[09:32] <Laney> flexiondotorg: Setting up the milestone and kicking a rebuild now, FYI
[09:44] <Laney> rebuild-requests is taking a suspiciously long time to complete
[09:44] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Thanks.
[10:27] <Laney> ah, it waits for the rebuilds - okay then
[10:37] <lordievader> Oeehh, Alpha2 images
[11:19] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Could you do me a favour and update the ubuntu-mate seeds/tasks please?
[11:22] <Laney> flexiondotorg: Update from where?
[11:23] <flexiondotorg> Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-mate.wily
[11:26] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: you want to update ubuntu-mate-meta?
[11:26] <flexiondotorg> didrocks, Yes please.
[11:26] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: doing
[11:26] <Laney> I'm doing it
[11:26] <didrocks> ah :)
[11:26] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Thanks for doing.
[11:26]  * didrocks avoided heat \o/
[11:26] <flexiondotorg> didrocks, Thanks for offering :-)
[11:27] <didrocks> yw!
[11:28] <Laney> flexiondotorg: rev #11 does a little bit more than its message suggests...
[11:28] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: I still must say that beer and curry sounds weird :)
[11:28] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: (just listened to that episod while doing my daily run)
[11:31] <Laney> flexiondotorg: Also note that the tasks are generated from the seeds directly; you're asking to update the metapackage. :)
[11:31] <flexiondotorg> Laney, So it also removes some commented stuff for ibus. That has never featured.
[11:31] <flexiondotorg> Laney, And adds ubuntu-mate-welcome
[11:31] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Yes I forgot my teminology.
[11:32] <flexiondotorg> didrocks, Beer good. Curry good. Beer + Curry = Better :-)
[11:32] <Laney> Task is what you see in (e.g.) apt-cache show $package
[16:11] <wxl> um, why isn't lubuntu in alpha 2?
[16:12] <ianorlin> I don't think the dialies have built yet for today
[16:13] <wxl> we're not even in the manifest from what i can tell
[16:13] <Laney> Why would you be?
[16:13] <Laney> You never replied to the email.
[16:13] <wxl> Laney: i never got an email
[16:13] <ianorlin> oops
[16:14] <Laney> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2015-July/003322.html
[16:14] <Laney> Not too late.
[16:14] <wxl> wth
[16:15] <Laney> You want in?
[16:15] <wxl> yes please
[16:16] <wxl> just trying to figure out why i didn't get any of those emails
[16:16] <Laney> buildin
[16:16] <Laney> g
[16:18] <wxl> huh i do get digests so maybe i just missed it
[16:18] <wxl> turned digest mode off
[16:19] <wxl> sorry for the hassle, Laney
[16:20] <Laney> No worries
[17:11] <flexiondotorg> Laney, can you help me identify why ubuntu-mate-artwork is stuck in wily-proposed please?
[17:28] <slangasek> udisks2 in trusty-proposed seems to have regressed its own test suite; this means, for instance, that we don't have valid test results for the parted SRU which we would want to release for 14.04.3.  Should the udisks SRU be removed, and the autopkgtests rerun?
[17:37] <infinity> slangasek: I released the parted SRU anyway, based on some manual investigation.  But yeah, something should be done about udisks2, probably.  The sea of red in trusty autopkgtests in general is still something we need to get under control. :/
[17:39] <slangasek> infinity: well, udisks2 is removed now, so we could have gotten those autopkgtest results for parted... but ok
[17:41] <slangasek> it's actually not much of a sea anymore, I think - seems to be confined to a few SRUs, all of which surely need investigation
[17:42] <infinity> slangasek: I dunno.  All the red on gtk+3.0 for instance is probably not all GTK's fault (if any is).
[17:43] <slangasek> perhaps not, but it still needs investigated and not just ignored
[17:43] <cyphermox> infinity:  ^ ubiquity is in the queue
[17:43] <infinity> slangasek: Yeah, I'm not touching that one anyway. :P
[17:43] <slangasek> heh
[17:43] <infinity> cyphermox: Ta.
[17:44] <infinity> slangasek: That GTK bug looks like something I'd like fixed for the point release, mind you, but no one's touched it for verification in almost a month, so my hopes aren't high.
[17:44] <infinity> seb128: ^? :)
[17:47]  * infinity side-eyes that "2014 bit" key in the python3.4 upload.
[17:47] <infinity> Apparently, numeric dyslexia is contagious.
[17:49] <seb128> infinity, slangasek, I tried to ping bdmurray/the SRU team on #ubuntu-devel about that gtk update like 4 times
[17:49] <seb128> to get it approved
[17:49] <seb128> nobody ever ponged
[17:49] <infinity> seb128: Err, wat?
[17:49] <seb128> but yeah, please unblock it if you can
[17:49] <infinity> seb128: "approved" how?
[17:49] <infinity> seb128: It's been in -proposed for a month.
[17:50] <lordievader> stgraber: Hey, since the Kubuntu team is away at Akademy this week I am doing the lead for Alpha2. However I have not yet received admin rights, could you grant me these?
[17:55] <infinity> cyphermox: Accepted.
[17:55] <seb128> infinity, sorry, looking through logs it looks like we had the same issue for the previous SRU which got approved after a while, so seems we are back to having the same discussion for every update :-/
[17:55] <seb128> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/05/27/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t13:01
[17:56] <infinity> seb128: I'm not talking about the autpkgtest issues, that's on us to sort out, for the most part.
[17:56] <infinity> seb128: I'm talking about the bug itself having 0 activity since the upload.
[17:56] <seb128> infinity, ah, ok, I picked up your "<infinity> slangasek: I dunno.  All the red on gtk+3.0 for instance is probably not all GTK's fault (if any is)."
[17:56] <seb128> which made me react
[17:57] <seb128> because it has been an issue for the previous SRU already and finding somebody to unblock the validated SRU took ages
[17:57] <infinity> seb128: Ahh, yeah, no.  I'm just concerned about the lack of verification/testing.
[17:57] <seb128> anyway, going to chase somebody to verify the new one
[17:57] <seb128> thanks for pointing it out
[17:57] <infinity> seb128: We're well aware that the autopkgtest for SRUs is less than perfect. :/
[17:59] <infinity> doko: Do you care that your python3.4 changelog parrots the same typo from the upstream commit (s/1024/2014/), or would you prefer it reflect reality?
[17:59] <infinity> doko: I'm happy (though amused) to accept it as-is, but maybe you'd like it to not be silly.  Up to you if you want to reupload.
[17:59] <doko> don't care
[18:00] <infinity> Kay.
[21:30] <bdmurray> infinity: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/+junk/ubuntu-archive-scripts I removed utopic references from the ubuntu-archive scripts
[23:57] <Logan> infinity: want to accept my gnuradio SRU uploads for Trusty and Vivid? I can assure you they build properly :)
[23:57] <Logan> very harmless change, just removing an unneeded build dependency so it can build on armhf too