[00:03] slangasek: thanks [02:06] no h yet for bt ? [02:06] on ##crypto and #bitcoin [02:24] no pussies [05:58] I can't seem to figure out why gem2deb isn't building: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gem2deb/0.20.1 [05:58] we have a new enough ruby-all-dev === anthonyf is now known as Guest47499 [06:26] It's apparently uninstallable. [06:27] Logan: the log won't tell you why. The easiest thing to do is to try and install it locally and see if it fails. Keep a particular eye on trying to use packages from universe. [06:28] okay, thanks! the log doesn't make it very clear that ruby-all-dev is not installable :( [06:28] "not going to be installed" reads more like "I can't find it" [06:39] hmm, it installs fine locally [06:39] in fact, it's already installed on my box === neunon_ is now known as neunon === ev_ is now known as ev === psivaa_ is now known as psivaa === plars_ is now known as plars === soee_ is now known as soee === yofel_ is now known as yofel === dobey_ is now known as dobey [15:06] siretart: hi, can we drop the -dev package from libav maybe? [15:07] package*s* [16:10] Laney: Any ideas about the general sketchiness of the udisks2 force-removal test? [16:11] Laney: Is that a bug in the test, or is the test correctly finding a bug in the code (or the system)? [16:12] infinity: Don't know, hoping pitti will save us all when he comes back [16:12] he's the udisks2 guy really [16:12] Hahaha. [16:12] I got as far as seeing "yup, that sure does hang locally" [16:13] Laney: I'm tempted to let glib2 through, since it *seems* mostly unrelated, though it's crazy suspicious and weird that the pass/fail flip-flopped after the glib upload. [16:13] (Used to fail on amd64, pass on i386, now it's the inverse, lolwut?) [16:14] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/data/packages/wily/i386/u/udisks2/20150722_172916@.log [16:14] Laney: Yeah. Ima leave proposed in its current state and let glib suffer for this one until we investigate more. [16:15] glib and a kernel in there [16:16] Might spend a few tomorrow running it interactively, but otherwise it'll be easier to wait, I bet. :) [16:16] Kernel's certainly equally likely. [16:17] Annoying, ci.debian.net only runs amd64, so that's not much use to compare against. [16:21] Haha. [16:21] It's skipped there anyway [16:24] Oh, breaks-testbed. Indeed. [16:24] Wish the ci UI would call that something other than a "pass". :P === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa