[00:01] There go all the icons. [00:21] yup [00:21] gtk [00:21] Can't we keep them and just ignore the stupid deprecation warnings? [00:21] (Or port to Qt. :-----D) [00:22] it's just 2 button icons, so could be worse [00:22] Ah. And yeah, just look how they ruined Remmina. [00:22] "It's better this way!" :D [00:22] ..I'm on -devel, whoops. [00:23] :D [00:42] slickymaster: And, forgot to say. Good then! \o/ [01:06] import and export implemented [01:06] ... hackily [01:06] :D [02:29] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2015-July/001143.html [02:35] yup [02:35] expecting some breakage [02:36] Unit193: anything else you'd expect here, do you want to be in AUTHORS for your desktop file contribution? Where is our old history for this thing, or did I do the gui myself? https://code.launchpad.net/~xfpanel-switch-dev/xfpanel-switch/trunk [02:37] :D [03:10] ochosi: should be good to test now, enjoy [03:11] * bluesabre goes to bed [03:11] Oh, good night. And whatever makes you feel best, tbh. [03:14] Unit193: I can help with livecd-rootfs [03:14] I have to know what you want though :) [03:14] as for the gcc-5 rebuild, I was going to see what we needed [03:14] That one looked like it'd be the easier one to patch. Well, xubuntu-core is "all" we needed to add, soo. [03:14] Yeah, that's mostly fine for us. [03:18] Thanks for offering too, micahg! [06:33] places-plugin is already fixed, and the only actual gcc issue seems to be libopenraw [11:23] ochosi, i just added the possibility to show/hide the whiteboard... [11:28] slickymasterWork, i just added the possibility to show/hide the whiteboard... [11:28] let me check [11:29] knome, getting an Internal Server Error [11:29] oh right [11:29] look at your email again then :) [11:29] no, wait [11:29] was accessing yesterday url [11:29] yep [11:30] now disabling javascript :P [11:30] yw, but the whiteboard is hidden then [11:30] or better enabling it [11:30] yeah :P [11:30] because it's a bit too obtrusive to show it all by default [11:31] I prefer it showing the whiteboard [11:33] well, you can expand all, then show all whiteboards [11:33] and consider if that was the view you saw with no js by default [11:34] consider in what aspect? [11:34] consider what it would feel inside you [11:34] would it make you warm [11:34] or would it make you puke of the information overload [11:34] you're crazy [11:34] lol [11:35] me? crazy? nooo... [11:35] just a pure aesthetically point of view [11:35] it gives some color to the wall of text/data [11:36] the whiteboard? [11:36] or the puke? [11:36] :P [11:36] but yeah, i've been considering the visual aspec too [11:36] +t [11:36] there's something that doesn't work as is [11:36] what? [11:36] i can't exactly pinpoint it yet [11:37] but it might be better if the different specs were their own tables [11:37] and there was some padding between them [11:37] that would also give some kind of rhythm for the page [11:37] perhaps [11:38] but it could also make it heavier - the different specs being their own tables [11:38] and that wouldn't be a bad move technically either, it'd help the modularity a bit [11:38] it could turn out to be a trade off [11:38] well, if i separate them, the tables are still easy to put back together [11:39] so maybe i'll do that change next.. [11:39] trial and error proccess ;) [11:40] hmm, heh [11:40] now that looks chaotic... [11:41] yeah [11:41] too much [11:41] well the bars are misaligne etc [11:41] let me fix that first :P [11:42] (and do some other changes while i'm at it...) [11:42] :) [11:43] I'll check it after lunch knome [11:43] sure [11:43] bon appetit [11:43] dank [11:43] (i'm also eating as we talk, bad habits!) [11:43] lol [12:19] pleia2, remind me again, was there something about the SSL thing we wanted to check before contacting IS (or did i already promise to do that and forgot?) [14:36] knome: nope [15:31] hello channel [15:37] howdo [15:44] hi Reklan [15:47] pleia2, ok, i'll follow up with IS on that today then [15:48] hello flocculant, Reklan [15:50] hi knome [15:54] soo... what's up? [15:54] only stuff [15:55] * slickymasterWork didn't see any changes in the status page [15:55] ... just sayin'.... [15:55] slickymasterWork, that's because you looked too late [15:56] lol [15:56] that'll be a Y in the day then [15:56] i did the to migration already [15:56] but it didn't work [15:56] well i mean visually [15:56] so i reverted the visual style [15:58] so [15:58] I have seen talk in logs in some blueprint/status replacement [15:59] * slickymasterWork will go with knome's experienced position on the visual/aesthetic aspect of it all ;) [15:59] oh right ... [15:59] that [15:59] slickymasterWork, i'll have to count on you on the puke though [15:59] bah [16:00] flocculant, would you like to contribute to xubuntu? d: [16:00] I could possibly spend some of my time with QA stuff [16:00] IF there is a need [16:01] like... half of your life? [16:03] lol [23:33] bluesabre: meh, parole currently segfaults (even with xv selected as backend) when closing it [23:33] knome: nice, so we can soon ship pdf offline docs per release? [23:34] also, nice work on the status tracker! [23:34] i guess so.. [23:34] some hover-style for the overview list might help, currently it's not always easy to see (especially on wide screens) which progressbar is associated with which blueprint [23:35] and yeah, i did like the burndown, but i guess that one would be the hardest to replicate ;) [23:37] evening, ochosi. Did you see my question a while back about working on the thunar docs? [23:37] hey jjfrv8 [23:37] oh sorry, yeah, that was a longer while ago already, right? [23:37] was on and off a lot [23:37] kinda [23:37] hence didn't follow up on everything maybe [23:38] well, I went ahead and started working on them anyway, hope that was okay [23:38] sure! [23:38] so the green parts you've worked on? [23:38] mostly [23:39] i'm kind of stopped on the plugins, though [23:39] xubuntu seems to have integrated all of them but I"m not sure about other distros [23:40] that looks really nice, judging from the first impression! [23:40] ok cool. [23:40] right, so what would be the problem if other distros haven't? [23:41] i mean either way, it's useful to have docs for them [23:41] well I put two screenshots in of the File and Edit menus, which in xubuntu have the plugins built in. So I don't know if it's okay to show them that way [23:41] oh that [23:41] imo that's minor [23:42] theoretically you can uninstall the plugins in xubuntu, but it's really better to have your updated shots than the current outdated ones [23:43] so maybe just put a disclaimer in that one might have to install the plugins if they're not already available? [23:43] yeah [23:43] that's definitely enough [23:43] the links to the plugins upstream docs seem to be pretty out of date to. [23:43] or even too much, for just a few menu items [23:43] yeah [23:43] i'm not surprised [23:44] anyway, gotta get some sleep [23:44] i'll try to do some closer review soon, but tomorrow i'll be afk [23:44] sounds good. thanks. [23:44] after the review, we can plan merging the parts that are ready asap [23:46] hmmh [23:46] now i can build all translations into pdf's too with the makefile [23:47] boring :) [23:48] knome: awesome :) [23:54] https://rt.ubuntu.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=26794 (requesting SSL for xubuntu.org) [23:54] Unit193, PI-PI-PI-PING!!!! [23:54] Unit193, see above.' [23:54] Wow, good timing. [23:54] Unit193, check out the docs branch makefiles [23:55] Unit193, make pdf and make translate-pdf should both work [23:55] (for desktop-guide, make pdf from root calls make pdf, but translate isn't linked) [23:55] ochosi: yup [23:55] poor poor parole [23:55] poorole [23:55] poo role? [23:55] :| [23:55] :| [23:55] TMI [23:55] lol [23:56] ochosi: didja check out xfpanel-switch? [23:56] huhu