Riddell> but maybe after gcc 5 is in if it's building now
[13:29] <doko> sure
[13:49] <doko> and now hitting again https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1043507 ... die webkit, die ...
[14:27] <Riddell> it is dying but I don't know if QtWebEngine will be any better
[14:29] <rdieter_work> Riddell: for packaging headaches... much worse, imho
[14:30] <rdieter_work> (if such a thing is possible)
[14:30] <Riddell> wibble
[14:31] <ScottK> Like packaging chromium only more so.
[14:33] <lordievader> Longer compile times than qtwebkit?
[16:07] <sgclark> Riddell: looks like you changed the status pages as well. Seems simple enough but I still cannot mange to get it to work.
[16:30] <vinay__> exit
[18:02] <ovidiu-florin> kubotu ping
[18:03] <ahoneybun> ovidiu-florin: seems xcf's do not work will with the Design Team
[18:03] <ahoneybun> I'm learning Inkscape for it
[18:08] <ovidiu-florin> where's kubotu?
[18:08] <ovidiu-florin> :P
[18:08] <ovidiu-florin> ahoneybun: ^
[18:17] <ahoneybun> idk
[21:05] <ovidiu-florin> ahoneybun:  the :P was for you. The kubotu question was general
[23:29] <genii> valorie: I like that ( in #k), recruit the critics to come help ;)
[23:30] <valorie> hey, critics often become best friends
[23:31] <valorie> and nothing ventured, nothing gained
[23:32] <valorie> also, I try to always keep in mind that there is a silent audience
[23:58] <sgclark> Riddell: status pages don't seem to function :(
[23:59] <Riddell> sgclark: hmm, it's only tested with plasma and probably there's issues with other bits that need tweaked, what are you doing?
[23:59] <sgclark> frameworks
[23:59] <sgclark> seems like I did it right
[23:59] <sgclark> but refuses to show 5.12.0