[01:49] <a1fa> has anybody noticed random high ports being open (or at least randomly responding) with no tcp listeners?
[01:49] <a1fa> $ nmap localhost -p 0-65535
[01:49] <a1fa> 40424/tcp open  unknown
[01:49] <a1fa> 41820/tcp open  unknown
[01:50] <a1fa> ...
[01:50] <a1fa> 59865/tcp open  unknown
[01:51] <a1fa> goofy... whatever is causing it (tested on fresh build/air gap)
[01:52] <a1fa> and it only happens if a non priviledged user does a port scan
[02:00] <a1fa> can anyone else confirm the same behaviour? as a non root user run nmap localhost -p 0-65535
[02:00] <a1fa> several times in a row
[02:02] <teward> a1fa: any specific OS you want tested, or just any Ubuntu?
[02:03] <a1fa> 15.04 or 14.04
[02:03] <a1fa> 14.04.02
[02:03] <a1fa> and 15.04 with 3.19.0-24-generic
[02:03] <teward> stupid question but
[02:03] <teward> you wouldn't happen to have dhcp on your network would you?
[02:04] <teward> (dhclient might be listening on random high ports for DHCP changes and such)
[02:06] <a1fa> i do
[02:06] <teward> i can replicate the behavior on wily, but only insomuchas there's only one open port
[02:06] <teward> a random high tcp port on my side
[02:06] <teward> and only one
[02:07] <teward> multiple UDP ports are 'listened' on by dhclient
[02:08] <a1fa> odd
[02:08] <teward> and i just saw one with a few high number random TCP ports open
[02:08] <teward> but the next scan they're gone
[02:09] <a1fa> it only happens with non-root user
[02:09] <teward> which makes me think they're destructible connections - since high ports are usually used for client-initiated TCP
[02:09] <teward> and nmap needs those too iirc
[02:09] <a1fa> i did see S/Ack on tcpdump
[02:10] <a1fa> so forwhatever reason, something answered, followed by RST
[02:10] <a1fa> just tested the same thing on a chromebook, same behaviour
[02:11] <teward> lemme start up my CentOS box
[02:12] <teward> and see if it's replicated there too
[02:12] <teward> my guess is it's standard stuff happening
[02:14] <patdk-lap> doesn't happen for me at all, on 14.04.2
[02:14] <patdk-lap> you didn't happen to *run out* of available ports did you?
[02:14] <teward> i'll spin up my ubuntu server vm to test in a moment
[02:14] <patdk-lap> cycling through them too fast, in time-wait
[02:15] <patdk-lap> hmm, atleast with *that* nmap command, they aren't going to time-wait, cause they aren't full tcp session test
[02:15] <a1fa> patdk-lap: thats what i was thinking.. but i saw a s/ack
[02:16] <patdk-lap> could be hundreds of reasons
[02:16] <patdk-lap> depending on what you have installed
[02:16] <a1fa> base
[02:16] <patdk-lap> I know I only install minimal-installs so
[02:16] <patdk-lap> don't know what base is
[02:17] <a1fa> basically nothing besides what comes on a default install
[02:17] <patdk-lap> ya, I never install that *much*
[02:17] <a1fa> the odd thing is, its doing it on the chromebook too
[02:18] <a1fa> running chromeos+14.04.02
[02:18] <patdk-lap> about 30, nmap runs now
[02:18] <patdk-lap> and always the same 3 ports, of stuff I have running
[02:18] <patdk-lap> ssh/http/munin
[02:18] <teward> dhclient gets involved a little at some point
[02:18] <a1fa> running as non root user, right?
[02:18] <teward> centos can't replicate this
[02:18] <patdk-lap> oh non root? that will ahve other things
[02:19] <a1fa> what kernel version teward
[02:19] <teward> a1fa: for...?
[02:19] <a1fa> centos
[02:19] <teward> centos?  you're 30 seconds slow i already powered off the VM
[02:19] <a1fa> :P
[02:19] <teward> i'll tell you after i test on my Trusty VM
[02:19] <a1fa> k
[02:20] <patdk-lap> ok, as non-root
[02:21] <patdk-lap> it happens, and also happens on rhel7
[02:21] <a1fa> its worth looking into it, and maybe opening a bug
[02:21] <patdk-lap> why?
