* xnox ponders how nuts is wily at the moment. | 01:09 | |
Unit193 | Are you referring to the golang transition about to begin, python3 transition, or gcc5 transition? ;) | 01:10 |
---|---|---|
infinity | xnox: wily is fine. wily-proposed, on the other hand, might be a bit lolz. | 03:40 |
infinity | mitya57: It seems you lost track of #1157421 a long time ago. Did you want to fix that SRU or just backport the trusty version (assuming it builds with all << trusty kernels)? | 04:41 |
=== Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa | ||
=== Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
siretart | Laney: I'd say drop libav completely, if dropping the -dev packages help in the interim, I have no objections | 12:53 |
MegaManSec | Will Ubuntu be going back to the regular glibc soon? | 14:02 |
ogra_ | ogra@styx:~/apps$ apt-cache show libc-bin|grep ^Source | 14:08 |
ogra_ | Source: glibc | 14:08 |
ogra_ | MegaManSec, ^^ | 14:08 |
ogra_ | (thats on 15.04 | 14:09 |
ogra_ | ) | 14:09 |
MegaManSec | great | 14:09 |
MegaManSec | patches will not occur on eglibc anymore? | 14:09 |
ogra_ | i dont think so ... | 14:09 |
ogra_ | (well, for the LTS releases that use it they will) | 14:10 |
MegaManSec | Hmm, ok. development for eglibc within ubuntu seems to be dead | 14:14 |
MegaManSec | so I guess it doesn't really matter. | 14:14 |
MegaManSec | oh also, does ubuntu have an open repo. for its development stuff? such as their (now old) eglibc? | 14:44 |
Laney | siretart: Needs a transition doing, like Debian's, I guess | 15:41 |
infinity | MegaManSec: We weren't upstream for eglibc, I'm not sure what made you think we are. Like any other ubuntu package, though, you can get the source via "apt-get source eglibc" on the release you're using. | 17:54 |
infinity | MegaManSec: That said, eglibc was a pretty lightweight fork of glibc, many of the patches I carried in the package were directly from glibc git, you're better off treating them as the same thing. | 17:55 |
mitya57 | infinity: Actually I know nothing about blktap-dkms, and don't remember why I started looking at it back then. | 17:58 |
infinity | mitya57: Heh. Check. | 17:58 |
infinity | Well, we should probably fix that SRU. Though, hopefully all the people who cared found another solution by now. :P | 17:59 |
mitya57 | It will be nice if someone else can look at that, otherwise I'll do it later (I'm on semi-VAC these days). | 17:59 |
infinity | mitya57: I just noticed because I'd done wily/vivid/trusty uploads and was scouring for bugs. And there was the ancient precise SRU failed and sad. | 18:00 |
mitya57 | Also I didn't get much feedback on the version in my PPA (I believe the package is still there) | 18:02 |
mitya57 | It will be nice if someone else tests it :) | 18:03 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
siretart | Laney: the transition in debian is already done | 20:16 |
siretart | Laney: more or less: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ffmpeg-libav.html | 20:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!