[04:00] <pitti> Good morning
[07:30] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[07:32] <pitti> bonjour seb128, comment vas-tu ?
[07:32] <seb128> pitti, salut, ça va bien ! et toi ?
[07:33] <pitti> je vais bien, merci !
[07:33] <pitti> trop de travail avant mes vacances :)
[08:01] <willcooke> morning all
[08:02] <larsu> morning!
[08:02] <willcooke> hey larsu
[08:04] <Laney> hey hey
[08:14] <willcooke> hi Laney
[08:15] <seb128> hey willcooke Laney
[08:19] <Laney> hey seb128 & willcooke, how's it going?
[08:20] <seb128> good! played some tennis yesterday evening ;-)
[08:20] <seb128> you?
[08:20] <Laney> not bad!
[08:20] <Laney> went to the pub quiz but didn't win this week :(
[09:08] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, hi, are you sure what you pushed to the prereleases ppa is actually rc3?
[09:09] <ricotz> i am pretty sure it isn't :\
[09:14] <Sweet5hark> ricotz: urgh indeed -- will fix
[09:15] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, add "check version in about-dialog" to your smoke test ;P
[09:15] <ricotz> pretty small diff, and the missing etonyek/mdds fix for 4.6 made me wonder
[09:16] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, so "5.0.0~rc3.1"?
[10:19] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, let me know if you uploaded something
[13:11] <Laney> cyphermox: did you fix the iso smoke testing? :)
[13:13] <cyphermox> Laney: psivaa disabled part of the tests :(
[13:13] <cyphermox> apparently there are issues with utah
[13:13] <Laney> oh :/
[13:14] <Laney> are they going to be fixed?
[13:15] <Laney> & what about the lvm test?
[13:15] <cyphermox> yes, they're working on fixing the issues
[13:15] <willcooke> cool, thanks chaps
[13:15] <cyphermox> what about the lvm test?
[13:15] <willcooke> the lvm build is red
[13:16] <willcooke> oh
[13:16] <willcooke> Finished: SUCCESS
[13:16] <cyphermox> the lvm builds are disabled, I think
[13:16] <Laney> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/wily/view/Smoke%20Testing/job/wily-desktop-amd64-smoke-lvm/
[13:17] <Laney> it doesn't make the project fail
[13:17] <Laney> but still
[13:17]  * willcooke was looking at the wrong log
[13:17] <cyphermox> Laney: it also hasn't run for a while
[13:17] <Laney> hmm?
[13:17] <Laney> dates on the left look recent to me
[13:17] <cyphermox> may 10?
[13:18] <Laney> 15-Jul-2015 09:11:20
[13:18] <Laney> 20150715
[13:18] <willcooke> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/wily/view/Smoke%20Testing/job/wily-desktop-amd64-smoke-lvm/lastBuild/consoleText
[13:18] <cyphermox> err
[13:18] <cyphermox> ah, I'm not looking at the same
[13:18] <Laney> good ol jenkins
[13:19] <willcooke> :)
[13:19] <Laney> shall I file a bug somewhere for psivaa to peek at?
[13:20] <Laney> good job he's not in here to see that I'm trying to give him work :)
[13:20] <cyphermox> haha
[13:20] <cyphermox> ping cihelp in #u-ci-eng
[13:20] <cyphermox> I don't know where they might keep bugs
[13:21] <cyphermox> interestingly, the lvm install looks like it worked
[13:21] <Laney> that log makes my eyes hurt
[13:22] <cyphermox> me too
[13:22] <cyphermox> but the kernel cmdline looks correct, and it's obviously booted and able to do things
[13:22] <cyphermox> I doubt the lvm test checks much more ;)
[13:24] <Laney> yeah it just doesn't give any useful error
[13:24]  * Laney eats own arm
[13:24] <Laney> too hungry, will file bug in a bit
[13:26] <cyphermox> heh
[13:27] <cyphermox> looks like it would check the output of vgs, lvs, and what's mounted for the root partition, so it does check a few things
[13:27] <cyphermox> ohh
[13:27] <cyphermox> but as I recall that test was broken
[13:27] <cyphermox> yep
[13:28] <cyphermox> it all needs some lovin' :)
[14:03] <pitti> aah -- la monde est beaucoup mieux avec de la glace !
[14:04] <pitti> seb128: as-tu déjà ton ?
[14:04] <seb128> pitti, mon ?
[14:04] <pitti> seb128: glace !
[14:04] <seb128> ici il fait gris, il pleut et il fait 19°C
[14:04] <seb128> non :-(
[14:05] <pitti> wow; we've had almost neverending summer here for many weeks
[14:05] <pitti> seulment lundi il faitait grise et "seulement" 22 deg (mais pas de la pluie)
[14:06] <pitti> our ice cream café is working double shifts :)
[14:07] <seb128> pitti, http://www.bbc.com/weather/2747373
[14:07] <seb128> pitti, ici il a fait chaud quelques jours mais plus depuis 1 semaine
[14:10] <pitti> seb128: :(
[14:29] <willcooke> il pleut
[14:32] <desrt> pluvas?
