[00:04] <knome>  off to bed, see you later
[00:04] <knome> have a nice evening bluesabre 
[00:27] <bluesabre> seeya knome
[00:40] <Dragon64> Good evening
[01:12] <jjfrv8> ochosi, Preferences is ready for a review as well.
[01:31] <bluesabre> ochosi: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~menulibre-dev/menulibre/2.1/revision/248
[01:31] <bluesabre> :D
[05:21] <ali1234> why do the tabs in mousepad look weird now?
[07:40] <ochosi> bluesabre: phew nice :) thanks!
[08:14] <Noskcaj> puzzles launcher 0.0.2 is now in the PPA, maintscripts made
[08:59] <flocculant> busy old bot that one 
[09:04] <knome> Dragon64, hello
[11:23] <Dragon64> hello
[14:23] <drc> Any noted problems DL'ing the daily images?
[14:23] <flocculant> not sure about a straight downloads - but zsyncing works it seems
[14:25] <flocculant> also appears to download ok from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20150731/
[14:25] <drc> Straight DL'ing appears to work until the very end when FF shows a fail and the file disappears.  Tried Xubuntu and Kubuntu daily's no go...DL'ing X15.04 from cdimage works just fine.
[14:26] <flocculant> just rechecking the zsync 
[14:28] <flocculant> drc: where did you get it from? dated or daily? 
[14:29] <flocculant> zsync works for current (not daily)
[14:29] <flocculant> just trying the straight download here 
[14:29] <flocculant> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/current/
[14:29] <drc> I tried both current and dated
[14:30] <flocculant> ok - well I'll know in ~25 minutes what happens for me 
[14:30] <drc> Like I said, wait until the very end...it's tricksy :)
[14:30] <flocculant> :)
[15:00] <flocculant> drc: yup - failed 
[15:00] <drc> Yay, it's not just me...er...I mean, that's too bad :)
[15:00] <flocculant> ha ha 
[15:03] <drc> Just for grins and giggles, I'm DL'ing yesterday's daily.
[15:03] <flocculant> going to see if I get some sort of error message with wget
[15:04] <drc> 'bout 10 min from now....
[15:04] <flocculant> drc: if you do and you get that ok - would be useful to double check zsyncing to today's 
[15:04] <drc> never done that...might need instructions.
[15:05] <flocculant> ok :)
[15:05] <flocculant> it's certainly useful if you get these images frequently 
[15:06] <drc> I don't, that's why I've never done it.
[15:08] <flocculant> aah right :)
[15:12] <drc> huh...yesterday's daily DL'ed fine
[15:17] <drc> back in a bit
[15:23] <drc> Looks like everything is working now...today's dated daily does not fail at the end (as of bout 2 minutes ago)
[15:24] <flocculant> odd - but good :)
[15:25] <drc> must be k...er...gnomes.
[15:25] <flocculant> lol
[19:20] <ochosi> evening all
[19:20] <flocculant> evening ochosi 
[19:22] <ochosi> hey flocculant, how's it going?
[19:22] <flocculant> ok - you? 
[19:23] <flocculant> reading -quality where there's a discussion about the ubiquity autopilot tests going on 
[19:28] <ochosi> good good, a bit tired though
[19:28] <flocculant> :)
[19:29] <flocculant> it'll get worse ... 
[19:34] <ochosi> heh
[19:34] <ochosi> yeah, i guess
[20:34] <knome> flocculant, since we've been discussing QA and the xubuntu tracker, is there something from the ISO/packages tracker you'd like to see in the xubuntu tracker?
