[04:41] <Logan> is it possible to copy a newer version of a package down to a supported release instead of manually uploading an SRU?
[04:44] <ScottK> No, since the version would have already been used.
[04:44] <ScottK> Also, even if you could do it, you'd still need to go through the SRU process.
[04:49] <ScottK> Actually, the copy would probably succeed, but there's no guarantee that the binaries would work on the older toolchain, so it'd be a bad idea.
[04:55] <infinity> Logan: We don't copy backward for the reason ScottK stated.  Sometimes, if the versions already matched before, I'll consider copying forward (ie: sru to vivid, copy to wily, that sort of thing).
[04:56] <Logan> gotcha, thanks!
[09:57] <Riddell> infinity, stgraber: lordievader here wants to lead on kubuntu alpha 2 next week cos we're all away at akademy otherwise
[09:57] <Riddell> can you give him admin powers on iso tracker?
[09:58] <lordievader> Do note I have no idea what 'taking the lead' means, I'm just a simple tester ;)
[10:04] <Laney> Riddell: can you reply to the thread and say you want to participate please?
[10:04] <Laney> and it's some team "kubuntu release" but I can't see its launchapd ID
[10:08] <Riddell> lordievader: test the ISOs, poke others into testing the ISOs, decide if it's good enough for an alpha or not, poke people to make fixes if not
[10:24] <Riddell> lordievader: what's your e-mail?
[10:24] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, Someone else has sponsored ubuntu-mate-welcome. It is in the new queue right now.
[10:24]  * Riddell looks
[10:24] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, The issue you've seen "works" on Ubuntu MATE because the mate-menu package is installed by default.
[10:25] <Riddell> then it should pre-depend on mate-menu
[10:25] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, But I will release a 1.0.1 which address the dependency issue you caught.
[10:25] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, Yes, I've added that, but not release yet. Like I say, it "works" for Ubuntu MATE.
[10:26] <Riddell> ok
[10:28] <Riddell> gosh fonts are so complex, flexiondotorg what's an fontawesome-webfont.eot file ?
[10:28] <Riddell> what's the .eot ?
[10:29] <Riddell> flexiondotorg: data/css/font-awesome.css does say the font is OFL 1.1 so you can remove the comment in copyright about no versions being specified
[10:29] <Riddell> flexiondotorg: accepted!
[10:29] <Riddell> ping me about the binaries in a bit
[10:31] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, Well, the fonts are essentially icons.
[10:31] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, Thanks.
[10:31] <lordievader> Riddell: Its on launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~oliviervdtoorn
[10:32] <Riddell> lordievader: "No public address provided. " but I found it
[10:32] <lordievader> Ah, oke ;)
[10:32] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, eot are embedded OpenType fonts.
[11:30] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, Many thanks for your help.
[11:56] <Riddell> flexiondotorg: the font can be removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/1477962
[11:56] <ubot93> Launchpad bug 1477962 in ubuntu-mate-welcome (Ubuntu) "lintian warnings" [Undecided,New]
[11:56] <Riddell> binary accepted!
[11:58] <flexiondotorg> Riddell, OK, I'll look at that bug later. ubuntu-mate.org is under DDoS attack right now, so I'm dealing with that.
[12:21] <rtg> infinity, re-uploaded blktap-dmks for Trusty with yet another compatibility patch, this time for Linux 3.13, courtesy of smb. bug #1477718
[12:21] <ubot93> bug 1477718 in blktap-dkms (Ubuntu Trusty) "blktap-dkms FTBS on kernels >= 4.1" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1477718
[15:46] <Daviey> arges: bug 1464253 is referenced in an SRU but still marked as Private, i guess this should be made Public now
[15:46] <Daviey> (it might have made more sense for it to be a sec upload IMO)
[15:53] <arges> Daviey: i'll takea  look
[15:54] <arges> Odd_Bloke: is it ok if bug 1464253 be made public security?
[15:59] <arges> Daviey: actually I grepped through my logs, he ACKd making this public before. So its done now.
[15:59] <Daviey> arges: Super, thanks
[16:30] <Odd_Bloke> arges: Yeah, definitely.
[16:30] <Odd_Bloke> Oh, caught up.
[16:30] <Odd_Bloke> Cool. :)
=== balloons_ is now known as balloons
=== balloons39 is now known as balloons
[20:39] <slangasek> Laney: I see you force-badtest'ed lava-server... I don't think that was correct, that means that lava-server /itself/ was let into wily, when it was the new package that was broken
[20:41] <slangasek> (when I did this for lava-dispatcher, I also removed the broken lava-dispatcher from -proposed first)