[00:10] <spiv> thomi: is it a stacked branch where the stacked-on branch has moved, or something?  It's basically saying part of the history isn't there anymore, which shouldn't happen in a self-contained repo.
[00:11] <spiv> But perhaps could happen if it depends on other repo for some of the history (i.e. is stacked).
[00:11] <spiv> Perhaps see if you can find a likely repo with that revision in it.
[00:11] <thomi> hmmmm..
[00:13] <fullermd> That sounds like it's the _current_ rev that's a ghost, which is Really Marfed Up.
[00:14] <thomi> the repo isn't anything special, I don't think.
=== frecel_ is now known as frecel
[03:39]  * bambams began reading bzrinit.com after the author's blog post enraged him.
[03:39] <bambams> And now I just don't know what to think.
[04:12] <wgrant> thomi: If it's a package branch, that's probably https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/888615
[04:12] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 888615 in Bazaar "UDD branch freshness checker breaks on incomplete history" [High,Confirmed]
[04:13] <thomi> wgrant: it's a charm branch. Same problem I guess?
[04:13] <wgrant> thomi: Likely.
[04:14] <thomi> *sigh*
[04:14] <wgrant> thomi: There's a workaround in the bug.
[04:14] <wgrant> Comment #3
[04:14] <thomi> it's not a huge deal, just yet another papercut in my day :D
=== Spads_ is now known as Spads
=== quicksil1er is now known as quicksilver