[00:26] Is linux are ubuntu? [00:26] serial troll, hitting 3rd channel in order === Captain_h00k is now known as h00k [16:25] ah i knew there was gonna be an ops channel [16:25] so who can tell me why i was banned from #ubuntu? [16:38] well ping me when you answer [17:28] @btlogin [17:33] GitGud: Any chance your IP address is in 66.187.72.0/24? [17:34] no sir [17:34] hold on actually one sec [17:34] cause i'm in my local library [17:34] 205.189.187.4 [17:34] thats my current ip ^ [17:36] Ah, here it is [17:37] so what is the issue? [17:37] ikonia: Set by you, 2015-06-24, bt log=68159. [17:38] GitGud: Looks like there was someone being offtopic from that IP last month. [17:38] do you know the nick of that person? [17:39] ikonia: btw, the whois does check out to that IP being owned by "Toronto Public Library Board". [17:39] Yes, but that's not terribly relevant really. [17:39] well. I was just on here yesterday with my home IP [17:39] right now I'm at my library [17:39] so it must had hit the filter [17:40] GitGud: "gambl0re" was the nick used at that time [17:40] yep. that's not me [17:40] must had been someone from the same library? [17:40] Possibly [17:41] so could I be unbanned? [17:42] Normally we'd leave it until ikonia responded, but I think looking at this I'm fine removing it now - he can yell at me later if that's a problem. [17:42] alrighty [17:43] thank you [18:29] anyone on watch in #ubuntu today? [18:30] What are you looking at teward [18:30] DJones: the same thing you called them out on [18:30] just a minute faster than you [18:30] :) [18:30] it smelled reminiscent of a bot [18:30] Heh, I looked at after commented, but thatnks for the prompt [18:30] after you commented [18:32] heheh [18:32] DJones: i'll keep you posted if i see them do it again, but likely you're already watching it [18:32] thanks [18:46] DJones: still around? [18:47] or any other #ubuntu op [18:49] *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr joins then excess floods, then joins again, excess floods, etc. continually, botnet like fashion is my guess [18:49] can we ban that from the channel in #ubuntu ? [18:49] Tebhw just flooded off [18:54] teward: oh, interesting. Yeah, I'll grab it. [18:54] teward: thanks [18:54] h00k: keep an eye on *.abo.wanadoo.fr in the future as well - there's been a weeks-long trend of this activity as well [18:54] in here, #winehq, and others [18:55] There's a few more hosts that do this. [18:55] script fail. [18:56] Unit193: indeed, afaict from #ubuntu the most prevalent is the wanadoo one [18:56] Unit193: can you grab it, I'm gonna figure out why my thing is broken [18:57] h00k: I'm not an #ubuntu OP, though. [18:57] Unit193: I knew that, standby. [18:58] h00k: I can grab it still if you need though. [18:59] c'mon. [18:59] Want me to just ban *!*@*.abo.wanadoo.fr for you? [18:59] Unit193: that's a pretty wide ban though [18:59] Unit193: no, that's the entire ISP [19:00] why did it +I them [19:00] autobleh what are you doing. [19:00] teward: The more the merrier! :P [19:00] Unit193: heheh [19:00] "BAN THEM ALL!" *bans everyone* *500 complaints to IRCC* [19:01] but yeah it's still a headache [19:02] herp derp. fixed it. [19:02] there we go [19:02] thanks, h00k [19:02] why is it not showing the entire channel on my client [19:02] HOW DO I COMPUTER [19:03] 14:02 ::: Mode #ubuntu "+b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti" by h00k [19:03] Should be $##fix_your_connection [19:03] h00k: Really though, want me to tag it? [19:06] h00k: There you go. [19:08] h00k: Just ban the Internet - 100% of the abusive users come from there. [19:08] tonyyarusso: I've seen that happen! :D [19:09] Me too - #linode@oftc, a couple weeks ago. [19:10] maybe I just need to try /forward [19:10] I'll do that later. [19:11] my forwardban wants to +I [19:13] h00k: [2015-07-23 15:12:32] * Drone` sets modes [#ubuntu -b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti] <-- drone is wrong [19:13] burn it with fire? [19:13] oh come on, internet [19:13] tonyyarusso: Drone is right, try reading it again, and look further back. [19:13] teward: ^ [19:14] oop yep missed that :/ [19:14] sorry [19:14] it set the ban right, it's just not... [19:14] Heh, sure. :) [19:15] 14:02 ::: Mode #ubuntu "+b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti" by h00k mine did the same thing, but I told it proper [19:16] but that didn't include the $ [19:17] tonyyarusso: see, work is killing my brain, why is it not showing the proper ban removal in that line? [19:19] h00k: hrmwhatnow? [19:19] tonyyarusso: the ban forward is reporting not-the-entire-line [19:19] see: [19:19] Drone` sets modes [#ubuntu -b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti] [19:20] That's because that's what the ban was. [19:20] I wasn't aware "ban forwards" where beings capable of "reporting". [19:20] also exhibit b: Mode #ubuntu "+b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti" [19:20] What about