[01:09]  * xnox ponders how nuts is wily at the moment.
[01:10] <Unit193> Are you referring to the golang transition about to begin, python3 transition, or gcc5 transition? ;)
[03:40] <infinity> xnox: wily is fine.  wily-proposed, on the other hand, might be a bit lolz.
[04:41] <infinity> mitya57: It seems you lost track of #1157421 a long time ago.  Did you want to fix that SRU or just backport the trusty version (assuming it builds with all << trusty kernels)?
=== Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa
=== Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[12:53] <siretart> Laney: I'd say drop libav completely, if dropping the -dev packages help in the interim, I have no objections
[14:02] <MegaManSec> Will Ubuntu be going back to the regular glibc soon?
[14:08] <ogra_> ogra@styx:~/apps$ apt-cache show libc-bin|grep ^Source
[14:08] <ogra_> Source: glibc
[14:08] <ogra_> MegaManSec, ^^
[14:09] <ogra_> (thats on 15.04
[14:09] <ogra_> )
[14:09] <MegaManSec> great
[14:09] <MegaManSec> patches will not occur on eglibc anymore?
[14:09] <ogra_> i dont think so ...
[14:10] <ogra_> (well, for the LTS releases that use it they will)
[14:14] <MegaManSec> Hmm, ok. development for eglibc within ubuntu seems to be dead
[14:14] <MegaManSec> so I guess it doesn't really matter.
[14:44] <MegaManSec> oh also, does ubuntu have an open repo. for its development stuff? such as their (now old) eglibc?
[15:41] <Laney> siretart: Needs a transition doing, like Debian's, I guess
[17:54] <infinity> MegaManSec: We weren't upstream for eglibc, I'm not sure what made you think we are.  Like any other ubuntu package, though, you can get the source via "apt-get source eglibc" on the release you're using.
[17:55] <infinity> MegaManSec: That said, eglibc was a pretty lightweight fork of glibc, many of the patches I carried in the package were directly from glibc git, you're better off treating them as the same thing.
[17:58] <mitya57> infinity: Actually I know nothing about blktap-dkms, and don't remember why I started looking at it back then.
[17:58] <infinity> mitya57: Heh.  Check.
[17:59] <infinity> Well, we should probably fix that SRU.  Though, hopefully all the people who cared found another solution by now. :P
[17:59] <mitya57> It will be nice if someone else can look at that, otherwise I'll do it later (I'm on semi-VAC these days).
[18:00] <infinity> mitya57: I just noticed because I'd done wily/vivid/trusty uploads and was scouring for bugs.  And there was the ancient precise SRU failed and sad.
[18:02] <mitya57> Also I didn't get much feedback on the version in my PPA (I believe the package is still there)
[18:03] <mitya57> It will be nice if someone else tests it :)
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== _salem is now known as salem_
[20:16] <siretart> Laney: the transition in debian is already done
[20:17] <siretart> Laney: more or less: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ffmpeg-libav.html