[02:21] <patdk-lap> so far it's not worth it at all
[02:22] <a1fa> it's not supposed to ack back at all
[02:22] <teward> ran nmap 5 times and it started to show open ports locally
[02:22] <teward> in rapid succession
[02:22] <teward> otherwise it wasn't giving any ports (14.04)
[02:22] <patdk-lap> nmap just acts funky when you don't use it as root
[02:22] <teward> mhm
[02:22] <patdk-lap> cause it can't use raw sockets
[02:23] <patdk-lap> so it attempts to do the best it can
[02:23] <a1fa> patdk-lap: but the system responds back with s/ack on those prots
[02:23] <a1fa> confirmed with tcpdump. on both loopback and actual interface ip
[02:24] <patdk-lap> both use loopback interface
[02:24] <patdk-lap> what happens if you use a remote ip?
[02:24] <a1fa> no ports show up
[02:25] <a1fa> i'll do some more work tomorrow to debug it
[02:27] <a1fa> thanks for confirming
[02:30] <PryMar56> on a new install of Vivid server, my `systemd-analyze time` shows too much kernel time (>20s). Anyway to improve this?
[02:30] <PryMar56> ^ kernel time should be about 5s
[05:12] <gmaciolek> What are people using for centralized update management these days?
[05:12] <gmaciolek> I assume Landscape is an option; are there FOSS things that are worth trying?
[06:56] <lordievader> Good morning.
[06:57] <ObrienDave> o/
[07:04] <mobile3> anyone ?
[07:05] <lordievader> mobile3: ?
[07:06] <mobile3> Can you help me with Webuzo Control Panel on VPS ?
[07:06] <mobile3> Ubuntu 14.04 x64
[07:06] <lordievader> Ah, no. But do ask your questions.
[07:06]  * ObrienDave does not want to know what webuzo is ;P
[07:08] <lordievader> ObrienDave: No adventure in the early morning?
[07:08] <ObrienDave> getting close to sleepy time :)
[07:08] <mobile3> I have been given 4 IP , while installing webuzo 1 IP got bonded to it... I have placed index.php file in public_html folder... when I am accessing via bonded IP , I am able to get correct index.php file but with all other 3 IP , I am getting different things..
[07:09] <mobile3> What to do so that I can get the same index.php file from all of my IP ??
[07:09] <lordievader> Vhost configuration?
[07:10] <OerHeks> easy to add an extra ip to your machine, manually .. http://askubuntu.com/a/313887
[07:10] <lordievader> mobile3: Who set up the Web server?
[07:11] <mobile3> lordievader: they gave me with Ubuntu 14.04 x6
[07:11] <mobile3> minimal installed
[07:11] <mobile3> I changed it to Ubuntu 14.04 x64
[07:12] <lordievader> mobile3: So you control the Web server config?
[07:13] <mobile3> ya I can...
[07:14] <mobile3> How to solve this problem ?
[07:14] <lordievader> mobile3: Check the vhost configuration.
[07:14] <mobile3> how  ?
[07:15] <lordievader> By reading the configuration/
[07:15] <lordievader> mobile3: Step 4 in this tutorial shows how vhosts are configured: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-apache-virtual-hosts-on-ubuntu-14-04-lts
[07:16] <lordievader> In that particular case it is any incoming request on port 80.
[07:21] <mobile3> not such file    /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf
[07:21] <mobile3> in my server
[07:22] <lordievader> mobile3: What is in /etc/apache2/sites-available?
[07:22] <mobile3> No apache2 folder
[07:25] <lordievader> mobile3: What Web server are you using to serve your control panel?
[07:26] <mobile3> Ubuntu 14.04 x64    ....        Webuzo  Control Panel
[07:26] <lordievader> mobile3: That is not a Web server.
[07:27] <mobile3> Apache
[07:28] <mobile3> lordievader : Apache Version : 2.2.29
[07:28] <lordievader> But you have no /etc/apache2? Where is your Apache coming from?
[07:29] <mobile3> I don't know !
[07:30] <lordievader> mobile3: What is the output of 'apt-cache policy apache2'?
[07:30] <mobile3> apache2:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 2.4.7-1ubuntu4.4   Version table:      2.4.7-1ubuntu4.4 0         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages         500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 Packages      2.4.7-1ubuntu4 0         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
[07:31] <lordievader> For in the future
[07:31] <lordievader> !paste | mobile3
[07:32] <lordievader> mobile3: That is not installed... Is Apache coming from outside of the repo?