the one Drone` set? [19:20] not reporting, just the server echoing back the mode change [19:20] look at the channel [19:20] ##fix-your-connecti [19:21] I clearly had ##fix-your-connection in my line, I even did it manually, but it comes back "Set this to ##fix-your-connecti" and is cut off [19:21] Does that make sense? [19:22] h00k: But you didn't have the $, right? [19:22] tonyyarusso: I did not, but Drone did [19:22] and Drone's worked [19:23] I get I needed the $ for the actual ban to work [19:23] I don't know why it's echoing this: [19:23] * Drone` sets modes [#ubuntu -b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr##fix-your-connecti] [19:23] oh, that was Unit193 clearing my ban [19:23] That's the REMOVE [19:23] 14:05:37 -!- mode/#ubuntu [+b *!*@ARennes-656-1-358-140.w86-214.abo.wanadoo.fr$##fix_your_connection] by Drone` [19:24] * h00k sips [19:24] Without the $, the whole thing is being interpreted as the hostname, and hitting a (probably wrong) character limit. [19:24] It's probably hitting a chara- [19:24] yes [19:24] exactly that. [19:24] h00k: Whatcha drinking? [19:24] Unit193: not enough, holy balls. [19:25] Sorry for the confusion? I have french pressed columbian. :D [19:26] Sounds like Unit193 is genii in disguise [19:26] I thought drone set a ban, and then removed that same ban [19:26] but drone set a ban, and removed my idiot screwup [19:26] Hm? [19:27] I was wrong on the internet today. Let it be known. [19:27] DJones: We are both purveyors of fine coffees :) Consider joining us sometime in ##coffeeclub [19:28] See, now I'm stuck reading IRC RFCs to see if they have different character limits than SMTP. Darn you. [19:29] that brings me to another point - my autojoins are screwed. irssi ends up joining my Freenode channels on other servers (slack) [19:29] tonyyarusso: because...that's great info to know... [19:32] tonyyarusso: what's the verdict? [19:32] On what planet are RFCs one-pagers? [19:33] Also, there are like six of them, soooooo [19:33] tonyyarusso: I thought you knew how to ctrl+f [19:34] Dear god. This thing references RFCs from before DNS was a thing. "the format of the Internet Host Table" [19:40] AHAH [19:41] oh lord [19:41] that was probably the same time somebody read that RFC last, tonyyarusso [19:42] " has a maximum length of 63 characters. This is a limitation of the protocol as internet hostnames (in particular) can be longer. Such restriction is necessary because IRC messages are limited to 512 characters in length. Clients connecting from a host which name is longer than 63 characters are registered using the host (numeric) address instead of the host name." - RFC 2812, section [19:42] 2.3.1 [19:42] TIL [19:42] And TIF [19:42] Pretty much [19:42] (Tomorrow I'll Forget) [19:42] Wouldn't it be easier to read the source of the ircd? :P [19:44] Unit193: That was going to come next if the RFCs suggested it should be longer and I thought it was an implementation error. [19:46] h00k: At the beginning of this hunch I pasted the string into a text editor and said "63 characters? That's an ....interesting length." [19:46] I bet you can figure out why! [19:47] today I learned what TIF means [20:27] Can kIoeri be removed from #ubuntu? [20:30] kloeri is Freenode staff, kIoeri was a troll. [20:33] Unit193: Are you trying to confuse me now? Did i do good or bad? I need more coffee [20:33] you did fine :) [20:33] genii: A bad, you hit the staffer rather than troll. :3 [20:33] kloeri might get angry. :3 [20:33] * genii hides [20:33] really? I must be mixing up my channels then :) [20:33] genii: That's fantastic. Thanks for the day-brightener :P [20:34] oh well, can't really complain as my targetting is also off a bit from time to time :) [20:36] tonyyarusso: Nice, though since he's already back in I wonder if it matters. :--D [20:36] Unit193: Not really - probably had to invite, but not hard. [20:36] Bad tab-completes used to happen *all the time* when the channel was busier than it is these days. [20:39] @comment 68455 Boo-boo, bad tab-complete [20:39] Comment added. [20:40] Is that a pic-a-nic basket? [20:40] Hah, smartass [20:41] Well, at least there's that failsafe here that won't let you ban *!*@* , which my Quassel used to substitute when the person left before command executed [20:42] I did that a couple times before I figured out what the problem was [20:42] There's no failsafe. [20:43] I think i did empty the channel at least once that way [20:43] lol genii remoed a staffer. [20:43] that'll get back at them for accidentally k-lining me one day many years ago. [20:44] genii: even more fun back when it was possible to kline *@* (yes, that did happen a few times) [20:47] I'm afraid to try removing it now :(( [20:47] I'm having "one of those days" [20:50] h00k: I remember that [20:51] genii: I already removed your ban if that's what you mean [20:51] * genii feeds tonyyarusso tasty cookies in thanks [21:06] tonyyarusso: lol you do? Good memory.