[09:27] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I've seen you email about Alpha 2.
[09:34] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I could arrange to take the 29th and 30th off work to do this.
[09:35] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I just want to understand if I would be sending the release announcement of if I would just be composing it?
[09:35] <Laney> flexiondotorg: that's nice... but I wouldn't do that
[09:35] <Laney> maybe you could team up with someone else
[09:35] <Laney> release announcement> both
[09:35] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Well, I want Alpha 2 to happen.
[09:35] <flexiondotorg> So, I feel I need to step up.
[09:35] <flexiondotorg> Xubuntu have opted out.
[09:36] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Even if I team up I can't be doing this on my works time.
[09:39] <Laney> flexiondotorg: I don't think it'll be much effort, especially if few flavours join in
[09:41] <Laney> flexiondotorg: You could check in a bit in the evenings, I guess
[09:41] <Laney> flexiondotorg: Another option is to not have it, or do it unofficially on your side by designating a daily as "Alpha 2".
[09:41] <Laney> You could still do whatever QA you want on any daily
[09:47] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I'll contact some of the other flavours. I'll see if Ubuntu GNOME want to play.
[09:48] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I appreciate your all busy but is there any chance you could sponsor an upload for me?
[09:49] <Laney> flexiondotorg: I'm going to do my shift soon and I'll look then
[09:50] <Laney> Just got a few annoying things to get out of the way
[09:50] <flexiondotorg> Laney, many thanks. I have several small updates but this is the most important - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1476653
[09:51] <flexiondotorg> Laney, cyphermox took a quick look last night but got busy with multi-path SRU.
[12:54] <cyphermox> Laney: flexiondotorg: ubuntu-mate-welcome is in NEW.
[12:54] <flexiondotorg> cyphermox, Thank you!
[15:54] <arges> bdmurray: infinity : upload for nova in trusty-proposed (bug 1362863) is verification failed and causing other openstack related SRUs to fail, is this OK to remove from proposed to unblocked others until nova gets fixed propoerly?
[15:55] <arges> not nova. oslo.messaging btw
[15:56] <jamespage> arges, I'm +1 on that please :-)
[16:10] <infinity> arges: That's between you, the uploader, and your mutual religious intersection.
[16:10] <infinity> arges: Just so long as removing A doesn't go breaking dependencies for B, C, and D.
[16:10] <infinity> In which case, the only way forward is to fix it.
[16:11] <arges> jamespage: nothing deps on that particular version of oslo.messaging atm, so it shouldn't break deps
[16:11] <arges> infinity: ok i'll triplecheck before i trash anything
[16:13] <infinity> bdmurray: Does sru-review locally cache debdiffs or something?
[16:14] <infinity> bdmurray: I keep getting the diff for a package I rejected instead of the new upload.  Which is annoying, since the bug refs are different. :P
[16:15] <infinity> Maybe it's an LP frontend hating me or something.
[16:26] <bdmurray> infinity: it might python-launchpadlib being helpful, I usually just wait a bit when happens to me
[16:27] <infinity> bdmurray: Yeah, it cleared up eventually.
[17:29] <teward> stupid question but today's the last day utopic is supported right?  Or is today the day it dies?
[17:32] <infinity> teward: It amounts to pretty much the same thing.
[17:33] <mdeslaur> teward: you get to pick :)
[17:34] <infinity> teward: On a technical level, it's "supported" until I flip the switch in LP to "obsolete".
[17:34] <infinity> teward: On a social level, it's supported until I send the email (which is around when I flip the switch).
[17:34] <infinity> teward: Realistically, it's dead already, cause no one's going to try to start a week-long SRU process on a series that dies today, and the security team isn't likely to try to jam one last fix through (and test it) before this afternoon.
[17:35] <mdeslaur> I deleted my VMs this morning, so no security update from me :P
[17:36] <infinity> mdeslaur: Yeah, I rebuilt a laptop and didn't create utopic schroots.  It felt good.
[18:00] <teward> i torpedoed by nginx and znc build folders for utopic yesterday, and officially "EOL'd" Utopic on the nginx PPAs, so... :P
[18:00] <cyphermox> bdmurray: do you still do SRU reviews on Thursdays? if so, could you please review parted in trusty qeueu & network-manager in trusty and utopic?
[18:00] <teward> and micahg said yesterday late in -motu to disregard anything for utopic-backports XD
[18:01] <teward> infinity: mdeslaur: so from a technical/social/announcements perspective, utopic is dead once those things happen (announcement, flip it to "obsolete" on LP).  but effectively it's dead today
[18:03] <bdmurray> cyphermox: utopic?
[18:03] <cyphermox> bah
[18:04] <teward> hehehe
[18:05] <teward> well i can recover 25GB of space in my hypervisor now, i can purge my 14.10 VM xD
[18:12] <bdmurray> cyphermox: did you mean network-manager-applet in trusty?
[18:12] <cyphermox> yes, sorry :)
[18:15] <bdmurray> no problem, just want to make sure I'm looking at the right thing
[18:15] <teward> cyphermox: i think you need this coffee more than I do :)  (just kidding)
[18:16] <teward> infinity: mdeslaur: thanks for confirming what i thought - that today is effectively the 14.10 death date, whether the announce goes out and switches flip, or not :)
[21:13] <jderose> does anyone know if there will be a libegl1-mesa-drivers-lts-vivid package for the *-lts-vivid HWE? what are the vivid instructions equivalent to the lts-utopic instructions documented here - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack
[22:06] <teward> infinity: saw the Utopic Is Dead notice
[22:06] <teward> glad to hear that, one less thing on my radar xD
[22:07] <wxl> heh, wore my utopic shirt yesterday in honor ;)
[22:07] <teward> wxl: heheh