[07:33] <mobile3> I don't know...
[07:34] <lordievader> mobile3: What is the output of 'whereis apache2'?
[07:34] <mobile3> whereis apache2 apache2:
[07:37] <lordievader> Huh? How did you just get the version information?
[07:44] <mobile3> lordievader :http://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/436540/dcbc63865c203be5ee4bce22fa8caea7
[07:45] <lordievader> Ugh, does that thing do its own software installation?
[07:45] <neonixcoder> I am upgrading 10.04 to 12.04 but middle of upgrade my system reboots..
[07:46] <neonixcoder> When checked system logs it states that "locale: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by locale)"
[07:46] <neonixcoder> My present glibc version is 2.11..
[07:46] <neonixcoder> any suggetions?
[07:47] <mobile3> lordievader : may be but I don't know
[07:50] <jelly> neonixcoder: verify versions of libc6, libc-bin and locales packages.  Make sure they match by installing and/or configuring them manually if needed, then finish your release upgrade.
[07:51] <jelly> neonixcoder: newer versions of .deb package files will have been downloaded into /var/cache/apt/archives/
[07:52] <neonixcoder> ok?
[07:52] <neonixcoder> Thanks for your reply..
[07:54] <neonixcoder> jelly: when I checked with apt-cache policy for libc6 and libc-bin it shows installed is 2.11 and candidate is 2.15. But for locales it shows installed and candidate as 2.11
[07:54] <neonixcoder> Any thoughts on this?
[07:54] <mobile3> lordievader : are you there ?
[07:55] <Amillo> Hey guys, if I nslookup my zone 'test.co.uk' and it returns the server as a loopback does this mean I've configured something wrong?
[07:55] <jelly> neonixcoder: both of those are unusual for 12.04.  My 12.04 installation has locales:  Installed: 2.13+git20120306-3  Candidate: 2.13+git20120306-3
[07:55] <lordievader> mobile3: Still here, just busy. Anyhow I get the feeling it does install its own packages. I have no idea how, why or where. So I really cannot help you.
[07:56] <neonixcoder> jelly: I am still on 10.04 machine..
[07:56] <mobile3> lordievader : okay
[07:56] <neonixcoder> I am upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04
[07:57] <lordievader> neonixcoder: Restart the upgrade?
[07:59] <jelly> neonixcoder: pastebin the output of "apt-cache policy" and "apt-cache policy libc6 libc-bin locales" please
[07:59] <neonixcoder> lordievader and jelly: Let me give some background here..
[08:01] <neonixcoder> I have some 200 machines need to upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04(Intention is to upgrade to 14.04). I have some test machines where I can upgrade multiple times if something went wrong..
[08:01] <neonixcoder> I am going to follow http://askubuntu.com/questions/125742/why-did-my-upgrade-to-12-04-fail-with-glibc-not-found-or-libc6-or-requires
[08:02] <neonixcoder> from there I install that PPA which is giving me 2.15 versions for libc6 and libc-bin
[08:02] <jelly> neonixcoder: oh dear
[08:03] <lordievader> Somewhere that sounds like a bad idea.
[08:03] <tonyyarusso> ........PPA for libc6?  *grabs popcorn*
[08:03] <jelly> neonixcoder: well, good luck with that, I won't be able to help with that mess
[08:04] <neonixcoder> Ok.. Let me remove that ppa from list then..
[08:04] <neonixcoder> I did not try to upgrade it with that PPA, before doing it I want your valuable advice..
[08:05] <lordievader> neonixcoder: Did you install anything from the ppa?
[08:05] <neonixcoder> right now no..
[08:05] <neonixcoder> Just added it..
[08:05] <lordievader> Phew, doged a bulled.
[08:05] <lordievader> bullet*
[08:05]  * jelly would prefer to the valuable current state of the system before dispensing potentially harmful advice
[08:06] <jelly> to see*
[08:16] <neonixcoder> jelly: My present policy list is http://pastebin.com/Lugf3j7N
[08:16] <neonixcoder> any suggetions?
[08:28] <neonixcoder> jelly:Any thoughts on how to proceed with upgrade?
