[07:27] If someone has the time to run me through some of iconview in glade that would be great [10:19] Noskcaj: what info/hints are you looking for exactly? [11:06] hey all [11:06] I'll return to my regularly scheduled usefulness tonight [11:06] :D [11:07] hey sean [11:08] you ought to look at the new features of the tracker === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:20] hey bluesabre [11:20] hope you enjoyed your holidays [12:03] knome, pleia2 (or anyone else in -team with proofreading skills): i just finished a brief artwork update on our LO integration work for 15.10 on x.org, would be great if you could review before i publish! thanks in advance [12:03] http://xubuntu.org/?p=3269&preview=true [12:05] I've been told I'm one of the nastiest nitpickers people have ever met, and they run their texts by me because of it. I could have a look in a few hours when I get home. [12:09] ochosi, Xubuntu’s default “elementary-xfce”. -> Xubuntu's default icon theme elementary-xfce [12:09] knome: sure, feel free to change that [12:09] ochosi, and i guess generally try to be consistent with quotes or no quotes on theme names [12:10] ochosi, then release the lock [12:10] oh [12:10] oops :) [12:10] Ahh... knome is on it, so then I don't need to. :D [12:10] * ochosi releases lock [12:15] * knome did edits, feel free to double-check [12:15] i changed the whole LO upstream sentence [12:16] ochosi, what about something on how people can help? [12:16] or who to contact [12:16] yeah, could do [12:16] not that i expect wonders, but still [12:16] who knows [12:17] also ping ping pleia2: we would likely prefer to have this on the news :) [12:17] ochosi, we haven't used tags for projects before, do you want to start doing that now? [12:17] ochosi, see the sidebar for the tags we have now [12:18] yeah, dunno, i just felt i could add some, haven't put too much thought into the tags yet tbh [12:18] ok [12:18] i guess 15.10 is an ok tag [12:18] not sure about the others [12:18] i left Artwork [12:18] alright [12:18] we have tags like Marketing and QA [12:18] so it might be ok to tag posts with "interest groups" [12:19] right [12:19] or in other words, subteams [12:20] another option (that requires code change) is to create new taxonomies [12:20] "release" and "team" [12:20] then start tagging like mad men [12:20] (pun intended) [12:22] but to make it clear, the code change is pretty trivial [12:22] but *shrug* [12:22] yeah [12:23] * ochosi shrugs too [12:23] ok, added a brief contribute-section [12:23] i'm somwhat dissatisfied with this now [12:23] with what? [12:23] the tag issue [12:23] oh [12:23] maybe i'll add at least the releases taxonomy [12:24] with some extra features [12:24] like release and EOL date fields [12:24] * ochosi poked the bear [12:24] could then even use that to create the list for supported releases on "Help & Support" [12:24] nah, i've been thinking this for a long time [12:24] +about [12:28] right [12:28] in that case i guess it's a good thing i tagged without thinking :D [12:29] bah [12:29] :P [12:54] ok, got to pick up some groceries, bbl [12:58] ttyl [20:46] ochosi, poke? [20:47] today is trying to kill me, but I can probably find time tomorrow or tonight to look if still needed [20:47] look at what? [20:47] the article? [20:47] i did that already, don't worry too much about that [20:47] ok [20:48] pleia2, more goodness incoming: http://xstaging.lallinaho.fi/release/12-04/ [20:48] reminds me, should remove utopic from docs.x.o [20:48] basically moving releases from tags to a "release" taxonomy [20:48] with custom fields [20:48] we can even build the "supported releases" list with this information [20:48] tagging confounds me, good work [20:49] so now we can use the tags for something else [20:49] like [20:49] this is what i do on my blog: [20:49] all application names that are mentioned in the article -> tag [20:49] all themes that are covered in the article -> tag [20:50] also app names "Capitalized", themes "uncapitalized" [20:50] http://open.knome.fi/?s= [20:50] ^ makes most sense to me [20:51] ok :) [20:51] but we can do whatever we want [20:51] mixing in releases there was the bad idea [20:52] but since we didn't have this custom taxonomy... [20:57] evening all [20:58] * ochosi pokes knome back [20:58] ochosi, basically the url i posted to pleia [20:58] +2 [20:58] pleia2: yeah, dont worry, just wanted another set of eyes [20:58] knome: nice! i like it [20:59] also see sidebar [20:59] widget just arrived [20:59] you mean the "object(stdClass)#296 (9) { ["term_id"]=> string(2) "25" ["name"]=> ..." [20:59] ? [20:59] :) [20:59] refrehs :P [20:59] refresh too [20:59] nice [20:59] so we can dump in the release codename, release and eol dates, and of course, a description [21:00] sometimes i'm wondering whether we should use the per-release animal logos more [21:00] so we can do a quick overview of the release if we want [21:00] sounds lovely [21:00] ..and then have a list of all articles linked to that release [21:01] yeah [21:01] so basically collecting all info of a single release in one (dynamic) place would be great [21:01] incl links to docs for that release etc [21:01] that's pretty much what i'm doing [21:01] right... [21:01] that's a different question, but yeah, it's doable [21:02] yeah, i know, that could be the next step [21:02] but let's go with the tagging mechanism you're working on there [21:02] heh [21:02] ;)) [21:03] well, as long as we name the release slugs in a standard way, we can resolve the docs link from there [21:03] automatically, that is [21:04] eg. the slug '15-04' can be easily converted to 'http://docs.xubuntu.org/1504/' [21:04] do i need to tell you how to do that? (: [21:04] what me? do i need to resolve the links now? [21:04] hah. [21:05] * knome slaps ochosi [21:06] ouch [21:06] * ochosi bleeds when people stab him [21:06] * ochosi feels pain when knome slaps him [21:06] well good, that's the goal :P [21:06] better example for archives http://xstaging.lallinaho.fi/release/14-04/ [21:07] nice [21:07] yeah, that really makes sense to group our articles by release [21:07] definitely [21:07] we're doing that already [21:07] just with tags [21:07] (i mean the release-tagged ones at least) [21:07] http://xubuntu.org/news/tag/14-04/ [21:08] but that isn't even close [21:09] http://xstaging.lallinaho.fi/release/14-04/ [21:09] updated that with a description from wikipedia [21:09] >:) [21:10] :D [21:10] i wonder if it would be better if the description was first [21:10] opinion? [21:11] maybe it was better the other way [21:12] yeah [21:12] well [21:12] hmm [21:12] heh [21:12] to some extent both make sense [21:12] now this feels too top-heavy [21:13] or bottom [21:13] but the EOL is really important for releases [21:13] depending how you look at it [21:13] yeah [21:13] one thing i've been pondering is how to show the eol status [21:13] eg. if it's EOL, should the date be in red? [21:13] or appended with some notice? [21:13] or both? [21:16] yeah [21:16] yeah to what? [21:16] definitely should be highlighted [21:16] stupid [21:16] :P [21:16] :) [21:16] btw, any more comments on the LO article or can i pubish as is? [21:16] pubish? [21:16] HUH. [21:16] PLEASE [21:16] or publish [21:16] no pubes on the website [21:16] you decide [21:16] * knome checks quickly [21:17] after all, you're the fancy web lead [21:17] oh, i'm now fancy? [21:17] the web lead position is [21:17] so you holding that position makes you fancy too, i guess [21:18] i'm so flattered now, simon. [21:18] anyway, i fixed a few pubish errors [21:18] why am i not surprised? [21:18] you're good to go now [21:19] good good, i'm a go-er, ya know ;) [21:19] yeah i do [21:19] there's no doubt about it - your partner is pregnant [21:20] heh @ wikipedia: [21:20] There will also be a new version of Xubuntu "Core" starting from Xubuntu 15.10. Developers have speculated that it will fit in regular CDs.[citation needed] [21:20] yeah... [21:20] who has "speculated" with that? [21:20] CONFESS! [21:20] haha [21:20] gotta love wikipedia [21:21] now somebody will surely make a mention there that the developers do not care for their users because they only joke about their wikipedia edits [21:22] especially that fancy web lead [21:22] definitely [21:22] and it's teh truth! [21:22] citation: Pasi Lallinaho, Xubuntu Web Lead [21:22] ^ obviously fake, we have no "Web Lead" [21:23] who's that pasi guy? [21:23] don't know [21:23] but i've heard he's damn fancy [21:24] and a go-er [21:24] fwiw [21:24] indeed, wears strange clothes, talks "the fancy talk" he himself invented and constantly references the pythons and m.a.numminen [21:25] and sports a minimalist designer wallet, i've heard [21:26] ochosi, i just checked our status tracker and saw you haven't scheduled our next meeting [21:26] <: [21:26] haha, yeah, had to publish that article first ;) [21:26] but will do that now [21:26] hard work, that [21:26] * ochosi schedules time for scheduling the next meeting [21:26] pubishing :P [21:27] yeah, i hear they build houses just for that! [21:27] hah [21:27] anyway [21:27] something else i need to figure out [21:27] is how to separate articles on the blog better [21:27] it looks clunky now [21:27] the problem is [21:27] i've never really sorted that problem [21:27] except by only showing one article at a time [21:28] maybe it just needs more space in between [21:28] humm [21:28] right now there's so little space in between [21:28] yeah [21:28] i mean basically almost no visible separation at all [21:28] i have a mixed group of updates for the theme incoming [21:28] some from way back [21:28] so, meh [21:28] need to pull the strings together [21:29] maybe i need to do the other things first [21:29] then the release stuff [21:29] that's fortunately still relatively easily kept separate [21:29] right, take your time [21:29] i'll meanwhile figure out a good meeting time [21:29] i will, i just hate this process [21:29] brb [21:29] lol [21:29] have fun scheduling [22:00] huh, ok, worst bunch of work done and stuff in the repository [22:30] good evening al [22:30] l [22:30] and al and all [22:30] hey al! [22:30] :D [22:30] nice of you to stop by [22:30] heya ochosi [22:30] looking forward to the burndown looking more optimistic after tonight ;D [22:31] or tomorrow night [22:31] going to work on it tonight though [22:31] but not feeling too great [22:31] oh [22:32] sorry to hear [22:32] first day at work after holidays is rarely fun though [22:32] a few days out, and plenty to do when I get back :) [22:33] yeah [22:33] hey bluesabre [22:33] hey knome [22:34] ochosi, i think the burndown chart looks much better than a few days ago [22:34] (pun intended and obvious) [22:34] xstatus is looking quite good [22:35] so does the burndown burn itself down as you complete tasks improving the actual burndown chart? :D [22:36] knome: hehe, indeed [23:27] looks like only G+ updated so far with new article? [23:27] I'll do fb and twitter [23:27] oh, ok [23:27] :) [23:28] knome: or you can do twitter if you want [23:28] * pleia2 writes words for fb [23:28] can do that [23:29] tweeted [23:29] ty [23:45] slickymaster, knome: This fixes all the current targets of the docs: http://paste.openstack.org/show/tMcOyxWCYEhyXy5oULhz/ [23:47] krytarik, erm, you sure that's done against the latest docs branch? [23:48] Yep. [23:48] oh pop [23:48] *poop [23:49] krytarik, please rediff [23:50] krytarik, i just pushed your changes from last time [23:50] Meh. [23:52] well, you aren't willing to do MP's, so you'd better give us the diff in some other way we fancy it. [23:53] knome: Thought you hadn't decided on that one yet though, and since it was all in a bunch... [23:54] no, i just forgot to push it basically [23:54] Alright then. [23:55] Give me a min. [23:55] MPs are nice because there's history and real commit log [23:55] sure, i'm watching a dvd... [23:55] lol