[13:06] <jtaylor> hi, 497b4050e0eacd4c7 should be a good candidate to add to the kernel packages, issue applies down until at least 3.13
[13:08] <rtg> jtaylor, it is Cc stable, so should trickle down organically
[13:08] <apw> that
[13:08] <jtaylor> ok good, I'll wait then :)
[13:13] <rtg> apw, bug #1453117 - seems CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA got set in Utopic
[13:14] <apw> lovely
[13:14] <rtg> any memory of why ? I certainly don't have one
[13:14] <apw> isn't U out of support like ... today
[13:14]  * apw waits for the bug to appear, come on LP
[13:14] <rtg> apw, indeed, but V still has it
[13:16] <apw> but indeed it does seem that it would be neiche at best to want that on
[13:16] <apw> i do wonder why it would matter, but i am sure we can turn off the entire ACORN_* family if any are on
[13:17] <apw> there is a group of the iirc
[13:17] <rtg> apw, yup, so I'm gonna write an SRU patch to disable it
[13:17] <apw> ack
[13:17] <rtg> likely needs an annotation as well
[13:17] <apw> i would like to know why it matters, do they have the same on disk signature as something else i wonder
[13:18] <rtg> apw, looks like a false positive when detecting the super block
[13:19] <rtg> apw, I wonder about the rest of the ACORN partition types ?
[13:20] <apw> rtg, i can see no reason to have any of them really
[13:20] <rtg> apw, I'm good with that
[13:24] <rtg> apw, hmm, not to be confused with the Acorn SCSI card
[14:07] <rtg> apw, oops - bug #1475662
[14:08] <apw> rtg, no that is just extra, and that is correct
[14:08] <apw> that is because once you remove -extra you now have a fully installed slim kernel and we need to
[14:09] <apw> do whatever one would want to do for that, ie rebuild initrd with only the slim kernel bits etc
[14:09] <rtg> apw, k, makes sense
[14:09] <apw> the real fix for _their_ issue is the use of triggers for things like grub etc which delays it, which
[14:09] <apw> i have some prototype patches for lying about somewhere
[14:11] <rtg> apw, not sure it is worth bending over for a benign DKMS issue
[14:11] <apw> i've written something in it
[14:12] <rtg> apw, I set it invalid
[14:21] <rtg> apw, are you still looking at bug #1475078 ?
[14:22] <apw> rtg, thats on my backlog yes
[14:22] <rtg> k
[14:33] <cristian_c> jsalisbury: hi
[14:34] <jsalisbury> cristian_c, hi, I don't have a new update on the bug as of yet.  I should soon.
[14:34] <cristian_c> jsalisbury: ok