[08:33] <neonixcoder> Any suggestions guys?
[08:33] <neonixcoder> How can I upgrade with out glibc issue?
[08:49] <neonixcoder> Quick recap.. I removed ppa and given my apt-get cache stuff..
[08:52] <neonixcoder> Or can I know which repo provides glibc?
[08:58] <neonixcoder> going home, ping you people tomorrow
[11:23] <Amillo> Hey guys - What's the command to read my bind9 error logs, can't seem to find it anyway?
[11:23] <jpds> Amillo: tail -f /var/log/bind9/* ?
[11:24] <jpds> Amillo: tail -f /var/log/syslog ?
[11:24] <jpds> Amillo: Same place most of the other logs are
[11:25] <Amillo> my bind9 is failing to restart but my error message doesn't make sense to me
[11:26] <Amillo> isc_stdio_option '/var/log/query.log' failed: permission denied
[11:26] <Amillo> but I've changed the ownership of that file to bind
[11:26] <Amillo> Also has configuring logging: permission denied
[11:46] <rbasak> '/var/log/query.log' sounds wrong to me.
[11:55] <jdstrand> momomo: if all you want are security updates, remove the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list that have '-updates' and then do 'apt-get update'. you will only get updates from the security pocket
[13:09] <Guest86431> Hey
[13:12] <Guest86431> I'm having what I believe might be an issue? - When I do an nslookup from both my slave and master of my zones they are turning loopback addresses as the server - http://i.imgur.com/UZq0Mk9.jpg is this normal? (sorry for blocking stuff out - on a work network don't wanna mess anything up)
[13:43] <pmatulis> {stick around next time}
[14:47] <gmaciolek> Wow, tis weechat client integrates screenshot links.
[14:47] <gmaciolek> *this
[14:48] <gmaciolek> So, I'm wondering, what are people using for centralized update management these days?  (It looks like Landscape is an option. but O
[14:48] <gmaciolek> *I'm hoping for FOSS, and ideally a tool that'll work on deb & rpm distros
[14:49] <maswan> automatic updates
[14:51] <teward> ^ that
[14:51] <teward> but if you want centralized management of Ubuntu servers, it's Landscape (but that can be expensive)
[14:51] <teward> or puppet or other multisystem management systems
[14:52] <lordievader> Puppet is rather nice.
[14:53] <teward> lordievader: when configured right, yes.
[14:53] <lordievader> True, it can be painfull too ;)
[14:54] <OerHeks> landscape is up to 10 servers free, no ?
[14:55] <teward> OerHeks: when you set it up on your own system, 10 physical machines, 10 virtual
[14:55] <teward> OerHeks: i use it to manage my VPSes (which get listed on the Virtual category)
[14:56] <teward> problem is you actually have to set it up, as the 'cloud' one from Canonical needs the Advantage licenses
[14:56] <OerHeks> Nice, it is indeed good usable for small business
[14:56] <teward> OerHeks: provided there's only 10 physical and 10 virtual machines
[14:56] <garethdaine> Guys, how long should it take to wipe and reinstall a fresh Ubuntu server, only running Ubuntu 14.04 x64 on a machine with 16GB RAM?
[14:58] <maswan> garethdaine: Mostly depends on the storage and set of installed packages
[14:58] <maswan> garethdaine: writeback cache on the storage is a factor 10-100
[14:59] <maswan> compared to slow spinning disks without
[15:00] <garethdaine> But it shouldn;t take 4 hours should it?
[15:00] <garethdaine> Being installed by professionals
[15:00] <garethdaine> I’ve asked our dedicated host to wipe the server and install only a fresh copy of Ubuntu 14.04 x64 and they are saying it’s 4 hours chargable work
[15:01] <teward> garethdaine: they probably have to do things at the datacenter to make the revisions - network reconfiguration, configuration for networking, etc.
[15:01] <teward> depending on what all they ahve to do over at the datacenter it could very well be 4 hours of work for them
[15:03] <tgm4883> teward: assuming that it had a previous version of Ubuntu server on there, what else would they need to reconfigure?
[15:03] <garethdaine> Hmmm, really? Thought it took like 30 minutes to install
[15:03] <rbasak> 30 minutes within an 80% confidence interval maybe
[15:04] <rbasak> (if the hardware isn't Ubuntu certified, etc)
[15:04] <rbasak> If quoting in advance it makes sense to add contingency time, for example if there are driver issues.
