[00:03] <teward> slangasek: thanks
[02:06] <nagromlt> no h yet for bt ?
[02:06] <nagromlt> on ##crypto and #bitcoin
[02:24] <nagromlt> no pussies
[05:58] <Logan> I can't seem to figure out why gem2deb isn't building: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gem2deb/0.20.1
[05:58] <Logan> we have a new enough ruby-all-dev
[06:26] <ScottK> It's apparently uninstallable.
[06:27] <ScottK> Logan: the log won't tell you why. The easiest thing to do is to try and install it locally and see if it fails.  Keep a particular eye on trying to use packages from universe.
[06:28] <Logan> okay, thanks! the log doesn't make it very clear that ruby-all-dev is not installable :(
[06:28] <Logan> "not going to be installed" reads more like "I can't find it"
[06:39] <Logan> hmm, it installs fine locally
[06:39] <Logan> in fact, it's already installed on my box
[15:06] <Laney> siretart: hi, can we drop the -dev package from libav maybe?
[15:07] <Laney> package*s*
[16:10] <infinity> Laney: Any ideas about the general sketchiness of the udisks2 force-removal test?
[16:11] <infinity> Laney: Is that a bug in the test, or is the test correctly finding a bug in the code (or the system)?
[16:12] <Laney> infinity: Don't know, hoping pitti will save us all when he comes back
[16:12] <Laney> he's the udisks2 guy really
[16:12] <infinity> Hahaha.
[16:12] <Laney> I got as far as seeing "yup, that sure does hang locally"
[16:13] <infinity> Laney: I'm tempted to let glib2 through, since it *seems* mostly unrelated, though it's crazy suspicious and weird that the pass/fail flip-flopped after the glib upload.
[16:13] <infinity> (Used to fail on amd64, pass on i386, now it's the inverse, lolwut?)
[16:14] <Laney> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/data/packages/wily/i386/u/udisks2/20150722_172916@.log
[16:14] <infinity> Laney: Yeah.  Ima leave proposed in its current state and let glib suffer for this one until we investigate more.
[16:15] <Laney> glib and a kernel in there
[16:16] <Laney> Might spend a few tomorrow running it interactively, but otherwise it'll be easier to wait, I bet. :)
[16:16] <infinity> Kernel's certainly equally likely.
[16:17] <infinity> Annoying, ci.debian.net only runs amd64, so that's not much use to compare against.
[16:21] <Laney> Haha.
[16:21] <Laney> It's skipped there anyway
[16:24] <infinity> Oh, breaks-testbed.  Indeed.
[16:24] <infinity> Wish the ci UI would call that something other than a "pass". :P