[20:35] <knome> (keeping in mind the limitations the tracker API has)
[20:39] <flocculant> knome: I don't think so 
[20:39] <flocculant> about the only things that *might* be useful would be number of tests done and this new pass/fail for ubiquity possibility
[20:40] <flocculant> but iso.qa is more likely to have up to date info on it anyway
[20:41] <flocculant> perhaps if during the next cycle we go back to packages.qa - that might be useful information for others
[20:41] <flocculant> but I would be wary of adding stuff to tracker because it can be done
[20:42] <ochosi> could be useful though for non-qa folks to get a quick glance of how things are
[20:42] <ochosi> (i mean if there is useful stuff in the api)
[20:42] <knome> i'll look around quickly
[20:42] <knome> which probably means i'll spend the night hacking on xml-rpc
[20:42] <knome> but... that's ok
[20:43] <flocculant> ochosi: true 
[20:47] <flocculant> knome: if you are going to look then I'd guess a total for daily 32/64 would be sufficient for non-qa people
[20:47] <knome> what about for qa people? :P
[20:47] <flocculant> but it really depends on how often it updates
[20:47] <flocculant> knome: I'd expect qa people to want more detail and go to the qa tracker :p
[20:47] <knome> for the ultimately up-to-date information, you should always refer to the source, eg. the qa tracker
[20:48] <flocculant> yep
[20:55] <flocculant> maybe bugs from the summary - trouble there is the current page goes back further than wily 
[20:55] <ochosi> still, a single go-to place might make things easier for newcomers
[20:57] <flocculant> tbh - a list of bugs from launchpad would be more useful - to me at least :p
[20:57] <Unit193> But keep in mind simple != information overload.
[20:57] <flocculant> ochosi: yea - I agree with that view - just not so useful to me
[20:57] <knome> flocculant, list of what launchpad bugs?
[20:58] <flocculant> Unit193: yep "I would be wary of adding stuff to tracker because it can be done" 
[20:58] <flocculant> knome: 'current dev version' ones
[20:58] <knome> flocculant, i guess there is no common nominator you can use to search the bugs from LP?
[20:59] <flocculant> not that I've managed to find no 
[20:59] <ochosi> Unit193: btw while you're around, how's the x-core workitem going? anything you need help with there or are things moving ahead?
[20:59] <flocculant> ochosi: to be honest for non-qa people wouldn't a mail to the list once a week with total tests be enough 
[21:00] <flocculant> which has the added bonus of highlighting that to everyone subscribed to that list
[21:00] <Unit193> ochosi: Nope.
[21:01] <knome> flocculant, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.struc
[21:01] <knome> oops...
[21:01] <flocculant> :D
[21:02] <knome> http://tinyurl.com/q3wvvgm
[21:02] <knome> ^ all wily bugs reported from the iso tracker
[21:02] <knome> understanding which of those affect us... noep
[21:02] <knome> we need the qa trackers add more tags automatically
[21:03] <ochosi> Unit193: ehm, nope to what? progress or need for help?
[21:04] <Unit193> Now you've reversed the order of questions!  Progress.
[21:05] <ochosi> yeah, but what about the other question?
[21:09] <knome> ugh, i don't understand the php xml-rpc interface
[21:10] <knome> that's a good start.
[21:11] <Unit193> ochosi: I could maybe cludge something together for lp:ubuntu-cdimage, the Debian installer I haven't the slightest idea, and livecd-rootfs looks based on live-build, which I have messed with.  So I'd say that's a safe presumption that someone that actually knows something on these, or at least python.
[21:12] <knome> Unit193, would you also be willing to update debian-cd for us with the new pcx from krytarik?
[21:17] <Unit193> http://paste.openstack.org/show/5KhCuR1s4j0RGIc5sav0 should be it for livecd-rootfs, in theory.
[21:23] <Unit193> ochosi: I believe micahg volunteered to help with ubuntu-cdimage which would be great.
[21:31] <Unit193> knome: And, that'd be in lp:~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu
[21:31] <knome> Unit193, that works for me.
[21:33] <ochosi> Unit193: maybe we could split this up into >1 workitem then to account for micahg's part
[21:34] <ochosi> or to track the progress in more detail maybe
[21:37] <flocculant> night all 
[21:37] <knome> nighty flocculant 
[21:37] <ochosi> night flocculant 
[21:38] <flocculant> about tomorrow off and on