[15:04] <rbasak> Or if the hardware turns out to be faulty.
[15:04] <rbasak> Etc.
[15:04] <tgm4883> rbasak: true, I suppose there are a lot of unknowns here
[15:06] <OerHeks> even with a dedicated host you should be able to put an image back yourself.
[15:08] <garethdaine> rbasak: Shouldn’t have faulty hardware, it’s current live server that’s just getting a reinstall
[15:11] <rbasak> Disks can have latent errors that only show up when doing big things to them.
[15:12] <rbasak> This is why double RAID failures happen. Because only on attempt to reconstruct does the second disk fail.
[15:17] <garethdaine> OK, thanks for the help folks. Should I question the quote I have received and ask them to detail what is taking the 4 hours, or should I just accept that it can take 4 hours?
[15:18] <teward> garethdaine: i would, but i'm anal about making sure they're not doing extra work
[15:19] <rbasak> I would consider what your service costs you overall and what you get for that money, as compared to competitors.
[15:19] <teward> right
[15:19] <teward> garethdaine: although, if they have to redo the RAID to reinstall that could potentially explain a large time for completion
[15:19] <teward> (build the array, verify the array's integrity, etc.)
[15:19] <teward> but i woudl do that comparison rbasak says as well
[15:20] <teward> AND ask what the 4 hours entails
[15:23] <garethdaine> Yes, I will do that teward
[15:25] <garethdaine> Thanks for the help
[16:24] <alexandercogneau> exit
[16:24] <alexandercogneau> exit
[17:25] <Garogat> hey
[17:26] <Garogat> just have some probs with my dns server
[17:26] <teward> Garogat: 'some probs' is not descriptive
[17:26] <Garogat> sry ;)
[17:26] <Garogat> i got a domain
[17:26] <Garogat> slucky.de
[17:27] <Garogat> and i wanna use my own dns server
[17:27] <Garogat> *servers
[17:27] <teward> lets not forget that enter is not punctuation... ;)
[17:27] <teward> Garogat: i'm followin you so far, so, what's the 'problems'
[17:28] <jrwren> Garogat: https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/dns.html may help?
[17:28] <teward> ^ that too
[17:30] <Garogat> fsg-preetz.net and c.ns.buddynd.com, but when im trying to test them with nast from denic its always gving me an error. It's says: inconsistent set if NS rps (IP, Ns host names)
[17:48] <PryMar56> new vivd server & boot hangs for 15s before systemd starts: http://paste.ubuntu.net/11949526/
[18:43] <blaaa> I have issues with disks on a Marvell 88SE9230 controller, under load, especially when writing I suppose, failures occur
[18:44] <blaaa> are there known issues with 88SE9230 and LTS kernel 3.13?
[18:44] <dasjoe> Seeing issues seems to be the norm with that controller, I experience similar ones
[18:45] <blaaa> too bad... I had not used it so far, but I just recently added two disks
[18:46] <blaaa> my board is a Supermicro X10SBA, could have just used a X10SBA-L I suppose
[18:46] <blaaa> I'll try to find out if more recent kernels have patches
[19:25] <bilde2910> Uh, I've pushed myself into a corner here. My /boot is at 97%. I want to clean it up with apt-get autoremove, but I can't because a few packages (linux-image-extra-3.13.0-55-generic and -59-generic, as well as linux-image-generic) miss some dependencies (linux-image-3.13.0-55-generic and for the latter two -59-generic) and I am recommended to run apt-get -f install to fix these dependency issues. So I do this, and I am told that I cannot
[19:25] <bilde2910> install linux-image-3.13.0-59-generic_3.13.0-59.98_amd64.deb because the device is full. No space left on device. I then try apt-get autoremove to free some space, but I get the same errors as before. Running Ubuntu Server 14.04.2 LTS on amd64. Any help?
[19:26] <sarnold> bilde2910: use apt-get purge to manually delete specific packages
[19:27] <bilde2910> Just tried that too, and nope, I can't because aforementioned dependencies are not met
[19:27] <sarnold> bilde2910: start deleting the dependencies, too
[19:27] <bilde2910> Should I try using -f? Or is that dangerous?