[14:33] <pitti> mais non, il y a de la soleil tous le jours :) -- c'est l'été !
[14:34] <Laney> there was some police action over lunch
[14:34] <Laney> I wonder what happened
[14:34] <willcooke> ham wars
[14:34] <Laney> omg the ham meet
[14:35] <Laney> I forgot
[14:35] <willcooke> Nooooooooooo
[14:35] <Laney> it's at 16:28
[14:35] <willcooke> phew
[14:35] <willcooke> assuming he hasn't just been arrested
[14:38] <Laney> true
[14:39] <Laney> suspicious man lurking with a huge ham hock
[14:41] <Laney> mitya57: do you have commit powers for gnome-screensaver upstream?
[14:50] <mvo_> Sweet5hark: bad news, straight out of the archive it won't work: http://paste.ubuntu.com/11882956/ - hardcoded pathes, there is some ld_preload magic by mterry that might help here though
[14:52] <Sweet5hark> mvo: that one could be solvable though, by killing all the --with-system-$foo switches we do in deb packaging.
[14:53] <Sweet5hark> mvo: setting the SYSTEM_STUFF var in ./debian/rules to empty would work towards that (but likely some of our vendor patches break by doing that)
[14:54] <Sweet5hark> mvo_: that _is_ how you do development or upstream builds though. not using system langtag, but build and ship an in tree version.
[14:54] <Sweet5hark> mvo_: but thanks for giving it a try!
[14:59] <Sweet5hark> mvo_: (and no -- Im not expecting you to kick off a modified libreoffice build, in case it sounded like that)
[14:59] <Sweet5hark> ;)
[15:01] <Sweet5hark> mvo: FWIW, I could try to create a LibreOffice-vanilla debian package, kicking out as much debianisms as possible and upload that to a ppa ...
[17:00] <willcooke> g'night all
[17:02] <Laney> me too
[17:02] <Laney> byesie bye
[20:26] <chrisccoulson> ricotz, you around?
[20:59] <Sweet5hark> ricotz: ~rc3.1 copied. thanks for the hint ...
[21:02] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, ok, although I won't be upload the backports while the ppa is over-filled :\
[21:02] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, kind of
[21:03] <chrisccoulson> ricotz, do you want to help out with keeping https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next up-to-date?
[21:05] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, hmm, I guess I could
[21:06] <ricotz> although I am just taking one packaging as base, and no precise so far in my ppa
[21:07] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, btw, what is up with thunderbird 38.1.0?
[21:07] <chrisccoulson> ricotz, yeah, I don't have precise for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-aurora either because I need to fix the packaging to handle the different compiler packages
[21:07] <chrisccoulson> but https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next has a packaging branch for each release (as it ends up being what we push out to -security)
[21:08] <ricotz> I see
[21:09] <chrisccoulson> ricotz, thunderbird 38.1.0 will be coming, but I haven't had time to test it properly (been overwhelmed with bug 1471949 and bug 1474003 this week)
[21:09] <ricotz> jfyi, I decided to do some "private" update due the lack of updates in the official ppas ;)
[21:09] <chrisccoulson> so I'm going to push out 31.8 first, and then 38.2.0 or whatever for the next release
[21:09] <chrisccoulson> I've added you to ~mozillateam
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> I would have pushed out 38.1 had Firefox 39 not been so problematic :)
[21:10] <ricotz> I started using 38.1.0 here
[21:10] <ricotz> alright
[21:12] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, irc you didnt answer the last time, why the gcc-backport wasn't done in a more general way which could be a benefit for e.g. libreoffice too
[21:14] <chrisccoulson> Is it actually beneficial for libreoffice? At the time, I'd already created the new gcc package and got Firefox building with it. I was reluctant to change it again
[21:15] <chrisccoulson> I wouldn't use it for anything else at the moment, because it produces broken code ;)
[21:16] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, right, 4.8 is problematic, 4.7.x or 4.9.x would be more interesting
[21:16] <chrisccoulson> 4.8.2 is fine. There's a regression between that and 4.8.4. I'm bisecting atm
[21:17] <ricotz> libreoffice already requires some tweaks to work with 4.6
[21:17] <chrisccoulson> gcc-4.8 in trusty-updates is broken too
[21:19] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, I see what I can do regarding firefox, but I dont care much for the unity-menubar-patch
[21:19] <chrisccoulson> you probably won't need to touch that - it doesn't normally need tweaking outside of trunk
[21:20] <chrisccoulson> So at the start of the cycle I merge all of the packaging changes from trunk -> aurora / aurora -> beta, and then it generally doesn't change again
[21:20] <ricotz> ok, i already run into breakages caused by it
[23:39] <robert_ancell> tedg, regarding bug 1472097 - What's the unity8 branch RAOF is referring to?