[19:27] <sarnold> bilde2910: you can always re-install the metapackages once you're done
[19:28] <bilde2910> I don't really have much experience with Linux and Ubuntu and servers, so I'm not exactly sure which packages should be present and which shouldn't
[19:39] <bilde2910> Is it safe to manually delete some of the older ones of these files? http://paste.ubuntu.com/11950111/
[19:43] <sarnold> bilde2910: yeah; if you truncate them instead of delete them, it'll make some deleting steps easier..
[19:44] <sarnold> bilde2910: be sure to keep at least two -- whatever you're currently running, and the newest. if you're running the newest, then keep the next-oldest..
[19:44] <sarnold> or next-newest
[19:44]  * sarnold stops thinking about that before his head hurts
[19:45] <hexaclock> anyone know if there's a way to assemble mdadm raid arrays in a particular order?
[19:45] <hexaclock> i have a raid60 made up of 2 raid6 arrays
[19:46] <hexaclock> anytime that i reboot this box, i need to manually assemble the raid0 array (the underlying raid6 arrays assemble just fine on boot without any intervention)
[19:46] <hexaclock> i could always throw something in /etc/rc.local or such, but i'm wondering if there is a cleaner way?
[19:51] <TJ-> hexaclock: the arrays are assembled via udevd triggers, so how about a custom rule that assembles the RAiD0 once the 2 underlying arrays are ready
[19:53] <TJ-> hexaclock: along the lines of: when a RAID6 is added: 1) if /run/raid6 already exists then assemble the RAID0 and delete /run/raid6, otherwise "touch /run/raid6"
[19:54] <hexaclock> awesome, i'll look into it
[19:54] <hexaclock> thanks!
[19:56] <TJ-> hexaclock: "/lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules" might give you some clues on how to recognise the mdadm array is ready; your rule will want to be in "/etc/udev/rules.d/" and have a different number/name than the system mdadm rule to avoid over-riding it
[20:05] <bilde2910> sarnold, another question: How do I know which of the files I use? E.g. I have 8 of initrd.img-$version-generic, how do I know which one is the one my system uses?
[20:05] <sarnold> bilde2910: uname -a output
[20:06] <bilde2910> Ah, thank you :)
[20:26] <tanuki> I have Trusty server running as a headless VM (on another Trusty server machine). A few times now, the VM has spontaneously booted into memtest86+.
[20:27] <tanuki> Any idea why?
[20:41] <bekks> tanuki: You need to investigate the logs in /var/log/
[20:48] <tanuki> Paradoxically, the thing that pisses me off is when things *don't* fail (when I want them to).
[20:49] <bekks> I dont want things to fail :)
[20:49] <TJ-> tanuki: Is there anything non-standard about the server installation, any custom boot-loader configuration, anything unusual about the disk images being provided to the guest by the host?
[20:50] <tanuki> TJ-: Not to my knowledge, with the exception of choosing "minimal virtual machine" instead of "minimal system".
[20:50] <tanuki> bekks: I want things to fail when I need to know why they fail.
[20:52] <TJ-> tanuki: there were 2 things I would focus on... is the root file-system image separate to the /boot/ image and if so is the rootfs image present and ready, and if they are, then has grub set a different 'default' boot entry that happens to be the memtest86+ entry in some circumstances.... the only other option I can think is something running in the guest that actively causes a reboot to memtest86
[20:54] <tanuki> This server isn't used for anything, really (basically, it's a development box for things), so I'm tempted to just set up a cron job on the host that checks that sshd is running on the guest and fires off an email otherwise
[20:54] <tanuki> I'm more concerned with power consumption than anything else.
[22:02] <jak2000> how to change the linux hostname?
[22:07] <pmatulis> jak2000: edit /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts, then reboot. can avoid a reboot with 'sudo sysctl -w kernel.hostname=<hostname>'
[22:08] <pmatulis> the only place where a domain name enters into the mix is in /etc/hosts. everywhere else hostname is just the first part of the FQDN (up to the first dot)
[22:09] <jak2000> ok thanks
[23:09] <neonixcoder> Good day team..
[23:24] <jak2000> neonixcoder you worked with tomcat?
[23:25] <neonixcoder> jak2000: Yes, not deep in to it..
[23:27] <neonixcoder> What's up?
[23:29] <jak2000> check pm friend
[23:29] <jak2000> pls